Re: Fault percentage value of CPU usage in Cloud Platform

Hi, There may be a difference in what you have allocated and what is being actually used. The dashboard shows what is allocated. Regards, Bharat. On 11/21/16, 9:44 PM, "williamstev...@gmail.com on behalf of Will Stevens" wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Split Marvin to its own repository

Hi Rohit, what are we trying to achieve by moving marvin into a separate repo.? --Bharat. From: Raja Pullela Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 5:30:20 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Split Marvin to its own

Incorrect system vm templates for master build.

Hi All, looks like the systemvm templates are not getting built correctly in http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-systemvm64-master. The build version is in correctly set to 4.6, Im not sure but i think the build version in /etc/cloudstck-release is also getting wrongly set inside the

Re: [DISCUSS] PR testing process

first. No need spending test cycles on that. > > Most likely github already reports that PR as 'unstable' so you could also > check for that. > > Regards, Remi > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On 28 Mar 2016, at 09:28, Bharat Kumar <bharat.ku...@accelerite.com> wrote:

Re: [DISCUSS] PR testing process

Hi Sanjeev, Thanks for bringing this up. This is happening because the PR code and the master have deviated since the pr has been created(assuming that PR was rebased with master at the time of creation) and we start testing it. Ideally we should start testing as soon as the pr is created

Re: introduction

Welcome back Murali. —Bharat. > On 23-Mar-2016, at 9:50 PM, Rajesh Battala > wrote: > > Welcome Back Murali. Good to see you again on CloudStack :) > > -Original Message- > From: Murali Reddy [mailto:murali.re...@shapeblue.com] > Sent: Wednesday, March

RE: [VOTE] Move 'apache/cloudstack' -> 'apache-cloudstack/cloudstack'

+1 --Bharat On 21 Mar 2016 11:51 am, Kishan Kavala wrote: +1 for the move. Regards, Kishan Kavala Chief Product Engineer, CloudPlatform Development, Accelerite. www.accelerite.com -Original Message- From: chunfeng tian

Re: [PROPOSAL] Minimum Viable CI Integration

, Remi Bergsma <rberg...@schubergphilis.com<mailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.com>> wrote: Hi Bharat I’d say remove the tests that fail, to get a report with only tests that pass. Regards, Remi From: Bharat Kumar <bharat.ku...@accelerite.com<mailto:bharat.ku...@accelerite.com>>

Re: [PROPOSAL] Minimum Viable CI Integration

ur CI system provides value. Right now, there are so many failures that soon people don’t even care to look at it. Once we have a stable set that works, we can start fixing tests and 1-by-1 add them to the mix. Just my $0.02 Regards, Remi On 15/03/16 07:06, "Bharat Kumar" <bh

Re: [PROPOSAL] Minimum Viable CI Integration

Hi Paul, I totally agree with you. For now we should ignore the tests which fail all the time while we try to address them. Now that we have a CI in place we need go and fix issues with the tests. I have tried to identify a few of them and have mentioned them in the known issues part of the

Re: [PROPOSAL] Minimum Viable CI Integration

te.com> > wrote: > > Hi Bharat, > > Good to see the list of failed and skipped ones in the report. Is it possible > to add some generic comment/reason to know why these test cases are > failed/skipped? > > Thanks, > Suresh > > > > > On 08/03/16

Re: [PROPOSAL] Minimum Viable CI Integration

details like the setup info (number of hosts, etc) Report indicates few tests are skipped. is this due to setup limitations? can the skipped tests be also listed so that some of us can run those specific tests (say manually) and post the results. Thanks, Srinivas On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 11:0

Re: [PROPOSAL] Minimum Viable CI Integration

Hi guys, I am also working on the similar reporting problem, here is what i did link to the report https://github.com/bvbharatk/cloud-stack/pull/1 I am thinking this is good enough for now, I want to start posting the results on each pr as shown in the above link. please give me your comments

Re: [PROPOSAL] Minimum Viable CI Integration

ests, > it made things infinitely easier. > > Let me know if you have other questions. > > Cheers, > > Will > > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 11:29 PM, Bharat Kumar <bharat.ku...@accelerite.com> > wrote: > >> Hi will, >> >> we have a solution to

Re: [PROPOSAL] Minimum Viable CI Integration

Hi will, we have a solution to post the results to the community by email. We also have a github integration to fetch the Prs , run tests against them and post the consolidated results by email and share the logs using dropbox. We are facing some setup delays to get this up and running. I am

Re: PR validation using proposed CI.

> Thanks, > > *Will STEVENS* > Lead Developer > > *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts > 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 > w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Sebastien Goasguen <run...@gmail.com> > w

Re: PR validation using proposed CI.

> Hope all is well, > > Perhaps you can explain the workflow and extensiveness of your tests. > > Thanks > ilya > > > > On 2/24/16 9:23 PM, Bharat Kumar wrote: >> Hi, >> >> As all of you know from earlier discussions in the community, we have be

Re: PR validation using proposed CI.

sults in the PR? > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 6:23 AM, Bharat Kumar <bharat.ku...@citrix.com> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> As all of you know from earlier discussions in the community, we have been >> working on implementing a CI to test github PRs and p

Re: ACS CI BVT RUN: xenserver: Pr_number: 1417

omplete i will enhance this to post directly on the PR. > > > >> On Feb 25, 2016, at 6:27 AM, Bharat Kumar <bharat.ku...@citrix.com> wrote: >> >> >> On 24-Feb-2016, at 10:24 PM, >> jenkins-...@citrix.com<mailto:jenkins-...@citrix.com> wrote:

Re: ACS CI BVT RUN: xenserver: Pr_number: 1417

On 24-Feb-2016, at 10:24 PM, jenkins-...@citrix.com wrote: [http://jenkins-ccp.citrix.com/static/e59dfe28/images/32x32/red.gif]BUILD FAILURE Build Start Date: Wed Feb 24 06:29:34 2016 Git Repo Url: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack.git Git Commit

PR validation using proposed CI.

Hi, As all of you know from earlier discussions in the community, we have been working on implementing a CI to test github PRs and publish results. We have implemented this internally and will start testing PRs and publish the results by mail to dev list. At this point if a test fails, we

Re: Important Pending Items

ust neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. -Original Message- From: Bharat Kumar [mailto:bharat.ku...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2016 9:57 AM To: dev@cl

Re: Important Pending Items

Hi Sebastien, As Raja said, we are actively working on it and we will share the code on github soon. Thanks, Bharat. > On 11-Feb-2016, at 2:41 PM, Raja Pullela wrote: > > Hi Sebastien, > > On item (3) - the BVTs have been running consistently (with same passrates)

Re: [PROPOSAL] Freeze everything until we get CI

> Others might have an easier time getting access to hardware, and could use >> it to help test releases/PR >> >> >> Erik >> >> Den fredag 29. januar 2016 skrev Bharat Kumar <bharat.ku...@citrix.com> >> følgende: >> >>> yes, we w

Re: [PROPOSAL] Freeze everything until we get CI

and keep this going. Thanks, Bharat. On 28-Jan-2016, at 7:37 PM, Erik Weber <terbol...@gmail.com<mailto:terbol...@gmail.com>> wrote: Why not share it as is, then the community could help improving this, rather than this being a single company effort? -- Erik On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 1:4

Re: [PROPOSAL] Freeze everything until we get CI

Hi All, I agree that we need to have a CI to deal with the large volume of PRs. The current travis CI is not good enough as it runs only simulator tests. We identified this issue and came up with a effective CI for automating test runs for a each PR. This is already functional, with few github

Re: [PROPOSAL] Freeze everything until we get CI

Hi, I agree with Remi on the hurdles he mentioned. It is difficult to integrate 3rd party CI, If someone wants to implement their own CI, the link below gives one way to do it.

Re: User vm password gets update only the master VR.

ou just mention will work. If it does, then the issue > is not a blocker. > > Cheers, > Wilder > > >> On 05 Nov 2015, at 10:09, Bharat Kumar <bharat.ku...@citrix.com> wrote: >> >> I have’t checked, but form the code it looks like it will work if we rei

Re: User vm password gets update only the master VR.

I have’t checked, but form the code it looks like it will work if we reissue the reset command after the slave becomes master. —Bharat. On 05-Nov-2015, at 12:59 pm, Erik Weber <terbol...@gmail.com<mailto:terbol...@gmail.com>> wrote: On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 7:15 AM, Bharat Kumar

Re: User vm password gets update only the master VR.

, but it > shouldn’t block 4.6.0 IMHO. Talked to Rajani and she agrees. > > Regards, > Remi > > > > On 05/11/15 10:29, "Bharat Kumar" <bharat.ku...@citrix.com> wrote: > >> Hi Wilder, >> >> If we think that it is ok to have the wor

User vm password gets update only the master VR.

Hi, In my local setup i found this issue, The user VM password is not getting saved in the backup router. we send the save password command to both the VRs in a rvr enabled network, But the password gets saved only in the master VR. This happens because the password server is not running in

Re: Blameless post mortem

rns have been raised on the quality aspect I feel it needs to be > addressed appropriately. Let users take an informed decision on whether to > use a particular release or not. I am not saying that postponing is the only > option. > > > > > -Koushik > > > On 28-

Re: Blameless post mortem

Hi Remi, Thank you for the Blame less postmortem. I think there is a bigger problem here than just the review process and running tests. Even if we run the tests we cannot be sure that every thing will work as intended. The tests will only give some level of confidence. The tests may not

Re: Blameless post mortem

you are being captain obvious with all those emails about > documentation/bugs when we all already know about it and are working hard to > get it in a better shape. > > Cheers, > Wilder > >> On 28 Sep 2015, at 13:54, Bharat Kumar <bharat.ku...@citrix.com> wrote: >

Re: Blameless post mortem

n I > am afraid was six months ago. We can learn from it, but we are not going to > revert it, this would not go cleanly as David mentioned. > > So let’s get back to blockers for 4.6, are there still VR related issues with > master ? > > > > >> Regards, >>

Re: Blameless post mortem

-Sep-2015, at 5:24 pm, Bharat Kumar <bharat.ku...@citrix.com<mailto:bharat.ku...@citrix.com>> wrote: Hi Remi, Whatever ever we think we have discovered are all well known best practices while developing code in community. I agree that tests need to be run on a new PR, but

Re: Blameless post mortem

i > > > > On 28/09/15 13:54, "Bharat Kumar" <bharat.ku...@citrix.com> wrote: > >> Hi Remi, >> >> Whatever ever we think we have discovered are all well known best >> practices while developing code in community. >> I agree that tests need

Re: Blameless post mortem

bly not > important anyway. And if it is, then add a test :-) > > I do agree on the design documentation requirement for any (major?) change. I > found some design documentations on the subject you mention, but it should > have been more detailed. > > Regards, > Remi > > &

Re: Blameless post mortem

fter which all tests should > pass. Even better is we write (missing) tests before changing stuff so you > know they pass before and after the fact. > > When doing reviews, feel free to ask for design documentation if you feel it > is needed. > > Regards, Remi > &

Re: Blameless post mortem

PC the SNAT does not work. > >From an instance I can ping the router(s), but not any further than that. > SNAT works fine in a normal/non-vpc network. > I'll try to look more into it later today. > > Have a nice day :) > > Lucian > > -- > Sent from the D

Re: Proposal to get to 100% passrate on BVTs

n you please repost if there is any specific ask ? Thanks, Raja -Original Message- From: Bharat Kumar [mailto:bharat.ku...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 10:03 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org> Subject: Re: Proposal to get to 100% passra

Re: Proposal to get to 100% passrate on BVTs

Hi, I am already working towards this. We can already replicate the test infra using puppet. But i need some help in generating reports, sharing the test results and archiving them. particularly archiving them since we need some space which is accessible by everyone. I have also made a

Re: [Blocker/Critical] VR related Issues

K-8799<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8799> Thanks, Bharat. On 12-Aug-2015, at 10:52 am, Bharat Kumar <bharat.ku...@citrix.com<mailto:bharat.ku...@citrix.com>> wrote: Hi, looks like there is one more issue. Conntrackd fails to start in case of rvr enabled is

Re: [Proposal] Minimise VR downtime during network update.

. Thanks, Bharat. On 11-Aug-2015, at 9:16 pm, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: Can you make a ticket on apache instead of referring an internal ticket? Can you describe how this work relates to the rvpc refactor work done for 4.6? On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Bharat

[Proposal] Minimise VR downtime during network update.

Hi, Currently we use redundant virtual router enabled networks to prevent network outage even if one of the virtual router fails. This is achieved by using redundant virtual routers along with VRRP protocol. This has increased the network robustness. However updating a network with new

Re: [Blocker/Critical] VR related Issues

Hi, looks like there is one more issue. Conntrackd fails to start in case of rvr enabled isolated networks. created a bug to track this. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8725 Thanks, Bharat. On 11-Aug-2015, at 3:03 pm, Kishan Kavala

Re: [Proposal] Continuos Integration Testing on ACS master.

, Keep in mind that many people work on this in many ways and many attempts have failed due to nothing but lack of consensus. I have only glanced but will take my time with it soon. On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Bharat Kumar bharat.ku...@citrix.com wrote: Hi All, Currently we do

[Proposal] Continuos Integration Testing on ACS master.

Hi All, Currently we do sanity checks on master using Travis, But travis runs only simulator tests (AFAIK). I think it will be better if we can run both BVTs and regression tests on real hardware. I am woking on implementing this. Functional spec and design details.

Re: file /var/log/cloudstack/agent from install of cloudstack-agent-4.5.1-1.el7.centos.x86_64 conflicts with file from package cloudstack-management-4.5.1-1.el7.centos.x86_64

Hi, I totally agree with Wido, This should be fixed in the ACS repo for every one to use, Instead of sharing this using non ACS private builds. Thanks, Bharat. On 15-Jul-2015, at 2:41 pm, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.commailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: On 14-Jul-2015, at 9:23

Re: 4.5 clustered mgmt server

Hi, I guss you are correct. we need to add the newly created channel ch1 to the map after the handshake is complete. _peers.put(peerName, ch) should be changed to _peers.put(peerName, ch1); and also return ch1 instead of ch. Thanks, Bharat. On 15-Apr-2015, at 12:21 pm, Marcus

Regarding Cloudstack shutdown operations.

Hi, Recently i noticed that when we stop cloudstack we do not mark the state of the management server as down in the ms_host table. On further investigation I came to know that the stop methods of the beans are not getting executed during shutdown. I could not see any logs related to

Review Request 29364: [Dashboard] Primary Storage Used(type tag with value 2) related tag is not showing in listCapacity api response.

/diff/ Testing --- tested on 4.5 Thanks, bharat kumar

Re: Review Request 29365: [Overcommit]Static Min/Max memory is not getting configured according to overcommit factor for vms on xen 6.2

a090b1106ac4fb1acf3680991e990931d951fb65 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29365/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, bharat kumar

Re: Review Request 29364: [Dashboard] Primary Storage Used(type tag with value 2) related tag is not showing in listCapacity api response.

/29364/diff/ Testing --- tested on 4.5 Thanks, bharat kumar

Review Request 28217: when a template is deleted and then copied over again , it is still marked as Removed in template_zone_ref table

/VMTemplateZoneDaoImpl.java 8cadf61 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28217/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, bharat kumar

Review Request 28085: Fixed some coverity issues.

://reviews.apache.org/r/28085/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, bharat kumar

Review Request 27868: InvalidParameter Exception with stacktrace in MS log wile executing scale vm.

--- Thanks, bharat kumar

Re: Review Request 27868: InvalidParameter Exception with stacktrace in MS log wile executing scale vm.

- server/src/com/cloud/vm/UserVmManagerImpl.java 77ace7a5f6c7f6e423a7e97bbf4c4bb5fdcb730a Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27868/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, bharat kumar

Re: Review Request 27868: InvalidParameter Exception with stacktrace in MS log wile executing scale vm.

-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27868/#review60943 --- On Nov. 11, 2014, 2:19 p.m., bharat kumar wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply

Re: Review Request 27868: InvalidParameter Exception with stacktrace in MS log wile executing scale vm.

) - server/src/com/cloud/vm/UserVmManagerImpl.java 77ace7a5f6c7f6e423a7e97bbf4c4bb5fdcb730a Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27868/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, bharat kumar

Review Request 27021: Reservations for VMware VMs remain after dynamic scaling

/VmwareResource.java 085b6bbed4918be3155fd44c8bed785983526e11 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27021/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, bharat kumar

Review Request 26969: During VM deployment and while choosing CUSTOM disk offering for data disk, the size of the data disk is not considered for checking resource limit of primary storage.

limit of primary storage. Diffs - server/src/com/cloud/vm/UserVmManagerImpl.java 2636096d03d7cfa097605ac066b8bd66b24972b7 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/26969/diff/ Testing --- tested on 4.5 Thanks, bharat kumar

Review Request 25991: user vm can get a gateway ip when gateway ip is a part of the guest ip range.

/ConfigurationManagerImpl.java df6ce45 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25991/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, bharat kumar

Review Request 25768: changing value of cpu/mem.overprovisioning.factor for xen cluster is not affecting total memory at zone level

/ Testing --- Tested on master. Thanks, bharat kumar

Regarding gateway ip getting allocated to user VMs in shared network.

Hi All, I have found that the gateway ip can get allocated to the uservms in case of shared networks. This is a corner case and might happen accidentally. This happens because we allow addition guest ip ranges containing the gateway ip, while creating a shared network and internally there is

Review Request 25430: live migration is failing for vm deployed using dynaic compute offerings with NPE

--- Tested live migration on master using xenserver. Thanks, bharat kumar

Re: Review Request 25430: live migration is failing for vm deployed using dynaic compute offerings with NPE

) - engine/orchestration/src/com/cloud/vm/VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java 8edef77 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25430/diff/ Testing --- Tested live migration on master using xenserver. Thanks, bharat kumar

Re: Review Request 25430: live migration is failing for vm deployed using dynaic compute offerings with NPE

e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25430/#review52575 --- On Sept. 8, 2014, 9:16 a.m., bharat kumar wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply

Re: Review Request 25430: live migration is failing for vm deployed using dynaic compute offerings with NPE

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6099 Diffs - engine/orchestration/src/com/cloud/vm/VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java 8edef77 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25430/diff/ Testing --- Tested live migration on master using xenserver. Thanks, bharat kumar

Re: Review Request 23806: Re-copying templates to other zones doesn't work

, bharat kumar

Re: Review Request 24892: passwd_server attempts to start but terminates with the exit code 137

/debian/config/opt/cloud/bin/passwd_server 0f4a772 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24892/diff/ Testing (updated) --- I was able to reproduce this in the older version but not on master. but iam putting this patch anyway as this will not effect the regular runs. Thanks, bharat kumar

Re: Review Request 23806: Re-copying templates to other zones doesn't work

, bharat kumar

Re: Review Request 23806: Re-copying templates to other zones doesn't work

/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/image/db/TemplateDataStoreDaoImpl.java 50334f4 server/src/com/cloud/template/HypervisorTemplateAdapter.java 72aaff5 server/src/com/cloud/template/TemplateManagerImpl.java f5ad97f Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23806/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, bharat

Review Request 24645: Disabling failed test cases.

/integration/smoke/test_snapshots.py 5db3e40 test/integration/smoke/test_templates.py a757c2a Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24645/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, bharat kumar

Review Request 23806: Re-copying templates to other zones doesn't work

--- Thanks, bharat kumar

Review Request 23807: List templates API returns destroyed templates when recopying the template.

/TemplateJoinDao.java 298be4d server/src/com/cloud/api/query/dao/TemplateJoinDaoImpl.java 4c8ada1 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23807/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, bharat kumar

Re: Review Request 23806: Re-copying templates to other zones doesn't work

/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/image/db/TemplateDataStoreDaoImpl.java 50334f4 server/src/com/cloud/template/HypervisorTemplateAdapter.java 20309d6 server/src/com/cloud/template/TemplateManagerImpl.java f5ad97f Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23806/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, bharat

Re: Review Request 23808: listCapacity API missing types for certain zones

/capacity/dao/CapacityDaoImpl.java b7784f2 server/src/com/cloud/server/ManagementServerImpl.java 99b12732 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23808/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, bharat kumar

Review Request 23193: mark the test_01_primary_storage_iscsi as test that requires hardware

- test/integration/smoke/test_primary_storage.py 0312ad6 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23193/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, bharat kumar

Re: [ACS4.5] Can't access volumes on storage tab in GUI

Hi Mike, I think the volume_view did not get created properly for some reason. I think recreating the volume_view will fix the problem. below commas should fix the issue. DROP VIEW IF EXISTS `cloud`.`volume_view`; CREATE VIEW `cloud`.`volume_view` AS select volumes.id,

Review Request 22376: tagging the test case test_09_delete_detached_volume with the bugId.

- test/integration/smoke/test_volumes.py 73c2722 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22376/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, bharat kumar

Review Request 22377: tagging the test case test_01_sys_vm_start with the bugId.

/integration/smoke/test_secondary_storage.py 481d907 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22377/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, bharat kumar

Review Request 22378: tagging the test case test_01_snapshot_root_disk with the bugId.

/integration/smoke/test_snapshots.py a960e70 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22378/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, bharat kumar

Review Request 22379: tagging the test case test_vpc_site2site_vpn with the bugId.

/integration/smoke/test_vpc_vpn.py 03826e9 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22379/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, bharat kumar

Review Request 22375: tagging the test case test_deploy_vgpu_enabled_vm with the bugId.

/integration/smoke/test_deploy_vgpu_enabled_vm.py 13fad61 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22375/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, bharat kumar

Review Request 22229: Test case failure in test_iso.py

/integration/smoke/test_iso.py a3e42f1 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, bharat kumar

[ACS 4.4] cherry-pick request for CLOUDSTACK-5077

Hi Daan, please cherry pick the following commit to 4.4 branch. commit 489bb0c7edf6ab011895d5f082328eb5fe48aac1 in cloudstack 4.4-forward branch. link to diff Cloudstack-5077: reserve cpu and memory only when vmware.reserve.cpu/mem are

Re: [ACS 4.4] cherry-pick request for CLOUDSTACK-5077

Hi Daan, updating the link to diff. https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=99b4cf788eded0f6f155ff8cda51aeb2e505f764 Thanks Bharat. On 05-May-2014, at 3:36 pm, Bharat Kumar bharat.ku...@citrix.commailto:bharat.ku...@citrix.com wrote: Hi Daan, please cherry pick

Re: Review Request 20210: List templates returns destroyed temples when copying the same template after deleting.

/cloudstack/storage/image/db/TemplateDataStoreDaoImpl.java f5140e0 server/src/com/cloud/template/HypervisorTemplateAdapter.java 963aec9 server/src/com/cloud/template/TemplateManagerImpl.java 57f7ff6 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20210/diff/ Testing --- Tested on 4.2 Thanks, bharat

Re: Review Request 15349: Overprivisoning changes needed

/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/resource/VmwareResource.java e89777d setup/db/db/schema-420to421.sql 42e9c1e Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15349/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, bharat kumar

Re: Review Request 20210: List templates returns destroyed temples when copying the same template after deleting.

--- On April 10, 2014, 3:04 p.m., bharat kumar wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20210/ --- (Updated

Re: Review Request 20210: List templates returns destroyed temples when copying the same template after deleting.

, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20210/#review40039 --- On April 10, 2014, 3:04 p.m., bharat kumar wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https

Re: Review Request 20210: List templates returns destroyed temples when copying the same template after deleting.

/cloudstack/storage/image/db/TemplateDataStoreDaoImpl.java f5140e0 server/src/com/cloud/template/HypervisorTemplateAdapter.java 963aec9 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20210/diff/ Testing --- Tested on 4.2 Thanks, bharat kumar

Review Request 20210: List templates returns destroyed temples when copying the same template after deleting.

/ObjectInDataStoreManagerImpl.java d9a5164 engine/storage/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/image/db/TemplateDataStoreDaoImpl.java f5140e0 server/src/com/cloud/template/HypervisorTemplateAdapter.java 963aec9 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20210/diff/ Testing (updated) --- Tested on 4.2 Thanks, bharat kumar

Re: [PROPOSAL][QUESTION] Map parameters in API Commands

rootdisksize was made from a parameter into a part of the details map? On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 3:12 AM, Bharat Kumar bharat.ku...@citrix.com wrote: Hi ALL, There are many other APIs that use Map like createNetworkOffering, updateZone, createTemplate, in most of the cases we do not say how to use

Re: [PROPOSAL][QUESTION] Map parameters in API Commands

to decide if we're using 'details' or rootdisksize as an api param. That's why I'm asking. On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 1:43 AM, Bharat Kumar bharat.ku...@citrix.com wrote: Hi All, the roodiskresize is no longer valid. as there is no code which is using rootdiskresize currently. As a part

Re: [PROPOSAL][QUESTION] Map parameters in API Commands

Hi ALL, There are many other APIs that use Map like createNetworkOffering, updateZone, createTemplate, in most of the cases we do not say how to use maps, one way would be to write this in the description or to use the same way to access maps of all APIs. BTW the way to use details in deploy vm

Review Request 18571: live migration is failing for vm deployed using dynaic compute offerings

/HypervisorGuruBase.java e504e81 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18571/diff/ Testing --- TESTED ON 4.3 Thanks, bharat kumar

Re: Review Request 18571: live migration is failing for vm deployed using dynaic compute offerings

/files/2014/02/27/237012ce-e1a5-4852-9a2e-93927e7e60bd__0001-CLOUDSTACK-60993-fix-migration-when-using-custom-com.patch Thanks, bharat kumar

Re: KVM memory overprovision breaking me

for system vms. On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 11:44 PM, Bharat Kumar bharat.ku...@citrix.com wrote: Hi Marcus, KSM or memory de-duplication on KVM can only be used when the memory pages are identical. IMO this is a huge constraint which is true only for specific use cases. using KSM to implement

  1   2   3   4   >