Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #2781

See -- [...truncated 28722 lines...] [INFO] [INFO] --- findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:findbugs (findbugs) @ cloud-quickcloud --- [INFO] [INFO] <<< findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:check (cloudstack

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #2780

See -- [...truncated 28722 lines...] [INFO] [INFO] --- findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:findbugs (findbugs) @ cloud-quickcloud --- [INFO] [INFO] <<< findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:check (cloudstack

[GitHub] cloudstack-www pull request: 4.7.0 is out.

GitHub user pdion891 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www/pull/23 4.7.0 is out. update API, download page modified: * shape blue repo * look and feel slightly modify You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ gi

[GitHub] cloudstack-www pull request: 4.7.0

GitHub user pdion891 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www/pull/22 4.7.0 add API section for 4.7.0 update download section, add shapeblue repo and update page look and feel. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pu

[GitHub] cloudstack-www pull request: 4.7.0

Github user pdion891 closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www/pull/22 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the featur

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #2779

See -- [...truncated 28732 lines...] [INFO] [INFO] --- findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:findbugs (findbugs) @ cloud-quickcloud --- [INFO] [INFO] <<< findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:check (cloudstack

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8302: Removing snapshots on RB...

Github user dmytro-shevchenko commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1230#discussion_r48097934 --- Diff: plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/storage/KVMStorageProcessor.java --- @@ -1274,7 +1274,45 @@ public Answer creat

Request for assistance with Xenserver

Hi folks, Today I was checking a problem with XCP, and looking at the code to check how ACS discovers the hypervisor version I had a doubt. Sadly, I did not have in my hands an environment using Xensever. So, can some of you that use Xenserver, run the following command and provide me with the out

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Removed unnecessary code from getGuestOsT...

Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1262#issuecomment-166032637 @cristofolini could you please remove the @Local annotation from CitrixResourceBase ? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email a

[GitHub] cloudstack-docs pull request: update version to 4.7

GitHub user pdion891 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs/pull/13 update version to 4.7 You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/pdion891/cloudstack-docs master Alternatively you can review and

[GitHub] cloudstack-docs-admin pull request: change version to 4.7

GitHub user pdion891 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-admin/pull/34 change version to 4.7 You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/pdion891/cloudstack-docs-admin master Alternatively you ca

[GitHub] cloudstack-docs-install pull request: update for 4.7

GitHub user pdion891 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-install/pull/26 update for 4.7 You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/pdion891/cloudstack-docs-install master Alternatively you can r

Re: [DISCUSS] Move to Github

On 12/19/2015 07:57 PM, Remi Bergsma wrote: > I disagree with testing based on complexity. You simply cannot know the > implications upfront, as that is why you run the tests. What seems small, can > break it all. > > Example: > This commit seems an easy_fix, right? Just a findbugs issue reso

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #2778

See Changes: [Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-4787 Allow selection of scsi controller type in vSphere [Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-4787: Allow users to select disk controller for VM/template [w.zhou] CLOUDSTACK-9113: skip vm with inc

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-jdk18 #441

See Changes: [Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-4787 Allow selection of scsi controller type in vSphere [Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-4787: Allow users to select disk controller for VM/template [w.zhou] CLOUDSTACK-9113: skip vm with inconsis

Re: [DISCUSS] Move to Github

+1 If moving to Github means we can use all features without restrictions: labels, issues, editing and merging PRs, wiki, integrations, hooks etc etc. @René, I disagree with testing based on complexity. You simply cannot know the implications upfront, as that is why you run the tests. What seem

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Critical VPCVR issues fixed: CLOUDSTACK-9...

Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1259#issuecomment-166014008 Thanks, @DaanHoogland ! :) My other tests are still running. Will post results here once they are done. --- If your project is set up for it, you c

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Removed unnecessary code from getGuestOsT...

GitHub user cristofolini opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1262 Removed unnecessary code from getGuestOsType in CitrixResourceBase Considering that all mapping of Guest OS Names to their respective hypervisor compatible types is made thorugh accessing

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Removed unused variables from class Netwo...

GitHub user pedro-martins opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1261 Removed unused variables from class NetworkStateListener Removed unused variables from class NetworkStateListener We removed the following variables from "com.cloud.network.Netwo

Re: [DISCUSS] Move to Github

> On 19 Dec 2015, at 16:28, Rene Moser wrote: > > Hi Seb > >> On 12/19/2015 10:12 AM, sebgoa wrote: >> >> Late October I started thread [1] about moving our repo to GitHub, I would >> like to re-open this discussion. >> >> Now that we have stabilized master and release 4.6.0, 4.6.1, 4.6.2 a

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Critical VPCVR issues fixed: CLOUDSTACK-9...

Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1259#issuecomment-166010459 @wilderrodrigues my bad: ..-pr-.. means cloudstack-pr-analysis, ..-pull-.. means cloudstack-pull-analysis. The new job is a generic job does a rats tes

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Critical VPCVR issues fixed: CLOUDSTACK-9...

Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1259#issuecomment-166010092 Sorry @DaanHoogland, I don't understand what you meant. :) pr/pull jobs related to my previous comment? Or is it something preventing you to test the PR? So

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Critical VPCVR issues fixed: CLOUDSTACK-9...

Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1259#issuecomment-166009331 @wilderrodrigues the ..-pr-.. jobs are an attempt from me to deal with all the errors in the ..-pull-.. jobs and the lack of rats test. By now it seems the ..-

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Critical VPCVR issues fixed: CLOUDSTACK-9...

Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1259#issuecomment-166005919 From here I see that the build was successful: https://builds.apache.org/job/cloudstack-pr-analysis/162/console ``` [INFO]

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Removed methods from EventBus interface.

GitHub user pedro-martins opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1260 Removed methods from EventBus interface. Was removed the methods . org.apache.cloudstack.framework.events.EventBus.subscribe(EventTopic, EventSubscriber) . org.apache.clouds

[GitHub] cloudstack-cloudmonkey pull request: Update requester.py

GitHub user phillipkent opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-cloudmonkey/pull/11 Update requester.py urllib.quote_plus() requires the option safe="*" (that is, the * character is not encoded) to be consistent with CloudStack's internal encoder/decoder. Withou

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Critical VPCVR issues fixed: CLOUDSTACK-9...

Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1259#issuecomment-165997403 Ping @remibergsma @DaanHoogland @borisroman @miguelaferreira @bhaisaab @karuturi * Environment ``` Management Server on CentOS 7.1

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Critical VPCVR issues fixed: CLOUDSTACK-9...

GitHub user wilderrodrigues opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1259 Critical VPCVR issues fixed: CLOUDSTACK-9154; CLOUDSTACK-9187; and CLOUDSTACK-9188 This PR fixes: * CLOUDSTACK-9154: rVPC doesn't recover from cleaning up of network garbage c

Re: [DISCUSS] Move to Github

Hi Seb On 12/19/2015 10:12 AM, sebgoa wrote: > Late October I started thread [1] about moving our repo to GitHub, I would > like to re-open this discussion. > > Now that we have stabilized master and release 4.6.0, 4.6.1, 4.6.2 and 4.7.0 > we need to think about the next steps. > > To me Git

Re: [BRAINDUMP][KVM] ISO attachment via HTTP to Instance

On 12/19/2015 12:28 PM, Nux! wrote: > IMHO the idea is nice, but not sure if it's worth the effort. > So we'll have primary storage, secondary storage and HTTP ISO library, might > be a little bit confusing to users and the gain doesn't seem that big. If > your NFS store is not working properly

Re: [DISCUSS] Move to Github

+1 to that, as long as we keep stuff properly mirrored in ASF and so on. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "sebgoa" > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Sent: Saturday, 19 December, 2015 09:12:14 > Subject: [DISCUSS] Move to

Re: [BRAINDUMP][KVM] ISO attachment via HTTP to Instance

IMHO the idea is nice, but not sure if it's worth the effort. So we'll have primary storage, secondary storage and HTTP ISO library, might be a little bit confusing to users and the gain doesn't seem that big. If your NFS store is not working properly, then you already have other problems as well

Re: [DISCUSS] Move to Github

On 12/19/2015 10:12 AM, sebgoa wrote: > Hi folks, > > Apologies for a week end email couple days before christmas, but this needs > to get out. > > Late October I started thread [1] about moving our repo to GitHub, I would > like to re-open this discussion. > > Now that we have stabilized ma

[BRAINDUMP][KVM] ISO attachment via HTTP to Instance

Hi, So I just ran into a issue (again) where a NFS mount was hanging and a ISO could not be attached. Long story short, NFS goes through kernel space and causes timeouts, hanging kernels, processes in status D, etc, etc. Qemu already supports attaching a CD-Rom via HTTP to a VM, I just tried: htt

[DISCUSS] Move to Github

Hi folks, Apologies for a week end email couple days before christmas, but this needs to get out. Late October I started thread [1] about moving our repo to GitHub, I would like to re-open this discussion. Now that we have stabilized master and release 4.6.0, 4.6.1, 4.6.2 and 4.7.0 we need to