Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/pull/15
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Hi Mike,
Done that, I have added new FAQ section.
In addition, I have tested that volume can take a snapshot, create volume
from that snapshot and attach back to VM normally. Currently I am testing
with volume migration.
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Mike Tutkowski
Hi,
I'm seeing the same issue with 4.4 code. After further debug, I see
that CS mgmt server is sending
following command to XenHost,
xensource.log: script /opt/cloud/bin/ipassoc.sh -A -s -f -l
10.84.59.131/24 -c eth0 -g 10.84.59.254 /script
VirtualRouter's public interface is eth2. Also as per
That's:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Procedure+to+Replace+realhostip.com+with+Your+Own+Domain+Name
thanks
On 6 June 2014 04:03, Nitin Mehta nitin.me...@citrix.com wrote:
Please find wiki [1] containing the procedure to replace realhostip.com
with Your own custom
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19874/
---
Review request for cloudstack, daan Hoogland and Kishan Kavala.
Bugs:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20316/
---
(Updated June 6, 2014, 3:10 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Girish
Sudha,
- The point is that there are bugs being marked as blockers that where
never discussed on this list. Someone has decided all by their own
they are blocker and didn't ask for feedback. I don't find that
acceptable.
- My colleague Wilder has done some validation. I didn't memorize his
report
in so much words, yes please review them. All of you!
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:44 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
What I think we should do is ask people to review the list of blockers and
provide comments (if you feel knowledgeable enough in that area) as to
whether or
Ilya,
You are addressing non developpers, so I am crossposting.
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 4:25 AM, ilya musayev
ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Creating a separate thread to see what community thinks on next minor
release of CloudStack 4.3.1
There are more patches that need to be
three pulled,
i noticed windows line endings and trailing space in
server/test/resources/createNetworkOffering.xml
please take care.
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 4:57 AM, Alena Prokharchyk
alena.prokharc...@citrix.com wrote:
And one more – fixing the unit test (sorry for that)
commit
Dear guys
I encountered a problem that a ssh public key of ssh_keypairs for a
newly created instance is overridden by another ssh key in template
meta data. I think this leads to security vulnerability because a
template owner can login to other user's instance created from the
template. So,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19874/#review44885
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Kishan Kavala
On June 6, 2014, 2:58 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17994/
---
Review request for cloudstack, daan Hoogland and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.
FYI
Begin forwarded message:
From: scan-ad...@coverity.com
Subject: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for cloudstack
Date: 6 juni 2014 13:40:40 CEST
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to cloudstack found
with Coverity Scan.
Defect(s) Reported-by:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19874/#review44886
---
patch looks alright but it seems to me you have reused a review
On June 6, 2014, 12:09 p.m., daan Hoogland wrote:
patch looks alright but it seems to me you have reused a review board entry
for a second patch. please don't do that. close this one and start a new
one next time.
Sure, but reviewboard some times in process throws 5xx error and a given
Sorry, thought you were based off the link you provided in this reply.
In our case, we are using CloudStack integrated in VDI solution to provived
pooled VM type[1]. So may be my approach can bring better UX for user with
lower bootime ...
A short change in design are followings
- VM will be
On June 6, 2014, 12:09 p.m., daan Hoogland wrote:
patch looks alright but it seems to me you have reused a review board entry
for a second patch. please don't do that. close this one and start a new
one next time.
Santhosh Edukulla wrote:
Sure, but reviewboard some times in
Hi,
aftger upgrade to 4.3, I reported a bug where CS will not let me add
additional IP ranges when there are 2 vlans using same IP range - I
don't see point comparing IP ranges across two separate broadcast domains...
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6814
Thanks,
--
Andrija
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19874/#review44889
---
Commit 91d054cb00f6a5818f2be1c7e4d3f44a2c58bfcc in cloudstack's
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19874/#review44890
---
Commit 6c0b43431f7f117c1fcb049c483407b96b56d961 in cloudstack's
Hi All,
Of the 1697 issues reported by coverity in the latest scan, about 187 are in
upgrade###to###.java and many of them are due to RESOURCE_LEAKS because of not
closing the pstmt properly.
For ex:
Resource leak on an exceptional path (RESOURCE_LEAK)
299 }
300
Santhosh,
Have you made sure this goes into master as well?
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 3:53 PM, ASF Subversion and Git Services
asf...@urd.zones.apache.org wrote:
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19874/
Commit
Hi Daan,
Yes, for master planning additional approach with few more enhancements, useful
for future release. It may require modifying schema, which i believe is not
possible for 4.4 because of code freeze.
Regards
Santhosh
From: Daan Hoogland
That is better. Hope new ones can be fixed each week while the old ones can be
prioritized based on high density.
Original message
From: Rajani Karuturi
Date:06/06/2014 6:37 AM (GMT-08:00)
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for
code freeze does not mean that the schema can't be changed for bug
fixes. Any bug fix can go in if it genuinely serves the purpose of
fixing a bug.
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Santhosh Edukulla
santhosh.eduku...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi Daan,
Yes, for master planning additional approach with
great Rajani, I am having a look at Upgrade43to44 and will backport
the fix to all others that it applies to:
try(PreparedStatement selectstatement =
conn.prepareStatement(SELECT * FROM 1+1);
ResultSet results = selectstatement.executeQuery()) {
}without finally
On Fri, Jun
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22305/
---
Review request for cloudstack, daan Hoogland and Hugo Trippaers.
Repository:
That should be a good idea, Ilya. At that moment, i'm working on Docker
support. When it's done, we can run only Docker hosts, no need to use KVM
for hosting system vms.
Cheers,
--Tuna
Sent from my GT-N7000
On Jun 5, 2014 7:58 AM, ilya musayev ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com wrote:
We are
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-systemvm64-4.2/302/
--
Started by timer
[EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables.
Building remotely on devcloud-continuous-tests (devcloud) in workspace
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22305/#review44897
---
I was thinking of
private void updateVlanUris(Connection conn)
On June 6, 2014, 2:54 p.m., daan Hoogland wrote:
I was thinking of
private void updateVlanUris(Connection conn) {
s_logger.debug(updating vlan URIs);
try(PreparedStatement selectstatement =
conn.prepareStatement(SELECT id, vlan_id FROM `cloud`.`vlan` where
On June 6, 2014, 2:54 p.m., daan Hoogland wrote:
I was thinking of
private void updateVlanUris(Connection conn) {
s_logger.debug(updating vlan URIs);
try(PreparedStatement selectstatement =
conn.prepareStatement(SELECT id, vlan_id FROM `cloud`.`vlan` where
Hi,
Here’s a quick status update:
On 16 May 2014, at 15:22, Dave Scott dave.sc...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi,
On 14 May 2014, at 09:53, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 9, 2014, at 2:37 PM, Dave Scott dave.sc...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi,
Following up from Tim's Support pure Xen as a
Dave,
I've submitted a merge review request
(https://reviews.apache.org/r/22270/) yesterday. If you want to avoid
having to potentially deal with a bunch of conflicts, you might want
to see if your patches apply cleanly there and let me know. Happy to
help with any conflict resolution.
btw, I
ilya,
Let us know how it goes your hybrid of LXC+KVM. I'm interested to know how
it's going, I might try that too on the side.
Pierre-Luc Dion
Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect
855-OK-CLOUD (855-652-5683) x1101
- - -
*CloudOps*420 rue Guy
Montréal QC H3J 1S6
On Jun 6, 2014, at 5:17 PM, Tim Mackey tmac...@gmail.com wrote:
Dave,
I've submitted a merge review request
(https://reviews.apache.org/r/22270/) yesterday.
Unfortunately that patch did not seem to apply cleanly. I have not dug deep
though..
If you want to avoid
having to potentially
Rohit,
Any chance you have time to check this one review.
My git kungfu is limited and the patch seems to have conflicts.
Tim did quite a bit of work to get there, so a merge could be call quickly, if
this patch could apply, that would ease another round of rebasing..
thanks,,
-sebastien
On
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17994/#review44906
---
Commit b43517c49629d46c2dd222bef0d8b1b2944abb66 in cloudstack's
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17994/#review44907
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- SrikanteswaraRao Talluri
On June 6, 2014,
If you can give me the commit ID for your HEAD, I'll check and see
what's up. It could be another conflict needing resolution.
-tim
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 12:16 PM, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 6, 2014, at 5:17 PM, Tim Mackey tmac...@gmail.com wrote:
Dave,
I've submitted a merge
Folks,
Tim has prepared a pretty significant patch in the review it lists below.
There is also a wiki page describing the change.
Basically it splits XenServer and XenProject (pure Xen) in two separate
hypervisors. Until now we had used XenServer to also handle XenProject.
It will allow to
Andrija
I dont know if we can qualify this as a bug, this check was placed with
some purpose in mind - yet its not clear what it is and why would
someone think its bad.
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=a3b1a49c303a929c754561ca07fd8a9ed84e0382
Thanks Dan.
This was meant to be sent to dev list but somehow, i've sent it to users.
Folks, please chime in.
On 6/6/14, 4:39 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
Ilya,
You are addressing non developpers, so I am crossposting.
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 4:25 AM, ilya musayev
ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 10:14 PM, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote:
Folks,
Tim has prepared a pretty significant patch in the review it lists below.
There is also a wiki page describing the change.
Basically it splits XenServer and XenProject (pure Xen) in two separate
hypervisors. Until now
Hi Sebastien,
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 9:51 PM, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote:
Rohit,
Any chance you have time to check this one review.
My git kungfu is limited and the patch seems to have conflicts.
Tim did quite a bit of work to get there, so a merge could be call
quickly, if this patch
I just read the design document on the wiki
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Convert+Xen+usage+to+XenServer
and got my answers regarding the work. Thanks.
Regards.
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 11:48 PM, Rohit Yadav rohityada...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Sebastien,
On Fri, Jun 6,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19874/#review44945
---
Ship it!
Hi Santosh - We should add the domain id column in the
Hi again,
I was unable to deploy basic zone, I did:
# marvin and python dependencies were pre-installed
cd tools/devcloud;
python ../marvin/marvin/deployDataCenter.py -i devcloud.cfg
The error I got was related to agent communication, if this can help
resolve the issue:
Exception Occurred
Hi UI Team,
Last time I worked on the UI I found myself recompiling and restarting
jetty every time I modified a HTML/CSS/JS File.
Do we have some method to avoid doing this? I tried doing a symlink of the
source directory with the target directory which did work but it was messy.
Thanks,
Ian
On Jun 6, 2014, at 8:41 PM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote:
Hi again,
I was unable to deploy basic zone, I did:
# marvin and python dependencies were pre-installed
cd tools/devcloud;
python ../marvin/marvin/deployDataCenter.py -i devcloud.cfg
The error I got was related to
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 12:51 AM, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 6, 2014, at 8:41 PM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote:
Hi again,
I was unable to deploy basic zone, I did:
# marvin and python dependencies were pre-installed
cd tools/devcloud;
python
No Ilya,
I did that on purpose as you where asking non-devs to participate in
the release proces.
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 8:09 PM, ilya musayev
ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Dan.
This was meant to be sent to dev list but somehow, i've sent it to users.
Folks, please chime in.
On Jun 6, 2014, at 9:35 PM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote:
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 12:51 AM, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 6, 2014, at 8:41 PM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote:
Hi again,
I was unable to deploy basic zone, I did:
# marvin and python
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 8:14 PM, Alena Prokharchyk
alena.prokharc...@citrix.com wrote:
e4fc5d88427456b9f9b8d37b49a4406db8c886c1
the object is not found. Did you push it?
--
Daan
did you mean 9e2db2f2210904752eea2f3abf87b16bb3080384?
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 8:14 PM, Alena Prokharchyk
alena.prokharc...@citrix.com wrote:
e4fc5d88427456b9f9b8d37b49a4406db8c886c1
the object is not found. Did you
Yes.
On 6/6/14, 12:57 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
did you mean 9e2db2f2210904752eea2f3abf87b16bb3080384?
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 8:14 PM, Alena Prokharchyk
alena.prokharc...@citrix.com wrote:
done
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 10:04 PM, Alena Prokharchyk
alena.prokharc...@citrix.com wrote:
Yes.
On 6/6/14, 12:57 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
did you mean 9e2db2f2210904752eea2f3abf87b16bb3080384?
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
Tuna
Thanks for the feedback, conceptually, i was not trying to address the
issue of sysvms not running on LXC.
Here is the use case as i see it.
Assume you roll out a farm of 10 KVM servers and your density with KVM
is 200 virtual machines. Most of these VMs dont require independent
I'd boot it into single user mode and reset the password.
On 6/5/14, 6:04 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
Hey Edison,
Seif is using a copy of DevCloud named devcloud2.ova (908,991,488 bytes).
It was downloaded back in August of last year.
I don't use DevCloud much these days as I build this all
H,
I have commited a patch to Upgrade430to440.java that removes all
close() calls on PreparedStament en ResultSet objects, replacing it
with the try(resouce) construct in java 7. I was tempted for a short
moment to back-port it to older Upgrade classes. As those upgrade
paths are to be supported
Just heard from Seif.
It was a character-encoding issue with his keyboard.
On Friday, June 6, 2014, ilya musayev ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd boot it into single user mode and reset the password.
On 6/5/14, 6:04 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
Hey Edison,
Seif is using a copy of
In general, as long as it works in the new jvm, I don't see us changing the
code. However, if you have the time to do it. The upgrade classes are meant
to be immutable as far as data goes. So the idea is we can do upgrades from
any version to the current version. Because of that, then all
I don't want to fix resource leaks in master in a way we can not
backport. That's my point. And no I am not going to do a lot of it
but want to set a policy.
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 10:46 PM, Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com wrote:
In general, as long as it works in the new jvm, I don't see us
Hi Sachin,
The nicDevId() you see is coming from
prepareNetworkElementCommand(IpAssocCommand cmd) in CitrixResourceBase in
case of Xen.
You would see this:
if (addVif) {
// Add a new VIF to DomR
String vifDeviceNum =
Hi Marcus,
I have reopened this ticket for 4.4 release, fix needed for this is reverting
the code added as part of this in earlier versions.
Thanks,
Prachi
-Original Message-
From: Prachi Damle [mailto:prachi.da...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2014 1:04 PM
To: Marcus
Cc:
Folks - this one’s a little belated - we went through the invite process around
the
time of the mail issues, and somehow we didn’t send the announcement to dev@.
I noticed while doing some housekeeping this week, and wanted to send out the
announcement anyways just to give Demetrius the
Hi all,
Seems it's a good timing to bring back the discussion about the gerrit.
We want to do CI, and improve our code quality. One obvious way of doing
and reduce the workload of devs is introduce a tool to enforce the process.
I've checked out quite a few projects using gerrit, which would
Congratulations Demetrius!
-Original Message-
From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2014 4:18 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Demetrius Tsitrelis as committer
Folks - this one's a little belated - we went through the invite process
+ 1 to gerrit
-Original Message-
From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2014 4:27 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] Introducing Gerrit for quality? was: [PROPOSAL] Using
continuous integration to maintain our code quality...
Hi all,
Seems
+1 seems like a good idea.
On Jun 6, 2014, at 4:26 PM, Sheng Yang
sh...@yasker.orgmailto:sh...@yasker.org wrote:
Hi all,
Seems it's a good timing to bring back the discussion about the gerrit.
We want to do CI, and improve our code quality. One obvious way of doing
and reduce the workload of
Hey Ilya -
So, for about a month now we’ve had a system running SmartOS[1], which gives a
combination of containers and KVM, albeit on illumos instead of linux. In
general I’m not impressed by SmartOS’s story, but we had one customer asking
for it (and I sorta expect more, we’re not officially
It would be great if there's some kind of document in the wiki on this
proposal.
Regards,
Amit
*CloudByte Inc.* http://www.cloudbyte.com/
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Tim Mackey tmac...@gmail.com wrote:
If you can give me the commit ID for your HEAD, I'll check and see
what's up. It
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 4:56 AM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
Hi all,
Seems it's a good timing to bring back the discussion about the gerrit.
We want to do CI, and improve our code quality. One obvious way of doing
and reduce the workload of devs is introduce a tool to enforce the
I think in the branches 4.4 and above we should use try-resource-construct for
all the upgrade paths.
Otherwise we will continue to see resource leaks due to copy-paste-modified
code.
~Rajani
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Daan
75 matches
Mail list logo
