---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22075/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Kishan Kavala.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6808
Hi Andrija,
Daan asked me to have a look at this as well. Looking at you issue I
recall having seen something similar. Back then when upgrading 4.2.1 to
4.3 I though it had to do with out own custom build svm template.
Let me fire off some questions before explaining what the cause was in our
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22075/
---
(Updated May 30, 2014, 6:33 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Kishan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22077/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Kishan Kavala.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6669
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22075/
---
(Updated May 30, 2014, 6:41 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Kishan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21946/#review44343
---
Commit b4021284b853362f414e68e52deb5ba92734a7e2 in cloudstack's
Hi Joris,
thank you for taking time to address this issue :)
So...:
- I'm on KVM (stock CentOS 6.2 patched by Inktank for CEPH support), OS is
Centos 6.5, libvirt 1.2.3 compiled.
- ACS 4.3 having problems, ACS 4.2.1 was fine
- not XS, so I guess no answers for this part :)
- guest_os_id is 184
Long accountId =
_accountService.finalyzeAccountId(accountName, domainId, projectId,
true);
_accountService didn't get initialized/injected!?! The spring stuff
should have taken care of that.
I think the problem is in the test initialization not in the base code.
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at
Andrija,
Do not just assign a second net vlan://500 You have one like that and
you don't want conflicting nets using the same vlan. I am wondering
why 'untagged' comes out as 'vlan://untagged'. I think that is the
bug. Did you find the string 'vlan://untagged' in your db?
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at
Hi Daan,
Could you please cherry-pick commit f5ce280da32c4e0837fa39651dc801ba3f906e41
from 4.4-forward branch to 4.4 branch.
commit f5ce280da32c4e0837fa39651dc801ba3f906e41
Author: Devdeep Singh devd...@gmail.com
Date: Tue May 20 11:40:51 2014 +0530
CLOUDSTACK-6810: Fix storage migration
Hi Daan,
Can you cherry-pick the below commits from 4.4-forward to 4.4?
commit c5a1423d3d02e33c33eb630f6f4df24b731eba69 - CLOUDSTACK-6808
commit cc663bb7fc515a4960cd483e8f5697bc141ce95e - CLOUDSTACK-6669
~Rajani
From: Rajesh Battala
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 9:17 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ACS44] Cherry pick for CLOUDSTACK-6519
Hi Daan,
Please cherry-pick to 4.4
260e06d64c07c6e5f3c133d8bdc2779fad62c672
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=260e06d
Thanks
Rajesh
Hi Andrija,
Thanks for the answers. In deed your situation is different so PV/HVM is
not the issue.
When reading back the log output you have provided I noted that the VR
messages log indicates that it's waiting for ethnull to be up. This raises
the question where null was introduced instead of
SSVM Console proxy working fine. while trying to create vm from ISO on
new setup it throws below exception.
2014-05-30 16:42:20,358 ERROR [c.c.h.v.r.VmwareResource]
(DirectAgent-62:ctx-97ac79ab 10.129.137.199) Unable to execute ping command
on DomR (null), domR may not be ready yet. failure due
Hi Joris,
just to be sure - you want me to capture the log from the moment I reboot
router - or you want me to stop it, then start capturing log, and start it
(and continue capture untill ethnull errors inside VR) ?
Thanks,
On 30 May 2014 13:39, Joris van Lieshout
Hi Andrija,
Just the start of the VR should be sufficient.
Kind regards,
Joris van Lieshout
Schuberg Philis
Boeingavenue 271
1119 PD Schiphol-Rijk
schubergphilis.com
+31 20-7506672
+31 6-51428188
On 30/05/14 13:48, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Joris,
just to be sure -
Hi Joris,
here is the management log: http://pastebin.com/zxnKxFhk
Interesting parts (to me): in bold
2014-05-30 13:56:21,899 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.m.AncientDataMotionStrategy]
(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) copyAsync inspecting src type
TEMPLATE copyAsync inspecting dest type VOLUME
On May 29, 2014, at 9:34 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
wrote:
In an effort to help keep our releases from getting out of hand, I think we
should consider moving the Feature Proposal deadline up, as well.
My main concern is that many people have three CloudStack-related
Hi Andrija,
Bold formatting does not come trough on the dev list. :)
But u might need a bit more info.
At a certain point I see this line
2014-05-30 13:56:23,935 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Seq 1-609104082: Sending {
Cmd , MgmtId: 161344838950, via:
Hi Joris,
I have turned on DEBUG loging in agent.log on cs1.xxx/net host:
So, management logs again: http://pastebin.com/F6BRf7Y9
Agent logs on cs1.xxx: http://pastebin.com/BJauKbaC
Not playing smart, but there is some error: [kvm.resource.KVMGuestOsMapper]
(agentRequest-Handler-3:) Can't find
Hi Andrija,
That does sound familiar and in the start xml of KVM you can see type
arch='x86_64' machine='pc'hvm/type. I don't know KVM+ACS well enough
to judge if this is the cause but I thing focusing on getting the VR
started as PV guest might be worth trying. On the other hand I do see
Hey all,
We are due for our quarterly board reports. I’ve drafted an initial version.
Please review and post any feedback and/or questions.
DESCRIPTION
Apache CloudStack is open source software designed to deploy and manage
large networks of virtual machines, as a highly available, highly
OK, thanks Joris.
I will try playing with OS version option, on the systemvm-kvm-4.3
template...
Let me know if I can help with anything more.
Thanks.
Andrija
On 30 May 2014 15:19, Joris van Lieshout jvanliesh...@schubergphilis.com
wrote:
Hi Andrija,
That does sound familiar and in the
I've read back a bit in the code and if you look at BridgeVifDriver.java
(this is where the log message with the nic profile is generated) you can
see that the nic information might be off already once ACS hits the
LibvirtVMDef.InterfaceDef plug function. This leads be to believer that
the HVM/PV
Joris,
do you have recommendation on how in particular to try ? I'm not sure how
to fix that, except playing with editing systemvm-4.3 template to define it
as another OS type... ?
Thanks again,
Andrija
On 30 May 2014 15:30, Joris van Lieshout jvanliesh...@schubergphilis.com
wrote:
I've read
Andrija,
The thing is I don't know who the os matching on KVM works. There must be
a way to list supported os types.
I also did some queuing on the guest_os_hypervisor table (ACS 4.3) and I
don't see Debian 7 for KVM listed.
select * from guest_os join guest_os_hypervisor on
On May 27, 2014, 4:59 p.m., Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
I like the idea of taking action on OOM in the VR/systemvm. However there
is a missing (very important) piece: the VR stays unconfigured. So, it
should actually stop, not reboot in order for the management server to take
notice and
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 03:23:09PM +0200, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
Hey all,
We are due for our quarterly board reports. I’ve drafted an initial version.
Please review and post any feedback and/or questions.
DESCRIPTION
Apache CloudStack is open source software designed to deploy and manage
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 03:23:09PM +0200, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
Hey all,
We are due for our quarterly board reports. I’ve drafted an initial version.
Please review and post any feedback and/or questions.
Also, don't forget to add to the wiki here:
I confirm, the highest is Debian 5 64bit
Per docs
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-release-notes/en/4.3/rnotes.html#upgrade-from-4-2-x-to-4-3
, you should use Debian 7.0 64bit as OS type for system-kvm-4.3 template...
(same for xen and vmware templatest)
Will change now DB
Nope, started, did check, it is reported now as Debian 5 VM, but still
doesn't work...
Rebooted VPC (destroyed VR, new one created...)
$ virsh dumpxml r-812-VM
...
descriptionDebian GNU/Linux 5(64-bit)/description
...
os
type arch='x86_64' machine='rhel6.5.0'hvm/type
boot dev='cdrom'/
Let me make sure I understand... the 'Plug' of the nic works fine, as it
seems you do have an eth1 and can manually assign the IP to get it to work?
If that's the case then there's probably not an issue in BridgeVifDriver or
the XML. It is definitely in fetching/matching the eth device here
yes, correct, eth1 is present, and can be started by static IP
configuration...
On 30 May 2014 17:25, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
Let me make sure I understand... the 'Plug' of the nic works fine, as it
seems you do have an eth1 and can manually assign the IP to get it to work?
If
I believe I've found the issue. In 4.3, some changes were made to
BroadcastDomainType, to standardize Broadcast URIs to prepend vlan://. The
issue is that your IpAssocVpcCommand doesn't use this new format for the
broadcastUri it passes, so it fails to map the plugged device into the
Note the differences in broadcastUri, here is your plug command:
{
com.cloud.agent.api.PlugNicCommand: {
nic: {
deviceId: 1,
networkRateMbps: 9,
defaultNic: true,
uuid: 6c782af3-2071-4543-acdc-cb30096e89ff,
ip:
I thinnk the commit that caused the change was this or related to it. Is
there any way you could test a fix? Do you need me to build 4.3 RPMs or can
I just provide a patch? What works for you?
commit 53d09c6f1843f04c5f1ab76be9419f5584302d1e
Date: Mon Aug 5 11:52:40 2013 +0200
uri code per
Actually, if you're in the position to play a bit... New deployments seem
to work, and I believe it's because that broadcastUri is stored in the db
in the new format:
mysql select id,vlan_id from vlan where network_id = (select id from
networks where traffic_type=Public);
Marcus, I don't think it should be 'vlan://untagged'. If it works as
you describe this seems a bug. 'untagged' should be
broadcastdomaintype agnostic, shouldn't it?
If it should work that way then it is a bug/omission in the db upgrade.
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com
If that works, then I think the fix is better to update the database
upgrade script to look for this and change the vlan_id. That way new
installs and upgrades have consistent data. We could fix it in the code by
filtering it through BroadcastDomainType.Vlan.toUri(ipAddr.getVlanTag()),
but then
CLOUDSTACK-5505 looks alright. As for the solution; Isn't 'untagged' a
valid uri in itself? I would expect it would have always the value
without the 'vlan://'. That said a solution is better then no
solution, maybe the db upgrade path is best.
Andrija, can you try as Marcus suggests, editing the
I agree, I actually brought this issue up several months ago when we had
all of the 'untagged' discussions. I believe I pointed out that vlan:// was
now in the db. My impression was that the change was intentional, if you're
telling me you didn't intend to do that then we can change it back.
At
It's not valid if you've got code that says does string 'vlan://untagged'
equal 'untagged'.
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
wrote:
CLOUDSTACK-5505 looks alright. As for the solution; Isn't 'untagged' a
valid uri in itself? I would expect it would have
Hi all,
Our current git workflow is confusing with the *forward branches and
cherry-picking. Its hard to track on what all releases the commit has gone into
unless I do some git log greping. Also, as a contributor, I endup creating
patches for each branch as it doesn’t cleanly apply on
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Devdeep Singh
devdeep.si...@citrix.com wrote:
f5ce280da32c4e0837fa39651dc801ba3f906e41
is in
--
Daan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22077/#review44380
---
Commit c476312a10073240c1436664477c10219141ac6e in cloudstack's
two pulled
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Rajani Karuturi
rajani.karut...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi Daan,
Can you cherry-pick the below commits from 4.4-forward to 4.4?
commit c5a1423d3d02e33c33eb630f6f4df24b731eba69 - CLOUDSTACK-6808
commit cc663bb7fc515a4960cd483e8f5697bc141ce95e -
I think this flow is something we should seriously consider.
I find cherry picking from branch to branch to be error prone in that it's
easy for someone to forget to cherry pick to all applicable branches and
you don't have any easy way to see the cherry picks are related.
When I worked at HP,
I know it says no action is required on my part, but I've never received an
automated message like this from this list.
Any thoughts on what's going on here?
-- Forwarded message --
From: Alcatel-Lucent LISTSERV Server (16.0) lists...@alcatel-lucent.com
Date: Fri, May 30, 2014 at
What happens if a fix isn't relevant for newer versions, or has to be rewritten
for newer versions because the code has changed? Don't the branches diverge and
you end up cherry-picking after that?
--
Stephen Turner
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski
Hello Tejas,
May I know whether you can access the DomR via vCenter and check if the DomR
has a link local IP Address ( 169.254.x.x) ? Looks like the DomR didn’t get a
link local IP Address,
Thank you,
Chandan.
-Original Message-
From: Tejas Gadaria [mailto:refond.g...@gmail.com]
Hi ilya, David,
Thanks for the information!
I am working with Brocade Communications Systems and we are implementing a
network plugin for their VDX integration for L2 services. We are targeting for
4.5 release.
Some follow up questions:
1. Since I am not an Apache committer, I need not sign
Yep, that's what I was referring to in that a particular fix for an old
release may not apply to newer versions. That does happen.
We used to mark those as don't need to merge to branch x in SVN and then
you handed it however made sense on the applicable branch(es).
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at
Rajesh, it seems this is already in 4.4 it was pulled in May 13th.
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Rajesh Battala
rajesh.batt...@citrix.com wrote:
From: Rajesh Battala
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 9:17 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ACS44] Cherry pick for CLOUDSTACK-6519
Hi
Any thoughts on this?
Thanks! :)
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 10:39 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Hi,
I noticed while executing the createStoragePool command that the following
does not work entirely as expected:
Account csAccount =
Hello Daan,
Can you please cherry-pick the following commit from 4.4-forward to 4.4 ?
commit 48ea9e0b5e87fee067b711890cd5a5d7c9079bf1
CLOUDSTACK-6599:
1. Adding the missing Template/Volume URLs expiration functionality
2. Improvement - While deleting the volume during expiration use
On May 30, 2014, at 1:55 PM, Ritu Sabharwal rsabh...@brocade.com wrote:
Hi ilya, David,
Thanks for the information!
I am working with Brocade Communications Systems and we are implementing a
network plugin for their VDX integration for L2 services. We are targeting
for 4.5 release.
Hey All,
Paul Angus and I have both tested this and this is what we are seeing.
When we compile the the 'master' branch, the docs in
'tools/apidoc/target/xmldoc/html', but they appear to be the wrong docs.
Yes, we know that the versions that appear in the output is hardcoded in
the XSL files,
Hi Will,
Based on my last memories of the apidocs tool and maven poms, I think it
used to scan built jar artifacts and reference them against something like
a properties file (commands.properties?) and internally scans bunch of
annotations in available class files to find apis and create apidocs.
By clean install you mean starting from scratch, not 'mvn clean install'
right? I have been doing mvn clean installs...
Will
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Will,
Based on my last memories of the apidocs tool and maven poms, I think it
used to
On May 30, 2014, at 4:25 PM, Will Stevens wstev...@cloudops.com wrote:
By clean install you mean starting from scratch, not 'mvn clean install'
right? I have been doing mvn clean installs…
Will, quickly stated I think that piece of code is a nightmare + folks have
complained about our
Check if git branch or source code in question is correct, git clean -df
(note: this will remove files not tracked by git), check that
the commands.properties has the API you were searching in apidocs, remove
~/.m2 and do mvn clean install, if that does not work check if the
API/plugin in question
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22093/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Marcus Sorensen.
Repository: cloudstack-git
Thanks Rohit, I will do all those steps.
I know the git branch is correct, but I will do a clean anyway.
Removing the maven repositories is a good idea.
Thx,
Will
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote:
Check if git branch or source code in question is
I am alright with the ability to turn it off, preferably at run time.
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Nitin Mehta nitin.me...@citrix.com wrote:
Hey Daan,
In the thread we have discussed the merits and demerits of having this.
IMHO, I am not convinced why we should have this but very concerned
That's a lot of improvements without tests, Nitin.
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 8:14 PM, Nitin Mehta nitin.me...@citrix.com wrote:
Hello Daan,
Can you please cherry-pick the following commit from 4.4-forward to 4.4 ?
commit 48ea9e0b5e87fee067b711890cd5a5d7c9079bf1
CLOUDSTACK-6599:
1.
h Mike, sounds like a bug to me :)
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 8:14 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Any thoughts on this?
Thanks! :)
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 10:39 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Hi,
I noticed while executing the
Hi Sebastian,
This gives a real good picture of the IP clearance process.
I sent a Proposal email to mailing list last week, still waiting for
acceptance. Can you please have a look at it and provide feedback?
I am in the state to submit my design document to CloudStack wiki. I have
created
On 05/30/2014 10:40 PM, Will Stevens wrote:
Thanks Rohit, I will do all those steps.
I know the git branch is correct, but I will do a clean anyway.
Removing the maven repositories is a good idea.
NB; for this issue, e.g., fear of old cloudstack stuff being used rather
then newly built
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:51 PM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks good to me, aside from he debug statement.
Ah, the first line was not in my line of sight.
--
Daan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22093/
---
(Updated May 30, 2014, 9 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Marcus
I've been getting them all day about my polemic wiht Marcus. All mail
went through though so I didn't give them my second braincel.
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 7:50 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
I know it says no action is required on my part, but I've never received an
Daan - Here improvements are actually bug fixes that should be fixed.
Thanks,
-Nitin
On 30/05/14 1:47 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
That's a lot of improvements without tests, Nitin.
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 8:14 PM, Nitin Mehta nitin.me...@citrix.com
wrote:
Hello Daan,
Thanks, Daan
I logged the following ticket:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6815
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
wrote:
h Mike, sounds like a bug to me :)
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 8:14 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
I have completely started from scratch with a new clone of the CloudStack
repo.
Master is now pointing to 4.5, so I checked out the 4.4 branch.
I put all the deps in place as well as the vhd-util file.
I completely removed my ~/.m2 directory so I am starting from completely
clean.
I checked
Although it appears to be trivial, you have to take care of PF and LB rules
that might already exist to the old IP.
From: Chiradeep Vittal
chiradeep.vit...@citrix.commailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com
Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Please cherry-pick be765ce8680564b743a73dd360c590c0e495c204 as well as
part of this bug.
One more thing to add, majority of code is for the functionality which I
found missing in 4.4 and found some bugs which I termed as improvements
over previous design.
Thanks,
-Nitin
On 30/05/14 3:06 PM,
LGTM. Please create an FS on the wiki if you haven’t already. Take a look at
the document template:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Design+Document+Template
From: Ritu Sabharwal rsabh...@brocade.commailto:rsabh...@brocade.com
Reply-To:
LGTM. Please add the spec on the wiki. Take a look at the spec template
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Design+Document+Template
Please consider how one might test your feature without actually running the
controller.
From: cloudstack-ci
Hi Will,
I don't know why it was not updated, one reason, I'm anticipating, could be
that we moved to Spring for many things which uses bunch of xmls for some
configuration, any not this properties file anymore?
Probably Alex or Kelven could comment if this is the case. I think you can
add the
Thanks Daan.
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 11:32 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: FW: [ACS44] Cherry pick for CLOUDSTACK-6519
Rajesh, it seems this is already in 4.4 it was pulled in May 13th.
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 12:49
80 matches
Mail list logo
