IIRC we need the servlet.jar that comes with tomcat. Our servlets need that
during compilation.
It should be ok use tomcat7 to satisfy that requirement.
Cheers,
Hugo
On 10 nov. 2014, at 00:04, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote:
Hi All,
I was wondering if somebody could explain the
On Nov 7, 2014, at 10:55 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
I seem to recall that we had to remove paramiko back in 2012 because
it didn't conform to the licensing requirements. (Paramiko is LGPL,
which is a Cat X license.)
Indeed this message seems to indicate we removed it from the
On 10-11-14 08:37, Rohit Yadav wrote:
Hi,
In case of VMWare, when we register a new template we can pass in nic type
and disk controller but there is no API (or parameter passable to current
APIs) to change nic type and disk controller for both VM and template.
I’m planning to add a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27520/
---
(Updated Nov. 10, 2014, 9:14 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Kishan
On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 8:42 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com wrote:
88561e154f6d451d2437e7e6887417df6106c275
picked it but... it disables tests and replaces certificates. should
one of the two be enough?
--
Daan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27021/#review60546
---
Ship it!
ea99ff1c8622eadf8024ee9922d5f2b2b18d4f80
- Kishan Kavala
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26969/#review60547
---
Ship it!
Master: 991d783e0332d07cba18d046dfc7220a063f670f
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27671/#review60550
---
Ship it!
Master: 131c2f2014f69685b200b5304be88d9b1da3a2c9
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27613/#review60551
---
Ship it!
Master: ca66062cd54305afaaa64d707a88fc11764e292d
-
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/1833/
--
Started by an SCM change
[EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables.
Building remotely on cloudstack-buildslave-centos6-b00
(cloudstack-buildslave-centos6) in workspace
On Nov. 6, 2014, 4:49 a.m., Rajani Karuturi wrote:
looking at the diff isnt giving me much information. Can you share what
issues it is solving(a JIRA ticket?)? Is this related to internationalizing
the strings?
Derrick Schneider wrote:
Sorry it's not more clear. I asked on the
On Nov. 10, 2014, 9:33 a.m., Rajani Karuturi wrote:
Ship It!
commit: de3eb88b33eabc98568c353df4f5ee9e3233239c on 4.5 and master
- Rajani
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26969/#review60555
---
4.5: 310bb255acd74b6347bd778590e15543eef7333b
- Kishan Kavala
On
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27613/#review60557
---
4.5 cdabb2407a0761939d5159fd2317ebd7dcca4eb7
- Kishan Kavala
On
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27671/#review60558
---
4.5 34f31f90331d0027b133ccdc8fdb65ab86ce26cc
- Kishan Kavala
On
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27520/#review60559
---
4.5 36fd780482dbd65ef9328f630d0af0793d0fed2e
- Kishan Kavala
On
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27222/
---
(Updated Nov. 10, 2014, 9:45 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Kishan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27222/#review60560
---
Ship it!
master: 781648fb1003c8c32875e9ff7a6c4ef4694539f7
-
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/108/changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20518/
---
(Updated Nov. 10, 2014, 10:04 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Kishan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17941/
---
(Updated Nov. 10, 2014, 10:18 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Jayapal
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17941/
---
(Updated Nov. 10, 2014, 10:20 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Jayapal
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21805/
---
(Updated Nov. 10, 2014, 10:21 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Jayapal
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27801/
---
(Updated Nov. 10, 2014, 4:20 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27801/#review60566
---
Ship it!
b00f144c204bfa4ffa3db73c9d1fc9e86d79015c master
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27756/#review60568
---
Ship it!
f78defda0fa1c07d440b484c414b16a09e58433a 4.5
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27751/#review60570
---
Ship it!
fa8f0a43c3ae9025fede058178284792936c8657 master
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27677/#review60574
---
Ship it!
23df5f22ac96bf8032d10a5b65c6016534d67fcb 4.5
On Sept. 16, 2014, 10:17 a.m., Rohit Yadav wrote:
plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/resource/VmwareResource.java,
line 4995
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20518/diff/1/?file=563053#file563053line4995
Are we using _reserveCpu and _reserveMem in any other
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27416/#review60577
---
Ship it!
d4d8326a313b4dfecbeac04cfc51cbbf0a020563 master
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27379/#review60578
---
Ship it!
85ac979f72e7ea4b65f466429e786fe468a03646 4.5
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27321/#review60579
---
test/integration/testpaths/testpath_system_vm_ha.py
hi folks,
I am doing a 4.3.1KVM install on one centOS 6.6 host (mgt + agent).
Trying to setup an advanced zone with two bridges
I have two bridges br0 and br1 which have IPs like so:
br0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet addr:172.16.0.1 Bcast:172.16.0.255
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-maven-build/487/changes
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-maven-build/621/changes
Changes:
[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-7871: allow VM and template details update using
update APIs
--
Started by an SCM change
Started by an SCM change
[EnvInject] - Loading node
Hi,
Is anyone still experiencing these issues? If so, and willing to test a fix,
please let me know and I can provide you with a patch.
Many thanks,
Mihaela
-Original Message-
From: Leo Simons [mailto:lsim...@schubergphilis.com]
Sent: 15 October 2014 07:58
To:
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-maven-build/622/
--
Started by an SCM change
[EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables.
Building remotely on cloudstack-buildslave-centos6-87d
(cloudstack-buildslave-centos6) in workspace
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to cloudstack found
with Coverity Scan.
2 new defect(s) introduced to cloudstack found with Coverity Scan.
16 defect(s), reported by Coverity Scan earlier, were marked fixed in the
recent build analyzed by Coverity Scan.
New
yes, I don't know why this commit do both but it as been push in master +
4.5.
*Pierre-Luc DION*
Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect
t 855.652.5683
*CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w
I do see this issue still every now and then. Typically I notice it when I
re-compile the codebase and access the GUI for the first time. If I log out
and back in again, the problem goes away.
I can try out your fix.
Thanks!
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 6:15 AM, Mihaela Stoica
Wido,
If i get your note, then shall i remove the mentioned if else logic only to one
liner as below?
newDisk = destPool.createPhysicalDisk(name, Storage.ProvisioningType.THIN,
disk.getVirtualSize());
Regards,
Santhosh
From: Wido den Hollander
On 10-11-14 17:04, Santhosh Edukulla wrote:
Wido,
If i get your note, then shall i remove the mentioned if else logic only to
one liner as below?
newDisk = destPool.createPhysicalDisk(name, Storage.ProvisioningType.THIN,
disk.getVirtualSize());
Yes, that should be right. The
Mike,
Thank you for offering to try out my fix.
I will email you directly the patched files.
Thanks,
Mihaela
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
Sent: 10 November 2014 15:46
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: i18n issues in (master) GUI
Hi,
Basically I'm annoyed with the CPU (in MHz) usage in service offerings as
they are a lie basically.
Opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7874 and suggest to
have calculated automatically based on CPU cores number or at least having it
renamed to something like cpu
I agree completely. We've set all of our service offerings to equal
weights, and hard coded the same weight into the custom offering form.
It's a bit too confusing otherwise.
The way I understand the weights for (Xen/KVM at least) is that they're
just relative, so 1 vs 2 is the same as 1 vs
Rohit,
1. Regarding the below note, you can decided on that, but removing or not is
not related to this fix though.
2. Check the below link for other areas in code that need to be fixed as part
of poodle issue fix.
http://security.coverity.com/blog.html
Regards,
Santhosh
I am not entirely sure if 1 vs 2 = 1 vs 1000. It might be that the one with
1000 will get 1000 more prio to CPU compared to the one with 1. This needs to
be clarified per each hypervisor.
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message
That was definitely only an assumption. If each host handles it different
it may be preferable to hard code a Default level for each hypervisor
type, as well as a few different levels (e.g., 'Max', 'High', 'Default',
'Low', 'Min' 'Custom'). This would operators end-users clear options
to work
Personally, I'd propose the defaults should be values proportional or equal to
the cores number (that's how openstack does it).
Anyway, all this doesn't matter as long as no developer is listening. :-)
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original
I can't speak for all hypervisors, but with KVM, it takes the hypervisor
CPU MHz * cores and treats that as 'capacity' of the hypervisor. This
translates directly to the number used for cgroups cpu shares. So a 2GHz
quad core would have 8000 MHz worth of vms allocated to it (ignoring
Santhosh,
Please go ahead with any better fix you think would work on any/all of the
affected (release) branches.
On 10-Nov-2014, at 9:53 pm, Santhosh Edukulla santhosh.eduku...@citrix.com
wrote:
Rohit,
1. Regarding the below note, you can decided on that, but removing or not is
not
That option would probably work too. I do think that it should have a
custom option though. No changes should be implemented that could
potentially mess with current production environments, so leaving a custom
option in for operators that are already using it should prevent that.
Thank You,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24991/
---
(Updated Nov. 10, 2014, 7:23 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep
So, interesting, I'm now using XenServer 6.2 (with the patches that
CloudStack ends up calling XenServer 6.2.5).
When I created a second snapshot/backup of my volume, another hypervisor
snapshot was created and the data contained in the second hypervisor
snapshot was copied to secondary storage
I should test this out, but I'm thinking the current logic of blindly
deleting all previous hypervisor snapshots for a given volume will be
incompatible with the Take VM Snapshot feature (where a hypervisor
snapshot is created for the VM and every disk the VM is using).
If you've taken a VM
Hi,
In 4.6 I've noticed when I create a template from a snapshot that I can
spin VMs up from this template until I shut the CS MS down and re-start it.
Upon re-start, the template entries in cloud.template_store_ref get purged
(as in completely removed from the table). That being the case, the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27845/
---
Review request for cloudstack and sangeetha hariharan.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7876
I remember there was an issue with that occasionally happening when
templates were simply registered. Sometimes they'd be downloaded and
installed, and other times they would disappear. I think that was fixed
maybe 18 months ago, could be related.
On Nov 10, 2014 3:36 PM, Mike Tutkowski
Thanks, Marcus
I'll take a look into it later tonight more. I'm working on a feature for
4.6 and noticed this yesterday. It happened again today and I narrowed it
down to occurring when the CS MS was stopped and re-started.
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
I
Similar to VmWare, however unless you enable cpu reservation flag in
general settings, it does not actually allocate and reserve it on vmware
side - it only keeps it in cloudstack for tracking purposes.
On 11/10/14, 10:02 AM, Marcus wrote:
I can't speak for all hypervisors, but with KVM,
For existing installs(4.4 4.4.1), is there currently a method in place to
move an existing zone into a new region?
I found this but it says: Limitation:Zone migration currently does not support
zones with KVM hosts
It looks like those rows get deleted in
TemplateServiceImpl.handleTemplateSync(DataStore).
I noticed earlier that the XenServer 6.2.5 resource code does NOT write out
a properties file alongside the VHD template the way the XenServer 6.1
resource code does.
At the moment, I suspect that that is
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27856/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Jayapal Reddy and Kishan Kavala.
Bugs:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27858/
---
Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.
Bugs:
64 matches
Mail list logo
