[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1815: Fix docker image build for cloudstack-management

Github user sebgoa commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1815 LGTM but really the database should be outside the mgt server container and we should not be using supervisord. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email

Re: Migrating CloudStack content from download.cloud.com

> On Mar 30, 2016, at 7:36 AM, Raja Pullela wrote: > > Just to summarize... and to close this thread for now, > > 1) short term - we will move the content to cloudstack.apt-get.eu > 2) long term - can someone from PMC or Cloudstack Apache Infra help find out >

Re: External fork of Cloudstack

> > What would you be able to do if the git-dual experiment were expanded to > CloudStack that you couldn't do with the proposal above? I suggest that you > take full advantage of the fact that people are now listening. > Thanks for chiming in Sam, Could you give us a summary of the Whimsy

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

> On Mar 17, 2016, at 6:15 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:51 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote: > >> As to forks being against Apache >> policy, forks are not, however forks that use the Apache e.g., >> namespace, that have the

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

> On Mar 19, 2016, at 3:59 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > > The initial action (creating the fork) was not clearly done by the PMC > as a whole, that is now being rectified by a retroactive vote being > taken. Even that I wouldn't suggest be done any differently: many > parts of

Re: [VOTE] Move 'apache/cloudstack' -> 'apache-cloudstack/cloudstack'

+1 Note: ——— To be honest I never contemplated this move. Somehow it never occurred to me as a possibility. But if the board and infra would let use move the mirror of the apache canonical repo to apache-cloudstack/cloudstack then I think we would be all set. > On Mar 19, 2016, at 5:14 PM,

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

> On Mar 17, 2016, at 5:16 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) > wrote: > > Hi Mike, > > Thank you. What you describe effectively below is going to > implicitly switch the “canonical” repo in my opinion of the > > repository to cloudstack/cloudstack. Merges that

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

> On Mar 17, 2016, at 3:07 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote: > > Hi Sebastien, > > Thanks for your reply and yes, I am a member of the ASF board. > > The thing is, there was already some discussion of this at the > ASF board meeting that happened yesterday. I can tell you that >

Re: External fork of Cloudstack

> On Mar 18, 2016, at 6:30 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > > > I'm more concerned that the page is indistinguishable from a fork, and > gives no indication of official status. That may be OK for a work in > progress, but isn't ideal as a final solution. I'll share that I've >

Re: ACS CI BVT RUN: xenserver: Pr_number: 1417

Bharat, that’s great, thanks for this But… Since this is the first results like this sent to the list, can you explain what we are looking at. What hardware this is running on, what configuration of cloudstack… And I very much would like for these results to be sent as comments to the PR

Re: [Proposal] Concerning open PRs

> On Feb 18, 2016, at 8:38 AM, Wilder Rodrigues > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > It’s been a long time, but the Wolverine is not dead yet. ;) > > Currently we have 175 opened PRs, which we all agree to be a lot, given the > fact that few people, if any, are

Re: disable github notifications ?

not the > intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon > its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you > believe you have received this email in error. > > > -Original Message- > From: sebgoa [

disable github notifications ?

Hi folks, Shall we disable github notifications to dev@ ? It has become quite noisy. On the other end you see all the comments fly by... -sebastien

Re: [DISCUSS] Move to Github

On Jan 11, 2016, at 10:51 AM, Rene Moser wrote: > Hi Sebastien > > On 01/11/2016 09:53 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: >> Part 3: >> >> >> To me the main issue for us is that our current privileges on GitHub prevent >> us from building more productive CI workflow and

Re: Minor releases!

On Jan 7, 2016, at 5:27 PM, Remi Bergsma wrote: > > On 07/01/16 17:22, "Rene Moser" wrote: >> No, it is not the pace. You can do as many major as often as you want >> but if one uses this major, how long will it get minors? We have no clue. >>

Re: Minor releases!

see inline On Jan 7, 2016, at 3:39 PM, Nux! wrote: > Hi, > > >> So, yes, monthly releases can be done and the quality is better than before. >> Actually, I think we should go much faster. Whenever a PR is merged that >> fixes >> your issue, it should be possible to deploy it

Re: BVT Report for the week of 1/5

On Jan 5, 2016, at 11:13 AM, Raja Pullela wrote: > Happy New Year to all! > > Please see the BVT report > KVM Basic - 97.1% > XS Basic - 94.0% > KVM Adv - 85.8% - action item on me to add configurations for the new tests > to run > XS Adv - 79.1% - action item on me

4.7 release notes

There are no release notes for 4.7 …? I merged the new docs and website, but the link for RN break.

[DISCUSS] Move to Github

Hi folks, Apologies for a week end email couple days before christmas, but this needs to get out. Late October I started thread [1] about moving our repo to GitHub, I would like to re-open this discussion. Now that we have stabilized master and release 4.6.0, 4.6.1, 4.6.2 and 4.7.0 we need

Re: 4.7.0 vote passed -> freeze is over

Releases branches should only be written to by RMs. On Dec 18, 2015, at 11:22 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Committers, please keep in mind our quality standards when executing your > liberty to merge. > > -- > Daan

Re: 4.7.0 vote passed -> freeze is over

On Dec 18, 2015, at 11:44 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sebastien, > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 11:36 AM, sebgoa <run...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Releases branches should only be written to by RMs. >> > ​Knowing how you feel abou

Re: Feedback of my Phd work in Cloudstack Project

On Dec 10, 2015, at 12:31 AM, Igor Wiese wrote: > Hi, Cloudstack Community. > > My name is Igor Wiese, phd Student from Brazil. In my research, I am > investigating two important questions: What makes two files change > together? Can we predict when they are going to

Re: Feature freeze ACS 4.7 next Monday

Hate to be a pain, but could you make sure to keep the exact list of Features merged, so that the Release notes are accurate ? thanks On Dec 4, 2015, at 11:58 PM, Remi Bergsma wrote: > Hi all, > > Next Monday we'll feature freeze for our upcoming 4.7 release. We

Re: Feature freeze ACS 4.7 next Monday

tes that describe *all* the features added. Check the 4.6 release notes, I am sure we did more than this, but since dev more often than not don't care much about the RN, the features are not publicized. > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 8:55 AM, sebgoa <run...@gmail.com> wrote: > &g

Re: Feature freeze ACS 4.7 next Monday

we make a script that gets this output and queries Github, we can get a > list of the PR titles. Then we need to make sure those titles are any good ;-) > > > Regards, > Remi > > > > > On 07/12/15 10:13, "sebgoa" <run...@gmail.com> wrote: >

Re: What SDN are you using?

On Nov 29, 2015, at 8:19 PM, Simon Weller wrote: > Nux, > > The two most deployed SDN solutions are Vmware NSX-MH (Nicara) and Nuage VSP > (Alcatel-Lucent). Neither are cheap! > We've been evaluating whether we're going to run a POC on Nuage, as it does > have some very

Re: Package Repositories

Hi folks, we need to resolve this. 1-But I have to start with one comment: Apache open office releases binaries, users don't compile from source. So it is possible within ASF to officially release binaries. 2-We have several initiatives around repos, apt-get.eu (Wido), shapeblue repos, Nux

Re: Package Repositories

On Nov 30, 2015, at 4:39 PM, Nux! wrote: > BTW, if these bits are "no redistribute", why are we distributing them? This is really a case of evolution and expectation. When Wido started this, these pkgs were not sanctioned by the *project*, hence non-official release pkgs and

Re: Package Repositories

bastien > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote: > > > +1 your categories. > > > > Also +1 for the unified thing under cloudstack.apache.org domain. > > > > -- > > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technolo

Re: Package Repositories

On Nov 30, 2015, at 11:28 AM, Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > >> On 30-Nov-2015, at 3:38 PM, sebgoa <run...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> - source >> - community repo >> - 3-rd party repo >> >> I am +1 with this, why ? &g

Re: 4.7 status update

On Nov 27, 2015, at 7:23 PM, Remi Bergsma wrote: > Hi all, > > The next version of Apache CloudStack will be built on top of 4.6 and > released from the stable master branch. In the past weeks we’ve added several > PRs on master with new features: > > *

Re: [NOTICE] people.apache.org web space is moving to home.apache.org

ot;http://people.apache.org/~sanjeev/CentOS5.3-x86_64.ova; >> >> " >> http://people.apache.org/~sanjeev/eec2209b-9875-3c8d-92be-c001bd8a0faf.qcow2.bz2 >> " >> >> "url": "http://people.apache.org/~sanjeev/CentOS-6.3-x86_64-bin-DVD1.iso; &

Re: Package Repositories

On Nov 26, 2015, at 7:52 AM, John Burwell wrote: > All, > > A conversation emerged on a PR [1] regarding how package repositories should > listed on the downloads page [2]. This PR was prompted by a change on the > page which removed reference to the ShapeBlue

main docs not on 4.6

looking at this: http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/latest/# it's still on 4.5 there are no changes to it for 4.6, but it's confusing because there is no 4.6 tag, …..and a 4.5 ref in the header…

Re: [NOTICE] people.apache.org web space is moving to home.apache.org

On Nov 25, 2015, at 2:07 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > are those refs expecting particular content returned? (it will be > redirected) > the way I read the email, it will be redirected but would give a 404 if you don't move the data yourself :) > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

On Nov 7, 2015, at 2:33 PM, Remi Bergsma wrote: > As requested by Boris, I’ll extend the vote until the end of today CET > (instead of 4pm CET), that’s 8 extra hours. > > Anyone else actively testing? I was waiting for Pierre Luc to push the RC to docker hub to

Re: BVT report - 10/22

I presume simulator runs are still 100% ? On Oct 22, 2015, at 4:01 PM, Raja Pullela wrote: > Hi, > > Following is the latest BVT report - 10/22 > Xen Basic : 94.0% > KVM Basic: 97.1% - glad to see the reboot ssvm/cpvm are fixed > Xen Adv: 91.9% - test_internal_lb and

Re: BVT report 10/1

n, Yes, I trying to debug all the KVM issues currently - but not able > to root cause what the issue is? > > Can anyone please run these tests on a KVM setup and report if it is > working/not working for you? > > Thanks, > Raja > > -Original Mes

Re: BVT report 10/1

Raja, Is anyone on your side looking at those test_ssvm failures ? On Oct 1, 2015, at 1:20 PM, Raja Pullela wrote: > Blockers - as open in ACS JIRA: > > - CloudStack-8927 / > > - CloudStack-8924 / Test case failure. Waiting for PR-900/902 to be >

Re: test_nicira_controller.py is failing on all Advzone - XS, KVM

I am not aware of anyone except Schuberg that uses the nicira (NSX) cloudstack integration. And since Miguel wrote the test, I am comfortable doing what he suggests and not run it as part of the standard tests for a release. -sebastien On Oct 1, 2015, at 12:57 PM, Miguel Ferreira

[DOCS] Remove all docbook reference

Doc folks, I removed all docbook references in: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs If we need we can always get back to a previous commit... -Sebastien

[CCC] Docker Challenge, Raspberry Pi to win.

Hi folks (apologies for cross-posting), I am running out of time to do it myself so I would like to issue everyone a challenge. Create a docker-compose file that: * Starts the mgt server in a container * Starts a mysql container to act as mgt server db * Starts the usage server in a container

Re: Blameless post mortem

Remi, thanks for the detailed post-mortem, it's a good read and great learning. I hope everyone reads it. The one thing to emphasize is that we now have a very visible way to get code into master, we have folks investing time to provide review (great), we need the submitters to make due

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack EC2stack 0.8.0

Hi all, After 72 hours, the vote for CloudStack EC2stack 0.8.0 *passes* with 4 PMC + 1 votes +1 (PMC / binding) * Rajani * Rohit * Sebastien (implicit) * David Thanks to everyone participating. I will now prepare the release announcement to go out after 24 hours to give the mirrors time to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack EC2stack 0.8.0

On Sep 1, 2015, at 9:17 AM, Rajani Karuturi wrote: > Where did you give cloudstack apikey and secret? > Did you give AWS keys both at AWS configure and ec2-register? yes you need to do both… $ aws configure ….> give your keys $ ec2stack-register ….> give your keys

[EVENT] CCC Dublin Oct 8-9

CloudStack collab Dublin Oct 8-9 is coming up fast, http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/cloudstack-collaboration-conference-europe Register for this exciting event. See you all there, Cheers, -Sebastien

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack EC2stack 0.8.0

to the cloudstack docker hub account rather than the runseb account, but don't think it's a blocker for release missed that, now fixed. --David On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 5:25 AM, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, I've created a 0.8.0 release of EC2stack, with the following artifacts up

[VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack EC2stack 0.8.0

Hi All, I've created a 0.8.0 release of EC2stack, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-ec2stack.git Commit: a61d7c01129dfe4c31515a48e0f6b4a53436c208 There are no code changes from the time the code was

Re: review wanted

On Aug 25, 2015, at 12:41 AM, Rafael Weingärtner rafaelweingart...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Daan, I think that we should do a proper introduction. It might seem kind of odd to some people that a bunch of folks suddenly started working for free. Our first PR was done a while ago:

Re: Release EC2stack 1.0.0

think we had coveralls at one point and that fury thing…not sure what that is. On Wednesday, August 12, 2015, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote: On Aug 12, 2015, at 12:31 PM, sebgoa run...@gmail.com javascript:; wrote: Hi folks, I am working towards making a release of EC2stack. Since

Re: Release EC2stack 1.0.0

On Aug 12, 2015, at 12:31 PM, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote: Hi folks, I am working towards making a release of EC2stack. Since it was given to our project we have not made an official release. I just added a few documentation files, added license headers, notice files, copied over

Re: Ec2stack not working with current aws cli

On Aug 10, 2015, at 11:25 PM, Carlos Reátegui car...@reategui.com wrote: Can you make a PR that updates the README with this config option… Done. thanks merged thanks On Aug 6, 2015, at 3:07 AM, Carlos Reategui create...@gmail.com wrote: BTW I figured out how to force the

Re: [BLOCKER][4.6] New AWS SDK in master breaks S3 uploads

On Jul 17, 2015, at 10:53 AM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote: Hi, Issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8640 I encountered this by using the AWS SDK under 4.5 (homebrew). 4.5 uses the 1.3.22 SDK, but master uses 1.9.8 and that breaks S3 uploads. AWS SDK

Re: [Discuss] separate ML for PR and build notification?

On Jul 13, 2015, at 12:55 PM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 13-07-15 10:11, Rene Moser wrote: Hey Since we rebuild our communication stack (slack, irc, ML, ...) I would bring up some discussion about the noise in the dev

Re: [DISCUSS] Release principles for Apache CloudStack

Finally read the thread, It seems to me that a way forward is to have Remi and Rajani RM 4.6 (which is currently master). The two of them can discuss and start RMing 4.6 (PR merge etc) and then we can iterate on the wiki release scenario. @Remi @Rajani, would that work for you and you ready

Re: Introducing Boris Schrijver

On Jul 8, 2015, at 5:08 PM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote: Hi all, As you might know, we at PCextreme are using CloudStack for our public cloud offering and have been looking for a CloudStack dev for a long time. We found one; so let me introduce Boris Schrijver. Boris will

Re: [PROPOSAL] Commit to master through PR only

On Jul 3, 2015, at 12:01 PM, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi John, If you look at the discrete operations wearing a hat of a Project Manager, you won’t care… neither would I. However, from a Software Engineer perspective, as much as the other people contributing

Re: [ACS4.5] status

On Jul 7, 2015, at 8:17 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: I haven't heard of this in a few days. Does anyone keep track of 4.5 releasebility at the moment? I would like to move on to 4.6:) So can we make a release candidate for 4.5.2 yet? if you think it needs to be done, just

Re: resource leaks exception to the 2LGTM rule

On Jul 7, 2015, at 12:10 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: I will not do it in one commit, if we insist on a PR i will do 73 commits in one PR. are you automating those commits ? I would not mind scanning through them and giving green light. and in that case squash might be

Re: IRC and Slack

to be admin, just ping me. Regards, Remi On 3 jul. 2015, at 10:10, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 9:27 AM, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote: Some great ideas in there. I am +1 for: -consolidate #cloudstack-dev and #cloudstack -move bots to #cloudstack

Re: [DISCUSS] LTS releases?

On Jul 2, 2015, at 4:58 PM, Remi Bergsma r...@remi.nl wrote: Bug fixing in older releases is actually a lot of work. For security related issues we could maybe do it. Personally, I prefer to have a fast release cycle and smooth (tested) upgrade paths over 2-year LTS release cycle. It's

Re: IRC and Slack

Some great ideas in there. I am +1 for: -consolidate #cloudstack-dev and #cloudstack -move bots to #cloudstack-announce -Remi's idea to publish slack message to #cloudstack (and vice versa). -the idea to use something like discourse or stack overflow etc… Somebody wants to take this on :) On

Re: [DISCUSS] Release principles for Apache CloudStack

On Jul 3, 2015, at 9:06 AM, Raja Pullela raja.pull...@citrix.com wrote: Remi, couple of questions on the branching part - when we take the Feature PR and Feature is back in Master, feel like we are potentially destabilizing Master ? I know, currently we push changes to master even

Re: IRC and Slack

terbol...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 9:27 AM, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote: Some great ideas in there. I am +1 for: -consolidate #cloudstack-dev and #cloudstack -move bots to #cloudstack-announce -Remi's idea to publish slack message to #cloudstack (and vice versa

Re: [PROPOSAL] Commit to master through PR only

On Jul 2, 2015, at 8:43 AM, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Sateesh and Rajesh, It seems you were the only guys who +1 the squash idea. Could you please share with us what benefits you think squashing commits will bring? I wil give you the simplest example that

Re: [DISCUSS] LTS releases?

On Jul 3, 2015, at 11:13 AM, Rene Moser m...@renemoser.net wrote: Sebastien, So wouldn't it be nice to make clear which release is still supported and which release is not? On 03.07.2015 09:20, sebgoa wrote: I think we got in a situation with 4.4 that called for us to keep

Re: [PROPOSAL] Quota management service for cloudstack

On Jun 26, 2015, at 1:32 PM, Abhinandan Prateek abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com wrote: Team, Would like to enhance usage server to provide quota management service to cloudstack. This will provide better control on resource usage; and a common denomination to measure resource usage.

Re: [PROPOSAL] Commit to master through PR only

? Cheers, Wilder On 29 Jun 2015, at 11:27, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote: Ok we are on, Starting today, commit to master through PR only. 2 LGTM needed for merge. If Travis fails, we can still merge given a good explanation of why (since travis has issues once in a while). I will keep

Roadmap

Hi, A note to everyone about the roadmap. We need to get going on this, add description to items already there, link to JIRA and offer to contribute: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Roadmap Please chime in, thanks, -sebastien

Re: [PROPOSAL] Commit to master through PR only

Ok we are on, Starting today, commit to master through PR only. 2 LGTM needed for merge. If Travis fails, we can still merge given a good explanation of why (since travis has issues once in a while). I will keep an eye on commit, at least once a day, and ping the list if I see a commit that

Re: 4.6

from anyone welcome and let the discussions happen on whether to merge or not…no frustration. Thanks, -John From: sebgoa run...@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 6:33 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: 4.6 On Jun 8, 2015

Re: 4.6

mentioned this feature, I am hoping he can comment soon on it. -sebastien On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 2:28 PM, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote: On Jun 22, 2015, at 2:21 PM, Rafael Fonseca rsafons...@gmail.com wrote: Hi guys, I plan on getting started on dissecting the embedded Tomcat/Jetty

Re: CloudStack Ansible Role

On Jun 17, 2015, at 10:18 PM, Milamber milam...@apache.org wrote: Hello, Great idea. I can help. I already created a playbook for CS+Ubuntu+KVM https://github.com/milamberspace/ansible-cloudstack-ubuntu-aio Some parts can be got from this playbook. Milamber You (rene) Milamber

Re: devopsdays amsterdam

I am coming over. On Jun 17, 2015, at 1:54 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: H, Who are going, next week? -- Daan

Re: Third party VR / L2 support

On Jun 12, 2015, at 11:13 AM, Christian christ...@bt.net wrote: Thank you all for your views and comments. I agree with everything said when it is positioned under today’s business-as-usual cloud compute. Perhaps I should put some context around my thoughts. NFV is coming and the world is

Re: 4.6

On Jun 8, 2015, at 11:45 PM, Remi Bergsma r...@remi.nl wrote: Hi, I can jump in and work with Rohit and Daan to make 4.6 happen. +1 for the QA on master. It would be best if we could then all focus on stabilizing 4.6 aka master and wait with refactor stuff and new features until 4.6

[UPDATE] 2015 progress

Hi folks, Couple months ago I shared a few thoughts for 2015 [1], things that we could do to make our project even greater. There has been good progress, so I would like to share a few updates. 1- Review board. We are no longer using review board, all code contributions should now come as

Re: [DISCUSS] 4.6 release management

On May 13, 2015, at 6:07 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi guys, I hope that’s not too late to react on this one. Having 6 RMs seems a bit too much for me. For PRs containing a few lines of

Re: [WWW] Website now managed via Git

On May 13, 2015, at 9:37 AM, Jan-Arve Nygård jan.arve.nyg...@gmail.com wrote: I created a PR to add committers that fell out of the list during the move. I'm not sure if you want non committers to build with middleman and then do a PR so i just created a PR against the source for the next

docker machine driver for cloudstack

Folks, The exoscale driver was recently merged in Docker machine. There is an oustdanding pull request for a more generic cloudstack driver: https://github.com/docker/machine/pull/425#issuecomment-101440493 Sander who originally made the PR has no cycles right now to finish it. So that's an

[WWW] Website now managed via Git

Hi folks, Our website is now managed via Git. The build is now using Middleman [1] instead of the Apache CMS. The source of truth for the site is at: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-www.git;a=summary It is mirrored on GitHub like all our other repos and we can accept pull

Re: API guide link getting an error...

same issue that Abhi reported, fixed On May 12, 2015, at 9:26 AM, Raja Pullela raja.pull...@citrix.com wrote: Hi, Not found error is seen for the link - http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/ I do know that the documentation has moved to

Re: [DISCUSS] 4.6 release management

-either you or me- all other direct commits to master will be reverted -sebastien Op wo 6 mei 2015 om 09:47 schreef sebgoa run...@gmail.com: So no -1 on this. Do we have volunteers to RM 4.6 on the master branch ? I propose to set a date asap, tag master and tell everyone

Re: [DISCUSS] 4.5.1 announcement draft

Rohit, looks good to me On May 11, 2015, at 9:03 AM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi all, If the following announcement (draft) is alright, I would like to send it out later today or tomorrow. Please review, thanks. Sally - can you too please have a look. Thanks. On

[ANNOUNCE] New Committer Marco Sinhoreli

It seems we forgot to announce that Marco was made a committer, my sincere apologies - The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Marco Sinhoreli to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted. Marco has

Re: Publishing on website?

On May 11, 2015, at 6:29 PM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote: On May 11, 2015, at 4:59 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: So - you can now have git based websites [1] Those websites will publish as soon as something hits the git repo in the proper branch. Note, that it

Re: [DISCUSS] 4.6 release management

refine at any time. Op vr 1 mei 2015 om 09:55 schreef sebgoa run...@gmail.com: On May 1, 2015, at 12:52 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion pdion...@apache.org wrote: Hi, In my mind it was kind of making more sense to start by keeping 4.6 into a separate branch, enforce pull-requests and deploy the CI

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

On May 6, 2015, at 9:38 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee wrote: Hi, I am sorry for not being authorized to vote for release, Everyone can VOTE on a release, you don't need to be a committer. The entire community can vote and chime in on the VOTE threads and help test

[DONE] IP clearance for ec2stack and gstack has passed

Folks, Git repos have been created and the github mirrors are in place. ec2stack and gcestack are now official CloudStack subproject https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-ec2stack https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-gcestack We just need to create two releases for these. Note that while

[44/50] [abbrv] cloudstack-gcestack git commit: Remove unnecessary print

Remove unnecessary print Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/repo Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/commit/dcf0afc0 Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/tree/dcf0afc0 Diff:

[28/50] [abbrv] cloudstack-gcestack git commit: Improve test coverage, clean operations

Improve test coverage, clean operations Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/repo Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/commit/08757591 Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/tree/08757591 Diff:

[30/50] [abbrv] cloudstack-gcestack git commit: Update readme instructions

Update readme instructions Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/repo Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/commit/a33d4665 Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/tree/a33d4665 Diff:

[31/50] [abbrv] cloudstack-gcestack git commit: Update README usage instructions

Update README usage instructions Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/repo Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/commit/d4126d5e Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/tree/d4126d5e Diff:

[34/50] [abbrv] cloudstack-gcestack git commit: Bump version

Bump version Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/repo Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/commit/e91551e5 Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/tree/e91551e5 Diff:

[38/50] [abbrv] cloudstack-gcestack git commit: Update README.rst

Update README.rst Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/repo Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/commit/48b3b31c Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/tree/48b3b31c Diff:

[43/50] [abbrv] cloudstack-gcestack git commit: Upgrade database definition

Upgrade database definition Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/repo Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/commit/8f36cd1b Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/tree/8f36cd1b Diff:

[39/50] [abbrv] cloudstack-gcestack git commit: Update README.rst

Update README.rst Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/repo Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/commit/2bcb234c Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/tree/2bcb234c Diff:

[24/50] [abbrv] cloudstack-gcestack git commit: Merge branch 'master' of github.com:NOPping/gstack into refactor

Merge branch 'master' of github.com:NOPping/gstack into refactor Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/repo Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/commit/60ee7e46 Tree:

[04/50] [abbrv] cloudstack-gcestack git commit: Begin refactoring process, messy template usage

Begin refactoring process, messy template usage Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/repo Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/commit/5bb67d51 Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/tree/5bb67d51 Diff:

[42/50] [abbrv] cloudstack-gcestack git commit: Finish support for updated gcloud

Finish support for updated gcloud Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/repo Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/commit/4219ecc2 Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/tree/4219ecc2 Diff:

  1   2   3   4   5   >