Hi Ivan,
I don't think cloudstack offer cluster anti affinity and i'm sure i would
be in favor of introducing another anti affinity level, because it would
expose cluster notion to your cloud user.
Although, look at the vm provisionning strategy config, their should be a
deployment strategy that
Thanks for the reply Wido, can you clarify the point:
>- Is Ubuntu Precise still supported?
> - If not, we must change the docs (I can open a Jira ticket and PR
> for that)
No, it's not because there is no Java 8 support there.
We deprecated support for Ubuntu Precise because
Hey folks,
Has anybody else here used the “Upload from local” feature in ACS?
It seems that it does not work (at least in ACS 4.9.2.0). I receive the
following metadata to execute the POST request and send the template
binaries:
{"postuploadtemplateresponse":{"getuploadparams":{"id":"","postURL"
We are waiting for 4.10 installation and other 4.10 documentations(like
source compile) since long time there was a thread about this documentation
generation on mailing list but it looks like the problem on that step did
not solved yet, its still waiting :(
+1 for Christians & Rafaels questions
> Op 26 september 2017 om 16:23 schreef Rafael Weingärtner
> :
>
>
> Folks,
>
> How is the status of the 4.10 release? I thought it was already released,
> right?
>
> Even though all of the CloudStack packages are in the right folders for
> Precise and Xenial, it
+1 for removal of unused ones but prior to remove, Can you please check once
what Rafael suggested. "using the value without referencing the constant”.
Thanks,
Nitin
On 26-Sep-2017, at 7:25 PM, Rafael Weingärtner
> wrote:
IMO, if
Folks,
How is the status of the 4.10 release? I thought it was already released,
right?
Even though all of the CloudStack packages are in the right folders for
Precise and Xenial, it seems that only the “Release” file of Ubuntu Trusty
was updated with the new release files.
Moreover, reading
+1 too. Thanks Sigert
From: Gabriel Beims Bräscher
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 11:17:19 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Clean up of unused constants
+1 on removing unused code.
2017-09-26 11:16 GMT-03:00 Marc-Aurèle
+1 on removing unused code.
2017-09-26 11:16 GMT-03:00 Marc-Aurèle Brothier :
> +1 to sort them too
>
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Daan Hoogland <
> daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 Sigert, be my guest. We will run integration tests on your changes
> >
+1 to sort them too
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> +1 Sigert, be my guest. We will run integration tests on your changes
> anyway, so low risk ;)
>
> On 2017/09/26 15:55, "Rafael Weingärtner"
> wrote:
>
> IMO,
+1 Sigert, be my guest. We will run integration tests on your changes anyway,
so low risk ;)
On 2017/09/26 15:55, "Rafael Weingärtner" wrote:
IMO, if something is not used or if something does not work, it has to
be removed or fixed.
I am +1 for the
IMO, if something is not used or if something does not work, it has to
be removed or fixed.
I am +1 for the removal of unused constants. Did you check if the value
of these unused constants were being used somewhere? I mean, using the
value without referencing the constant.
On 9/26/2017
Hi all,
Am I allowed to remove all unused constants in ApiConstants.java?
Kind regards,
*Sigert Goeminne*
Software Development Engineer
13 matches
Mail list logo