Re: Refactoring CitrixResourceBase

2016-05-19 Thread Daan Hoogland
Syed, gogogo. actually it has shrunk to 5k lines since 2012 ;) I like your initiative and initial direction. A lot of small steps to improve the blob have been taken and I would sugest to keep going in small steps. On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 9:44 PM, Tim Mackey wrote: > +1 > >

Re: jenkins pr check

2016-05-19 Thread Daan Hoogland
*|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 > w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ > > On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 7:46 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > People, > > > > I've asked several people to reopen their pr because of jenkins > > con

jenkins pr check

2016-05-19 Thread Daan Hoogland
People, I've asked several people to reopen their pr because of jenkins configuration problems. I think i found the little checkbox that needed setting now. Please do not hurry but reopen any failed PRs on jenkins problems, if you fell it wasn't in your code. don't do it all at once as builds.a.o

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Will Stevens as new Apache CloudStack VP

2016-05-19 Thread Daan Hoogland
thanks Sebastien, looking forward to a workshop on your new endevours and please have a thought for poor Will once in a while. On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Jayapal Uradi < jayapal.ur...@accelerite.com> wrote: > Congrats Will. > > Thanks, > Jayapal > > On 19-May-2016, at 1:54 pm, Rohit

Re: How to fix Jenkins git workspace issues

2016-05-19 Thread Daan Hoogland
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 7:22 AM, Rajani Karuturi wrote: > untracked ​good call Rajani, it was only doing an ordinary clean in the rat check step.​ -- Daan

Re: How to fix Jenkins git workspace issues

2016-05-18 Thread Daan Hoogland
ionHandler$RPCRequest.perform(RemoteInvocationHandler.java:608) >> > at >> > >> hudson.remoting.RemoteInvocationHandler$RPCRequest.call(RemoteInvocationHandler.java:583) >> > at >> > >> hudson.remoting.RemoteInvocationHandler$RPCRequest.c

Re: How to fix Jenkins git workspace issues

2016-05-18 Thread Daan Hoogland
m(UserRequest.java:120) > > at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:48) > > at hudson.remoting.Request$2.run(Request.java:326) > > at > > > hudson.remoting.InterceptingExecutorService$1.call(InterceptingExecutorService.java:68) > >

Re: How to fix Jenkins git workspace issues

2016-05-18 Thread Daan Hoogland
and so forth. > That > “@” symbol in a folder may break some scripts. > > Also, if the scripts that are executed were not prepared to run in > parallel, they might use the very same temp folder and files, which can > cause problems. > > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Daan Hoogl

Re: How to fix Jenkins git workspace issues

2016-05-18 Thread Daan Hoogland
It also does a mvn clean so that should not be an issue. I am thinking more along the line of parallel builds on the same node. On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Rafael Weingärtner < rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote: > Is Jenkins configure to clean the workspace before it starts a new build? >

Re: Problem enabling Intermediate SSL Certificate on Console VM

2016-05-18 Thread Daan Hoogland
Thanks for reporting back Ohzan, sorry we couldn't be of much help ;) On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Özhan Rüzgar Karaman < oruzgarkara...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi; > I solved the issue, somehow Alpha SSL has an extra space character in their > intermediate CA file. So i removed the space

Re: Juniper Build Failure

2016-05-17 Thread Daan Hoogland
I have been going past that point twice today but got stuck on it twice as well. I think juniper is having network problems ;) (had to say that but I really think it is maven central that has the problems) On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > I have

Re: old error back?

2016-05-17 Thread Daan Hoogland
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > have not tested ​I have, works!​ -- Daan

Re: old error back?

2016-05-17 Thread Daan Hoogland
ud Solutions Experts >> 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 >> w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ >> >> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> thanks, I will see in my backlog if any PR

Re: old error back?

2016-05-17 Thread Daan Hoogland
*Cloud Solutions Experts > 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 > w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ > > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Rohit, the connector installs from epel and the mysql rep

Re: old error back?

2016-05-17 Thread Daan Hoogland
Rohit, the connector installs from epel and the mysql repo does not contain the python connector. I think we are not talking about the same problem. On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am now trying 1297, for the third time today. > nex

Re: old error back?

2016-05-17 Thread Daan Hoogland
u testing against > 4.7, 4.8 or master? > > *Will STEVENS* > Lead Developer > > *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts > 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 > w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ > > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 8:26 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl..

Re: old error back?

2016-05-17 Thread Daan Hoogland
s* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts >>>>> 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 >>>>> w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Will Stevens <wstev...@cloudops.com> >>>>&

Re: old error back?

2016-05-16 Thread Daan Hoogland
he created entries=== > > *Will STEVENS* > Lead Developer > > *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts > 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 > w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ > > On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> >

Re: old error back?

2016-05-16 Thread Daan Hoogland
k with the freeze so close and I had > > working bubbles. > > > > I think the recent changes are going to help mitigate issues going > > forward, but I have not had a chance to validate yet. > > On May 16, 2016 12:27 PM, "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@gmail

Re: old error back?

2016-05-16 Thread Daan Hoogland
ue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 > w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ > > On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 8:02 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Thanks Rohit, > > > > I did try the manual install on the build host but that

Re: old error back?

2016-05-16 Thread Daan Hoogland
re-python dependency, can > you try to install that on your host system and retry rpm building. > > Regards. > > From: Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > Sent: 15 May 2016 14:34:49 > To: dev > Subject: old error b

Re: old error back?

2016-05-15 Thread Daan Hoogland
sorry, i think you meaan to read #124 On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 12:00 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > 3aa1707648f9a059bc30b71d4ad530815fcf92f5 > > On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 11:20 PM, Will Stevens <wstev...@cloudops.com> > wrote: > >>

Re: old error back?

2016-05-15 Thread Daan Hoogland
bec *|* H3J 1S6 > w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ > > On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 5:04 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > anybody else seeing this in the bubble or during rpm build? > > > > ``` > > error: Failed build dependencies: > &g

Re: Autoscaling without netscaler

2016-05-15 Thread Daan Hoogland
Adrian, I am not familiar with the autoscale functionality but are willing to help you fix it. Do you have a (marvin) definition of an environment in which the button should show but doesn't display? Can you send it or attach to a jira ticket? On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 4:56 AM, Adrian Sender

old error back?

2016-05-15 Thread Daan Hoogland
anybody else seeing this in the bubble or during rpm build? ``` error: Failed build dependencies: mysql-connector-python is needed by cloudstack-4.9.0-SNAPSHOT.el7.centos.x86_64 RPM Build Failed ``` -- Daan

Re: ACS PRs Status - 2016/05/12

2016-05-12 Thread Daan Hoogland
just resurfaced from testing 1536. I'm missing it in your list. Get sleep and maybe a weekend now and again! On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 11:02 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > ACS PRs > >- 1537 - master (ready, pending Jenkins) >- 1514 - 4.7 (pending Jenkins) >- 1520

Re: RM after 4.9

2016-05-04 Thread Daan Hoogland
Will, you are taking RM work yet another step in to our future, good work. I of course hope the next RM will make us almost forget your achievements as you are making us work to remember your predecessors (building on their work of course). On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Will Stevens

Re: [DISCUSS] Pull Requests Triage sprint

2016-05-02 Thread Daan Hoogland
great work Rohit, thanks I will go through my work, hopefully within the coming day (1 earth spin) On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > All, > > I've tried to triage all open PRs, starting from oldest to newest. Based > on my understanding, I've put

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-jdk18 #509

2016-04-28 Thread Daan Hoogland
jenk...@cloudstack.org> wrote: > >> See <http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-jdk18/509/changes> >> >> Changes: >> >> [anshul.gangwar] CLOUDSTACK-9194: Making the console popup window >> resizable in IE to >> >> [Daan Hoogland] CLOUDSTACK-

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Simon Weller

2016-04-28 Thread Daan Hoogland
welcome, kiwi. Good work and keep going. On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Nick LIVENS wrote: > Congrats Simon! > > Kind regards, > Nick Livens > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Nux! wrote: > > > Congrats! :-) > > > > -- > > Sent from the

[ANNOUNCE] Rafael Weingartner joining the PMC

2016-04-28 Thread Daan Hoogland
Guess I should have facilitated everybody's mail filters On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > People, > > The PMC has ask Rafael to join them to oversee the project and he has > gracefully accepted. Please join me in congratulati

Rafael Weingartner joining the PMC

2016-04-28 Thread Daan Hoogland
People, The PMC has ask Rafael to join them to oversee the project and he has gracefully accepted. Please join me in congratulating Rafael and wish him wisdom in his new task. ​on behalve of the PMC,​ -- Daan

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Open source distributed virtual machine scheduling platform

2016-04-26 Thread Daan Hoogland
congratulation guys On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 10:59 PM, Gabriel Beims Bräscher < gabrasc...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello CloudStack community members (@dev and @users), > > This email is meant to announce the publication of a project on Github that > provides a distributed virtual machine scheduling

Re: No module named marvin

2016-04-26 Thread Daan Hoogland
About travis. I only saw timeouts in the prepare scripts, so far. On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > Thank you for the hints re:Travis script. Will review that as well. Travis > has also been failing a lot recently though. That is another thing I

Re: No module named marvin

2016-04-25 Thread Daan Hoogland
I had this some bubbles back. the mysql connector python driver is not the stablest of packages it seems. I started a new environment in my bubble last this afternoon (your morning). I will restart one later tonight, just to see. On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 8:06 PM, Will Stevens

Re: Multithreaded Builds

2016-04-23 Thread Daan Hoogland
No Will, it was to prove you need extra hardware! On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > Haha. Awesome. :) > > This was more to validate that it was OK that I configure parallelism in my > CI environment. > On Apr 23, 2016 9:34 AM, "Ian Rae"

Re: CaaS in CloudStack with Kubernetes

2016-04-23 Thread Daan Hoogland
Nice site, Go skipbox On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Madan Ganesh Velayudham < madangan...@actonmagic.com> wrote: > +1 Sebastien; This is a great add to CloudStack. > > Congratulations to Skippbox and Shapeblue for this milestone. > > Would love to give it a real try to embrace it in AoC. > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Using framework level API argument validation

2016-04-21 Thread Daan Hoogland
checked out the code, looks good Rohit. It will give us a handle to keep the API from becoming even more inconsistent, and maybe even improve. On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 1:07 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > All, > > Whenever we've to write new APIs, we end up putting a lot of

Re: ACS Testing

2016-04-20 Thread Daan Hoogland
I think we want to test both, but we will have to consider and judge each test on it's own merits. We can start a run with everything from both directories as a parallel track and then see what to do with the failing ones. On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 11:52 PM, Will Stevens

Re: [DISCUSS] Network offerings for Isolated Networks / VPCs

2016-04-20 Thread Daan Hoogland
that came out wrong, I mean You are right! On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > thanks Will, That is a bummer and a discouragement. > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Will Stevens <williamstev...@gmail.com> > wrote: > &g

Re: [DISCUSS] Network offerings for Isolated Networks / VPCs

2016-04-20 Thread Daan Hoogland
thanks Will, That is a bummer and a discouragement. On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Will Stevens <williamstev...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ws: Inline > > On Apr 20, 2016 8:24 AM, "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 20,

Re: [DISCUSS] Emeritus Committer Status

2016-04-20 Thread Daan Hoogland
at some explicitly requests the status. > > Thanks, > -John > > > > Regards, > > John Burwell > > john.burw...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London VA WC2N 4HSUK > @shapeblue > On Apr 20, 2016, at 8:01 AM, Daan Hoog

Re: [DISCUSS] Network offerings for Isolated Networks / VPCs

2016-04-20 Thread Daan Hoogland
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > I'm not sure that is a good idea. There are a LOT of implications with this > idea. > > For example, many hardware appliances can not handle overlapping ip space > between networks. Because of this they can't be

Re: [DISCUSS] Emeritus Committer Status

2016-04-20 Thread Daan Hoogland
Guys, one thing is to ping their apache known forwarding address if we suspect they are no longer active. Some might have still addresses of former employers listed and those are emeritus when found, if I may have that opinion.

Re: [QUESTION] ACS 4.8 Centos 7 ARM / Raspberry PI B 2 with Intel KVM hypervisor

2016-04-20 Thread Daan Hoogland
H Patrick, nobody is answerring but I know they have, Not to start off with as you intent to, though. Let us know. On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 6:25 PM, Patrick Miller < patrick.mil...@sungardas.com> wrote: > I built ACS 4.8 on Centos 7 ARM on a Raspberry PI B 2. With ACS 4.8 built > on a Centos 7

anybody doing load testing?

2016-04-19 Thread Daan Hoogland
I will go to a talk this evening about http://gatling.io/ Is there anybody busy testing cloudstack this way? What tools are you using? ​nice to hear,​ -- Daan

Re: [discuss] CloudStack logging

2016-04-15 Thread Daan Hoogland
Paul, I think that asking for input is a good approach. Those that have problem with a certain log message or - sequence are the best to say what should be different. Whether we should make hundreds of PRs or one?.. neither. I would say change anything from a big class to a small package, or get

Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [CLOUDSTACK-9003] Resource Naming Policie...

2016-04-14 Thread Daan Hoogland
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 4:14 PM, ProjectMoon wrote: > Github user ProjectMoon commented on the pull request: > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1492#issuecomment-209963503 > > @DaanHoogland Do you have any kind of integration tests in mind? > ​I could

Re: [discuss] CloudStack logging

2016-04-14 Thread Daan Hoogland
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > Is there an easy way to do that Daan, or is it a tedious task you just have > to power through? > ​It is hard work, mostly tedious, sometimes hilarious and most definitely ​ ​devops!​ It certainly wouldn't classify

Re: Feature proposal: Resource naming policies

2016-04-14 Thread Daan Hoogland
sounds usefull for companies that for instance want to enforce uuid in name or include some user string in it, same would be true for networks. look forward to your design. On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Jeff Hair wrote: > Yesterday, we submitted this pull request: >

Re: [discuss] CloudStack logging

2016-04-14 Thread Daan Hoogland
I largely agree with just one sneer to the operators amongst us: the level can be set on a per package and even class basis. So you can work through disabling anoying logging step by step. Makes sense to keep looking at the source in the meanwhile to make sure sensible diagnostics remains

Re: Strange XenServer SR behavior when deploying system VMs in Basic Zone on 4.9

2016-04-14 Thread Daan Hoogland
Mike, did the iso copy process not complete as expected. Sound like they are a remanence of some task ending in an exception. Probably a silently ignored one ;| On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Tutkowski, Mike wrote: > Just an FYI, but when I kicked off my first VM in

instances in test vpc without router

2016-04-12 Thread Daan Hoogland
@swill and @remibergsma I saw this in the test ``` [dahn@blimbing ~]$ for i in 1 2 ; do ssh kvm$i virsh list; done Warning: Permanently added 'kvm1,192.168.22.21' (ECDSA) to the list of known hosts. IdName State

Re: Introduction

2016-04-08 Thread Daan Hoogland
> 'new > ​***' > ​very welcome Rashmi, I hope you will feel comfortable in our snug little community.​ -- Daan

Volunteers wanted: Masters Thesis on False Alarms in Test Failures

2016-04-08 Thread Daan Hoogland
lling to categorise a couple of issues. A few > issues per week per person will come a long way :) > > Regards, > Kevin > > > On 07 Apr 2016, at 20:56, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Kevin, what you intent to do sound promising. I think yo

Re: PRs for 4.9 Release

2016-04-07 Thread Daan Hoogland
rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 > > w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ > > > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> yes, makes perfect sense. I skipped 1326 for now, I just tried to build

Re: Masters Thesis on False Alarms in Test Failures

2016-04-07 Thread Daan Hoogland
Kevin, what you intent to do sound promising. I think you are on your own in collecting data but by the sound of it you allready have a list of 110 name/question pairs, do you? If not, how do you intent to do the collection of the data you require? On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Kevin van den

Re: PRs for 4.9 Release

2016-04-07 Thread Daan Hoogland
ged outside the test, I always run the full suite. > Make > > sense? > > > > *Will STEVENS* > > Lead Developer > > > > *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts > > 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 > > w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ > &

Re: PRs for 4.9 Release

2016-04-07 Thread Daan Hoogland
idating the tests at source makes sense. > :) > > *Will STEVENS* > Lead Developer > > *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts > 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 > w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Daan Hoogland <da

Re: PRs for 4.9 Release

2016-04-07 Thread Daan Hoogland
1326 is just a test. it does not touch production code. Do we run regression tests against such PRs. seems a waste to me. On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 7:27 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 7:26 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>

Re: PRs for 4.9 Release

2016-04-07 Thread Daan Hoogland
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 7:26 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > 1326 - master (*pending CI) ​starting​ -- Daan

Re: PRs for 4.9 Release

2016-04-07 Thread Daan Hoogland
*|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 > w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > will, Fred Neubauer just helped me finalize my test environment on a > fedora > > laptop. I will be chipping away at

Re: PRs for 4.9 Release

2016-04-07 Thread Daan Hoogland
will, Fred Neubauer just helped me finalize my test environment on a fedora laptop. I will be chipping away at the pile as well. hopefully at a rate of one per day. I would like your directions as to which I can pick. of course I can go my own way but double work is a shame. On Thu, Apr 7, 2016

Re: [ACP Doctor] What is it?

2016-04-07 Thread Daan Hoogland
except that there is no link on that page to the scripts On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 6:32 AM, ilya wrote: > Wow, a whole one page site dedicated to this endeavor :) > > On 4/6/16 9:22 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > > FYI, It does still seem to be freely available:

Re: Jenkins on PRs

2016-04-06 Thread Daan Hoogland
strangely the timeout wasn't reached on those jobs. I upped the timeout anyway. let's see what happens. On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > you are right, there are three of those in the preserved history. I will > look at the timeout c

Re: Jenkins on PRs

2016-04-06 Thread Daan Hoogland
uebec *|* H3J 1S6 > w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I've seen this one before: > > > > Tests in error: > > SecondaryStorageManagerTest.getDefaultNetworkForAdvancedN

Re: Jenkins on PRs

2016-04-06 Thread Daan Hoogland
. On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 10:13 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > looking at the history in [1] this is not true. most are succeeding. > > > [1] https://builds.apache.org/view/All/job/cloudstack-pr-analysis/ > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 8:40 PM, W

Re: Jenkins on PRs

2016-04-06 Thread Daan Hoogland
looking at the history in [1] this is not true. most are succeeding. [1] https://builds.apache.org/view/All/job/cloudstack-pr-analysis/ On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 8:40 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > Hey All, > Anyone know what is going on with Jenkins? It seems to be failing

Re: GPG signing commits on Github

2016-04-06 Thread Daan Hoogland
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 6:58 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > but we have to work with the ASF ​so we can not go there tomorrow but maybe the day after. Both we and the foundation​ want signed commits so in the end we can be using github for this as well. As long as there is no

Re: GPG signing commits on Github

2016-04-06 Thread Daan Hoogland
r 6, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> hm, no ;) We can control access to the organisation right? so we can >> close it for committers that don't have a valid key. We just need to think >> of a procedure for checking and

Re: GPG signing commits on Github

2016-04-06 Thread Daan Hoogland
rts > 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 > w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Rafael Weingärtner < > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I agree with Daan. > > > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Daan H

Re: Cwiki access

2016-04-06 Thread Daan Hoogland
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Kris Sterckx wrote: > krissterckx ​is in​ -- Daan

Re: GPG signing commits on Github

2016-04-06 Thread Daan Hoogland
there. I think there are more >> moving >> > parts here than meet the eye, but we can definitely continue the >> discussion >> > and see where it can lead. >> > >> > *Will STEVENS* >> > Lead Developer >> > >> > *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Soluti

Re: GPG signing commits on Github

2016-04-06 Thread Daan Hoogland
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl> wrote: > > > Op 6 april 2016 om 10:50 schreef Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com > >: > > > > > > Good reading for the Wednesday morning;) yes I think we need to go there >

Re: GPG signing commits on Github

2016-04-06 Thread Daan Hoogland
Good reading for the Wednesday morning;) yes I think we need to go there and maybe even ask it of our contributors. On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > Hi, > > Github just added [0] support for verifying GPG signatures of Git commits > to the > web

jenkins restart

2016-04-05 Thread Daan Hoogland
sorry for not giving prior notice. I am updating plugins on jenkins.buildacloud.org. It will restart. -- Daan

Re: [QUESTION] baremetal router

2016-04-05 Thread Daan Hoogland
an also initiate this agent on VR from management server using > sshCmdHelper just before deploying the baremetal instance. > > Regards, > Harikrishna > > > On 30-Mar-2016, at 5:26 pm, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > People, > > &g

monday morning reading

2016-04-04 Thread Daan Hoogland
H, for those interested in how we get to improve, here is something I stumbled upon on reddit [1] I must admit I think most of us are already working as described but still,... it touches on some of the pitfalls we have been tripping in as a project as well. ​[1] :

Re: Permissions issues on cwiki with my login credentials

2016-04-01 Thread Daan Hoogland
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 7:50 AM, Shweta Agarwal < shweta.agarw...@accelerite.com> wrote: > shwetaag ​is added​ -- Daan

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-rat-master #7108

2016-03-31 Thread Daan Hoogland
Rafael, I think you need to ask infra. On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 11:21 PM, Rafael Weingärtner < rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote: > Could someone with access to those VMs check the problem? > It seems that there is an envrioment misconfiguraiton > > -- Forwarded message -- >

[QUESTION] baremetal router

2016-03-30 Thread Daan Hoogland
People, in the following code the baremetal-vr.py configuration script is started unconditionally, this means it will be started on ssvm and cpvm as well. but also on virtual routervms; CMDLINE=$(cat /var/cache/cloud/cmdline) router=$(echo "$CMDLINE" | grep -o type=router) vpcrouter=$(echo

Re: [SSL CERTS] Importing ROOT and INTERMEDIATE certs for SSVM

2016-03-29 Thread Daan Hoogland
Ilya, to my knowledge the certificate won't be saved on file. It will be loaded from the command coming from the MS in the agent directly. Why are you looking to update the ssvm? I thought these are only used in the consoleproxy. On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 12:17 AM, ilya

Re: [DISCUSS] Request for comments: Dynamic Role Based API Access Checker for CloudStack

2016-03-25 Thread Daan Hoogland
to nail down the edges around upgrade process. > I'm also investing a lot of time of marvin tests to ensure high quality > delivery of this feature. > > Regards. > > Regards, > > Rohit Yadav > > rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > 53 Chandos Place, Covent

Re: [DISCUSS] Request for comments: Dynamic Role Based API Access Checker for CloudStack

2016-03-25 Thread Daan Hoogland
Rohit, I had a first glance and it looks promising; +1 You have been thourough on the fs. One question that comes to mind is whatever happened to the role base access That Min and Pradhi(not sure if I remeber her name correctly) where implementing for 4.4. It failed then because the work was

Re: introduction

2016-03-23 Thread Daan Hoogland
welcome back Murali, good luck. On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Murali Reddy wrote: > All, > > Just wanted to let the community know that I have decided to work on > Apache CloudStack again. I have taken up a position at ShapeBlue, so you > will be seeing me around

Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8958: release dedicated ip ran...

2016-03-22 Thread Daan Hoogland
Bharat et al, >From this report, I find it difficult to get a feel for the quality of the pr. Clearly some of the failures are not related to this PR but are some related? Can you give some guidance as to how to read the report? Biligual auto correct use. Read at your own risico Op 22 mrt.

Re: [VOTE] Move 'apache/cloudstack' -> 'apache-cloudstack/cloudstack'

2016-03-21 Thread Daan Hoogland
Makes sense Shane if we can have that role shared amongst several people of the PMC, not just one as you suggest. On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 2:41 AM, Shane Curcuru wrote: > Will Stevens wrote earlier: > ... snip... > > *Proposal:* > > Transfer ownership of the

Re: Issue: CLOUDSTACK-9255 Unable to start VM DomainRouter due to error in finalizeStart

2016-03-19 Thread Daan Hoogland
Boris closed it, @Boris why? On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Remi Bergsma wrote: > Hi, > > This issue has been resolved some time ago but unfortunately the PR hasn’t > been merged nor tested yet. > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1400 > > This PR

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

2016-03-19 Thread Daan Hoogland
But for the record, yes, there was the impression > and (mis)understanding that "moving" to GH was indeed what > was desired and "demanded". > > My post was in direct response to Sebastien's query, as was hopefully > indicated by including that paragraph in my p

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

2016-03-19 Thread Daan Hoogland
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > On Mar 19, 2016, at 2:12 PM, sebgoa wrote: > > > > > > Personally I have always thought that this is a very serious issue and > trend in open source projects and that ASF (and the board in

Re: External fork of Cloudstack

2016-03-19 Thread Daan Hoogland
conversation and will likely > change based on this outcome. I think we should put that org on ice for the > time being. > On Mar 19, 2016 9:59 AM, "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Will Stevens <williamstev..

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

2016-03-19 Thread Daan Hoogland
ideas/questions? ​let's discuss or better,​ Reading this back I can see how this can be interpreted in several ways, I'm sorry. [1] http://markmail.org/message/pca3j6vzojik2xyd On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 9:50

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

2016-03-19 Thread Daan Hoogland
Thanks for the explanation Sam, I have to ask for your patience with me as there is one remark in there that leaves me confused; Don't feel obligated to answer in length but please confirm or negate my suspicion On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: ​...​ >

Re: github organisation cloudstack

2016-03-19 Thread Daan Hoogland
Will, On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 7:03 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > Please be advised this conversation is continuing in a thread titled: Re: > External fork of Cloudstack > > Mailing list link: > >

Re: External fork of Cloudstack

2016-03-19 Thread Daan Hoogland
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > I see you found the vote thread. Thanks for voting. :) > > For now I think it is best that we try to avoid using the cloudstack org > for anything in order to mitigate confusion and try to get everyone on the > same

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

2016-03-19 Thread Daan Hoogland
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > That sounds like a cop-out to me related to what's really going > on. > ​Jim, I am not a native english speaker and this remark has no meaning to me. It sounds somewhat hostile, can you explain what you mean? ​ --

Re: External fork of Cloudstack

2016-03-19 Thread Daan Hoogland
Hm, Will let's use a vote thread for voting. My brain is old and rigid and needs the clarity of it. Just to be clear, are we keeping the cloudstack organisation for experimenting and we do the move to apache-cloudstack? I am not sure if github has a policy on naming of organisations so It would be

Re: [VOTE] Move 'apache/cloudstack' -> 'apache-cloudstack/cloudstack'

2016-03-19 Thread Daan Hoogland
+1 (binding as I saw others mention that. I doubt this is of any concern in such a technical decision) On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > Thank you for this information, this is very helpful. > On Mar 19, 2016 5:29 AM, "Rene Moser"

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

2016-03-19 Thread Daan Hoogland
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 4:37 AM, Will Stevens wrote: > I may be thinking too far outside the box, but hear me out as this is > likely the best way to satisfy everyone's requirements. > > Recap: The community needs additional github permissions in order to > integrate CI in

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

2016-03-19 Thread Daan Hoogland
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:51 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote: > As to forks being against Apache > policy, forks are not, however forks that use the Apache e.g., > namespace, that have the Apache logo, that use the Apache name for > the project *are* against Apache policy. If it’s

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >