Unfortunately, that is out of scope for our plans right now. If anyone knows
who originally asked for this functionality or who is still using it, we would
be interested in having discussions around the use cases these APIs are
addressing and then looking into bringing that functionality into
As an alternative to removing the code, Christopher - would you be
willing / able to consider fixing it up / updating it's dependencies /
finding a way to help get support for maintaining it?
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 05:42:03PM +, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
If you remove it, it will break the
I'd like to get a final word on this - is it OK to be removed? Is there someone
who is knowledgable with what it will take to remove it and/or is comfortable
removing it? I don't know how tied into the rest of the codebase it is.
--
Chris Suich
chris.su...@netapp.com
NetApp Software Engineer
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 04:44:51PM +, SuichII, Christopher wrote:
I'd like to get a final word on this - is it OK to be removed? Is there
someone who is knowledgable with what it will take to remove it and/or is
comfortable removing it? I don't know how tied into the rest of the codebase
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 05:42:03PM +, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
If you remove it, it will break the following APIs:
Alex had suggested that it's not maintained. Anybody want to try to
maintain it / update it?
I really question why the current netapp plugin exists in ACS at all to
begin with at all. It basically just manages LUNs and such in really has
nothing to do with ACS or cloud functionality (that I can see). I'd be all
for trashing it.
Is there any chance whatever you're working on will have
I think it should be removed.
--Alex
-Original Message-
From: SuichII, Christopher [mailto:chris.su...@netapp.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 5:26 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Removal of cloud-plugin-netapp
I remember seeing/hearing some discussion about
It could enable a volume service for baremetal, but currently it is too
tied to NetApp.
On 9/18/13 11:35 AM, Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com wrote:
I think it should be removed.
--Alex
-Original Message-
From: SuichII, Christopher [mailto:chris.su...@netapp.com]
Sent: Wednesday,
Darren,
The integration we are working on will be closed source. The NetApp OpenStack
integrations are GPL due to the nature of OpenStack. They may be simply doing
xml/http request because that is the lowest level of communicating with our
storage controllers. Our work uses an internal library
