Thank you, Rohit --very comprehensive!
I'll review and forward any adjustments this weekend.
Kind regards,
Sally
- - -
Vice President Marketing & Publicity
Vice President Sponsor Relations
The Apache Software Foundation
Tel +1 617 921 8656 | s...@apache.org
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019, at 04:56, Roh
That is written from the point of view of a developer.
From someone who has no desire to ever see the code, let alone change
it, EOL has a big impact.
In a normal project, in the period prior to EOL, the developers commit
to fixing bugs and issuing security notices with resolutions.
Cloudstac
Yes - I see your point
I think the thing to bear in mind here is that there is no *formal* EOL for an
ACS version or branch - its open source - EOL effectively means that people
have lost the interest in maintaining that branch. If people see a demand for
more releases on a branch in order to
+1
Tested:
-- Environment
ACS management + DB: Ubuntu 16.04
Hypervisor: KVM hosts Ubuntu 16.04, XenServer 6.5
Primary Storage: KVM Local Filesystem, NFS, and Ceph
Secondary Storage: NFS
Network: Advanced Network
-- Tests
- build from source
- deploy system VMs
- create VR for the advanced network
I can only agree with Haijiao, that 4.11 deserves a longer time span.
Because many bugs are found naturally between the .0 and .1 of the next LTS
release with it's adoption.
For us 4.11 could only be adopted with 4.11.2.0 after several bugs needed
to get resolved. So if 4.11's support stops in
On 3/15/19 10:20 AM, Riepl, Gregor (SWISS TXT) wrote:
> Hi Giles,
>
>> I would *expect* 4.13.0 (LTS) to be released in Q2, which will
>> supersede the 4.11 branch as the current LTS branch
>
> Are you confident that this schedule can be kept?
> 4.12 is still in RC right now, and I don't thin
+1 (binding)
Tested:
- Building DEB packages
- Run on Ubuntu 18.04
- Tested live storage migration
- Tested Advanced Networking with VXLAN
- Tested IPv6 deployment in Advanced Networking
- Tested destroy and re-create of Virtual Routers
On 3/14/19 10:58 PM, Gabriel Beims Bräscher wrote:
> Hi All
Hi Giles,
> I would *expect* 4.13.0 (LTS) to be released in Q2, which will
> supersede the 4.11 branch as the current LTS branch
Are you confident that this schedule can be kept?
4.12 is still in RC right now, and I don't think it's a good idea to
rush another major release in just 3 months...
