Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1502#discussion_r61780464
--- Diff:
engine/schema/src/org/apache/cloudstack/outofbandmanagement/dao/OutOfBandManagementDaoImpl.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,163 @@
+// Licensed to
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1408#issuecomment-216319525
I am pretty comfortable with this because @wido is already using this. I
don't have an SG environment setup right now for testing, so I would have to
build one
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1502#discussion_r61779846
--- Diff:
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/outofbandmanagement/driver/OutOfBandManagementDriverPowerCommand.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+// Licensed to
Github user wido commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1408#issuecomment-216318692
@swill and @rhtyd: The code in the PR is currently in production at
PCextreme and running fine.
With a 'with' statement in Python I couldn't get a proper
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1502#discussion_r61778988
--- Diff:
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/outofbandmanagement/OutOfBandManagementService.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1502#discussion_r61778682
--- Diff:
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/outofbandmanagement/OutOfBandManagementService.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1502#discussion_r61777665
--- Diff:
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/admin/outofbandmanagement/IssueOutOfBandManagementPowerActionCmd.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1502#discussion_r61777563
--- Diff:
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/admin/outofbandmanagement/IssueOutOfBandManagementPowerActionCmd.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1502#discussion_r61777306
--- Diff:
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/admin/outofbandmanagement/IssueOutOfBandManagementPowerActionCmd.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1502#discussion_r61777268
--- Diff:
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/admin/outofbandmanagement/EnableOutOfBandManagementForZoneCmd.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+//
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1502#discussion_r61777183
--- Diff:
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/admin/outofbandmanagement/EnableOutOfBandManagementForHostCmd.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+//
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1502#discussion_r61777144
--- Diff:
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/admin/outofbandmanagement/EnableOutOfBandManagementForClusterCmd.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1502#discussion_r61777066
--- Diff:
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/admin/outofbandmanagement/DisableOutOfBandManagementForZoneCmd.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+//
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1502#discussion_r61776973
--- Diff:
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/admin/outofbandmanagement/DisableOutOfBandManagementForHostCmd.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+//
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1502#discussion_r61776838
--- Diff:
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/admin/outofbandmanagement/DisableOutOfBandManagementForClusterCmd.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1502#discussion_r61776673
--- Diff:
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/admin/outofbandmanagement/ChangeOutOfBandManagementPasswordCmd.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+//
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1502#discussion_r61776712
--- Diff:
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/admin/outofbandmanagement/ConfigureOutOfBandManagementCmd.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
+//
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1463#issuecomment-216310118
Thanks @nvazquez, I think this one is ready now...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1502#issuecomment-216309958
@jburwell no worries, I know how that goes. :) Thanks for your support
regardless...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user nvazquez commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1463#issuecomment-216309949
Code LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user jburwell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1502#issuecomment-216309500
@swill I have gotten diverted from review. Hoping to pick up today.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1350#issuecomment-216308956
@rafaelweingartner thanks for the review. :) I think what @rhtyd meant is
anything outstanding is only cosmetic, I don't think he meant the entire
discussion.
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1374#issuecomment-216307729
#1515 is going in today and then we will validate that this one and #1376
don't have merge conflicts once #1515 is in and they will follow right after...
---
If
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1350#issuecomment-216307184
@swill,
I did a review on the comments and discussions to get me up to date (we had
a discussion about some code duplications). Those discussions
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1463#issuecomment-216306697
LGTM, @swill @wido @resmo @nvazquez @nlivens @koushik-das and others - one
more LGTM needed
tag:easypr
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1374#issuecomment-216306406
Thanks @milamberspace cc @swill @DaanHoogland we need one more LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1269#issuecomment-216306144
I am missing code reviews on this one...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1516#issuecomment-216305760
@DaanHoogland thanks...
@sudhansu7 can you do a force push to kick off the travis run again so we
can get this PR green. Thx...
---
If your project is set
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1433#issuecomment-216305899
fair enough, LGTM
tag:mergeready
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#issuecomment-216305206
@DaanHoogland please rebase and push -f again, to re-kickoff Travis; I'll
review and test this change soon against a real KVM env tomorrow
---
If your project is
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1365#issuecomment-216304460
Thanks @DaanHoogland -- though there is a way to run ESXi6 with vCenter 6
on KVM (http://rohit.yadav.xyz/logs/vmware-esxi-vcenter-on-kvm-cloudstack)
/cc
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1408#issuecomment-216304156
@swill I've validated the lock logic in a gist above, I've tested the
elusiveness of critical code that runs when a lock is acquired; security groups
is implemented
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1516#issuecomment-216303934
LGTM, considdered it implied by the test report but here it is.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1490#issuecomment-216302867
I think this one is ready to merge given the scope of the change. Thanks...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1490#issuecomment-216302469
That change makes sense to me.
I do now if I have installed the âbzip2â program without noticing while
installing some other tool, but in my MSs
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1321#issuecomment-216302010
All tests have passed on this and we have the required number of code
reviews. There are no merge conflicts, so I think we should be fine to merge
this PR as is.
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1330#issuecomment-216301175
We are still accepting bug fixes in 4.7 and 4.8, but all features should be
added to master. Anything merged into 4.7 or 4.8 will be forward merged up
through
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1350#issuecomment-216300372
@rafaelweingartner This one seems to be in OK shape. I am missing one code
review, given that you have actively reviewed this code, can I get your final
status?
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1493#issuecomment-216298669
No worries. Thanks... I also am a bit behind. I apparently have to just
assume I won't get any work done on mondays. :P
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user kiwiflyer commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1493#issuecomment-216296997
@swill I'm a bit behind. I'm building this now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1385#issuecomment-216296327
Missing one code review on this one. @rafaelweingartner? I saw you post
in this thread, so I am calling you out. :P
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user milamberspace commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1374#issuecomment-216296425
@rhtyd rebase and squash done
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1403#issuecomment-216294699
I need some code reviews here. @jburwell can you let me know what that
status of your review is?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1408#issuecomment-216293581
@wido is this code currently deployed and working in your prod environment?
@rhtyd any suggestions for validating this code before merge? Have you tested
this?
Github user nvazquez commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1518#issuecomment-216293439
@rafaelweingartner @cristofolini I refactored unit tests based on your
comments, I also removed testStorageNfsVersionNotPresent as it is
covered by tests
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1437#issuecomment-216291321
I don't have the ability to test HyperV. Can anyone verify this PR for me?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1488#issuecomment-216289908
Need to run CI against this one to verify...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1490#issuecomment-216289492
We need more more code review on this one...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1493#issuecomment-216289074
@kiwiflyer do you have test results on this one? Thanks...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1516#issuecomment-216286395
We are missing one code review on this one.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#issuecomment-216287103
I need some code reviews on this one. Also, @DaanHoogland you may have to
push again. Our lovely checkers are being annoying again...
---
If your project is set
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1421#issuecomment-216285170
How do I test this and verify it is working?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1421#issuecomment-216273377
@remibergsma requires force push again. Travis timed out...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1502#issuecomment-216274944
@jburwell I will be doing a group of merges in a couple of hours which will
include this one. If you have any pending concerns with this one, speak up
soon. :)
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1502#issuecomment-216274536
I think this one is ready to merge...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user nvazquez commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1518#discussion_r61756168
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/vmware/test/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/resource/VmwareResourceTest.java
---
@@ -117,4 +154,79 @@ public void
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1297#issuecomment-216270640
@rhtyd rebased, as these are several different commits by different people
from different companies, I will not squash it.
---
If your project is set up for
Github user nvazquez commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1518#discussion_r61756291
--- Diff:
core/src/com/cloud/agent/api/storage/StorageNfsVersionCommand.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+//
+// Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1502#issuecomment-216271049
Marvin tests where successful. Testing community submission of OOBM, which
includes end to end regression testing with IPMI simulator. Issue power state
Github user nvazquez commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1518#discussion_r61756086
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/vmware/test/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/resource/VmwareResourceTest.java
---
@@ -117,4 +154,79 @@ public void
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1482#issuecomment-216270026
Squash yes, but this can remain open against 4.7 as we are still fixing
bugs and such against 4.7 and it is still supported (until 4.9 is released).
Anything merged
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1519#issuecomment-216267768
I am also fine with these being separate commits as they are functionally
separate.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1518#discussion_r61754369
--- Diff:
core/src/com/cloud/agent/api/storage/StorageNfsVersionCommand.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+//
+// Licensed to the Apache
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1519#issuecomment-216267457
@rhtyd is there a reason you want him to rebase to master? We still
support 4.7, so all fixes to that branch will be forward merged to 4.8 and
master. I think this
Github user nvazquez commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1518#discussion_r61754039
--- Diff:
core/src/com/cloud/agent/api/storage/StorageNfsVersionCommand.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+//
+// Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1444#issuecomment-216266457
I think the two commits are fine in this case, so just leave it as it is.
ð
Can we get some LGTM code reviews on this one? Thanks...
---
If your
Hey Everyone,
Just wanted to give you all a heads up. The early bird pricing of $150 +
tax will be increasing to $250 + tax today at 4PM EST.
Get your tickets today to save some money...
CCCNA Website: http://ca.cloudstackcollab.org/
Registration Link:
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1444#issuecomment-216264551
@rhtyd I think it would not be a good idea to squash these commits. We will
lose the history if we do it here.
I only cherry picked the changes
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1466#issuecomment-216258261
Running CI now...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user nvazquez commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1497#issuecomment-216254374
Sure @rhtyd, I'll add them. I was working on it based on @koushik-das
suggestion but I still have to work on it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user nvazquez commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1466#issuecomment-216251605
Done, thanks @rhtyd @swill @rafaelweingartner
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1526#issuecomment-216248435
You can close this PR. Once #1495 is merged, it will be forward merged
into 4.8 and master, so this PR is not needed. Thanks... :)
---
If your project is set up
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1365#issuecomment-216248411
did a code walk through and saw no extravaganzas and some useful
extractions and renamings. As for the functionality, I have no clue. I am not a
vmware user,
Thanks Rohit. This is very helpful. :)
*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer
*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> great work Rohit,
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1514#issuecomment-216243431
code looks good and functionally sane but this needs extensive testing.
Especially when master fails the dns functionality needs to be still available,
i.e.
Github user Slair1 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1433#issuecomment-216244116
Hi @rhtyd since it uses "ls" to get a list of packages, if the directory or
.jar file does not exist it is no big deal. It will output a No such file or
directory
great work Rohit, thanks
I will go through my work, hopefully within the coming day (1 earth spin)
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Rohit Yadav
wrote:
> All,
>
> I've tried to triage all open PRs, starting from oldest to newest. Based
> on my understanding, I've put
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1463#issuecomment-216242001
@rhtyd better tag with tag:easypr
the logic is that this need not be executed on ssvm or cpvm
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1477#issuecomment-216233168
@rhtyd in general, I agree with you. The main blocker with that is the
fact that very few people have the ability to test regional templates. The
code is pretty
Github user sverrirab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1495#issuecomment-216233064
Created new PR on master: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1526
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
GitHub user sverrirab opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1526
Add perl-modules as install dependency for cloudstack-agent
Required to run perl scripts that configure networking for VMs.
That script fails silently if this is not installed.
Congrats Simon.
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
On Apr 28 2016, at 12:53 pm, Erik Weber wrote:
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache
Congrats Rafael.
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
On Apr 29 2016, at 1:20 am, Rafael Weingärtner
wrote:
Thank you all for the warm welcome. It
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1477#issuecomment-216232227
@swill apart from the PR author, it would be great if at least one more
reviewer can share a screenshot; please proceed as per your discretion
---
If your project
Github user wido commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1514#issuecomment-216232254
@rhtyd I'd love to. But I never used the Redundant VR, so I can't tell.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
All,
I've tried to triage all open PRs, starting from oldest to newest. Based on my
understanding, I've put tag: in comments (as tagging was not allowed on
PRs) to sort them as following:
tag:mergeready - PRs that are ready for merge, may need one more LGTM
tag:easypr
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1489#issuecomment-216231216
I will make sure this gets into 4.9 because I think it is really needed.
We do need one more LGTM on the code. Also, since this PR does have some
implications
Github user singalrahul commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1523#issuecomment-216230102
test_deploy_vm_userdata_MultiNic.py script is added for the verification of
this Bug. It will verify that a user can deploy MultiNic VM when non-default
nic
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1520#issuecomment-216230034
@NuxRo thanks, please rebase and squash to a single commit
LGTM
tag:mergeready
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1519#issuecomment-216229957
@dsclose rebase against master, squash changes to a single commit, thanks
tag:needlove
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1516#issuecomment-216229873
@sudhansu7 rebase against master and push -f, squash changes to a single
commit, thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1515#issuecomment-216229763
LGTM
tag:mergeready
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1514#issuecomment-216229708
Good pr, let's ask comments from @remibergsma @DaanHoogland @wido and
others?
tag:needlove
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#issuecomment-216229542
@DaanHoogland please rebase against latest master; after that I can help
test this in my env. Thanks.
tag:needlove
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1502#issuecomment-216229281
PR is code complete with testing efforts that @borisstoyanov can share
tag:mergeready
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1497#issuecomment-216228984
Nice PR, though this would need some regression tests. Can you add marvin
smoke tests around list APis (add them to travis yml file)
tag:needlove
---
If
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1496#issuecomment-216228687
LGTM (code review)
tag:mergeready
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1495#issuecomment-216228633
tag:easypr
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1477#issuecomment-216228565
I think this is ready to merge. @remibergsma has shown screenshots to
verify the UI change does what it is supposed to and we have the LGTMs required.
---
If your
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1493#issuecomment-216228508
This PR is ready for merge, /cc @swill
tag:mergeready
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
101 - 200 of 376 matches
Mail list logo