H Marcus,
concerning https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5502
Is this still a problem for you? Can I have some more info? I was
aware of the setting of vlan back to untagged when I wrote it. That's
why I thought it wouldn't be a problem. In a prior mail of you you
downwrote the
Hi,
With the recent CentOS announcement there is a call for Special Interest Group
(SIG):
http://www.centos.org/variants/
This might be an opportunity to create an official centos variant for our
management server and hypervisor setup as well as CentOS templates with
Cloud-init support.
I
Can some one with the privilege give edit access to cwiki for the user
'murali.reddy'
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16736/#review31428
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Abhinandan Prateek
On Jan. 8, 2014, 1:03
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16749/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek, Min Chen, and Radhika PC.
updateCloudToUseObjectStoreCategory is not not found in the known_categories
dictionary which is causing apidoc to fail.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /Users/talluri/asf/cloudstack/tools/apidoc/gen_toc.py, line 194, in
module
category = choose_category(fn)
File
On Jan. 9, 2014, 12:39 a.m., Alena Prokharchyk wrote:
One more check is needed: don't let to add vm to VPC network if its already
a part of another VPC network.
This check is already in place unless I am missing something:
if (existingNetwork.getVpcId() != null network.getGuestType() !=
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16750/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Kishan Kavala.
Repository: cloudstack-git
I agree with John. It's fine as implemented it just wasn't stated clearly in
the documentation (or the error message) and it appears we have a migration
path in place for 4.3 when wanting to convert from NFS to S3.
-Aaron
(+ @dev)
Min,
I don't think that the current implementation is a
Daan,
I don't get the idea behind making the methods static. Making
getter/setters static will lead to instance vars losing their meaning and
we need each instance to let us know its sensitivity. I assume you are not
suggesting changing the abstract method into static. Can you please
explain?
Hey All,
I’ve upgraded Jenkins to version 1.546. There are some performance improvements
that i found interesting enough to warrant the upgrade.
I’ve also upgraded all plugins that had pending updates.
If you notice any strange behavior let me know.
Cheers,
Hugo
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16126/#review31433
---
Commit 3af4cf4488a857984872c4275b5486b8e23c16fd in branch
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.2/23/
--
Started by an SCM change
[EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables.
Building remotely on rpmbuilder-2 in workspace
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.2/ws/
Fetching changes from the
On Jan 9, 2014, at 2:03 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
On 09.01.2014 09:11, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
Hi,
With the recent CentOS announcement there is a call for Special
Interest Group (SIG):
http://www.centos.org/variants/
This might be an opportunity to create an official centos variant
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.2/24/
--
Started by an SCM change
[EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables.
Building remotely on rpmbuilder-2 in workspace
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.2/ws/
Fetching changes from the
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Murali Reddy murali.re...@citrix.com wrote:
murali.reddy
is in
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.2/25/
--
Started by an SCM change
[EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables.
Building remotely on rpmbuilder-2 in workspace
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.2/ws/
Fetching changes from the
I mean to have the setting of the vars and the vars them selves be
static , not the retrieving method.
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Mandar Barve mandar.ba...@sungard.com wrote:
Daan,
I don't get the idea behind making the methods static. Making
getter/setters static will lead to
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.2/27/
--
Started by an SCM change
[EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables.
Building remotely on rpmbuilder-2 in workspace
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.2/ws/
Fetching changes from the
I've added my hyper-v server into CloudStack (after dropping firewall and
discovering I need to set the service to start automatically - sc config
CloudStack Hyper-V Agent start= automatic).
Now I can't find the hyper-v system vm template. I've found a ticket which
says it's built by Jenkins,
Hi Paul,
Systemvm template for HyperV is already pushed to download.cloud.com
Here is the url for the same.:
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2013-12-23-hyperv.vhd.bz2
Please download and use it.
If you find issues with the template, please post the details.
Thanks
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.2/28/
H Marcus, We had a small session on how we plan to go about ipv6 configuration
with your bullet list present. Comments are still brainstorming phase quality
but hopefully they will lead to something.
* VPC has no global IPv6 prefix (super CIDR as current private space), it's
simply IPv6
CloudStack can't start hyper-v system vms with the following error:
2014-01-09 15:56:09,840 WARN [o.a.c.s.d.ObjectInDataStoreManagerImpl]
(consoleproxy-1:ctx-da5fc066) Unsupported data object (VOLUME,
org.apache.cloudstack.storage.datastore.PrimaryDataStoreImpl@6e3c7871), no need
to delete
H Rajesh,
How is the hyperv template build? And can it be build in the jenkins
process that builds the other templates?
thanks,
Daan
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Rajesh Battala
rajesh.batt...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi Paul,
Systemvm template for HyperV is already pushed to download.cloud.com
Good info. I think seeing another use case helps us narrow the
requirements a bit more.
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 8:04 AM, Daan Hoogland
dhoogl...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
H Marcus, We had a small session on how we plan to go about ipv6
configuration with your bullet list present. Comments are
Daan,
It is build using the jenkins jobs, however at the moment they are not
archived. See http://markmail.org/message/hyknsi5udiirdd7p
Cheers,
Hugo
On 9 jan. 2014, at 17:28, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
H Rajesh,
How is the hyperv template build? And can it be build in
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you have any specific reasoning or need for the
VPC itself to have a configured contiguous block, rather than just
assign the /64s the networks?
convenience in configuring the upstream router. The idea is that
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you have any specific reasoning or need for the
VPC itself to have a configured contiguous block, rather than just
assign the /64s the
Hi,
I was merging some code from 4.3 to master and received three checkstyle
errors.
I'm not really familiar with how to find out details of these errors. Can
someone point me to the right place to begin my investigation?
All I see right now is the following:
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
Hi Rajesh,
Yes I'm using SMB for the secondary storage, the system vm image gets copied
over to the local storage (2.6GB routing-9.vhd ) this gets copied to as
ROOT-1.vhd then deployment fails, then it creates ROOT-2.vhd and fails, then
creates ROOT-3.vhd and fails etc...
Regards
Paul
Currently if I create my public range with 'untagged', I get:
Vlan id is required when add ip range to the public network
So at the very least it seems the patch is not working. It may be
better to edit CreateVlanIpRangeCmd and change the parameter at the
source if 'untagged' is passed in,
Thanks Talluri for fixing this. It is my bad for forgetting this extra
step in replacing old API.
-min
On 1/9/14 2:39 AM, Srikanteswararao Talluri
srikanteswararao.tall...@citrix.com wrote:
updateCloudToUseObjectStoreCategory is not not found in the
known_categories dictionary which is causing
On Jan. 9, 2014, 12:39 a.m., Alena Prokharchyk wrote:
One more check is needed: don't let to add vm to VPC network if its already
a part of another VPC network.
Saksham Srivastava wrote:
This check is already in place unless I am missing something:
if
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16361/#review31444
---
Saksham,
The patch fails on 4.3 branch with the error:
Applying:
Mike,
If you're using eclipse, checkstyle has a plugin that you can install. Point
the plugin to the style file in tools/checkstyle/cloud-style.xml and it will
use the same syntax. I've always found it much easier to use the plugin than
to read the build outputs.
If you don't want to
Can you post the agent log and mgmt. server log.
Look like agent is trying to clone the template disk to create root volumes for
the VM's and failing to clone/copy.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 9, 2014 11:15 PM
To:
Oops, the list got dropped off accidentally.
My previous two messages were in regards to CS 4.2. To recap, in 4.2
the UI would interpret no vlan entered as 'untagged' and pass that as
a parameter. Undocumented or not, it was being used by the API's
biggest customer.
with 4.2, passing 'untagged'
I think we simply make == untagged in CreateVlanIpRangeCmd and be
done with it. It maintains compatibility with the UI and any
installations that have taken advantage of it. Will post a patch
review.
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
Sound like we
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16758/
---
Review request for cloudstack and daan Hoogland.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5502
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16758/
---
(Updated Jan. 9, 2014, 6:52 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and daan
Oops, I stated the problem incorrectly a few messages up, it's
confusing. Here's the proper issue, for posterity:
To recap, in 4.2
the UI would interpret no vlan entered as 'untagged' and pass that as
a parameter. Undocumented or not, it was being used by the API's
biggest customer.
with 4.2,
In CloudStack's various uses of SSL, I never see that we disable Nagle. Isn't
this a performance killer?
On Jan. 9, 2014, 6:22 p.m., Alena Prokharchyk wrote:
Saksham,
The patch fails on 4.3 branch with the error:
Applying: CLOUDSTACK-5535 : Do not allow addNetwork to create NIC across
VPC tiers and Isolated Networks
error: patch failed:
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-maven-build/316/
--
[...truncated 551 lines...]
Receiving objects: 62% (288765/460815), 82.12 MiB | 213 KiB/s
Receiving objects: 62% (289086/460815), 82.47 MiB | 255 KiB/s
Receiving objects: 63%
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-maven-build/317/
--
[...truncated 561 lines...]
Receiving objects: 74% (341859/460815), 123.92 MiB | 456 KiB/s
Receiving objects: 75% (345612/460815), 124.21 MiB | 483 KiB/s
Receiving objects:
I can install the plug-in for Eclipse.
Thanks, Alex!
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com wrote:
Mike,
If you're using eclipse, checkstyle has a plugin that you can install.
Point the plugin to the style file in tools/checkstyle/cloud-style.xml and
it will
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-maven-build/319/
--
[...truncated 561 lines...]
Receiving objects: 75% (349827/460815), 137.28 MiB | 457 KiB/s
Receiving objects: 75% (349827/460815), 137.61 MiB | 447 KiB/s
Receiving objects:
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-maven-build/320/
--
[...truncated 558 lines...]
Receiving objects: 73% (336502/460815), 104.87 MiB | 195 KiB/s
Receiving objects: 73% (336505/460815), 105.04 MiB | 180 KiB/s
Receiving objects:
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-maven-build/321/
--
[...truncated 558 lines...]
Receiving objects: 71% (331649/460815), 92.47 MiB | 256 KiB/s
Receiving objects: 71% (331649/460815), 92.73 MiB | 248 KiB/s
Receiving objects: 71%
It looks like we need to apply the checkstyle rules on a project-by-project
basis.
Are we currently applying these rules to every project or just a subset?
Thanks
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
wrote:
I can install the plug-in for Eclipse.
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-maven-build/322/
--
[...truncated 561 lines...]
Receiving objects: 75% (349816/460815), 125.79 MiB | 410 KiB/s
Receiving objects: 75% (349816/460815), 125.91 MiB | 370 KiB/s
Receiving objects:
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-maven-build/323/
--
[...truncated 563 lines...]
Receiving objects: 75% (349821/460815), 126.31 MiB | 428 KiB/s
Receiving objects: 75% (349821/460815), 126.60 MiB | 379 KiB/s
Receiving objects:
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-maven-build/324/
--
[...truncated 565 lines...]
Receiving objects: 73% (339137/460815), 123.14 MiB | 273 KiB/s
Receiving objects: 73% (339143/460815), 123.30 MiB | 278 KiB/s
Receiving objects:
Agent log:
http://pastebin.com/40Tan8UG
mgmt log:
http://pastebin.com/ZATWt7Nb
Regards,
Paul Angus
Cloud Architect
S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: @CloudyAngus
paul.an...@shapeblue.com
-Original Message-
From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com]
Sent: 09
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-maven-build/325/
--
[...truncated 561 lines...]
Receiving objects: 75% (349813/460815), 127.44 MiB | 466 KiB/s
Receiving objects: 75% (349813/460815), 127.75 MiB | 497 KiB/s
Receiving objects:
Hi,
I haven't tried to build master in Eclipse in quite a while and am noticing
at least 88 POM-related problems.
http://i.imgur.com/io2SJRn.png
Is there an easy and safe way to fix these so Eclipse is happy?
Thanks!
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e:
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-maven-build/326/
--
[...truncated 562 lines...]
Receiving objects: 75% (349827/460815), 134.96 MiB | 403 KiB/s
Receiving objects: 75% (349827/460815), 135.50 MiB | 451 KiB/s
Receiving objects:
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-maven-build/327/
--
[...truncated 559 lines...]
Receiving objects: 75% (349762/460815), 144.28 MiB | 370 KiB/s
Receiving objects: 75% (349763/460815), 144.36 MiB | 346 KiB/s
Receiving objects:
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-maven-build/328/
--
[...truncated 561 lines...]
Receiving objects: 73% (339109/460815), 120.35 MiB | 251 KiB/s
Receiving objects: 73% (339109/460815), 120.65 MiB | 256 KiB/s
Receiving objects:
Mike,
My guess is it's been brought back in during the merge. I fixed most of those
things in master. You can go back to a previous version to double check.
Checkstyle is being run for every single project, unless someone specifically
disabled it.
--Alex
-Original Message-
From:
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-maven-build/329/
--
[...truncated 559 lines...]
Receiving objects: 75% (349821/460815), 132.36 MiB | 669 KiB/s
Receiving objects: 75% (349821/460815), 132.70 MiB | 551 KiB/s
Receiving objects:
You are correct, Alex. I did not notice until after I sent my e-mail that
the merge brought back in a few imports that checkstyle did not like.
Thanks!
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com wrote:
Mike,
My guess is it's been brought back in during the merge. I
Hey Alex,
While we're on the subject, do you know of a good way to easily apply the
checkstyle rules to all projects without having to go into the project
properties of each project?
Sometimes I find it useful in Eclipse after a big update from Git (where
directories have been changed or
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-maven-build/330/
--
[...truncated 563 lines...]
Receiving objects: 75% (348807/460905), 124.96 MiB | 270 KiB/s
Receiving objects: 75% (349843/460905), 125.44 MiB | 276 KiB/s
Receiving objects:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16750/#review31468
---
One minor suggestion - can you please change this place:
private
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16750/#review31467
---
One minor suggestion - can you please change this place:
private
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-maven-build/331/
--
[...truncated 562 lines...]
Receiving objects: 73% (338296/460905), 118.73 MiB | 474 KiB/s
Receiving objects: 73% (338296/460905), 118.98 MiB | 410 KiB/s
Receiving objects:
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-maven-build/332/
--
[...truncated 561 lines...]
Receiving objects: 75% (349934/460931), 133.21 MiB | 331 KiB/s
Receiving objects: 75% (349934/460931), 133.69 MiB | 336 KiB/s
Receiving objects:
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-maven-build/333/
--
[...truncated 566 lines...]
Receiving objects: 75% (349915/460945), 146.11 MiB | 696 KiB/s
Receiving objects: 75% (349916/460945), 146.81 MiB | 711 KiB/s
Receiving objects:
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-maven-build/334/
--
[...truncated 560 lines...]
Receiving objects: 75% (349930/460945), 131.74 MiB | 313 KiB/s
Receiving objects: 75% (349930/460945), 132.17 MiB | 319 KiB/s
Receiving objects:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16729/#review31476
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Nitin Mehta
On Jan. 9, 2014, 6:47 a.m.,
On Jan. 9, 2014, 10:46 p.m., Nitin Mehta wrote:
Ship It!
Get the following error applying for 4.3. Also for master you might have to
submit a different patch because of checkstyles. Do check.
Nitins-MacBook-Air:cloudstack nitinmehta$ git apply
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-maven-build/335/
--
[...truncated 563 lines...]
Receiving objects: 75% (350165/461220), 130.60 MiB | 201 KiB/s
Receiving objects: 75% (350165/461220), 130.82 MiB | 202 KiB/s
Receiving objects:
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
Sanjay Tripathi to become a committer and we are pleased to announce
that they have
accepted.
Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more autonomously. For
developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-maven-build/336/
--
[...truncated 561 lines...]
Receiving objects: 75% (350440/461262), 151.28 MiB | 394 KiB/s
Receiving objects: 75% (350442/461262), 151.71 MiB | 390 KiB/s
Receiving objects:
Sanjay, congratulations!
On 1/9/14, 2:53 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
Sanjay Tripathi to become a committer and we are pleased to announce
that they have
accepted.
Being a committer allows many contributors to
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/400/
--
[...truncated 586 lines...]
Receiving objects: 76% (350608/461267), 168.86 MiB | 355 KiB/s
Receiving objects: 76% (350610/461267), 169.40 MiB | 421 KiB/s
Receiving objects: 76%
Congrats Sanjay.. :)
On 09/01/14 3:06 PM, Alena Prokharchyk alena.prokharc...@citrix.com
wrote:
Sanjay, congratulations!
On 1/9/14, 2:53 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
Sanjay Tripathi to become a committer and we are
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16774/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Frank Zhang.
Bugs:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16774/
---
(Updated Jan. 9, 2014, 11:11 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Frank
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-maven-build/337/changes
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/401/
--
[...truncated 567 lines...]
Receiving objects: 75% (350458/461267), 171.21 MiB | 283 KiB/s
Receiving objects: 75% (350458/461267), 171.72 MiB | 289 KiB/s
Receiving objects: 75%
Hello,
What's Netapp storage plugin doing?
Thanks,
Victor Rodionov
This might help:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SI8xIV38Oiw
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 4:18 PM, Victor Rodionov vito.or...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello,
What's Netapp storage plugin doing?
Thanks,
Victor Rodionov
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e:
See
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-maven-build-noredist/310/
--
[...truncated 558 lines...]
Receiving objects: 76% (350590/461267), 163.00 MiB | 500 KiB/s
Receiving objects: 76% (350592/461267), 163.61 MiB | 546 KiB/s
Receiving
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/402/
--
[...truncated 572 lines...]
Receiving objects: 77% (357575/461283), 188.74 MiB | 396 KiB/s
Receiving objects: 77% (357869/461283), 188.88 MiB | 384 KiB/s
Receiving objects: 77%
Mike - thanks for pointing Victor to our video.
Victor - I’m not sure that everyone on the dev list wants to see this whole
conversation, so feel free to contact David (cc’d) and I off list and we can
talk more in depth.
-Chris
--
Chris Suich
chris.su...@netapp.com
NetApp Software Engineer
This method was just brought in by git during the merge.
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
wrote:
Any thoughts on this checkstyle issue?
[INFO] Starting audit...
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/403/
--
[...truncated 572 lines...]
Receiving objects: 76% (350649/461301), 173.41 MiB | 665 KiB/s
Receiving objects: 76% (350651/461301), 173.89 MiB | 649 KiB/s
Receiving objects: 76%
Worst case, I should just be able to copy/paste from what's already in
master, but I was curious about the error message itself.
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
wrote:
This method was just brought in by git during the merge.
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014
See
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-maven-build-noredist/311/
--
[...truncated 577 lines...]
Receiving objects: 79% (364428/461301), 193.45 MiB | 1.27 MiB/s
Receiving objects: 79% (366737/461301), 194.87 MiB | 1.32 MiB/s
Receiving
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/404/
--
[...truncated 566 lines...]
Receiving objects: 76% (350653/461301), 172.28 MiB | 433 KiB/s
Receiving objects: 76% (350657/461301), 172.62 MiB | 431 KiB/s
Receiving objects: 76%
Daan,
Please review Marcus's comment we should continue with the old behavior.
Thanks
Animesh
-Original Message-
From: Animesh Chaturvedi (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 1:30 PM
To: cloudstack-iss...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [jira]
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/406/
--
Started by an SCM change
[EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables.
Building remotely on cloudstack-buildslave-centos6-a99 in workspace
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/ws/
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/407/
--
[...truncated 575 lines...]
Receiving objects: 79% (366761/461301), 196.21 MiB | 473 KiB/s
Receiving objects: 79% (366761/461301), 196.87 MiB | 534 KiB/s
Receiving objects: 79%
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/408/
--
[...truncated 572 lines...]
Receiving objects: 77% (357606/461306), 185.68 MiB | 294 KiB/s
Receiving objects: 77% (357606/461306), 186.14 MiB | 353 KiB/s
Receiving objects: 77%
See
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-maven-build-noredist/312/
--
[...truncated 562 lines...]
Receiving objects: 75% (350459/461342), 152.60 MiB | 435 KiB/s
Receiving objects: 75% (350463/461342), 153.11 MiB | 417 KiB/s
Receiving
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.2/30/
--
[...truncated 573 lines...]
Receiving objects: 79% (364461/461342), 193.57 MiB | 446 KiB/s
Receiving objects: 79% (366158/461342), 193.79 MiB | 434 KiB/s
Receiving objects: 79%
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/410/
--
[...truncated 573 lines...]
Receiving objects: 76% (351114/461342), 180.13 MiB | 500 KiB/s
Receiving objects: 76% (354071/461342), 180.84 MiB | 563 KiB/s
Receiving objects: 77%
1 - 100 of 170 matches
Mail list logo
