nice to see this discussion being had again and sorry to be late in
replying João,
I see no replies have come forward yet. Let's add a new
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/new/choose for this
as well. I still feel my proposal is good and should have been
applied. but we can gather
I think your proposals are ok as an ad-hoc solution to the current
situation @Rohit Yadav . I wonder how we should deal with this in the
future though.
1. As for the numbering, do we have a procedure to prevent this issue
in the future?
2. The provider is part of apache and I think the link
Devs,
I've been getting these errors on main the last few weeks:
~~~
[ERROR] Failures:
[ERROR] ActionEventInterceptorTest.testInterceptComplete:247
[ERROR] ActionEventInterceptorTest.testInterceptException:261
[ERROR] ActionEventInterceptorTest.testInterceptStartAsync:234
expected: but was:
+1 binding
I checked the hashes alright and the log of commit/tag (Note this last
check is based on the recent TZ issues to make sure nothing slipped
through). Other than that trusting on the testing I was involved in
over the last month or so.
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 1:37 PM João Jandre wrote:
welcome aboard @slav...@apache.org
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 1:11 PM Ivet Petrova wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
> has invited Slavka Peleva to become a PMC member and we are pleased
> to announce that they have accepted.
>
> Slavka has
Welcome to the group kiran. Now the hard work starts ;)
On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 7:46 AM Rohit Yadav wrote:
>
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
> has invited Kiran Chavala (kiranchavala) to become a committer and
> we are pleased to announce that they have accepted.
>
I was pointed out that I did not formally vote in this mai:
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 1:02 PM Daan wrote:
>
> Kiran, the release looks good, the format of the hashes is a bit off but on
> manual inspection they seem ok. I created a PR to correct thsi for next time
> :
suming the same bug (other
> driver) is currently in 4.19.0.
> But I feel bad knowing, that I would introduce a bug for other storage
> drivers.
>
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 10:30 AM Daan Hoogland
> wrote:
>
> > Rene, is this a blocker (or critical issue) in your opinion ?
&g
Rene, is this a blocker (or critical issue) in your opinion ?
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 8:06 AM Rene Peinthor wrote:
>
> -1
>
> Because I would still this to be included:
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/8790
>
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 9:11 PM João Jandre wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> >
nice to see you again Sina ;)
On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 10:10 PM Sina Kashipazha
wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> My name is Sina Kashipazha, and you may remember me from my time at Leaseweb.
> I wanted to take this opportunity to reintroduce myself as I have recently
> joined ComplianceWise.
>
> I work
devs and users,
The PMC have asked Rene Peinthor to become a committer to the Apache
CloudStack project and they have accepted.
Please join me in congratulating Rene.
--
Daan
thanks Rohit,
go Daniel
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 2:45 PM Rohit Yadav wrote:
>
> All,
>
> It gives me great pleasure to announce that the ASF board has accepted
> CloudStack PMC resolution of Daniel Augusto Veronezi Salvador as the next PMC
> Chair / VP of the Apache CloudStack project.
>
> I
devs,
currently we have an upgrade path for 4.19.0.0 to 4.19.1.0 in the 4.19 branch
in the main branch we have a 4.19.0.0 to (4.)20.0.0 upgrade path
merging fails because of this and allowing either or both in main will
cause main to fail (at least after upgrading)
If we are sure that 4.19.1 will
ment the major version number in
> > situations where underlying implementation details require a cloud operator
> > to face significant challenges in upgrading from one version to the next.
> > This should be rare situation.
> >
> >
> > From this I can't see how we h
users and devs,
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
has invited Vishesh Jindal to become a committer and we are pleased
to announce that they have accepted.
Being a committer enables easier contribution to the
project since there is no need to go via the patch
submission
eally underplays the
> > changes it can hold.
> >
> >
> > I'm going to stick in a -1. Not as hard 'no' to any changes, but I think
> > the vote should be on 'A change to the version numbering scheme' and then
> > what is proposed properly laid out.
> >
>
'A change to the version numbering scheme' and then what is
> proposed properly laid out.
>
>
>
>
> [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Releases
> (section on versioning about 2/3 down)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daan
LS,
This is a vote on dev@c.a.o with cc to users@c.a.o. If you want to be
counted please reply to dev@.
As discussed in [1] we are deciding to drop the 4 from our versioning
scheme. The result would be that the next major version will be 20
instead of 4.20, as it would be in a traditional
e disruptive changes (in a cautious and
> structured way) in the major versions, all my concerns are met; I do not
> have further technical reasons to keep the "4.".
>
> Best regards,
> Daniel Salvador (gutoveronezi)
>
> On 2/12/24 11:55, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> >
i'm a bit -0 on this. I agree that a lot of stale issues deserve
closing, but others are really long term goals. I do not want to block
this great idea but am just a bit worried about other great ideas
getting lost. So I would propose to tag anything we close or not
remove the stale tag, so these
bump,
@Daniel Salvador is there any technical reason to keep the 4? any
reason why there must be a 5 instead of a 21, 22 or 23? We are
maintaining 4 number semantic versioning for no reason, as I see it.
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 12:02 PM Daan Hoogland wrote:
>
> Daniel, "technic
no worries as João proposed to release 4.18.2 in march, but let's
make sure we have a good period between the two.
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 12:50 PM Suresh Anaparti
wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> CloudStack 4.19.0.0 is the latest LTS release. There are already some open
> issues [1] and pull requests
Huawei has still not answered my request to
> publish the OBS SDK with Maven coordinates, I assume that this is the
> "chinese way" of saying "Nope, not going to happen!".
sounds so :(
>
>
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen
> R. Feicht
>
> sc synergy GmbH
devs (and PMC),
I created a procedure based on a staging->production promotion of PRs.
it is described in the readme file [1]
I went ahead and created it as we didn't have anything before. That
does not mean I get to decide on my own, so please add your unsalted
comment or create/add change
People,
we brought the new website. Please all have a look at
https://cloudstack.apache.org
thanks for any feedback
--
Daan
The vote has passed with
6 * +1
0 * 0
0* -1
On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 1:32 PM Daan Hoogland wrote:
>
> LS,
>
> I am not sure this is still needed after all the discussions
> before,but I would like to start a lazy consent vote threat anyway
> there are some non-blocking rest point
thanks Abhi, for all the hard work.
On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 12:37 PM Abhishek Kumar wrote:
>
> The Apache Software Foundation and the Apache CloudStack Project Announces
> Apache® CloudStack® v4.19.
>
> Apache CloudStack 4.19 is the most recent release of the cloud management
> platform. It comes
LS,
I am not sure this is still needed after all the discussions
before,but I would like to start a lazy consent vote threat anyway
there are some non-blocking rest points mentioned and we can
administer those in the repo for the site [1]
so without further ado;
Do we want to go life with the
Ronald,
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 10:02 AM Ronald Feicht
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have only lately found out, that I cannot use the publicly available
> Java SDK for Huawei Object Storage (which has Maven coordinates) as this
> SDK only works for the public Huawei Cloud, not for local non-cloud
>
_
> From: Sven Vogel
> Sent: Monday, January 22, 2024 18:30
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org ;
> priv...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: users
> Subject: Re: new website design
>
> +1 looks nice
>
> Am Montag, den 01/22/2024 um 11:46 schrieb Nux:
>
>
>
>
signatures ok,
+1 (binding)
will also do a monkey test on simulator and retract my +1 if needed ;)
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 7:58 AM Abhishek Kumar wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a 4.19.0.0 release (RC4), with the following artifacts up for
> a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>
Daniel, "technical" reasons for dropping the 4 are all in the field of
social engineering. In practice (as I think Wei also described) we are
already treating the "minor" version number as major version. Since
4.0 or 4.1 (don´t remember) there has been renewed talk of a 5 , but
never enough reason
;
> I just replied the discussion thread and I would like to discuss it a
> little bit further before voting.
>
> Best regards,
> Daniel Salvador (gutoveronezi)
>
> On 1/25/24 11:47, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> > LS,
> >
> > As previously discussed [1] ther
LS,
As previously discussed [1] there is a growing wish to no longer carry
the version number 4 in future versions. The proposal is to proceed as
usual but just drop the first number. This means the next version will
be called 20.0, in addition to a possible 4.18.2 and/or 4.19.1
+1 for agree
0
If I start a vote it will be to adjust to the semantic versioning
system. I do not approve of the ubuntu scheme, sorry. I will probably
-0 just to get us moving forward but I think it is not the best for
us. So I'll wait a few and start a vote if no-one else did before me.
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at
personally I don't like the months too much. They tie us down to a
release schedule that we have proven not to be able to maintain. a
year as number restricts us to just one major release that year, i.e.
only one moment for new integrations or major features. S I am for the
more liberal 20.x and
backup for VMware (without needing Veeam) to make it similar
> > to what ACS does with XenServer and KVM; Operators backup (which are
> > different from end-user backups); and many other items.
> >
> > What do you guys think?
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
As we get no major issues on it and we already voted to have this
design applied, is it alright to deploy this in the coming weeks?
On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 8:31 PM Daan Hoogland wrote:
>
> devs and users,
>
> back in august we had a small discussion about a new website design,
>
I live in his backyard, will there as well.
On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 3:58 PM Wido den Hollander
wrote:
>
>
>
> Op 09/01/2024 om 13:45 schreef Ivet Petrova:
> > Dear community members,
> >
> > We managed to finalised the date for our joint event with the Ceph
> > community.
> > I am happy to share
devs, PMC,
as we are closing in on 4.19 I want to propose that we drop the 4. in
our versioning scheme. We've been discussing 5 but no real initiatives
have been taken. Nowadays big features go into our "minor"
dot-releases. In my opinion this warrants promoting those version to
the status of
t;> multipath is not used in our environments at all.
>> The tests for PR https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/8524 look ok
>> until now. Let's wait for the test results.
>>
>> -Wei
>>
>> On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 15:16, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>>
>> &
devs and users,
back in august we had a small discussion about a new website design,
led by Ivet [1]. In the meanwhile Rohit had investigated using
docusaurus as a publishing mechanism for the site. After the last few
weeks I have been working on integrating the two. The result so far
can be
Wei, is this with a VM/Volume not using multipath itself? If it is it
is definitely a reason to create a new RC, if it isn't I think we can
manage a known issue for a new feature.
On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 2:50 PM Wei ZHOU wrote:
>
> Thanks Ahbishek, and everyone tested or is testing RC2.
>
> I
+1 (binding)
both signatures checked, otherwise as I was heavily involved I am
trusting in all testing done along the way.
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 1:04 PM Abhishek Kumar wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a 4.19.0.0 release (RC2), with the following artifacts up for
> a vote:
>
> Git Branch
users and dev,
The PMC have invited Harikrishna to join their ranks and he has
gracefully accepted. Please join me in congratulating Hari.
--
Daan
community,
The PMC have invited João Jandre Paraquetti to join the project as a
committer and the invitation was gratefully accepted.
Please join me in welcoming João.
Congratulations João,
--
Daan
community,
The PMC has decided Vladi to become a committer and he has gracefully
accepted. Please join me in welcoming Vladi to the project as
committer.
Congratulations Vladi
--
Daan
+1 i like your proposal and support you João, Let us know what you need.
On Sat, Dec 9, 2023 at 9:23 PM Rohit Yadav wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Given, 4.18 branch is benefitting from maintenance work already, I wouldn't
> mind if you want to push it earlier to even say end of Jan, and target
> release
you think?
Also, How would you word it instead, João?
> On 12/4/23 10:51, Daan Hoogland wrote:
...
> > Fatal:
> > - include a reason why the system can not function anymore,
> > - be followed by a System.exit() call,
> > - include a stack trace if it is reasonabl
devs,
Other than we all have great new plans for integrations and other
features for 4.20 and we have about 300 issues to solve, There are
some platform issues that need addressing. So far I can think of
- the outstanding logging PR
- java 11 is out of support and we'll need to support a higher
There have been some discussions on github PRs about the subject of
proper logging and I want to use this to start a discussion and come
to some guidelines that hopefully everybody can agree to.
My idea is the following
Fatal:
- include a reason why the system can not function anymore,
- be
All,
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
has invited Bryan Lima to become a PMC member and we are pleased
to announce that they have accepted.
Bryan has contributed himself and assisted in reviewing and testing
the work of others. He has shown to be responsive,
great
On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 10:30 AM Rohit Yadav wrote:
>
> All,
>
> It's been a while since I had last proposed adopting and trying the Github
> Discussions feature for our users community. Since then, the ASF infra seems
> to have enabled integration and allowing Discussions integrated
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
has invited Abhishek Kumar to become a PMC member and we are pleased
to announce that they have accepted.
Abhishek has contributed in the past and has shown effort to make the
project run smoothly. He is also the Release Manager for the
mber 2023
>
> Also, if you have got an active PR with a new feature or fix that you
> would like to see in 4.19.0.0 release please comment with your interest on
> the Github item.
>
> Regards,
> Abhishek
>
>
>
> From: Daan
thanks Rohit,
It is a great idea. I have some questions concerning "measuring is
influencing" and "prerequisites",
but those should not stop us from creating a repo for this in the project
great idea,
On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 9:58 AM Nux wrote:
> Great idea, looking forward to it.
>
>
> On
Devs,
Please keep an eye on the PRs you want merged for 4.19 on a daily basis. As
we get closer and more gets merge the integration work get more continuous
(pun intended :P ). There are a lot of conflicts to be handled by authors
at the moment.
regards,
thanks Abhishek,
Also devs, please be aware that conflict/rebase cycles will have to
intensify a bit in the coming weeks. Please be vigilant.
regards,
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 12:43 PM Abhishek Kumar <
abhishek.ku...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> I'm sending this to remind you that we
Henrique,
Thanks for bringing this up/
I think both disallowing and creating a default nic on importing are
acceptable behaviours. One could argue for either and operators will
complain either way (I know I probably would ;). I think we can make
disallowing the default and if we want to make this
Please note that these figures are not including any issues or PRs marked
for 4.18.2. We have a lot to filter out.
On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 11:33 AM Abhishek Kumar <
abhishek.ku...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Update on the current state of the 4.19.0.0 milestone. Currently, there
> are
great, thanks you for your persistence and effort in general.
On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 1:51 PM Vishesh Jindal
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I wanted to update everyone that powermock is completely removed from main
> branch now. Thank you everyone for helping out on this.
>
> Regards,
> Vishesh
>
>
Oliver,
you can snapshot the VMs and convert to template (if all else fails). It
might be worth trying to find out why it fails though (capacity, cpu level,
network/storage configuration?)
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 6:06 PM Olivier GUIN
wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I have 2 clusters each with
Hey Rohit,
guess this is not a hot topic, but i'm +1 on this. with 4.18 out I think
now is a good time.
On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 10:53 AM Rohit Yadav
wrote:
> All,
>
> Our UI building in packages/PRs uses npm v14, while the current LTS
> version is v18. However, since we use npm for only
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache [PROJECT]
has invited Daniel Salvador to become a PMC member and we are pleased
to announce that they have accepted.
Daniel has contributed in the past and has shown effort to make the
project run smoothly
please join me in congratulating Daniel
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache [PROJECT]
has invited Sina Kashipazha to become a committer and we are pleased
to announce that they have accepted.
Sina has been active as a contributor in several ways; code, testing,
talks, documentation
Please join me in welcoming Sina
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
has invited Jown Bampton to become a committer and we are pleased
to announce that they have accepted.
John is mostly active on CI and build specific issues.
please join me in welcoming John to the project
--
Daan
Rohit, I either agree or have no strong opinion on points 2 through 6, but
I do not think point 1 is a good idea. Users in some cases rely heavily on
projects and/or sharing domains and accounts. The two constructs both have
earned their right to existence in production environments.
€0,02
On
FYI,
I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-24823
On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 8:48 AM Vishesh Jindal
wrote:
> +1
> If possible, please include "Update with Rebase" option as well.
>
> Thanks,
> Vishesh
>
> ____
> From
LS,
In guthub there is a feature that allows you to update your branch with the
target branch [1] . As for for instance for lint checking and out of
security concerns we don't run github actions by default on the target
branch, it is a convenience to regularly update PRs with the target with
this
@Rohit Yadav is this worth mentioning on the website
somewhere?
On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 8:33 PM Rohit Yadav
wrote:
> All,
>
> Reminder - we've ability to add frequent contributors and add them as
> collaborators [1] to our Github repos. This allows them to use project
> Github with ability to
Giles, just about point one as the others follow from it.
On Fri, Jun 9, 2023 at 10:17 AM Giles Sirett wrote:
>
> Hi Daan - thanks for your input. Some comments inline below
>
>
>
> Kind Regards
> Giles
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Daan Hoo
Giles, the principle of what you are saying seems good but I have a few remarks;
1. Consistency should not become a goal. Clarity is and if context
might give rise to a different understanding of the same work
consistency is detrimental to understanding
2. Metaphor is an important aspect in system
I like your approach Vishesh +1 from me
On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 2:18 PM Vishesh Jindal
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am working on upgrading Mockito's version & phasing out powermock. For new
> maven modules, I would request all to use Mockito's mockStatic instead of
> Powermock.
>
> Why?
>
you should be able to edit now
On Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 3:44 PM Sina Kashipazha
wrote:
>
>
> Yes, I just created one, my username is "esterlinkof"
>
>
> --- Original Message ---
> On Friday, June 2nd, 2023 at 15:22, Daan Hoogland
> wrote:
>
&g
Yes Sina,
do you have an account on cwiki.apache.org?
On Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 3:14 PM Sina Kashipazha
wrote:
>
> Hey there,
>
> I found the following webpage on how to set up a Marvin test, but it's pretty
> outdated and has some problems. Is it possible to edit it?
>
>
nice, good luck and have fun
On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 6:53 AM Ayush Pandey wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I am Ayush Pandey, joining the community for a project as part of Google
> Summer of code 2023. I will be working with my mentor Nicolas Vazquez on
> "Extend Import-Export Instances to the KVM
ommunity seems to count on support of
> both users and other devs, and we have already done quite an extensive test
> round, what else are we missing to move along with that PR? Is any of the
> merging criteria missing to move on with it?
>
> Best regards,
> Daniel Salvador (gutove
-0
Joao, Daniel reacted negatively to my question to create a proxy with bad
arguments and I had no time to respond yet. I think not adding a proxy at
this time is a missed opportunity and I would full heartedly +1 if we had.
Not creating a proxy class (with or without configurability) is a waste
Rohit, Daniel,
Let me weigh in a bit. I held back about this as I have discussed this in
the past a lot in different settings and do not want to take sides. My
personal motivation for either reload4j or log4j2 are slim but I can see
that people might want to lean to either. For this reason I want
+1, you have my support @weiz...@apache.org
On Thu, 4 May 2023, 10:02 Rohit Yadav, wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks for volunteering Wei, yes our community absolutely will benefits
> with a 4.18.1.0 maintenance release!
>
>
> Regards.
>
>
> From: Wei ZHOU
> Sent:
fessionally and
> > politely on the mailing lists [1].
> >
> > [1] https://cloudstack.apache.org/mailing-lists.html
> >
> >
> > Regards.
> >
> >
> > From: Daan Hoogland
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 2, 2023 13:19
> > To: dev@cloudst
nother professionally and
> politely on the mailing lists [1].
>
> [1] https://cloudstack.apache.org/mailing-lists.html
In short, I stand by my previous mail on this thread. This is provided
there is no misunderstanding on what was meant.
>
>
>
> Regards.
>
> ___
+1 (binding),
monkey tested (no pun intended)
connected to different local and remote envs bot by restarting and set
profile commands.
tried different commands and command completions
Also trusting on Rohit's due diligence
On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 11:32 AM Rohit Yadav
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
>
Abhishek, I think the discussion about log4j2 needs to be concluded in
coercion with this. I am fine if you and/or Daniel co-RM this release for
instance, but the log4j issue may not be disregarded on these grounds and
must be fully discussed and agreed upon.
On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 9:43 AM Suresh
I agree we should go to log4j2.
I think if you used any scripts to do the renaming, João, you should share
those here and on your PR. This will help people with dealing with the
conflicts mentioned by Wei on users@.
Also thank you for the effort to help this forward.
regards,
On Fri, Apr 28,
Devs,
There are two PRs [1][2] to be merged soon that have several hundreds of
files involved. One is to unify the line-endings and the other one to
(finaly) upgrade log4j. please beware that this is going to cause you to
resolve conflicts in your PRs.
regards,
[1]
thanks all,
will try to be worthy ;)
On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 2:17 PM Simon Weller wrote:
> Wow, that's fantastic. Congratulations Daan!
>
> -Si
>
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 4:29 AM Paul Angus wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > It is my pleasure to announce that Daan
-- Forwarded message -
From: Gavin McDonald
Date: Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 10:57 AM
Subject: TAC supporting Berlin Buzzwords
To:
PMCs,
Please forward to your dev and user lists.
Hi All,
The ASF Travel Assistance Committee is supporting taking up to six (6)
people
to attend
We are pleased to announce that the Apache CloudStack 4.18.0.0 LTS
Releaseis out.
The Apache Software Foundation Announces Apache® CloudStack® v4.18.
Apache CloudStack 4.18.0.0 is a 4.18 LTS release with 300+ new features,
improvements, and bug fixes since 4.17, including 19 major new features.
I know of some here that have trouble rebuilding the website with
middleman. I am one of them. Is there anybody out there that can still do
the build?
--
Daan
Marketeers,
Please have a read through the following announcement and point me to any
errors or omissions that need to be dealt with. Hopefully we can send this
out on monday.
NOTA BENE: the packages will be in place by than, but are not yet.
Apache CloudStack 4.18.0.0 LTS Release
The
devs,
main, 4.17 and 4.18 are open for any approved commit now that the milestone
is closed and the release is ready to be announced.
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 7:32 PM Daan Hoogland wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After 72 hours, the vote for CloudStack 4.18.0.0 *passes* with
> 5 PMC + 0 n
Hi all,
After 72 hours, the vote for CloudStack 4.18.0.0 *passes* with
5 PMC + 0 non-PMC votes.
+1 (PMC / binding)
* Nux (lucian)
* Rohit
* Simon
* Boris
* Nicolas
+1 (non binding)
None
0
none
-1
none
Thanks to everyone participating.
I will now prepare the release announcement to go out
packages are available at
https://download.cloudstack.org/testing/4.18-rc3/
and
http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/upstream/testing/4.18.0.0-RC20230311T0935/
On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 9:45 AM Daan Hoogland wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a new 4.18 release candidate, with the
Hi All,
I've created a new 4.18 release candidate, with the following
artifacts up for a vote:
Git Branch and Commit
SH:https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.18.0.0-RC20230311T0935
Commit: 0574087284f8b646ebc41617cfd70b3a31e3ae94
Source release
k/pull/7229 (not sure if this causes a
> critical billing/usage issue?)
>
>
> Regards.
>
>
> From: Daan Hoogland
> Sent: Thursday, March 2, 2023 14:31
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: users ; PMC <
> priv...@cloudstack.apache.or
, 2023 at 5:29 PM Vladimir Petrov <
vladimir.pet...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> +1, I tested different upgrades (from 4.15, 4.16 and 4.17 using different
> hypervisors) and the common operations and found no issues.
>
> Best wishes,
> Vladi
>
>
>
> Daan Hoo
Hi All,
some small errata,
- I added my key
- I will keep this vote open till friday, we've had a weekend and being
lenient on those 72 hours will not hurt the quality, I think.
It has taken some time but;
I've created a second 4.18.0.0 release candidate, with the following
artifacts up for a
Ah, yes, I had to create a new key as the old ones (also in the KEYS file
were no longer valid (at least none that I knew)
```
sec rsa4096 2023-02-14 [SC]
256ABDFB8D89EDE07540BE6ACEF9E802B86FEED4
uid [ultimate] Daan Hoogland (CODE SIGNING KEY)
ssb rsa4096 2023-02-14 [E]
```
I
There are now also convenience packages on
download.cloudstack.org/testing/4.18-rc2 for a variety of systems. The
ubuntu packages are not indexed but are downloadable at least.
regards,
On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 5:25 PM Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> There are convenience packages available at
>
1 - 100 of 3647 matches
Mail list logo
