date:20170425

[GitHub] koushik-das commented on issue #1997: CLOUDSTACK-9208: Assertion Error in VM_POWER_STATE handler- Fixed

2017-04-25 Thread git

koushik-das commented on issue #1997: CLOUDSTACK-9208: Assertion Error in 
VM_POWER_STATE handler- Fixed
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1997#issuecomment-297244639
 
 
   Code changes LGTM
 

This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

RE: Alternative Cloudstack UI for KVM and Basic Zones (with SG)

2017-04-25 Thread Rashmi Dixit

Congratulations! This looks really good. Plus it's on the latest (& greatest) 
stack.  

Good stuff!

Rashmi

-Original Message-
From: Ivan Kudryavtsev [mailto:kudryavtsev...@bw-sw.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2017 12:42 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Alternative Cloudstack UI for KVM and Basic Zones (with SG)

Hello, Cloudstack community.

We are proud to present our last development effort to you. During the last
5 months we spend some time to develop alternative Cloudstack UI for basic 
zones with KVM hypervisor and security groups. This is basically the thing we 
are using in our clouds. During the design of the software we tried to fulfill 
the expectations of our average cloud users and simplify operations as much as 
possible.

The project is OSS and can be found at GitHub with bunch of screenshots and 
deployment guide. It's under active development so, we will ge glad if you join 
and provide us with additional feedback, UX considerations and other 
interesting information.

Project page at GitHub: https://bwsw.github.io/cloudstack-ui/
Source code: https://github.com/bwsw/cloudstack-ui

Have a good day. Looking forward hearing your feedback.

--
With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev
Bitworks Software, Ltd.
Cell: +7-923-414-1515
WWW: http://bw-sw.com/



DISCLAIMER
==
This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is the 
property of Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business. It is intended only for 
the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain, copy, print, 
distribute or use this message. If you have received this communication in 
error, please notify the sender and delete all copies of this message. 
Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business does not accept any liability for 
virus infected mails.

[GitHub] swill commented on issue #2062: CLOUDSTACK-9878: remove unnecessary VPN drops

2017-04-25 Thread git

swill commented on issue #2062: CLOUDSTACK-9878: remove unnecessary VPN drops
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2062#issuecomment-297232153
 
 
   Is there a label for `run CI on this`?  I feel like that would be useful.
 

This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

[GitHub] rashmidixit commented on issue #1894: CLOUDSTACK-9700 Allow user to Register/Copy templates to multiple zones at the same time

2017-04-25 Thread git

rashmidixit commented on issue #1894: CLOUDSTACK-9700 Allow user to 
Register/Copy templates to multiple zones at the same time
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1894#issuecomment-297231746
 
 
   The failed test in travis CI doesn't have anything to do with the actual fix.
 

This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Re: Alternative Cloudstack UI for KVM and Basic Zones (with SG)

2017-04-25 Thread Ivan Kudryavtsev

Hello, Pierre-Luc

We didn't think about it yet, but I suppose if the UI is mature and quite
universal then if community vote for it and there are no drawbacks for
development process I believe it's great.

As an long term advantage of the project I see the usage of the state of
art frontend development stack (TypeScript, Angular2 and Material) which is
great and and fits for next several years which may be good for the project
and future users who are planning to push development efforts to integrate
the ACS in their environments.

26 апр. 2017 г. 9:26 пользователь "Pierre-Luc Dion" 
написал:

Wow, that looks great, good start!

Do you have intent to give it back as an Apache projet eventually?

Thanks for the initiative!

Le 25 avr. 2017 4:04 PM, "Nathan Johnson"  a écrit :

> Very nice!
>
> Ivan Kudryavtsev  wrote:
>
> > Hello, Cloudstack community.
> >
> > We are proud to present our last development effort to you. During the
> last
> > 5 months we spend some time to develop alternative Cloudstack UI for
> basic
> > zones with KVM hypervisor and security groups. This is basically the
> thing
> > we are using in our clouds. During the design of the software we tried
to
> > fulfill the expectations of our average cloud users and simplify
> operations
> > as much as possible.
> >
> > The project is OSS and can be found at GitHub with bunch of screenshots
> and
> > deployment guide. It's under active development so, we will ge glad if
> you
> > join and provide us with additional feedback, UX considerations and
other
> > interesting information.
> >
> > Project page at GitHub: https://bwsw.github.io/cloudstack-ui/
> > Source code: https://github.com/bwsw/cloudstack-ui
> >
> > Have a good day. Looking forward hearing your feedback.
> >
> > --
> > With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev
> > Bitworks Software, Ltd.
> > Cell: +7-923-414-1515
> > WWW: http://bw-sw.com/
>
>
>

Re: Alternative Cloudstack UI for KVM and Basic Zones (with SG)

2017-04-25 Thread Pierre-Luc Dion

Wow, that looks great, good start!

Do you have intent to give it back as an Apache projet eventually?

Thanks for the initiative!

Le 25 avr. 2017 4:04 PM, "Nathan Johnson"  a écrit :

> Very nice!
>
> Ivan Kudryavtsev  wrote:
>
> > Hello, Cloudstack community.
> >
> > We are proud to present our last development effort to you. During the
> last
> > 5 months we spend some time to develop alternative Cloudstack UI for
> basic
> > zones with KVM hypervisor and security groups. This is basically the
> thing
> > we are using in our clouds. During the design of the software we tried to
> > fulfill the expectations of our average cloud users and simplify
> operations
> > as much as possible.
> >
> > The project is OSS and can be found at GitHub with bunch of screenshots
> and
> > deployment guide. It's under active development so, we will ge glad if
> you
> > join and provide us with additional feedback, UX considerations and other
> > interesting information.
> >
> > Project page at GitHub: https://bwsw.github.io/cloudstack-ui/
> > Source code: https://github.com/bwsw/cloudstack-ui
> >
> > Have a good day. Looking forward hearing your feedback.
> >
> > --
> > With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev
> > Bitworks Software, Ltd.
> > Cell: +7-923-414-1515
> > WWW: http://bw-sw.com/
>
>
>

[GitHub] blueorangutan commented on issue #2035: CLOUDSTACK-9867:VM snapshot on primary storage usage metrics

2017-04-25 Thread git

blueorangutan commented on issue #2035: CLOUDSTACK-9867:VM snapshot on primary 
storage usage metrics
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2035#issuecomment-297191753
 
 
   Trillian test result (tid-1034)
   Environment: xenserver-65sp1 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
   Total time taken: 42947 seconds
   Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr2035-t1034-xenserver-65sp1.zip
   Intermitten failure detected: 
/marvin/tests/smoke/test_deploy_virtio_scsi_vm.py
   Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_privategw_acl.py
   Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_vpc_redundant.py
   Test completed. 48 look ok, 3 have error(s)
   
   
   Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
   --- | --- | --- | ---
   test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | `Failure` | 542.61 | test_vpc_redundant.py
   test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | `Failure` | 1346.12 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
   test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | `Failure` | 573.89 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
   test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 763.43 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
   test_06_verify_guest_lspci_again | `Error` | 0.00 | 
test_deploy_virtio_scsi_vm.py
   test_05_change_vm_ostype_restart | `Error` | 0.00 | 
test_deploy_virtio_scsi_vm.py
   test_04_verify_guest_lspci | `Error` | 0.00 | test_deploy_virtio_scsi_vm.py
   test_03_verify_libvirt_attach_disk | `Error` | 0.00 | 
test_deploy_virtio_scsi_vm.py
   test_02_verify_libvirt_after_restart | `Error` | 0.00 | 
test_deploy_virtio_scsi_vm.py
   test_01_verify_libvirt | `Error` | 0.00 | test_deploy_virtio_scsi_vm.py
   ContextSuite context=TestDeployVirtioSCSIVM>:teardown | `Error` | 0.00 | 
test_deploy_virtio_scsi_vm.py
   test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 326.25 | test_vpc_vpn.py
   test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 166.73 | test_vpc_vpn.py
   test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 568.86 | test_vpc_vpn.py
   test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 325.18 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
   test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 733.84 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
   test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
Success | 914.74 | test_vpc_redundant.py
   test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | Success | 1036.15 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
   test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 15.70 | test_volumes.py
   test_08_resize_volume | Success | 95.99 | test_volumes.py
   test_07_resize_fail | Success | 101.00 | test_volumes.py
   test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 20.37 | test_volumes.py
   test_05_detach_volume | Success | 100.46 | test_volumes.py
   test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 10.21 | test_volumes.py
   test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 15.28 | test_volumes.py
   test_02_attach_volume | Success | 10.83 | test_volumes.py
   test_01_create_volume | Success | 397.28 | test_volumes.py
   test_change_service_offering_for_vm_with_snapshots | Success | 389.49 | 
test_vm_snapshots.py
   test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 280.21 | test_vm_snapshots.py
   test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | Success | 191.44 | test_vm_snapshots.py
   test_01_create_vm_snapshots | Success | 130.76 | test_vm_snapshots.py
   test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 222.54 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
   test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
   test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
   test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.83 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
   test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.25 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
   test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 66.27 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
   test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.10 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
   test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 5.13 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
   test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 10.22 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
   test_02_start_vm | Success | 20.26 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
   test_01_stop_vm | Success | 30.28 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
   test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 151.28 | test_templates.py
   test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
   test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.09 | test_templates.py
   test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.08 | test_templates.py
   test_04_extract_template | Success | 5.23 | test_templates.py
   test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.14 | test_templates.py
   test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.10 | test_templates.py
   test_01_create_template | Success | 105.84 | test_templates.py
   test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 196.58 | test_ssvm.py
   test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 229.00 | test_ssvm.py
   test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 141.50 | test_ssvm.py
   test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 148.93 | test_ssvm.py
   test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 166.53 | test_ssvm.py
   test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 168.90 | test_ssvm.py
   test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.14 | test_ssvm.py
   test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.44 | test_ssvm.py
   test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.17 |

Re: Alternative Cloudstack UI for KVM and Basic Zones (with SG)

2017-04-25 Thread Nathan Johnson

Very nice!

Ivan Kudryavtsev  wrote:

> Hello, Cloudstack community.
>
> We are proud to present our last development effort to you. During the last
> 5 months we spend some time to develop alternative Cloudstack UI for basic
> zones with KVM hypervisor and security groups. This is basically the thing
> we are using in our clouds. During the design of the software we tried to
> fulfill the expectations of our average cloud users and simplify operations
> as much as possible.
>
> The project is OSS and can be found at GitHub with bunch of screenshots and
> deployment guide. It's under active development so, we will ge glad if you
> join and provide us with additional feedback, UX considerations and other
> interesting information.
>
> Project page at GitHub: https://bwsw.github.io/cloudstack-ui/
> Source code: https://github.com/bwsw/cloudstack-ui
>
> Have a good day. Looking forward hearing your feedback.
>
> -- 
> With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev
> Bitworks Software, Ltd.
> Cell: +7-923-414-1515
> WWW: http://bw-sw.com/

RE: Alternative Cloudstack UI for KVM and Basic Zones (with SG)

2017-04-25 Thread Kishan Kavala

Ivan,
UI is very impressive and user friendly.
Thanks for sharing.

-Original Message-
From: Jayapal Uradi [mailto:jayapal.ur...@accelerite.com]
Sent: 25 April 2017 03:41 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Alternative Cloudstack UI for KVM and Basic Zones (with SG)

New UI pages looks good.

Thanks,
Jayapal
> On Apr 25, 2017, at 1:55 PM, Rajani Karuturi  wrote:
>
> Looks very good. Thanks for open sourcing it :)
>
> ~ Rajani
>
> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
>
> On April 25, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Ivan Kudryavtsev
> (kudryavtsev...@bw-sw.com) wrote:
>
> Hello, Cloudstack community.
>
> We are proud to present our last development effort to you.
> During the last
> 5 months we spend some time to develop alternative Cloudstack UI for
> basic zones with KVM hypervisor and security groups. This is basically
> the thing we are using in our clouds. During the design of the
> software we tried to fulfill the expectations of our average cloud
> users and simplify operations as much as possible.
>
> The project is OSS and can be found at GitHub with bunch of
> screenshots and deployment guide. It's under active development so, we
> will ge glad if you join and provide us with additional feedback, UX
> considerations and other interesting information.
>
> Project page at GitHub: https://bwsw.github.io/cloudstack-ui/
> Source code: https://github.com/bwsw/cloudstack-ui
>
> Have a good day. Looking forward hearing your feedback.
>
> --
> With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev
> Bitworks Software, Ltd.
> Cell: +7-923-414-1515
> WWW: http://bw-sw.com/

DISCLAIMER
==
This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is the 
property of Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business. It is intended only for 
the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain, copy, print, 
distribute or use this message. If you have received this communication in 
error, please notify the sender and delete all copies of this message. 
Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business does not accept any liability for 
virus infected mails.

DISCLAIMER
==
This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is the 
property of Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business. It is intended only for 
the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain, copy, print, 
distribute or use this message. If you have received this communication in 
error, please notify the sender and delete all copies of this message. 
Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business does not accept any liability for 
virus infected mails.

Re: Alternative Cloudstack UI for KVM and Basic Zones (with SG)

2017-04-25 Thread Jayapal Uradi

New UI pages looks good.

Thanks,
Jayapal
> On Apr 25, 2017, at 1:55 PM, Rajani Karuturi  wrote:
>
> Looks very good. Thanks for open sourcing it :)
>
> ~ Rajani
>
> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
>
> On April 25, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Ivan Kudryavtsev
> (kudryavtsev...@bw-sw.com) wrote:
>
> Hello, Cloudstack community.
>
> We are proud to present our last development effort to you.
> During the last
> 5 months we spend some time to develop alternative Cloudstack UI
> for basic
> zones with KVM hypervisor and security groups. This is basically
> the thing
> we are using in our clouds. During the design of the software we
> tried to
> fulfill the expectations of our average cloud users and simplify
> operations
> as much as possible.
>
> The project is OSS and can be found at GitHub with bunch of
> screenshots and
> deployment guide. It's under active development so, we will ge
> glad if you
> join and provide us with additional feedback, UX considerations
> and other
> interesting information.
>
> Project page at GitHub: https://bwsw.github.io/cloudstack-ui/
> Source code: https://github.com/bwsw/cloudstack-ui
>
> Have a good day. Looking forward hearing your feedback.
>
> --
> With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev
> Bitworks Software, Ltd.
> Cell: +7-923-414-1515
> WWW: http://bw-sw.com/

DISCLAIMER
==
This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is the 
property of Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business. It is intended only for 
the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain, copy, print, 
distribute or use this message. If you have received this communication in 
error, please notify the sender and delete all copies of this message. 
Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business does not accept any liability for 
virus infected mails.

Re: Alternative Cloudstack UI for KVM and Basic Zones (with SG)

2017-04-25 Thread Rajani Karuturi

Looks very good. Thanks for open sourcing it :)

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On April 25, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Ivan Kudryavtsev
(kudryavtsev...@bw-sw.com) wrote:

Hello, Cloudstack community.

We are proud to present our last development effort to you.
During the last
5 months we spend some time to develop alternative Cloudstack UI
for basic
zones with KVM hypervisor and security groups. This is basically
the thing
we are using in our clouds. During the design of the software we
tried to
fulfill the expectations of our average cloud users and simplify
operations
as much as possible.

The project is OSS and can be found at GitHub with bunch of
screenshots and
deployment guide. It's under active development so, we will ge
glad if you
join and provide us with additional feedback, UX considerations
and other
interesting information.

Project page at GitHub: https://bwsw.github.io/cloudstack-ui/
Source code: https://github.com/bwsw/cloudstack-ui

Have a good day. Looking forward hearing your feedback.

--
With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev
Bitworks Software, Ltd.
Cell: +7-923-414-1515
WWW: http://bw-sw.com/

Re:Re: Fw: [4.10] VPN disconnected while network changes taken

2017-04-25 Thread Haijiao

Thanks Will, 


will test this week.






在2017年04月25 04时03分, "Will Stevens"写道:


Here is the fix to this: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2062


Will STEVENS

Lead Developer






On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Haijiao <18602198...@163.com> wrote:

Hi Will

Any progress about this issue ?

tks


Sent from my mobile



- 转发的邮件 -

发件人：Haijiao
发送日期：2017年04月14日 23:21
收件人：dev
抄送人：
主题：Re:Re: [4.10] VPN disconnected while network changes taken   
 
Sure, Karuturi


Logged a bug in Jira,  thanks!


CLOUDSTACK-9878 Remote Access VPN that losing connection when new network 
configs are introduced
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9878






在2017年04月14 13时14分, "Rajani Karuturi"写道:

Hi Haijiao,

Thanks for testing. Can you log a bug for this please? It can be
a blocker for 4.10.

@Will,

Did you get a chance to take a look at this issue?

Thanks,

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On April 12, 2017 at 7:12 AM, Will Stevens
(wstev...@cloudops.com) wrote:

Thanks, I will have a look.

*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer



On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 8:58 PM, Haijiao <18602198...@163.com>
wrote:

HI, Will
It's a Remote Access VPN that losing connection while new
network configs
introduced.
Thanks !

在2017年04月12 02时26分, "Will Stevens"写道:

Is this a Site-to-Site VPN connection or the Remote Access VPN
that is
losing connection when new network configs are introduced?

Thanks,

*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer



On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 12:49 AM, Haijiao <18602198...@163.com>
wrote:

Hi,

We built and tested the ACS 4.10 from the latest master (Apr.7,
2017)

Our environment is,
- ACS: 4.10.0.0-SNAPSHOT
- Management Server: Centos7.2 1151
- Host: Centos7.2 1151
- System VM: systemvm64template-master-4.10.0-kvm.qcow2.bz2
- Network: Isolated Network
- Network Offering: Offering for Isolated networks with Source
Nat

service

enabled

We can successfully setup VPN and it works as expected. However,
once

we

take any network changes below, the VPN connnection will be
immediately
disconnected.

- Update firewall rules (add/change)
- Update port fowarding
- Update LB
- Add one more VPN account

Is there some configuration we missed ? Or it's due to the new
VPN
component (StrongSWAN) introcuced in 4.10 ?

Re: Alternative Cloudstack UI for KVM and Basic Zones (with SG)

2017-04-25 Thread Rohit Yadav

Hi Ivan and team,

Congratulations for building the first version. Looking forward to more 
improvements.

Thanks for sharing, this looks exciting.

Regards,
Rohit Yadav



From: Ivan Kudryavtsev 
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2017 12:41:59 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Alternative Cloudstack UI for KVM and Basic Zones (with SG)

Hello, Cloudstack community.

We are proud to present our last development effort to you. During the last
5 months we spend some time to develop alternative Cloudstack UI for basic
zones with KVM hypervisor and security groups. This is basically the thing
we are using in our clouds. During the design of the software we tried to
fulfill the expectations of our average cloud users and simplify operations
as much as possible.

The project is OSS and can be found at GitHub with bunch of screenshots and
deployment guide. It's under active development so, we will ge glad if you
join and provide us with additional feedback, UX considerations and other
interesting information.

Project page at GitHub: https://bwsw.github.io/cloudstack-ui/
Source code: https://github.com/bwsw/cloudstack-ui

Have a good day. Looking forward hearing your feedback.

--
With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev
Bitworks Software, Ltd.
Cell: +7-923-414-1515
WWW: http://bw-sw.com/

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue

Alternative Cloudstack UI for KVM and Basic Zones (with SG)

2017-04-25 Thread Ivan Kudryavtsev

Hello, Cloudstack community.

We are proud to present our last development effort to you. During the last
5 months we spend some time to develop alternative Cloudstack UI for basic
zones with KVM hypervisor and security groups. This is basically the thing
we are using in our clouds. During the design of the software we tried to
fulfill the expectations of our average cloud users and simplify operations
as much as possible.

The project is OSS and can be found at GitHub with bunch of screenshots and
deployment guide. It's under active development so, we will ge glad if you
join and provide us with additional feedback, UX considerations and other
interesting information.

Project page at GitHub: https://bwsw.github.io/cloudstack-ui/
Source code: https://github.com/bwsw/cloudstack-ui

Have a good day. Looking forward hearing your feedback.

-- 
With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev
Bitworks Software, Ltd.
Cell: +7-923-414-1515
WWW: http://bw-sw.com/

Re: [4.10] VPN disconnected while network changes taken

2017-04-25 Thread Remi Bergsma

Thanks! It was nice trading fixes ;-)
_
From: Will Stevens >
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2017 10:28 PM
Subject: Re: [4.10] VPN disconnected while network changes taken
To: >


Fair enough. Well you will have a fix if people start to complain. :P

*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer



On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 4:21 PM, Remi Bergsma 
>
wrote:

> I dont think the remote access feature is used a lot in our deploys, so I
> would assume it has the same issue. We mainly use s2s.
>
> Regards, Remi
> 
> From: Will Stevens >
> Sent: Monday, April 24, 2017 8:00:25 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [4.10] VPN disconnected while network changes taken
>
> @remi, judging from your configure.py, I am assuming that any network
> change, like adding a PF rule, will drop the Remote Access VPN connection
> as well. Is that the case? Or am I missing something?
>
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Will Stevens 
> >
> wrote:
>
> > I am trying to find a way to remove this explicit down and still be able
> > to keep the VPN connection up.
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/
> systemvm/patches/debian/
> > config/opt/cloud/bin/configure.py#L638
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Will Stevens 
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> @remi yes, I think you are right that we should change that for the
> >> site2site config. I will check that after.
> >>
> >> The issue referred to in this thread is in reference to the remote
> access
> >> VPN dropping when other networking is configured.
> >>
> >> In this case it is not a mystery why it is going down since we actually
> >> call a down on it when it gets reconfigured. I have been trying to get
> it
> >> to handle network config changes without taking down the VPN.
> >>
> >> I have obviously removed the explicit down and am trying to find a
> >> working configuration, but when xl2tpd is stopped, it goes down hard and
> >> when it comes back up it can't find the same tunnel, so the tunnel is
> >> dropped.
> >>
> >> I will review your config to see how you are handling this.
> >>
> >> Thanks for the support.
> >>
> >> On Apr 24, 2017 1:02 PM, "Remi Bergsma" 
> >> >
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> While I haven’t investigated this issue, it does sound similar to what
> I
> >>> fixed in Cosmic (our fork) last month.
> >>>
> >>> This code does a down/up of the VPN connection:
> >>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/systemvm/pa
> >>> tches/debian/config/opt/cloud/bin/configure.py#L547-L548
> >>>
> >>> We found that to be impacting. Since we have auto=start in the config
> >>> file already, we only have to reload the config and ipsec will take
> care of
> >>> the rest on its own. Fast & easy! Most of all, no more unneeded
> restarts.
> >>>
> >>> Simply put: just remove the stop/start lines as it is not needed.
> >>> The code is also hit when non-VPN changes are made, so that’s probably
> >>> why people report that another change causes it to disconnect.
> >>>
> >>> This is how we fixed it:
> >>> https://github.com/MissionCriticalCloud/cosmic/pull/339/comm
> >>> its/5ee5e70894a321f4d633c836e0bacef481b2b9af
> >>>
> >>> Hope this gives some inspiration and a possible solution.
> >>>
> >>> Regards, Remi
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 24/04/2017, 17:50, 
> >>> "williamstev...@gmail.com on behalf of 
> >>> Will
> >>> Stevens"  on 
> >>> behalf of wstev...@cloudops.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Working on it now, I will let you know when I have a fix.
> >>>
> >>> *Will STEVENS*
> >>> Lead Developer
> >>>
> >>> 
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Haijiao 
> >>> <18602198...@163.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Hi Will
> >>> >
> >>> > Any progress about this issue ?
> >>> >
> >>> > tks
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > Sent from my mobile
> >>> >
> >>> > - 转发的邮件 -
> >>> > 发件人： Haijiao <18602198...@163.com>
> >>> > 发送日期： 2017年04月14日 23:21
> >>> > 收件人： dev >
> >>> > 抄送人：
> >>> > 主题： Re:Re: [4.10] VPN disconnected while network changes taken
> >>> > Sure, Karuturi
> >>> >
> >>> > Logged a bug in Jira, thanks!
> >>> >
> >>> > CLOUDSTACK-9878 Remote Access VPN that losing connection when new
> >>> network
> >>> > configs are introduced
> >>> >

[GitHub] koushik-das commented on issue #1997: CLOUDSTACK-9208: Assertion Error in VM_POWER_STATE handler- Fixed

RE: Alternative Cloudstack UI for KVM and Basic Zones (with SG)

[GitHub] swill commented on issue #2062: CLOUDSTACK-9878: remove unnecessary VPN drops

[GitHub] rashmidixit commented on issue #1894: CLOUDSTACK-9700 Allow user to Register/Copy templates to multiple zones at the same time

Re: Alternative Cloudstack UI for KVM and Basic Zones (with SG)

Re: Alternative Cloudstack UI for KVM and Basic Zones (with SG)

[GitHub] blueorangutan commented on issue #2035: CLOUDSTACK-9867:VM snapshot on primary storage usage metrics

Re: Alternative Cloudstack UI for KVM and Basic Zones (with SG)

RE: Alternative Cloudstack UI for KVM and Basic Zones (with SG)

Re: Alternative Cloudstack UI for KVM and Basic Zones (with SG)

Re: Alternative Cloudstack UI for KVM and Basic Zones (with SG)

Re:Re: Fw: [4.10] VPN disconnected while network changes taken

Re: Alternative Cloudstack UI for KVM and Basic Zones (with SG)

Alternative Cloudstack UI for KVM and Basic Zones (with SG)

Re: [4.10] VPN disconnected while network changes taken

15 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information