Re: Can't create a zone using master

). Is anyone else having these kinds of issues with recent master code? Thanks! Mike On 2/14/17, 3:02 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote: By the way, this is for a Basic Zone. On 2/14/17, 2:44 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netap

Re: Can't create a zone using master

Thanks for pointing this out. I can incorporate those changes in the morning and see if it does the trick. > On Feb 15, 2017, at 12:50 AM, Rene Moser <m...@renemoser.net> wrote: > > Probably related to https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1927 > > > >> On

Re: Can't create a zone using master

wards. Wido > Can you try a commit before and a commit after that PR? > > Thanks, > > ~ Rajani > > http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ > > On February 16, 2017 at 1:02 AM, Tutkowski, Mike > (mike.tutkow...@netapp.

Re: Can't create a zone using master

Hi, I opened a blocker for 4.10 regarding this issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9790 Thanks, Mike On 2/16/17, 8:35 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote: I believe the issue is here: https://github.com/apache/clou

Re: Can't create a zone using master

2017-02-15 20:55 GMT+01:00 Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com>: > OK, so, what I plan to do is jump back a bunch of commits and see if it > works. If it does, I can binary search my way to the commit that fails it. > If the commit I pick doesn’t work, I can

Re: Can't create a zone using master

network Wed Feb 15 21:12:59 UTC 2017 Not setting up route of RFC1918 space to 10.117.40.126 befause 10.117.40.35 is RFC1918. Any thoughts as to what might be the issue here? Thanks! Mike On 2/15/17, 1:28 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote: Thanks,

Re: Can't create a zone using master

) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool$3.run(QueuedThreadPool.java:555) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) On 2/15/17, 12:52 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote: Thanks for pointing this out. I can incorporate those changes in the morning and see if i

Re: Can't create a zone using master

Lead Developer <https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote: > Thanks for noting that PR, Rene. I tried building a Basic Zone making use > of code from that PR, but – unfortunately – I s

Re: Can't create a zone using master

t; > Thanks for digging it Mike. > > ~ Rajani > > http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ > > On February 17, 2017 at 12:18 AM, Tutkowski, Mike > (mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote: > > Hi, > > I opened a blocker for 4.10 regarding this issue: > > https://iss

Re: CS Collab Conf Brazil page is down

Hi, I am personally OK with the event taking place in March, August, or September (i.e. any of the dates you've suggested). It might be a bit tight for March if the call for participation is not yet open. Also, I wonder if August might be tough for a bunch of people, though, as they may be on

Re: Volumes created without HyperVisor specified

Yes, when a volume is first created, it exists only as a row in the cloud.volumes table. When you first attach it to a VM, then the hypervisor type is associated with it (and the volume is actually created). On 1/18/17, 12:05 PM, "Rafael Weingärtner" wrote:

Re: Issue with SSVM on KVM on master

tp://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ > > On August 18, 2016 at 7:57 PM, Tutkowski, Mike > (mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote: > Based on the error message of not being able to find the > PremiumSecondaryStorageResource class, this seems to be the > following error (#9 on this > page: &g

Re: CCC Brasil

I believe that is the old date. It should probably be updated to TBD. On Aug 22, 2016, at 2:39 AM, Erik Weber > wrote: On the web page, the date is updated to Sept 29-30, is this correct? If so, it should be advertised. -- Erik On Tue, Aug 16,

Re: UnsatisfiedLink Error

Just in case anyone else encounters this problem, I solved it this way: sudo apt-get autoremove libjna-java From: Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 1:42 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Unsatisfi

Issue with SSVM on KVM on master

Hi, I am trying to build a cloud making use of KVM system VMs. My SSVM VM comes up, but its agent doesn't seem to: http://imgur.com/a/Fo2ax Thoughts on what might be going on here? Thanks! Mike

Re: Issue with SSVM on KVM on master

I should have pointed out that this is a Basic Zone. Also, there is only one KVM host in my one cluster. From: Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 5:03 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Issue wit

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

off of a slightly older version of master and it works fine here. > On Mar 2, 2017, at 6:51 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion <pd...@cloudops.com> wrote: > > Hi Mike, > Try vm with at least 512MB for memory. > >> On Mar 1, 2017 15:01, "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.t

Re: Save The Date: Spring Meetup Of Cloudstack European User Group

I’m looking forward to attending. Thanks for host this, Interoute! On 2/27/17, 5:54 AM, "Steve Roles" wrote: Hi guys, The next meetup is Wednesday, April 12, hosted by Interoute Prague. As always, there will be some great speakers, the chance to meet and

Re: Introducing Vishwas

Welcome to the CloudStack Community! :) > On Feb 24, 2017, at 9:30 AM, Nathan Johnson wrote: > > Vishwas Pathak wrote: > >> Hello CloudStack team, >> >> My name is Vishwas Pathak and I am working with Accelerite CloudPlatform >> testing

Re: System VM's are getting stuck in starting mode

o: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: System VM's are getting stuck in starting mode Hi Mike and thank you for the reply. Sorry but this issue is not similar to mine, I already gave you the one which looks similar : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7936 On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 5:28 AM, Tut

Re: storage affinity groups

If one doesn't already exist, you can write a custom storage allocator to handle this scenario. > On Sep 8, 2016, at 4:25 PM, Yiping Zhang wrote: > > Hi, Devs: > > We all know how (anti)-host affinity group works in CloudStack, I am > wondering if there is a similar

Re: storage affinity groups

vices available for the same cluster or zone (in case for zone wide primary storage volumes). Just curious, how many primary storage volumes are available for your clusters/zones? Regards, Yiping On 9/8/16, 6:04 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote: Person

Re: storage affinity groups

l *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote: > Hi Yiping, > > Reading your most recent e-mail, it seems like you are looking for a > feature that does more than simply makes sure virtual

Re: storage affinity groups

torage tag associated with it and then I assigned the appropriate storage tag to the primary storage. Regards, Marty Godsey -Original Message----- From: Tutkowski, Mike [mailto:mike.tutkow...@netapp.com] Sent: Thursday, September 8, 2016 7:16 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org

Re: System VM's are getting stuck in starting mode

Is your issue similar to this one? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9144 From: ned dogg Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2016 1:24 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: System VM's are getting stuck in starting mode

Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1642: System VMs on Managed Storage

I renamed it to “delay”, but I can’t remember now what I did that. ☺ On 9/15/16, 10:20 PM, "jburwell" wrote: Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642#discussion_r79104400 ---

Re: storage affinity groups

arketo.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Will described my use case perfectly. >>>> >>>> Ideally, the underlying storage technology used for the cloud should >>>> provide the reliability required. But not every company has the money >>

Re: storage affinity groups

erance redundancy through the app and at the same time make it easy to use for end users and administrators alike. Regards, Yiping On 9/9/16, 11:49 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote: Yep, based on the recent e-mail Yiping sent, I would agree, Will.

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Syed Ahmed

Congratulations, Syed! > On Oct 5, 2016, at 2:07 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack > has asked Syed Ahmed to become a committer and we are pleased to > announce that he has accepted. > > Being a committer allows

Re: [GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

Thanks, Sergey! On 9/21/16, 5:37 PM, "Sergey Levitskiy" wrote: @mike-tutkowski @nvazquez We can probably run it this week On 9/21/16, 12:11 PM, "mike-tutkowski" wrote: Github user mike-tutkowski commented

Re: Issue with SSVM on KVM on master

onnect to the management server if this is the case. Try telnetting to 8250 on your mgmt server and see if suddenly your agent starts to work. - Si From: Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 6:04 PM To: dev@cloudstac

Re: Marvin Error

on my Mac OS X laptop)? On 11/4/16, 11:50 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote: Looks like it’s not a problem specific to Marvin. This is the same error, but run from the interactive Python interpreter (and I get an error returned running this com

Re: Marvin Error

Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote: > Yeah, the weird part is that, for example, http://192.168.129.50:8096/ > client/api?response=json=listUsers=true works from any > Ubuntu client of my that is not running

Re: Marvin Error

, does that work? if you try with cloudmonkey, does that work? *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer <https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote: > Interesingly, I just

Re: Marvin Error

Wow…that solved it. I rolled back to VirtualBox 5.0.22 from 5.0.28. I probably could have just gone back one version, but wasn’t sure exactly what version I was running before “upgrading” to 5.0.28. On 11/4/16, 1:17 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote:

Re: Marvin Error

Actually, the problem only surfaces on Ubuntu VMs running on my Mac OS X laptop. Weird. Was working just fine a couple days ago. Maybe an automatic update on Mac OS X broke something. On 11/4/16, 12:59 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote: Interesingly,

Re: Marvin Error

(for whatever reason). On 11/4/16, 1:22 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote: Wow…that solved it. I rolled back to VirtualBox 5.0.22 from 5.0.28. I probably could have just gone back one version, but wasn’t sure exactly what version I was running before “upgr

Marvin Error

Hi, Does anyone know why I might suddently be getting the following error when starting up my Marvin tests? I see this problem on Ubuntu 14.04, but not on Mac OS X. On both platforms, I’ve got requests 2.11.1 installed (current version). I’ve tried un-install and re-install requests, but I

Re: Marvin Error

ckages/requests/models.py", line 679, in generate raise ChunkedEncodingError(e) requests.exceptions.ChunkedEncodingError: ("Connection broken: error(104, 'Connection reset by peer')", error(104, 'Connection reset by peer')) On 11/4/16, 8:19 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@

Re: Issue with SSVM on KVM on master

in this regard. > On Oct 11, 2016, at 12:15 AM, Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> > wrote: > > Hi Rajani, > > I actually ended up getting diverted to other work and am just coming back to > this now. ☺ > > Do you know if there’s a way in 4.10 to run the KVM agen

Re: Issue with SSVM on KVM on master

Regards, Frank On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 16:14 Tutkowski, Mike, <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote: As a little correction to what I said, I meant to ask if there is a way in 4.10 to run system VMs without using noredist for the build as I only have KVM hosts in this

Re: Issue with SSVM on KVM on master

without having to do anything special. It seems something has changed since 4.5 here. Thanks! Mike On 8/22/16, 12:43 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote: I can try that. Thanks, Rajani! > On Aug 22, 2016, at 12:17 AM, Rajani Karuturi <ra

Re: 4.8.2.0/4.9.1.0/4.10.0.0 RC Status

Hi Rohit, Can I get 1749 on the list for 4.10? Without it, there is a breakage in snapshots for managed storage (this PR fixes a couple issues from PR 1600). Thanks, Mike On 12/5/16, 4:09 AM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote: All, We've several open PRs, I'll

Re: Welcoming Simon Weller & Paul Angus to the PMC

Congratulations, guys! > On Jan 13, 2017, at 10:15 AM, Rajesh Ramchandani > wrote: > > Congratulations, Simon and Paul. > > Raj > > > From: Will Stevens > Sent: Friday, January 13, 2017 8:30:20 AM > To:

Re: CS Collab Conf Brazil page is down

Hi Marco, Do you know when your call for presentations will begin? Thanks! Mike On 1/13/17, 4:59 AM, "Marco Sinhoreli" wrote: All, We have tried to get another cloudstack event going but had the problem previously with the venue pulling out.

Re: Error adding primary storage from the UI

16 at 3:55 PM To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" <dev@cloudstack.apache.org> Cc: "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> Subject: Error adding primary storage from the UI Hi All, I was setting up a new cloudstack installation from source and I ran into a weird issue. I ca

Re: Cannot migrate VMware VM with root disk to host in different cluster (CloudStack 4.10)

- Si ____ From: Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 3:09 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Cannot migrate VMware VM with root disk to host in different cluster (CloudStack 4.10) This is interesting:

Re: Cannot migrate VMware VM with root disk to host in different cluster (CloudStack 4.10)

was looking to implement similar functionality for VMware. On 3/23/17, 2:01 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote: Another piece of info: I tried this same VM + storage migration using NFS for both datastores instead of iSCSI for both datastor

Re: Cannot migrate VMware VM with root disk to host in different cluster (CloudStack 4.10)

stination host has access to the destination > datastore. > > On 3/23/17, 1:34 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote: > >So, in my case, both the source and target datastores are cluster-scoped > primary storage in CloudStack (not zone wide

Re: Cannot migrate VMware VM with root disk to host in different cluster (CloudStack 4.10)

nformation for method RelocateVM_Task at line 1, column 110 while parsing SOAP body at line 1, column 102 while parsing SOAP envelope at line 1, column 38 while parsing HTTP request for method relocate on object of type vim.VirtualMachine at line 1, column 0 On 3/23/17, 12:33 PM, "Tutkowski, Mik

Re: Cannot migrate VMware VM with root disk to host in different cluster (CloudStack 4.10)

know for a fact that vmware supports moving from host to host and storage to storage at the same time so it seems to be a bug in migrateVirtualMachineWithVolume implementation. vSphere standard license is enough for both regular and storage vMotion. On 3/23/17, 1:21 PM, "Tutkowsk

Re: Cannot migrate VMware VM with root disk to host in different cluster (CloudStack 4.10)

I opened the following ticket for this issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9849 On 3/23/17, 6:03 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote: I think I should open a blocker for this for 4.10. Perhaps one of our VMware people can take a look

Re: Cannot migrate VMware VM with root disk to host in different cluster (CloudStack 4.10)

levits...@autodesk.com> > wrote: > > Was it working before in 4.9? > > On 3/23/17, 5:03 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote: > >I think I should open a blocker for this for 4.10. Perhaps one of our > VMware people can

Re: Cannot migrate VMware VM with root disk to host in different cluster (CloudStack 4.10)

Also, in case it matters, both datastores are iSCSI based. > On Mar 23, 2017, at 11:52 AM, Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> > wrote: > > My version is 5.5 in both clusters. > >> On Mar 23, 2017, at 9:48 AM, Sateesh Chodapuneedi >> <satees

Re: Cannot migrate VMware VM with root disk to host in different cluster (CloudStack 4.10)

My version is 5.5 in both clusters. > On Mar 23, 2017, at 9:48 AM, Sateesh Chodapuneedi > <sateesh.chodapune...@accelerite.com> wrote: > > >>> On 23/03/17, 7:21 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote: > >>

Re: Cannot migrate VMware VM with root disk to host in different cluster (CloudStack 4.10)

disk 'Hard disk 1' is not accessible on the host: Unable to access file [SIOC-1] Both ESXi hosts are version 5.5 and both clusters are within the same VMware datastore. The source datastore and the target datastore are both using iSCSI. On 3/23/17, 11:53 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" &l

Re: Cannot migrate VMware VM with root disk to host in different cluster (CloudStack 4.10)

Hi, The CloudStack API that the GUI is invoking is migrateVirtualMachineWithVolume (which is expected since I’m asking to migrate a VM from a host in one cluster to a host in another cluster). A MigrateWithStorageCommand is sent to VmwareResource, which eventually calls

Re: Cannot migrate VMware VM with root disk to host in different cluster (CloudStack 4.10)

or does the source host have to be able to see the target datastore? If so, does that mean the target datastore has to be zone-wide primary storage when using VMware to make this work? On 3/23/17, 7:47 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote: This looks a l

Re: Cannot migrate VMware VM with root disk to host in different cluster (CloudStack 4.10)

target datastore, that works for morDsAtTarget, but morDsAtSource ends up being null. For some reason, we only check if morDsAtTarget is null (I’m not sure why we don’t check if morDsAtSource is null, too). On 3/23/17, 7:31 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote:

VR Question

Hi, With 4.10 (master), I’m currently running all of my system VMs (including the VR) on XenServer. When I create a user VM on VMware, it acquires an IP address; however, when I create one on KVM, it does not. All of this is running in a single, basic zone. Thoughts on this? Thanks! Mike

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

e runtime references to http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland Can someone take a look at CLOUDSTACK-9811? ~ Rajani http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ On March 9, 2017 at 3:16 AM, Tutkowski, Mike (mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote:

Re: Remove me from mailing list[was]Re: [VOTE] Retirement of midonet plugin

Please see this page for details on removing yourself from CloudStack mailing lists: https://cloudstack.apache.org/mailing-lists.html On 3/29/17, 1:07 AM, "Sharad Nandwani" wrote: Please remove me from the mailing list.

Re: Cannot migrate VMware VM with root disk to host in different cluster (CloudStack 4.10)

Slight typo: Both ESXi hosts are version 5.5 and both clusters are within the same VMware datastore. Should be (datastore changed to datacenter): Both ESXi hosts are version 5.5 and both clusters are within the same VMware datacenter. On 3/23/17, 12:31 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" &l

Re: Cannot migrate VMware VM with root disk to host in different cluster (CloudStack 4.10)

Also, by the way, datastore-66 (referenced in the image) is the target datastore. From: "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> Date: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 at 11:13 PM To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" <dev@cloudstack.apache.org> Subject: Re: Cannot

Re: Cannot migrate VMware VM with root disk to host in different cluster (CloudStack 4.10)

Slight correction: That image on Imgur is of the VirtualMachineRelocateSpec that’s passed to the VirtualMachineMO.changeDatastore method to attempt to migrate the VM and its root disk. From: "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> Date: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 at 1

Cannot migrate VMware VM with root disk to host in different cluster (CloudStack 4.10)

Hi, Within CloudStack 4.10, I have two VMware 5.5 clusters (both in the same VMware datacenter). Each cluster has a shared iSCSI-based datastore. I can initiate the process of migrating a VM and its root disk from a host in one cluster to a host in another cluster. However, it fails with the

Re: Welcoming Wido as the new ACS VP

Thanks for taking on this role over the past year, Will! You did a great job. :-) > On Mar 16, 2017, at 11:00 AM, Will Stevens wrote: > > Hello Everyone, > It has been a pleasure working with you as the ACS VP over the past year. > I would like to say Thank You to everyone

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Wei Zhou and Rene Moser are now PMC members

Congratulations! > On Mar 17, 2017, at 8:57 AM, Rafael Weingärtner > wrote: > > Congratulation guys!! > You deserved it for your great contributions. > > Let’s keep the pace making ACS better every single PR ;) > >> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 9:35 AM, Simon Weller

Re: More Jira tickets clean up

Hi, This one appears to have been fixed a long time ago. I marked it as Fixed and closed the ticket. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1524 This one is not a big deal. I marked it as Won’t Fix and closed the ticket. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1432 I went

Re: Stop one of primary storage but no vm diskimg in it , All vm stoped.

Do you know if your other VMs shut down when you stopped the NFS service or when you put the primary storage into maintenance mode? Putting a primary storage in maintenance mode should only shut down VMs that have one or more disks running from that primary storage. For example, if you had

Re: Stop one of primary storage but no vm diskimg in it , All vm stoped.

some hypervisors rebooted by cloudstack-agent. In C storage ,only one file that for VMC1, there aren’t disk image for other vms , so it stoped all vms to be beyond comprehension. > 在 2017年3月22日，11:39，Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> 写道： > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Retirement of midonet plugin

Disable, then delete works for me, too. On 3/14/17, 7:49 PM, "Simon Weller" wrote: I agree with Sergey and Will. Let's disable it first. Simon Weller/615-312-6068 -Original Message- From: Rafael Weingärtner [rafaelweingart...@gmail.com]

Re: F5 compile issue with 4.5.x

What is your JDK version? On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I see the following error now when trying to compile 4.5.x code: > > [INFO] Compiling 12 source files to /Users/solidfire/D

Re: F5 compile issue with 4.5.x

org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-plugin-network-f5:jar:4.5.1 in central (https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2) -> [Help 1] I removed the F5 reference there and am re-compiling. On 4/4/17, 2:14 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote: I am running with Java 8 because I

F5 compile issue with 4.5.x

Hi, I see the following error now when trying to compile 4.5.x code: [INFO] Compiling 12 source files to /Users/solidfire/Documents/CloudStack/CloudStack/plugins/network-elements/f5/target/classes [INFO] - [ERROR] COMPILATION ERROR :

Re: F5 compile issue with 4.5.x

ation would work with jdk1.8.0_11 (or JDK 7), but would not work with anything higher. Did you try using Java JDK 7? On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 4:14 PM, Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote: > I am running with Java 8 because I typically have been working with 4.10.

Re: VR Question

lowing > 1. In kvm host logs once to see any security group rules got failed. > 2. Check the VR /etc/dhcphosts.txt entry for the vm is configured > 3. tcpdump on VR interface to see whether the dhcp request reached to VR. > > Thanks, > Jayapal > >> On Apr 2, 2017, at 1

Re: F5 compile issue with 4.5.x

jars from here: https://github.com/rhtyd/cloudstack-nonoss and > while building ACS 4.5.x use JDK1.7. > > > Regards. > > ________ > From: Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> > Sent: 05 April 2017 01:36:48 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

y. > >> On Mar 1, 2017 15:01, "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote: >> >> I see the following exception when trying to deploy a user VM in a Basic >> Zone with two XenServer 6.5 hosts in one cluster. My system VMs hav

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

that users only seed the 4.10 systemvmtemplate before upgrade and post-upgrade the upgrade paths fix the entries, global setting etc. Regards. ____ From: Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> Sent: 02 March 2017 22:39:08 T

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

nces to http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland Can someone take a look at CLOUDSTACK-9811? ~ Rajani http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ On March 9, 2017 at 3:16 AM, Tutkowski, Mike (mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote: Hi,

Re: CLOUDSTACK-9822

figured I would run them past you first. Thanks! > On Mar 8, 2017, at 12:03 PM, Sergey Levitskiy <sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> > wrote: > > Thanks, Mike. BTW issue with storage tags will be addressed shortly > > On 3/8/17, 12:24 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tu

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

a ticket for this. I want to examine it a bit more before doing so. On 3/7/17, 8:10 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote: No VM snapshot. I tried while the VM was in the Running state and then I also tried in the Stopped state. Same results.

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

Yes, I can open a ticket. > On Mar 7, 2017, at 1:50 PM, Sergey Levitskiy <sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> > wrote: > > Yes that’s the bug. Can you open a ticket for this? @ nvazquez can you take a > look? > > On 3/7/17, 12:44 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike&qu

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

levits...@autodesk.com> > wrote: > > Yes in schema492to410 existing tags are imported into the table > > INSERT INTO `cloud`.`storage_pool_tags` (pool_id, tag) SELECT pool_id, > name FROM `cloud`.`storage_pool_details` WHERE value = 'true'; > > > > > On 3/7/17

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

This does seem messed up. If I add a new primary storage and give it a storage tag, the tag ends up in storage_pool_details. If I edit an existing storage pool’s storage tags, it places them in storage_pool_tags. On 3/7/17, 1:39 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com&g

Re: [Proposal] - StorageHA

Thanks for your clarification. I see now. You were referring to a networking problem where one host could not see the storage (but the storage was still up and running). On 3/13/17, 10:31 PM, "Jeromy Grimmett" wrote: I apologize for the delay on the response, let me

Re: [Proposal] - StorageHA

Hi, Thanks for sending out this email and welcome to the CloudStack Community. :) I have a couple quick questions: First of all, let me start with something I found in our docs: Primary Storage Outage and Data

Re: CLOUDSTACK-9822

visor ? In some settings disabling cluster doesn’t have an intended affect. You might try unmanage your vmware cluster and re-try. I think one of the settings above can control where your router will end up. Thanks, Sergey On 3/8/17, 11:30 AM, "Tutkowsk

Re: CLOUDSTACK-9822

I went ahead and resolved/closed CLOUDSTACK-9822 just now. I am still investigating if CLOUDSTACK-9823 is an issue. Thanks! On 3/8/17, 2:41 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote: Thanks! I got the system VM up and running again on XenServer. On

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

as 2017-03-07 21:52 GMT-03:00 Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com>: > Here’s the ticket: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9827 > > On 3/7/17, 1:51 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.co

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

I believe this is another blocker, but probably related to CLOUDSTACK-9822 (which I just opened): https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9823 On 3/6/17, 11:32 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote: I seem to have found another blocker

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

es, global setting etc. Regards. ____ From: Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> Sent: 02 March 2017 22:39:08 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 I rolled back to my master bran

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

> On 3/6/17, 10:32 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote: > >I seem to have found another blocker: > >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9822 > >On 3/6/17, 9:51 PM, "Rajani Karuturi" <raj...@apache.org> wrote

Re: CLOUDSTACK-9822

4 AM, Sergey Levitskiy <sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> >> wrote: >> >> Is VM has an VMsnaphsot? Is VM in Stopped state? >> >> On 3/6/17, 10:32 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote: >> >> I seem to have found anothe

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

I see the following exception when trying to deploy a user VM in a Basic Zone with two XenServer 6.5 hosts in one cluster. My system VMs have all deployed properly. The user template gets downloaded fine. I can see the user VM begin to start on a XenServer host, then it goes away. We then

Re: CLOUDSTACK-9822

, "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote: I believe the VM was deployed that way. I know that suffix typically only shows up when VM snapshots are involved, but let me rebuild my environment and try to reproduce it from scratch. > On Mar

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

Here’s the ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9827 On 3/7/17, 1:51 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote: Yes, I can open a ticket. > On Mar 7, 2017, at 1:50 PM, Sergey Levitskiy <sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

t;sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote: > > Is VM has an VMsnaphsot? Is VM in Stopped state? > > On 3/6/17, 10:32 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote: > >I seem to have found another blocke

Re: CLOUDSTACK-9822

(it’s about 1:30 AM here, so I’m starting to get a bit tired), but I can close those tickets out if my testing works out as expected. On 3/7/17, 5:30 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote: Hi, I tried the following with both an NFS datastore and

<    1   2   3   4   5   >