Re: A home for 4.0

2016-09-29 Thread Nate McCall
Thanks Sylvain - since we have a few new folks, can you poke the docs on committing to include a bit about the merge order? On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 2:56 AM, Michael Shuler wrote: > Thanks! To clarify, yes, I was just being silly. We mostly use the > base.version in build.xml for version checking

Re: A home for 4.0

2016-09-29 Thread Michael Shuler
Thanks! To clarify, yes, I was just being silly. We mostly use the base.version in build.xml for version checking and we can special-case branch names like we do for trunk, if the needed. -- Michael On 09/29/2016 08:17 AM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote: > And of course I've been retarded and created a

Re: A home for 4.0

2016-09-29 Thread Sylvain Lebresne
And of course I've been retarded and created a '3.X' branch with is completely inconsistent with our usual branch naming. So I actually just renamed that to 'cassandra-3.X' instead. I apologize for the inconvenience if any (there hasn't been any commit since I created the branch though, so hopefull

Re: A home for 4.0

2016-09-29 Thread Sylvain Lebresne
So, this is done now and I've renamed the version on trunk to 4.0, so be sure to commit/merge to 3.X before going to trunk from now on. On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote: > As there has been no strong objection, I'm going to proceed and create the > branch. > > Note that I

Re: A home for 4.0

2016-09-29 Thread Sylvain Lebresne
As there has been no strong objection, I'm going to proceed and create the branch. Note that I'm discarding Michael remark as a joke due to the use of a smiley, but just in case that was a genuine concern, I'll argue that 1) 'trunk' isn't really more arithmetic friendly so I don't think there is t

Re: A home for 4.0

2016-09-27 Thread Michael Shuler
I foresee many arithmetic errors with 3.X.. :) -- Michael On 09/27/2016 05:18 AM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote: > We have a number of tickets that we now have to wait on 4.0 due to needing a > messaging protocol change or major sstable format (https://goo.gl/OvqNQp), > and > we currently have no branc

Re: A home for 4.0

2016-09-27 Thread Aleksey Yeschenko
WFM --  AY On 27 September 2016 at 11:18:33, Sylvain Lebresne (sylv...@datastax.com) wrote: We have a number of tickets that we now have to wait on 4.0 due to needing a messaging protocol change or major sstable format (https://goo.gl/OvqNQp), and we currently have no branch for those. And

A home for 4.0

2016-09-27 Thread Sylvain Lebresne
We have a number of tickets that we now have to wait on 4.0 due to needing a messaging protocol change or major sstable format (https://goo.gl/OvqNQp), and we currently have no branch for those. And as 4.0 was initially supposed to come after 3.11, which is coming, it's probably time to have a home