I fixed it,
You don’t see 4.3.2 in the latest announcement section, just the latest blog
entry.
thanks
> On Sep 29, 2015, at 9:22 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>
> HI Ron,
>
> I am looking into it. The announcement section is pulled from the blog.
> But it does not seem to
HI Ron,
I am looking into it. The announcement section is pulled from the blog.
But it does not seem to be updated.
The latest version is indeed 4.5.2
> On Sep 28, 2015, at 11:12 PM, Ron Wheeler
> wrote:
>
> I am running 4.5.2 on Centos7.
> Thanks to all who
Hi Experts,
I need help in understanding an issue with cloud platform 4.5 and 4.5.1.
I am using xenserver 6.5 in my LAB with an appropriate hotfixes and when I
install CCP 4.5.1 or 4.5 the system vm agent state state appears dash "-" on UI
but if you install 4.3.0.2 or 4.3 agent state shows up
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/master/networking/ovs-plugin.html
has the following sentence:
"CentOS 6.4 and OpenvSwitch 1.10 are recommended." These seem to be very
old. Are they really the recommended versions?
Ron
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email:
Dear Ron,
It's old I believe.
--Tuna
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 1:05 PM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
> http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/master/networking/ovs-plugin.html
> has the following sentence:
> "CentOS 6.4 and OpenvSwitch 1.10 are recommended." These seem to
On the page
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/master/networking/ovs-plugin.html
"Configuring the OVS Plugin"
starts with
"Prerequisites"
which opens with this sentence
"Before enabling the OVS plugin the hypervisor needs to be install
OpenvSwitch."
which needs to be fixed.
Does "Before
Don't mind making the changes.
I have a lot of SVN experience and have the git repo for Apache OFBiz
configured but am still trying to figure out git.
What do I have to setup in Eclipse to access the "right" bits on git.
Seems to be a ton of git repo entries at
Github user borisroman commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/893#issuecomment-144046791
LGTM Based on code review. Not tested against a real environment.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
David, Do you think you could do another cleanup on the master of j.bac.o
?
Could you list the jobs that consume most of the spaces?
Thanks,
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 12:22 AM, Rajani Karuturi <
rajani.karut...@citrix.com> wrote:
> Hi David,
> disk space issue again. Can you please do a little
Wilder,
If you check the log file, I don't think it matters really that it was done via
the UI, could be wrong though.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Wilder Rodrigues"
> To:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 7:58 AM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
> On the page
> http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/master/networking/ovs-plugin.html
> "Configuring the OVS Plugin"
> starts with
> "Prerequisites"
> which opens with this sentence
> "Before enabling the OVS
Hi Sebastien,
We are able to use ACS + KVM for a while and I have not faced such a problem as
described on CLOUDSTACK-8920
Just as a reminder, we have several tests executed agains KVM with ACS 4.6 on
Sunday… all went fine.
Cheers,
Wilder
> On 29 Sep 2015, at 13:36, Sebastien Goasguen
Hi,
Can someone LGTM this PR ? or we don't need the 2 LGTM as it's not on
master?
This fix the build of cloudstack simulator docker container of 4.5.x
Thanks
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 8:57 PM, pdion891 wrote:
> GitHub user pdion891 opened a pull request:
>
>
Github user pdion891 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/893#issuecomment-144051603
Thanks Guys!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user pdion891 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/893
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Go one, Nux!
We haven’t tested the UI for a while! All advanced/basic zones I have created
are done via Marvin.
Will add that to the list for next tests.
Cheers,
Wilder
> On 29 Sep 2015, at 15:17, Nux! wrote:
>
> I built fresh RPMs from today's master, but the same story. I
Github user runseb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/893#issuecomment-144048504
LGTM based on code review (1 line removed, 2 lines added).
This does not change cloudstack code, the Dockerfile is only used by the
docker hub to build the
Hopefully the format of this email stays as I compose ?
Bugs to be fixed for BVTs:
a. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8915
b. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8697
c. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8891 - Should be a
blocker
d.
I built fresh RPMs from today's master, but the same story. I created an issue
for it:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8923
I wish I could test further, but can't get past setting up secondary storage.
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
Indeed, this was created over night and is also against 4.5
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8920
We should not consider that a blocker, as I have done this many times without
issues. Will comment and ask for more details.
Regards,
Remi
On 29/09/15 14:21, "Wilder Rodrigues"
I built RPMs from today's master and I have the exact same problem.
I have opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8923
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Nux!"
> To:
I’m testing 8915 now. The vrrp configuration was broken: instead of CIDR it was
configured with IP only - messed up the guest network interfaces.
Concerning 8891, it was fixed over the weekend, right? We tested iso nets and
VMs got IPs assigned successfully.
Cheers,
Wilder
> On 29 Sep 2015,
GitHub user yvsubhash opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/899
BUG-ID:CLOUDSTACK-8921
Summary: CLOUDSTACK-8921
snapshot_store_ref table should store actual size of back snapshot in
secondary storage
Calling SR scan to make sure size is
Github user pritisarap12 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/684#issuecomment-144003970
Merged the testcase in the existing testcase
test_03_restart_network_cleanup by adding support for basic setup.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Hi everyone,
We had a cancellation in the CCC panel on the future of cloudstack.
Anyone interested to jump in ?
Send me a private email if you want to take part, should be fun.
-Sebastien
Github user koushik-das commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/895#discussion_r40657381
--- Diff:
server/src/com/cloud/agent/manager/allocator/impl/FirstFitAllocator.java ---
@@ -297,6 +297,7 @@
I just installed Cloudstack agent on a Centos7 server and have the
following messages in the "cloudstack-agent.err" file.
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger
(com.cloud.agent.AgentShell).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
log4j:WARN See
Github user koushik-das commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/895#discussion_r40657679
--- Diff:
server/src/com/cloud/agent/manager/allocator/impl/FirstFitAllocator.java ---
@@ -297,6 +297,7 @@
Github user harikrishna-patnala commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/809#discussion_r40658808
--- Diff: test/integration/smoke/test_baremetal.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,155 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
Github user sanju1010 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/809#issuecomment-144028463
@DaanHoogland , this test requires hardware. So I can't add this as part of
travis yaml.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Can someone fix this?
Does anyone know what the correct recommendation should be?
Is anyone interested in the documentation?
I am trying to read it all with an outsider's eye and identify areas
that I have trouble understanding.
Is it customary to use the Dev list or just create JIRA Issues.
Github user koushik-das commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/885#issuecomment-144030748
@resmo The changes LGTM.
About testing on XS, the following should work:
- Deploy a VM
- Destroy the VM outside of CS (for e.g. from XenCenter)
-
Github user koushik-das commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/880#discussion_r40658531
--- Diff: setup/db/db/schema-452to460.sql ---
@@ -413,3 +413,6 @@ CREATE TABLE `cloud`.`ldap_trust_map` (
UNIQUE KEY
Github user koushik-das commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/880#discussion_r40658483
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/template/TemplateManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -278,6 +278,8 @@
@Inject
private EndPointSelector selector;
Just checking JIRA, we have 5 blockers for 4.6:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8920 - not assigned
KVM agent cannot communicate with server on port 8250
The other 4 are assigned and being worked on.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8915 - assigned to Wilder
Github user jayapalu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-144036889
I will file a ticket for the rightsubnetwithin configuration.
I will run the BVT tests and update the results here.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Cool! Thanks for retesting!
Cheers,
Wilder
> On 29 Sep 2015, at 19:07, Raja Pullela wrote:
>
> Yes, looks like 8891 is resolved based on the comments. I will double check
> the tests in regression too - just to make sure.
>
>> On Sep 29, 2015, at 6:55 PM, Wilder
Hi Lucian,
I’m testing Master on a daily basis, deploying Advanced DCs with KVM running on
CentOS 7.1 (that’s a difference). No problems with storage so far.
Anyway, I will try via the UI just in case.
Cheers,
Wilder
> On 29 Sep 2015, at 15:56, Nux! wrote:
>
> Wilder,
>
>
Yes, looks like 8891 is resolved based on the comments. I will double check
the tests in regression too - just to make sure.
> On Sep 29, 2015, at 6:55 PM, Wilder Rodrigues
> wrote:
>
> I’m testing 8915 now. The vrrp configuration was broken: instead of CIDR it
I have tested an installation of the CS 4.6.0 SNAPSHOT (today) on Ubuntu
14.04 LTS with latest update (installation with a ansible script)
The cloudstack-management don't works.
I don't known the root cause, but I suppose that is the (new?)
dependency of Tomcat v7 (before ~1 month: tomcat6
If I change my ansible script to install the tomcat6 package before
cloudstack-management, that's works.
Tomorrow I will test a full ACS advanced network installation.
root@cs-mgr1:~# service cloudstack-management status
* CloudStack-specific Tomcat servlet engine is running with pid 5798
Github user SudharmaJain commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/880#discussion_r40756846
--- Diff: setup/db/db/schema-452to460.sql ---
@@ -413,3 +413,6 @@ CREATE TABLE `cloud`.`ldap_trust_map` (
UNIQUE KEY
Hi Rajani,
Since I’m busy with VOC, I will take a look at this one as well.
Assigned to me.
Thanks!
Cheers,
Wilder
> On 30 Sep 2015, at 06:14, Rajani Karuturi wrote:
>
> As per the latest BVT reports, CLOUDSTACK-8876 should also be a blocker.
> I am bumping the
Github user SudharmaJain commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/895#discussion_r40755936
--- Diff:
server/src/com/cloud/agent/manager/allocator/impl/FirstFitAllocator.java ---
@@ -297,6 +297,7 @@
As per the latest BVT reports, CLOUDSTACK-8876 should also be a blocker.
I am bumping the priority of it.
~Rajani
On 29-Sep-2015, at 5:06 pm, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
> Just checking JIRA, we have 5 blockers for 4.6:
>
>
On the docs link you sent, at the bottom right, there is a link which says
“v:master”. clicking on it will show you a github edit link which is
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs/edit/master/rtd/source/networking/ovs-plugin.rst
you can edit online and “propose the change”(which would
Wilder,
As mentioned in the issue, cloudmonkey doesn't succeed in adding the storage
either, though the error is slightly different.
I've also added a screen recording of the UI procedure, if it helps anyone to
understand better.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
Hi folks, let’s try to shed some lights on those tests errors.
First off, it appears some of those tests are not included in our Travis run…:(
If anyone wants to check that list of tests and cross check with Travis, we
could run them as well.
@miguel, looks like smoke/test_scale_vm is
48 matches
Mail list logo