Your views are correct in managing the 3rd party VRs
I see people try to use external devices to provide network services if they
see VR cannot handle the performance or stability or if the admin thinks third
party providers can do well w.r.t their environment.
In current cloudstack, CloudStack
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/510#issuecomment-114486026
good point so backwards compatibility is a glass eye anyway;) will merge
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/1299/
--
Started by upstream project build-master-simulator build number 2116
originally caused by:
Started by upstream project build-master build number 2419
originally caused by:
Started by an
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/1298/
--
Started by upstream project build-master-simulator build number 2115
originally caused by:
Started by upstream project build-master build number 2418
originally caused by:
Started by an
Github user sanju1010 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/512
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/510#issuecomment-114495407
@resmo can you send a doc PR so at least we can document this in release
notes?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/510
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/1300/
--
Started by upstream project build-master-simulator build number 2117
originally caused by:
Started by an SCM change
[EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables.
Building remotely on
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/510#issuecomment-114495233
this can potentially break clients depending on the behaviour when zoneid
is passed
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/1301/
--
Started by upstream project build-master-simulator build number 2118
originally caused by:
Started by upstream project build-master build number 2420
originally caused by:
Started by an
GitHub user resmo opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/513
CLOUDSTACK-8578: implement old behaviour for listing only non-destroyâ¦
â¦ed VMs using state=present
Also see
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/510#issuecomment-114502611
Github user resmo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/510#issuecomment-114502611
@bhaisaab Ok. I'll make a doc PR. We could probably think about extending
the list API to a state e.g. `present` which returns all VMs in states
`starting, running,
GitHub user rsafonseca opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/514
Extend wait before retry to states other than 'Starting'
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/493 implemented wait and retry
for SSVM state trying, but today there was as an occurrence
GitHub user DaanHoogland opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/515
findbugs: move assert to a place where it still makes sense
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/DaanHoogland/cloudstack
Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/513#discussion_r33093929
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/api/query/QueryManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -968,7 +968,11 @@
}
if (state != null) {
-
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/515
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/1302/
--
Started by upstream project build-master-simulator build number 2119
originally caused by:
Started by an SCM change
[EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables.
Building remotely on
IMO, asserts should be completely removed in most classes.
It's mostly used in early development stages and ACS has been production
grade for quite some time.
The assert statement won't even run on production, because it's disabled by
default in the JVM in production runtime, and we're of course
GitHub user DaanHoogland opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/517
findbugs: constant fields should be final
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/DaanHoogland/cloudstack findbugs-MS
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/1303/
--
Started by upstream project build-master-simulator build number 2120
originally caused by:
Started by upstream project build-master build number 2421
originally caused by:
Started by an
Thanks for the update.
I'll see how far along it is when I get home from summer vacation before I
do anything else.
--
Erik
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Anshul Gangwar anshul.gang...@citrix.com
wrote:
Erik,
It will take around month or 2 months to hit code base.
For testing purposes
GitHub user gauravaradhye opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/511
CLOUDSTACK-8579: Fix cleanup operation in few test cases
Cleanup list should be declared before returning from setUpClass() so that
tearDownClass() works properly.
Currently the
Github user sanju1010 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/511#issuecomment-114467280
LGTM...Please commit
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/511
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user sanju1010 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/512#issuecomment-114469391
Test Revoke ingress rule after deploy VM ... === TestName:
test_02_revokeIngressRule_AfterDeployVM | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
LGTM. I am taking this patch.
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 6:26 PM, nitt10prashant g...@git.apache.org wrote:
GitHub user nitt10prashant opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/507
CLOUDSTACK-8577: fixing script testpath_disable_enable_zone
disable enable
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/516#issuecomment-114733108
Travis has failed due to a timeout.
I will run the same tests (i.e. smoke/test_affinity_groups
smoke/test_primary_storage) on our test environment
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/1305/
--
Started by upstream project build-master-simulator build number 2122
originally caused by:
Started by upstream project build-master build number 2422
originally caused by:
Started by an
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/514#issuecomment-114732603
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/1304/
--
Started by upstream project build-master-simulator build number 2121
originally caused by:
Started by an SCM change
[EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables.
Building remotely on
+1! Thanks guys :-)
On 22 Jun 2015, at 07:38, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org wrote:
Thanks for all the hard work Rafeal and Daan. much needed fixes.
~Rajani
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 2:35 AM, Rafael Fonseca rsafons...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
Sorry for the 100+ SPAM mails from
GitHub user wilderrodrigues opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/509
Replace System.currentTimeMillis() by System.nanoTime()
- System.nanoTime() is the best way to measure elapsed time in Java.
- It gives a resolution on the order of
Hi Daan,
Thanks for fixing and testing it! After DevOpsDays Ams I will also give it a go.
I can prepare a PR for the release notes and document the new setting. You can
then merge it when the release passes. Or should we do this in another way?
Regards,
Remi
On 22 Jun 2015, at 16:35, Daan
Yes... that makes sense. Thanks Praveen!
-Original Message-
From: Praveen B [mailto:pbprave...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2015 11:13 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: question about Admin's capability to create a VM on a disabled host
Hi Raja,
I can think of this
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/509
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user resmo opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/510
CLOUDSTACK-8578: fix listVirtualMachines does not return deleted machâ¦
â¦ines when zone is specified
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Remi Bergsma
rberg...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
I can prepare a PR for the release notes and document the new setting. You
can then merge it when the release passes. Or should we do this in another
way?
This is fine but it is in the release even if it
Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/509#discussion_r33018252
--- Diff: utils/src/com/cloud/utils/Profiler.java ---
@@ -23,24 +23,20 @@
private Long startTickInMs;
private Long stopTickInMs;
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/509#discussion_r33018651
--- Diff: utils/src/com/cloud/utils/Profiler.java ---
@@ -23,24 +23,20 @@
private Long startTickInMs;
private Long stopTickInMs;
Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/509#discussion_r33019962
--- Diff: utils/src/com/cloud/utils/Profiler.java ---
@@ -23,24 +23,20 @@
private Long startTickInMs;
private Long stopTickInMs;
Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/509#discussion_r33018426
--- Diff: utils/src/com/cloud/utils/Profiler.java ---
@@ -23,24 +23,20 @@
private Long startTickInMs;
private Long stopTickInMs;
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/1296/
--
Started by upstream project build-master-simulator build number 2113
originally caused by:
Started by an SCM change
Started by an SCM change
Started by upstream project build-master
Hi Erik,
I will be working on console keyboard support refactoring. The main purpose of
this refactoring will be to enable end user to add their own keyboard mappings
without need to know CloudStack code much.
As of now all keyboard mappings are either into ajaxkeys.js or ajaxviewer.js.
Hi Anshul,
Thank you for the update.
Do you have a rough estimate for when this refactor might hit the codebase?
I don't expect my changes to hit 4.6 due to time constraints anyway, so if
your changes are around the corner I might as well wait.
Do you happen to know what the easiest way to
Hi Erik,
I'ld like to move in, but for the need of a german layout. Maybe we can
join forces :)
cheers,
- Stephan
Am Dienstag, den 23.06.2015, 12:24 +0200 schrieb Erik Weber:
Hi,
I am guessing there are more than me that's having trouble with keyboard
with non-us layouts.
I'd like to
Erik,
It will take around month or 2 months to hit code base.
For testing purposes I will go with quickcloud. It will be easier to test that
way as you can run CPVM functionality on you management server without
deploying CPVM. It will save you a lot of pain.
Hi Erik,
I found following link[1] useful do build a modified virtual router
systemvm.
I assume the very same process can be used for the console-vm.
You can upload your own template to ACS and define it in the settings
area via consoleproxy.system.offering
[1]
Hi,
Did some general tests on this release and would like to share my +1. Details
below...
Environment test
Management Server = CentOS 7.1
1 Host XenServer 6.2
Test restart network ... === TestName: test_03_restart_network_cleanup | Status
: SUCCESS ===
ok
Test router basic setup ... ===
Hi,
I am guessing there are more than me that's having trouble with keyboard
with non-us layouts.
I'd like to improve it, atleast for my native charset.
Has anyone done something like this, and have some insight into the process?
I've found this [1], that to some degree explain the process.
If
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/510#issuecomment-114432879
why should we return machines that no longer exist?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/497#issuecomment-114435233
Thanks for the update @rsafonseca
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
51 matches
Mail list logo
