Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1502#issuecomment-218666241
@jburwell fixed the ProcessRunner issues, please do a final review and LGTM
or suggest changes. Thanks.
@nvazquez @swill I've fixed two CI issues (Travis and
Github user abhinandanprateek commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1371#discussion_r62967326
--- Diff: utils/src/main/java/com/cloud/utils/net/cidr/CIDR4.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,172 @@
+//
+// Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user rhtyd closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1502
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user rhtyd reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1502
CLOUDSTACK-9299: Out-of-band Management for CloudStack
Support access to a hostâs out-of-band management interface (e.g. IPMI,
iLO,
DRAC, etc.) to manage host power operations (on/off
Github user rhtyd commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1539#discussion_r62967100
--- Diff: test/integration/smoke/test_list_ids_parameter.py ---
@@ -194,10 +194,7 @@ def setUpClass(cls):
cls._cleanup = [
Github user abhinandanprateek commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1371#discussion_r62965518
--- Diff: utils/src/main/java/com/cloud/utils/net/NetUtils.java ---
@@ -1159,6 +1181,25 @@ public static boolean validateGuestCidr(final String
Hi,
I came across an issue in the metrics for zone and cluster. I have logged a bug
for the same. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9377
To quickly summarize the issue: APIs have a pagesize restriction - the
default.page.size global setting is used as the max result count -
Github user abhinandanprateek commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1371#discussion_r62963628
--- Diff: systemvm/patches/debian/config/opt/cloud/bin/cs/CsQuagga.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1539#issuecomment-218657103
I think one way to cleanup would be to do it case by case basis for each
test case manually instead of relying on the class level cleanup. Also, it's
best to avoid
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1493#issuecomment-218656836
@kiwiflyer along with this patch, have you also applied the optimization
patch #1534 (make sure to apply the patch on both mgmt server and KVM agent) ?
We can debug
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#issuecomment-218656345
@DaanHoogland done
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user rhtyd closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user rhtyd reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511
4.9/master bountycastle changes
This PR adds bountycastle related version and code fixes from @DaanHoogland
on top of https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1510
I could not fix
Github user abhinandanprateek commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1371#discussion_r62962859
--- Diff:
server/src/org/apache/cloudstack/network/topology/BasicNetworkVisitor.java ---
@@ -316,4 +317,9 @@ public boolean visit(final
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1539#issuecomment-218654451
Sorry for the delay getting to this. I think this probably works in all
cases, but I suspect it will not clean up correctly always. Because this was
working
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1539#issuecomment-218652190
LGTM, cc @swill let's merge this first to avoid other PRs failing
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/985#issuecomment-218651517
Does this require a change to the system VM template? I am pulling this in
for testing now...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1483#issuecomment-218649701
I need some code review on this one. Thanks...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1472#issuecomment-218649198
Thanks gents. I will get this merged...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1474#issuecomment-218649126
Thank you sir. I will get this merged...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1470#issuecomment-218648913
Thanks for the hard work @remibergsma. ð
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1537#issuecomment-218648825
This one is ready other than Jenkins. @PaulAngus, can you please either
force push the PR or close and reopen it so it kicks off Jenkins so we can get
this PR all
Github user kiwiflyer commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1514#issuecomment-218611825
LGTM. Tested in hardware lab and works as designed.
tag:mergeready
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user kiwiflyer commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1474#issuecomment-218607576
LGTM. Tested in a hardware lab.
tag:mergeready
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user kiwiflyer commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1472#issuecomment-218607629
tag:mergeready
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user dmabry commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1472#issuecomment-218600092
LGTM. We tested this in our Lab on HW and all static routes on each PG
came up as expected.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1528#issuecomment-218597484
I think this one is good to go...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1472#issuecomment-218597071
@rafaelweingartner yes, it will be forward merged. Sorry I only just got
around to answering your question. I need one more code review on this one.
Thanks...
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1470#issuecomment-218595232
Worked with @swill and @kiwiflyer and found the issue: one bit was missing
in the backport from Cosmic. Will look into that tomorrow.
---
If your project is
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1304#issuecomment-218596132
The additional run of these tests in a new environment gives the same
results. I think this needs some work still...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user kiwiflyer commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1472#issuecomment-218592243
LGTM. Tested in a hardware lab.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1331#issuecomment-218591057
@syed can you have a look at this one.
I am not sure why, but I am having a lot of trouble with this PR. I have
not been able to get a test run to actually
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1444#issuecomment-218579831
I think this one is pretty much ready. I have one code review on this one.
Can I get one more person to look over this for me? Thanks...
---
If your project is
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1444#issuecomment-218579019
### CI RESULTS
```
Tests Run: 85
Skipped: 0
Failed: 1
Errors: 0
Duration: 9h 12m 09s
```
**Summary of the
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1470#issuecomment-218578631
### CI RESULTS
```
Tests Run: 85
Skipped: 0
Failed: 24
Errors: 10
Duration: 10h 46m 24s
```
**Summary of
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/816#issuecomment-218553761
@swill OK, looks like are OK here.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1385#issuecomment-218544251
It was stuck due to another jenkins job running. I am still not sure I saw
what I saw. when I stopped 1252, shortly after 1253 through 1256 finished.
---
If
Github user serg38 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1502#issuecomment-218543261
@swill PR1539 passed Jenkins and Travis. After you merge it should resolve
the issue in other PRs
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#issuecomment-218542671
Good point, I am numb to travis timeouts. RM work remnance :(
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1403#issuecomment-218540891
Did a review, I have some remarks, some questions as well.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1403#discussion_r62892495
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/storage/snapshot/SnapshotManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -144,6 +145,8 @@
@Inject
SnapshotDataStoreDao
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1403#discussion_r62892410
--- Diff: core/src/com/cloud/agent/api/StartupRoutingCommand.java ---
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
long memory;
long dom0MinMemory;
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1403#discussion_r62892193
--- Diff:
engine/storage/datamotion/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/motion/StorageSystemDataMotionStrategy.java
---
@@ -172,78 +232,211 @@ private
Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1403#discussion_r62891804
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/storage/StorageManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -209,6 +211,8 @@
@Inject
protected HostDao _hostDao;
Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1403#discussion_r62890825
--- Diff:
plugins/storage/volume/solidfire/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/datastore/driver/SolidFirePrimaryDataStoreDriver.java
---
@@ -692,12
Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1403#discussion_r62890766
--- Diff:
plugins/storage/volume/solidfire/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/datastore/driver/SolidFirePrimaryDataStoreDriver.java
---
@@ -665,22
Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1403#discussion_r62886608
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/xenserver/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xenserver/resource/CitrixResourceBase.java
---
@@ -2351,17 +2376,52 @@ public SR
Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1403#discussion_r62886063
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/xenserver/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xenserver/resource/CitrixResourceBase.java
---
@@ -1792,10 +1796,26 @@ protected
Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1403#discussion_r62885313
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/xenserver/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xenserver/resource/CitrixResourceBase.java
---
@@ -164,9 +165,12 @@
*
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1493#issuecomment-218522071
No worries. ð I am really short on sleep, but I was pretty confident.
:P
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user nvazquez commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1493#issuecomment-218520703
Sorry, I confused PRs. Please ignore my last comment.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user nvazquez commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1502#issuecomment-218520519
@rhtyd @kiwiflyer @swill a PR for fixing the problem #1539
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1493#issuecomment-218519246
@nvazquez I don't think #1539 is related to this PR. I think this one has
completely separate issues...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1403#discussion_r62881271
--- Diff:
engine/storage/volume/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/volume/VolumeServiceImpl.java
---
@@ -554,6 +574,51 @@ protected Void
Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1403#discussion_r62881152
--- Diff:
engine/storage/volume/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/volume/VolumeServiceImpl.java
---
@@ -554,6 +574,51 @@ protected Void
Github user nvazquez commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1493#issuecomment-218514854
@rhtyd @kiwiflyer @swill a PR for fixing the problem #1539
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1403#discussion_r62880956
--- Diff:
engine/storage/volume/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/volume/VolumeServiceImpl.java
---
@@ -134,6 +146,14 @@
EndPointSelector
Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1403#discussion_r62880949
--- Diff:
engine/storage/volume/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/volume/VolumeServiceImpl.java
---
@@ -134,6 +146,14 @@
EndPointSelector
Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1403#discussion_r62880464
--- Diff:
engine/storage/snapshot/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/snapshot/XenserverSnapshotStrategy.java
---
@@ -289,7 +291,7 @@ public boolean
Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1403#discussion_r62880347
--- Diff:
engine/storage/snapshot/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/snapshot/StorageSystemSnapshotStrategy.java
---
@@ -347,38 +395,87 @@ private
Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1403#discussion_r62879575
--- Diff:
engine/storage/snapshot/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/snapshot/StorageSystemSnapshotStrategy.java
---
@@ -347,38 +395,87 @@ private
Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1403#discussion_r62878912
--- Diff:
engine/storage/snapshot/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/snapshot/StorageSystemSnapshotStrategy.java
---
@@ -72,8 +77,10 @@
Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1403#discussion_r62876283
--- Diff:
engine/storage/datamotion/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/motion/StorageSystemDataMotionStrategy.java
---
@@ -361,59 +603,221 @@
Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1403#discussion_r62876182
--- Diff:
engine/storage/datamotion/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/motion/StorageSystemDataMotionStrategy.java
---
@@ -361,59 +603,221 @@
Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1403#discussion_r62876040
--- Diff:
engine/storage/datamotion/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/motion/StorageSystemDataMotionStrategy.java
---
@@ -361,59 +608,225 @@
Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1403#discussion_r62875666
--- Diff:
engine/storage/datamotion/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/motion/StorageSystemDataMotionStrategy.java
---
@@ -255,99 +473,123 @@
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1385#issuecomment-218505040
@DaanHoogland it finished!!! :P
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1537#issuecomment-218503981
I am testing now... ð
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1403#discussion_r62875028
--- Diff:
engine/storage/datamotion/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/motion/StorageSystemDataMotionStrategy.java
---
@@ -172,78 +254,214 @@
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#issuecomment-218503116
@DaanHoogland well a timeout in combination with a connection is not being
able to be established seems relevant since it is related to the code that has
changed.
Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1403#discussion_r62874090
--- Diff:
engine/storage/datamotion/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/motion/StorageSystemDataMotionStrategy.java
---
@@ -172,78 +232,211 @@
I think this is the extent of the documentation at this point.
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-admin/pull/37/files
Rohit, maybe you can shed some light on this from a developer's perspective
and how we should be handling this going forward? Are there official docs
which covered how to
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1497#issuecomment-218500189
Thank you, I will merge it assuming Jenkins and Travis come back clean.
Thx... ð
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user nvazquez commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1497#issuecomment-218499768
Done @swill @serg38
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user nvazquez opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1539
CLOUDSTACK-9378: Fix for #1497
JIRA TICKET: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9378
After #1497 was merged, test_list_ids_parameter.py failed on Travis. It was
noticed
Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1403#discussion_r62872442
--- Diff:
engine/storage/datamotion/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/motion/StorageSystemDataMotionStrategy.java
---
@@ -172,78 +232,211 @@
Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1403#discussion_r62868269
--- Diff: engine/schema/src/com/cloud/dc/dao/ClusterDaoImpl.java ---
@@ -260,4 +268,41 @@ public boolean remove(Long id) {
Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1403#discussion_r62867309
--- Diff:
engine/api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/engine/subsystem/api/storage/PrimaryDataStoreInfo.java
---
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
static final
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/816#issuecomment-218489553
I think we are definitely having issues with it not cleaning correctly. I
have seen a couple cases where we get the "unable to update index" when it
tries to do a
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1497#issuecomment-218489998
Can you create a new PR to fix this and we will get it tested right away.
Thanks for being on top of this. ð
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1304#issuecomment-218483982
The added test fails, but lots of tests failed. I will rebuild my
environment and test again to see if anything changes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1304#issuecomment-218483641
### CI RESULTS
```
Tests Run: 7
Skipped: 0
Failed: 4
Errors: 0
Duration: 0h 37m 50s
```
**Summary of the
Github user serg38 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1497#issuecomment-218480013
The issue that it couldn't find a snaphsot because it is already cleaned by
account cleanup.
+cls._cleanup = [
+
Hi,
I see in afcbd27 that we've deprecated commands.properties.in.
Is there documentation on the new way that we specify permissions for a given
API these days?
Thanks!
Mike
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/816#issuecomment-218480720
That is the rat test. it is usually right. I didn't see a new file without
license though. May one of the to with a license starting with an empty comment
line
GitHub user marcaurele reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1532
DAO: Hit the cache for entity flagged as removed too
I came along this part of the code and I don't see any reason why the cache
should not be used when fetching with the "removed" ones.
I can't point to this PR for this, but I have noticed an increase in random
failures in my CI runs since this code has gone in. I have not tracked it
down to this, but resources are tight in those environments, so if we are
getting CPU maxing out, that could potentially account for the higher
Github user kiwiflyer commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1493#issuecomment-218473922
![image](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/17278194/15184123/94553146-1759-11e6-8dec-c4e0bb0c1795.png)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user kiwiflyer commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1493#issuecomment-218473890
@rhtyd We're still seeing some odd behaviour related to the agent with this
PR (and PR1534) applied to 2 of our hardware labs. What we're seeing is 100%
cpu on
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#issuecomment-218473575
a timeout @swill. in travis that is not a good indication of not working. I
wouldn't know where to look. @rhtyd can you close and reopen?
---
If your project
Github user marcaurele closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1532
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Rohit, I have seen quite a few issues with this feature so far. The change
you made in #1538 does not change the actual code at all, it just reduces
the number of tests, so you are less likely to run into the problem, but
the problem still exists.
I am CCing in Simon Weller as well. I was
Thank you Wei & Remi !!
I will start using the latest system VM templates.
With regards,
Prashanth
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Remi Bergsma
wrote:
> Hi Prashanth,
>
> As Wei suggested, when you use CloudStack 4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 you also need
> the systemvm
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1532#issuecomment-218472093
@marcaurele instead of force push you can close and reopen after a few
seconds. This usually works as well and seves you switching windows
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1537#issuecomment-218470411
LGTM, @swill, I am being very formal but can you queue this for integration
tests?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1385#issuecomment-218467871
@swill I closed and reopened. It started building anew but is now stuck in
the archiving phase for quite some time.
```
[INFO]
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1497#issuecomment-218469220
@serg38 I had a bunch of people re-push PRs last night and this morning to
get everything green and 3 or 4 are failing with this.
Here are a couple off the
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1497#issuecomment-218464050
@nvazquez this seems to have broken travis for everyone. We have this
issue showing up in pretty much all travis runs right now `ContextSuite
Github user nvazquez commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1502#issuecomment-218468571
@rhtyd sure, I'll examine this. This tests are introduced in #1497, I'll
work on this
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user nvazquez commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1497#issuecomment-218467920
@swill it's strange, as @serg38 says it succeeds for us and for
@koushik-das, I'll investigate. Is there any log of the failure?
---
If your project is set up
1 - 100 of 159 matches
Mail list logo