Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

was indeed what was desired and "demanded". My post was in direct response to Sebastien's query, as was hopefully indicated by including that paragraph in my post. > On Mar 19, 2016, at 3:09 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 19

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

> On Mar 19, 2016, at 2:12 PM, sebgoa wrote: > > > Personally I have always thought that this is a very serious issue and trend > in open source projects and that ASF (and the board in particular) should try > to proactively address. What is the future of ASF in a GitHub

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

That sounds like a cop-out to me related to what's really going on. > On Mar 17, 2016, at 12:03 PM, Tutkowski, Mike > wrote: > > As far as I understand, cloudstack/cloudstack is only being proposed to help > with developer workflow and CI. > > To my understanding,