Github user rhtyd commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1365#discussion_r61833516
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/storage/resource/VmwareStorageProcessor.java
---
@@ -1363,24 +1364,15 @@ private Answer
Github user rhtyd commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1321#discussion_r61833399
--- Diff:
engine/orchestration/test/com/cloud/vm/VirtualMachineManagerImplTest.java ---
@@ -505,4 +513,24 @@ public void testSendStopWithNullAnswer()
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1489#issuecomment-216435191
@swill yes indeed we've performed upgrade tests with 4.8.1 to
4.9.0-SNAPSHOT (not using the feature by default) and then using
migrate-dyanamicroles.py script; the
hopefully we will have labels soon™. i am working on trying to get the
repo moved from the 'apache' github org to 'apache-cloudstack' so we can
control this sort of stuff and enable labels. it will make things SOO much
easier.
simon's contributions have been very helpful for me as RM though, so
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1321#issuecomment-216440946
Thanks @rhtyd. I will do a CI run on master before I merge anything else.
I will also pull in a couple people who I know have worked on this code to
review your
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1528#issuecomment-216433425
LGTM based on the discussion
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1365#issuecomment-216433479
Obviously this merge conflict exists because something has been refactored
in master which was not merged into previous versions. We need to understand
what was
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1516#issuecomment-216435537
@sudhansu7 can you rebase against latest master, squash the changes to a
single commit and push -f to re-kick travis. Thanks
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1297#issuecomment-216435475
@DaanHoogland thanks, how about you have consecutive changes by the same
author squashed to one commit; while keep it separate per author in general
---
If your
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1297#issuecomment-216442091
@DaanHoogland can you do a rebase and push -f, Travis failed for
`test_01_scale_vm` test
In general, LGTM (just code review)
---
If your project is set up
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1365#issuecomment-216442130
@rhtyd thanks for fixing the merge conflicts. ð
@GabrielBrascher and @mike-tutkowski, I know you guys have spent some time
with this file, would you
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1350#issuecomment-216423449
@swill yes that's what I meant, therefore commented that it's ready for
merge. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1519#issuecomment-216435381
@swill agree for keeping it against 4.7; but it would be great if @dsclose
can squash the changes to a single commit as all of them solve for
Cloudstack-9339 issue
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1529#issuecomment-216444177
I tested this by walking through with the debugger when the delete method
on Host was invoked from a test script of mine.
---
If your project is set up for
Ellie,
Can you try forcing ACS Management to only bind to IPV4?
Normally this is done in the JAVA_OPTS by setting
-Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true -Djava.net.preferIPv4Addresses=true
I think on the ACS Ubuntu release, JAVA_OPTS is set in your init scripts, but
I'm not absolutely sure about
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1408#issuecomment-216423344
@swill no objection, let's merge this
tag:mergeready
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1485#issuecomment-216435060
tag:easypr
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1485#issuecomment-216435050
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1351#issuecomment-216442417
@DaanHoogland I'm seeing a lot of commits, can you rebase against 4.7?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1444#issuecomment-216436317
@rafaelweingartner for a project with thousands of commits, splitting the
commits for a PR or bug that solves for the same logical issue results in
fragmented
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1489#issuecomment-216441837
Thanks @rhtyd, this makes me feel a little more comfortable. @borisroman
if you can give us a bit of an outline of what you have tested, I think it will
help
Github user rhtyd commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1321#discussion_r61833186
--- Diff:
engine/orchestration/test/com/cloud/vm/VirtualMachineManagerImplTest.java ---
@@ -505,4 +513,24 @@ public void testSendStopWithNullAnswer()
Github user rhtyd commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1365#discussion_r61833203
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/storage/resource/VmwareStorageProcessor.java
---
@@ -1363,24 +1364,15 @@ private Answer
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1493#issuecomment-216421909
@swill forced pushed; the Jenkins server is not reliable -- as long as
Travis is green we are alright; the only additional check Jenkins does is the
rat check, which
Github user rhtyd commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1321#discussion_r61833885
--- Diff:
engine/orchestration/test/com/cloud/vm/VirtualMachineManagerImplTest.java ---
@@ -505,4 +513,24 @@ public void testSendStopWithNullAnswer()
All,
Will mentioned a little project we've been working on to try and help get a
grasp on the open PR list.
You can access it here: http://acs:a...@acspr.ena.net
Due to the lack of github labels currently, there's quite a bit of
regex/pattern matching involved in determining data sets, so
GitHub user mike-tutkowski opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1529
Marvin: Replace a timer.sleep(30) with pulling logic
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9374
From the ticket:
In the base.py file, there is a Host class
great job Simon David and Will.
Given that we dont have github labels, this is very useful for the RM to
pickup the prs to merge and for others to review pending.
~Rajani
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 9:47 AM, Simon Weller wrote:
> All,
>
> Will mentioned a little project we've been
also check java version and upgrade nss
http://blog.backslasher.net/java-ssl-crash.html
~Rajani
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 7:36 AM, Simon Weller wrote:
> Ellie,
>
> Can you try forcing ACS Management to only bind to IPV4?
> Normally this is done in the JAVA_OPTS by setting
>
All,
I've tried to triage all open PRs, starting from oldest to newest. Based on my
understanding, I've put tag: in comments (as tagging was not allowed on
PRs) to sort them as following:
tag:mergeready - PRs that are ready for merge, may need one more LGTM
tag:easypr
Congrats Rafael.
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
On Apr 29 2016, at 1:20 am, Rafael Weingärtner
wrote:
Thank you all for the warm welcome. It
Congrats Simon.
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
On Apr 28 2016, at 12:53 pm, Erik Weber wrote:
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache
Github user nvazquez commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1466#issuecomment-216251605
Done, thanks @rhtyd @swill @rafaelweingartner
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1463#issuecomment-216242001
@rhtyd better tag with tag:easypr
the logic is that this need not be executed on ssvm or cpvm
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
GitHub user sverrirab opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1526
Add perl-modules as install dependency for cloudstack-agent
Required to run perl scripts that configure networking for VMs.
That script fails silently if this is not installed.
Github user sverrirab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1495#issuecomment-216233064
Created new PR on master: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1526
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1514#issuecomment-216243431
code looks good and functionally sane but this needs extensive testing.
Especially when master fails the dns functionality needs to be still available,
i.e.
Github user nvazquez commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1518#discussion_r61756086
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/vmware/test/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/resource/VmwareResourceTest.java
---
@@ -117,4 +154,79 @@ public void
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1502#issuecomment-216271049
Marvin tests where successful. Testing community submission of OOBM, which
includes end to end regression testing with IPMI simulator. Issue power state
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1477#issuecomment-216232227
@swill apart from the PR author, it would be great if at least one more
reviewer can share a screenshot; please proceed as per your discretion
---
If your project
Github user wido commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1514#issuecomment-216232254
@rhtyd I'd love to. But I never used the Redundant VR, so I can't tell.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user Slair1 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1433#issuecomment-216244116
Hi @rhtyd since it uses "ls" to get a list of packages, if the directory or
.jar file does not exist it is no big deal. It will output a No such file or
directory
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1365#issuecomment-216248411
did a code walk through and saw no extravaganzas and some useful
extractions and renamings. As for the functionality, I have no clue. I am not a
vmware user,
Github user nvazquez commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1518#discussion_r61754039
--- Diff:
core/src/com/cloud/agent/api/storage/StorageNfsVersionCommand.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+//
+// Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1519#issuecomment-216267768
I am also fine with these being separate commits as they are functionally
separate.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user nvazquez commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1518#discussion_r61756291
--- Diff:
core/src/com/cloud/agent/api/storage/StorageNfsVersionCommand.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+//
+// Licensed to the Apache Software
Thanks Rohit. This is very helpful. :)
*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer
*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> great work Rohit,
great work Rohit, thanks
I will go through my work, hopefully within the coming day (1 earth spin)
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Rohit Yadav
wrote:
> All,
>
> I've tried to triage all open PRs, starting from oldest to newest. Based
> on my understanding, I've put
Github user nvazquez commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1497#issuecomment-216254374
Sure @rhtyd, I'll add them. I was working on it based on @koushik-das
suggestion but I still have to work on it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1444#issuecomment-216266457
I think the two commits are fine in this case, so just leave it as it is.
ð
Can we get some LGTM code reviews on this one? Thanks...
---
If your
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1477#issuecomment-216233168
@rhtyd in general, I agree with you. The main blocker with that is the
fact that very few people have the ability to test regional templates. The
code is pretty
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1519#issuecomment-216267457
@rhtyd is there a reason you want him to rebase to master? We still
support 4.7, so all fixes to that branch will be forward merged to 4.8 and
master. I think this
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1518#discussion_r61754369
--- Diff:
core/src/com/cloud/agent/api/storage/StorageNfsVersionCommand.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+//
+// Licensed to the Apache
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1482#issuecomment-216270026
Squash yes, but this can remain open against 4.7 as we are still fixing
bugs and such against 4.7 and it is still supported (until 4.9 is released).
Anything merged
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1421#issuecomment-216285170
How do I test this and verify it is working?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1297#issuecomment-216270640
@rhtyd rebased, as these are several different commits by different people
from different companies, I will not squash it.
---
If your project is set up for
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#issuecomment-216287103
I need some code reviews on this one. Also, @DaanHoogland you may have to
push again. Our lovely checkers are being annoying again...
---
If your project is set
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1490#issuecomment-216289492
We need more more code review on this one...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1403#issuecomment-216294699
I need some code reviews here. @jburwell can you let me know what that
status of your review is?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user kiwiflyer commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1493#issuecomment-216296997
@swill I'm a bit behind. I'm building this now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1350#issuecomment-216300372
@rafaelweingartner This one seems to be in OK shape. I am missing one code
review, given that you have actively reviewed this code, can I get your final
status?
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1488#issuecomment-216289908
Need to run CI against this one to verify...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1408#issuecomment-216293581
@wido is this code currently deployed and working in your prod environment?
@rhtyd any suggestions for validating this code before merge? Have you tested
this?
Github user milamberspace commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1374#issuecomment-216296425
@rhtyd rebase and squash done
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1385#issuecomment-216296327
Missing one code review on this one. @rafaelweingartner? I saw you post
in this thread, so I am calling you out. :P
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user nvazquez commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1518#discussion_r61756168
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/vmware/test/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/resource/VmwareResourceTest.java
---
@@ -117,4 +154,79 @@ public void
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1502#issuecomment-216274944
@jburwell I will be doing a group of merges in a couple of hours which will
include this one. If you have any pending concerns with this one, speak up
soon. :)
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1421#issuecomment-216273377
@remibergsma requires force push again. Travis timed out...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1437#issuecomment-216291321
I don't have the ability to test HyperV. Can anyone verify this PR for me?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1493#issuecomment-216298669
No worries. Thanks... I also am a bit behind. I apparently have to just
assume I won't get any work done on mondays. :P
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1502#issuecomment-216274536
I think this one is ready to merge...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1493#issuecomment-216289074
@kiwiflyer do you have test results on this one? Thanks...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1516#issuecomment-216286395
We are missing one code review on this one.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user nvazquez commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1518#issuecomment-216293439
@rafaelweingartner @cristofolini I refactored unit tests based on your
comments, I also removed testStorageNfsVersionNotPresent as it is
covered by tests
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1490#issuecomment-216302867
I think this one is ready to merge given the scope of the change. Thanks...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#issuecomment-216305206
@DaanHoogland please rebase and push -f again, to re-kickoff Travis; I'll
review and test this change soon against a real KVM env tomorrow
---
If your project is
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1463#issuecomment-216306697
LGTM, @swill @wido @resmo @nvazquez @nlivens @koushik-das and others - one
more LGTM needed
tag:easypr
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1502#discussion_r61776712
--- Diff:
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/admin/outofbandmanagement/ConfigureOutOfBandManagementCmd.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
+//
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1502#discussion_r61776673
--- Diff:
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/admin/outofbandmanagement/ChangeOutOfBandManagementPasswordCmd.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+//
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1502#discussion_r61776973
--- Diff:
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/admin/outofbandmanagement/DisableOutOfBandManagementForHostCmd.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+//
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1502#discussion_r61777066
--- Diff:
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/admin/outofbandmanagement/DisableOutOfBandManagementForZoneCmd.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+//
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1502#discussion_r61781601
--- Diff:
engine/schema/src/org/apache/cloudstack/outofbandmanagement/dao/OutOfBandManagementDaoImpl.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,163 @@
+// Licensed to
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1385#issuecomment-216321608
@rafaelweingartner thanks. I understand completely...
I know the `final` stuff is debatable, but I don't think that should block
a PR. :)
I think
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1516#issuecomment-216303934
LGTM, considdered it implied by the test report but here it is.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user nvazquez commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1463#issuecomment-216309949
Code LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1502#issuecomment-216309958
@jburwell no worries, I know how that goes. :) Thanks for your support
regardless...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1408#issuecomment-216304156
@swill I've validated the lock logic in a gist above, I've tested the
elusiveness of critical code that runs when a lock is acquired; security groups
is implemented
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1433#issuecomment-216305899
fair enough, LGTM
tag:mergeready
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1516#issuecomment-216305760
@DaanHoogland thanks...
@sudhansu7 can you do a force push to kick off the travis run again so we
can get this PR green. Thx...
---
If your project is set
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1502#discussion_r61777144
--- Diff:
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/admin/outofbandmanagement/EnableOutOfBandManagementForClusterCmd.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1502#discussion_r61777183
--- Diff:
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/admin/outofbandmanagement/EnableOutOfBandManagementForHostCmd.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+//
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1502#discussion_r61778682
--- Diff:
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/outofbandmanagement/OutOfBandManagementService.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1502#discussion_r61780464
--- Diff:
engine/schema/src/org/apache/cloudstack/outofbandmanagement/dao/OutOfBandManagementDaoImpl.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,163 @@
+// Licensed to
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1408#issuecomment-216319525
I am pretty comfortable with this because @wido is already using this. I
don't have an SG environment setup right now for testing, so I would have to
build one
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1321#issuecomment-216320768
gogogo
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1374#issuecomment-216324676
@swill I think you want to forward merge before this one and then merge -s
ours or such to prevent this from being merged forward.
4.8 has its own
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1330#issuecomment-216301175
We are still accepting bug fixes in 4.7 and 4.8, but all features should be
added to master. Anything merged into 4.7 or 4.8 will be forward merged up
through
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1269#issuecomment-216306144
I am missing code reviews on this one...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1350#issuecomment-216307184
@swill,
I did a review on the comments and discussions to get me up to date (we had
a discussion about some code duplications). Those discussions
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1350#issuecomment-216308956
@rafaelweingartner thanks for the review. :) I think what @rhtyd meant is
anything outstanding is only cosmetic, I don't think he meant the entire
discussion.
1 - 100 of 376 matches
Mail list logo