Re: Ceph RBD related host agent segfault

> On Jul 8, 2016, at 2:53 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > > >> Op 7 juli 2016 om 6:35 schreef Aaron Hurt : >> >> >> >>> On Jul 6, 2016, at 5:14 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote: >>> Op 6 juli 2016 om 16:18 schreef Aaron Hurt

Re: [Feature Request] VM Snapshot based on KVM+Ceph

This is a feature that has been missing from Cloudstack since the beginning when using KVM as the hypervisor. It's been asked for many times but still no support. This would be a huge plus for Cloudstack if this feature was added and make it a much more viable product for end users. KVM is

Re: [Feature Request] VM Snapshot based on KVM+Ceph

Just FYI: You can ask on this list for sponsored feature development if this is something that needs prompt resolution. Regards ilya On 7/8/16 7:07 PM, 吕海蛟 wrote: > Hi, Developers > > > > We deployed ACS+KVM+Ceph in our environment. Everything looks fine > except the VM snapshot feature

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

Hi all, One small comment since strongSwan didn't make it into 4.9. There is still a very simple bug in enabling PFS for site-to-site VPNs. The code checks the Dead Peer Detection (DPD) variable instead of the PFS variable when determining whether or not to enable PFS for the site-to-site

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1608: Cleanup RBD contexts after exceptions to prevent pot...

Github user leprechau commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1608 Tests passed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so,

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1600: Support Backup of Snapshots for Managed Storage

Github user syed commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1600 @mike-tutkowski I think the `Destroyed` state should suffice. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does

Re: [GitHub] cloudstack issue #1600: Support Backup of Snapshots for Managed Storage

Well...it does say it's in the Destroyed state. I thought we removed these kinds of rows from this table, but it looks like we don't. That being the case, I think we can ignore what I asked for here. From: mike-tutkowski Sent:

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1600: Support Backup of Snapshots for Managed Storage

Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1600 A comment: I have observed that the SR that was previously not being detached from XenServer is now being detached with your newer version of the code. One

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1609: [CLOUDSTACK-9430] Added fix for adding/editin...

GitHub user pdube opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1609 [CLOUDSTACK-9430] Added fix for adding/editing Network ACL rule ordering BUG: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9430 The issue occurred because all of the ACL rules get

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1608: Cleanup RBD contexts after exceptions to prev...

Github user leprechau closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1608 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1608: Cleanup RBD contexts after exceptions to prev...

GitHub user leprechau reopened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1608 Cleanup RBD contexts after exceptions to prevent potential agent crash We noticed that when an exception occurs within the cleanup loop inside the deletePhysicalDisk routine that the

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

This one isn't a show stopper, but I noticed when setting up a new cloud in a XenServer environment that an SR remains that points to secondary storage after the system VMs have been deployed. http://imgur.com/5pEnkm9 We had chatted a bit about this on the list a while back and it seemed like

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

Hey Will, I was referring to the need to add: db.cloud.driver=jdbc:mysql db.usage.driver=jdbc:mysql db.simulator.driver=jdbc:mysql to db.properties when upgrading. Asking admins to add this manually won’t give the impression of a ‘well-packaged’ product. And I suspect will end up like the

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

Great, I am working on the Release Notes (and upgrade details) right now, so I will make sure that gets in there. Thanks for confirming. :) *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

Will, Yes, indeed, it should be added to Upgrade notes. Thanks! -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Will Stevens" > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Sent: Monday, 11 July, 2016 18:15:57 > Subject:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

Thanks Nux. Should the following information be added to the Release Notes and the Upgrade documentation? Make sure these are added to db.properties: db.cloud.driver=jdbc:mysql db.usage.driver=jdbc:mysql db.simulator.driver=jdbc:mysql I had a look at the files and they seem to have the correct

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

Other than using Wido's quick fix in db.properties, everything else checks out as far as I can tell. +1 (binding) Good job -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Nux!" > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

Yes, we did not change the systemvm templates because features like strongswan, etc, did not make it into this release... *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

I take it we're still to use the old 4.6 systemvm template? -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Will Stevens" > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Sent: Wednesday, 6 July, 2016 21:52:14 > Subject:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

Cool, thanks for clarifying. Too bad Strongswan didn't make it. I'll test shortly. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Will Stevens" > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Sent: Monday, 11 July, 2016

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

> Op 10 juli 2016 om 14:06 schreef Paul Angus : > > > Guys, > > Is it not possible to add the additional entries into db.properties when > CloudStack is upgrading rather than manually? If it is possible, then > manually intervention is a -1 in my book. > Sure it's

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1607: SSVM downloader now handles redirects properly.

Github user wido commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1607 Indeed, looke good to me, is there a simple way to test this? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

Hi Paul, Can you review the discussion here to see if it clears anything up: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1489#issuecomment-215479369 Can you help me understand what you are expecting the functionality to be and what you are experiencing? Thanks, *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer

Marvin - test_data.py

Hi all, The default test data has the following entries - does anyone have copies of these images which I can download and host locally to our Trillian deployment? "templateregister1": { "displaytext": "win8withpv", "name": "win8withpv",

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1608: Cleanup RBD contexts after exceptions to prevent pot...

Github user leprechau commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1608 Absolutely, I'll add a bit more to the logging when I get into the office. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

Paul, Is this condition a regression in previous behavior? Thanks, -John > john.burw...@shapeblue.com  www.shapeblue.com 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London VA WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue On Jul 10, 2016, at 8:06 AM, Paul Angus wrote: > > Guys, > > Is it not

Re: Opportunity to contribute in Apache CloudStack

Hello Sir, Can you please tell us more about the proposal to bring pure Xen in as fully supported hypervisor and your project in security space? Regards, TheAtom On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Tim Mackey wrote: > Jainesh, and by extension all members of TheAtom, welcome to

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1605: CLOUDSTACK-9428: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-9211 - Improve p...

Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1605 @nvazquez Thanks. I will try this in my setup and share the results. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1608: Cleanup RBD contexts after exceptions to prevent pot...

Github user wido commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1608 Thank you! Good catch :) Could you look into the logging, since it would show the user more which is happening. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1608: Cleanup RBD contexts after exceptions to prev...

Github user wido commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1608#discussion_r70217007 --- Diff: plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/storage/LibvirtStorageAdaptor.java --- @@ -863,26 +864,30 @@ public boolean

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1608: Cleanup RBD contexts after exceptions to prev...

Github user wido commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1608#discussion_r70216966 --- Diff: plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/storage/KVMStorageProcessor.java --- @@ -1325,6 +1328,8 @@ public Answer

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1607: SSVM downloader now handles redirects properly.

Github user karuturi commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1607 changes looks good. It would be great if a test case can be added. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your