Great! I'm going to be there! :-)
Wido
Op 08/04/2024 om 16:41 schreef Ivet Petrova:
Hi All,
I am delighted to announce that the registration for CloudStack Collaboration
Conference 2024 is now open.
I also would like to encourage you all to register here:
https://www.eventbrite.com/e
meet there?
Works for me on 12-09. Just wondering, Germany is big, which city are we
looking at?
Frankfurt? Berlin? München? Düsseldorf? :-)
Wido
I consider the usual formal of half day talks and will need 5-6 speakers on
place.
Best regards,
+1
Op 19/02/2024 om 13:49 schreef Daan Hoogland:
LS,
This is a vote on dev@c.a.o with cc to users@c.a.o. If you want to be
counted please reply to dev@.
As discussed in [1] we are deciding to drop the 4 from our versioning
scheme. The result would be that the next major version will be 20
Nice, very nice!
Op 07/02/2024 om 09:22 schreef Daan Hoogland:
People,
we brought the new website. Please all have a look at
https://cloudstack.apache.org
thanks for any feedback
with just going with an number. 24, then 25, then 26, etc.
Something else then 4.x for ever.
Wido
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 12:27 AM Wei ZHOU wrote:
Yes, the ubuntu version naming is the best in my opinion.
Other than the version naming, we need to decide the frequency of major
releases
a vote in the dev/users/pmc mailing list?
I think that's a good decision.
@ Daan: Do you want to start one?
I'd prefer the .MM release schedule. We just need a good (blog)post
to explain the new versioning.
Wido
在 2024年1月23日星期二，Nicolas Vazquez 写道：
I like this idea as well, even
it in Jan 2025.
A great post on the website, mailinglists and social media could explain
the change in versioning, but that the code doesn't change that much.
Project has matured, etc, etc.
Wido
Wei
On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 at 12:01, Daan Hoogland wrote:
João,
I think we should not consider 5.0
people from the community, so register
as an attendee here:
https://www.eventbrite.nl/e/cloudstack-and-ceph-day-netherlands-2024-tickets-700177167757
Look forward to meeting you in Amsterdam!
Yes! That's like my backyard. I'll be there!
Wido
Best regards,
anybody else with ideas?
Wido
[0]: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/8389
[1]:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/1411da1a22bc6aa26634f3038475e3d5fbbcd6bb/ui/src/components/view/ObjectStoreBrowser.vue#L449
It is working now!
PR is out: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/8389
On 12/16/23 13:14, Wido den Hollander wrote:
On 12/15/23 20:09, Wei ZHOU wrote:
Hi Wido,
I just tested your branch, it looks ok (
https://github.com/wido/cloudstack/commits/ceph-object-store).
Yes, it works now
' to AddObjectStorage.vue for the
dropdown in the UI. But when I select that dropdown entry and click "Save" in
the UI the following exception is thrown:
Great to see! I'm working on the Ceph plugin:
https://github.com/wido/cloudstack/commits/ceph-object-store
I will be changing something to the frame
On 12/15/23 20:09, Wei ZHOU wrote:
Hi Wido,
I just tested your branch, it looks ok (
https://github.com/wido/cloudstack/commits/ceph-object-store).
Yes, it works now! I had old files in my classpath... (rookie mistake!)
I get an error about an invalid URL, but that's something else
Op 15/12/2023 om 13:54 schreef Wei ZHOU:
Hi Wido,
It looks you need a file like
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/main/plugins/storage/object/simulator/src/main/resources/META-INF/cloudstack/storage-object-simulator/spring-storage-object-simulator-context.xml
Tnx. But that didn't
and
https://github.com/wido/cloudstack/commits/ceph-object-store but fail to see what I have
done wrong. The only significant thing I can make out is my choice for the directory name
"/opt/cloudstack-huawei-obs/plugins/storage/object/huawei-obs".
In plugins/pom.xml all object stora
' to AddObjectStorage.vue for the
dropdown in the UI. But when I select that dropdown entry and click "Save" in
the UI the following exception is thrown:
Great to see! I'm working on the Ceph plugin:
https://github.com/wido/cloudstack/commits/ceph-object-store
I will be changing something to the frame
Op 12/12/2023 om 04:45 schreef Rohit Yadav:
Hi Wido,
I think when the minio object storage plugin was written we didn’t have the
limitations or foresight on how to structure the code, I would agree in
refactoring the interface enough to allow what you’re trying to achieve.
Typically
of these methods, but
before I do so, is there any particular reason the String was passed and
not the whole Bucket object?
Thanks,
Wido
[0]: https://github.com/wido/cloudstack/commits/ceph-object-store
[1]: https://ceph.io/en/discover/technology/#object
[2]:
https://www.javadoc.io/doc
-0: Agree with Nux (see his concern in another e-mail)
Op 04/12/2023 om 22:56 schreef Nux:
-0 - I have voiced my concerns already.
On 2023-12-04 08:01, Rohit Yadav wrote:
All,
Following the discussion thread on adopting Github Discussions as
users forum [1], I put the following proposal
-0: Agree with Nux (see his concern in another e-mail)
Op 04/12/2023 om 22:56 schreef Nux:
-0 - I have voiced my concerns already.
On 2023-12-04 08:01, Rohit Yadav wrote:
All,
Following the discussion thread on adopting Github Discussions as
users forum [1], I put the following proposal
. It's a great improvement
over what we currently have.
Wido
Regards.
From: Ivet Petrova
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2023 19:04
To: Giles Sirett
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org ; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
; Marketing
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] New Design
travelling
we plan to post. Megali from DIMSI’s team is helping us on these details.
Great! And indeed, from London you can very easily reach Paris via
Eurostar. I just booked my Thalys train tickets :-)
Wido
Kind regards,
On 23 Jul 2023, at 20:27, Gregoire LAMODIERE
mailto:g.lam
Op 26/07/2023 om 09:40 schreef Ivet Petrova:
Hi Wido,
The link on the site is fixed.
As for the project website - it links on purpose to the Hubilo platform, so
that people can see a direct registration page and make it easier for them to
register.
As you mentioned there is not enough info
travelling
we plan to post. Megali from DIMSI’s team is helping us on these details.
Great! And indeed, from London you can very easily reach Paris via
Eurostar. I just booked my Thalys train tickets :-)
Wido
Kind regards,
On 23 Jul 2023, at 20:27, Gregoire LAMODIERE
mailto:g.lam
sense. I'll be doing that for sure and will make sure all my other
colleagues come by train as well.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-speed_rail_in_Europe
See you in Paris in November!
Wido
Op 31/05/2023 om 10:48 schreef Jamie Pell:
Hi everyone,
I am pleased to share that the CloudStack
sense. I'll be doing that for sure and will make sure all my other
colleagues come by train as well.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-speed_rail_in_Europe
See you in Paris in November!
Wido
Op 31/05/2023 om 10:48 schreef Jamie Pell:
Hi everyone,
I am pleased to share that the CloudStack
Hi,
We are aware. Those need to be build and uploaded.
Wido
Op 18-03-2023 om 13:39 schreef Curious Pandora:
Hello,
it looks like the 4.18 packages for focal/jammy/bionic are missing at
download.cloudstack.org.
Regards,
Looking forward to it! We'll join with 4 people from our company
(Netherlands).
Great to see the community again. Learn from and help each other and
afterwards enjoy a few beers.
See you all in Bulgaria!
Wido
On 10/26/22 12:59, Ivet Petrova wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to kindly ask all
Op 07-09-2022 om 09:34 schreef Nux:
Wido,
I've just run the UI standalone on a separate machine the other day, but
not on docker.
What I did was to install cloudstack-ui rpm package, then serve it like
a normal site, but proxy /client to mgmt-server:8000 like described here:
https
?
Wido
[0]: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/6709
them coming in.
We'll try to make the CCC in Bulgaria later this year!
Wido
Op 13-05-2022 om 11:39 schreef Wei ZHOU:
Hi Wido,
We do not allocate an ipv6 subnet to a VPC. Instead, we allocate an ipv6
subnet for each vpc tier.
These subnets have the same gateway (ipv6 addr in VR).
for example
ipv6 route fd23:313a:2f53:3111::/64 fd23:313a:2f53:3000:1c00:baff:fe00:4
can then allocate /64s
from that larger subnet.
Wido
Cheers
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Wido den Hollander
Sent: 12 May 2022 16:04
To: Abhishek Kumar ; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks
On 5/12/22 09:55, Abhishek Kumar wrote:
Hi Wido,
I
On 5/12/22 09:55, Abhishek Kumar wrote:
> Hi Wido,
>
> I do not understand what you mean by WAB address but
WAB was a type. I meant WAN.
> fd23:313a:2f53:3000:1c00:baff:fe00:4 is the public IP of the network
> (IPv6 of the public NIC of the network VR) in the sample.
> Y
3cbf::/64"
}
Looking at this JSON, does this mean that
fd23:313a:2f53:3000:1c00:baff:fe00:4 is the WAB address of the VR?
And that I would need to (statically) route fd23:313a:2f53:3cbf::/64 to
that IP?
The event message does not include the subnet, that makes it a bit more
diffic
VR/VPC is created?
This way you could pick up these messages and have the network create a
(static) route based on those.
ExaBGP for example could be used to inject such routes.
Wido
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/IPv6+Support+in+Isolated+Network+and+VPC
for download.cloudstack.org
Anybody else seeing this?
Wido
Sounds good! I'll do my best to be present!
(And make sure there's a bar nearby! ;-) )
Wido
Op 05-04-2022 om 16:57 schreef Alex Mattioli:
Sounds amazing @Ivet Petrova
-Original Message-
From: Daman Arora
Sent: 05 April 2022 16:51
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: users
On 1/17/22 4:28 PM, Wei ZHOU wrote:
> Hi Wido,
>
> CloudStack allows users to add multiple IP ranges to a shared network. All
> these IPs share the same vlan. I hope it helps you.
>
Yes, but then they would also be allocated to VMs.
> The problem is, a secondary IP ca
Op 17-01-2022 om 15:07 schreef Daan Hoogland:
Wido,
As an operator, would I sell a floating ip with a number of instances it
can be applied to?
For example you would sell a /32 and /128 address (or a larger subnet)
which a client can announce from their VMs.
It does require
IPs
- Add per-network setting which allows arbitrary secondary IPs
- Pre-define subnets which Anycast/Floating IPs can be picked from per
network
Any ideas or suggestions?
Wido
Op 11-12-2021 om 00:52 schreef Marcus:
Just for clarity - Wido you mention that you tried using a common CPU model
across the platforms (which presumably doesn't contain npt) but migration
still fails on npt missing. That does seem like a bug of some sort, I would
expect
On 11/24/21 10:36 PM, Wei ZHOU wrote:
> Hi Wido,
>
> I think it is not good to run an environment with two ubuntu/qemu versions.
> It always happens that some cpu features are supported in the higher
> version but not supported in the older version.
> From my experience,
'EPYC-Rome'
is unknown as the 18.04 hypervisor doesn't have that profile.
Any ideas on how to get this working?
Wido
ncrease root disk again, it increases disk space
> but "/" partiton do not get autoresize.
>
As far as I know it only grows the partition once, eg, upon first boot.
I won't do it again afterwards.
Wido
>
> Following parameters were passed in userdata
>
+1 on what Rohit said.
Op 15-09-2021 om 11:11 schreef Rohit Yadav:
Thanks for explaining Daniel.
+1 (binding) if the StringsUtils facade (in cloud-api) is used to rely on
commons-lang3 and use StringsUtils facade (from cloud-api) throughout the
source code.
-0 (binding) if we're only
Op 16-08-2021 om 11:29 schreef Rohit Yadav:
Thanks Hean, Kristaps, Wido for your feedback.
I think we've some quorum and consensus on how we should proceed with IPv6
support with static routing (phase1). Based on my proof-of-concept and
discussions, I believe we may target this feature
Op 17-08-2021 om 11:20 schreef Wei ZHOU:
Hi Wido,
(cc to Rohit and Alex)
It is a good suggestion to use FRR for ipv6. The configuration is quite
simple and the VMs can get SLAAC, routes, etc.
Privacy extension looks not the same as what you mentioned. see
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc
he subnet to a single
instance in a shared network.
If we could then also move these subnets between Instances easily one
can quickly migrate to a different instance while keeping the same IPv6
subnet.
Wido
Proof-of-concept commentary: here's what I did to test the idea:
* Created an
Op 19-07-2021 om 20:38 schreef Kristaps Cudars:
Hi Wido,
I assume that flouting ip will not work grate with ingress/egress acl on VR.
From regular ACS user perspective:
I have Instance with dualstack its running web app on 443.
I want to swap instances for whatever reason.
In case of IPv4
session. You can imagine your
Cisco Router list of few thousand BGP session there.
Yes, but I would suggest that both OSPFv3 and BGP should work. Not
everybody will have 1000 accounts on their environment.
Even static routes should be supported.
Wido
On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 11:17 PM
Op 16-07-2021 om 21:46 schreef Kristaps Cudars:
Hi Wido,
Your proposal is to sacrifice ability to reassign IPv6 to instance, have
internal domain prefix, and list/db in ACS what IPv6 has been assigned to what
instance and go with RA and SLAAC. For route signaling to switch use BGP/OSPFv3
Op 16-07-2021 om 16:42 schreef Hean Seng:
Hi Wido,
In current setup, each Cloudstack have own VR, so in this new IPv6 subnet
allocation , each VR (which have Frr) will need to have peering with ISP
router (and either BGP or Static Route) , and there is 1000 Acocunts, it
will 1000 BGP
Op 16-07-2021 om 05:54 schreef Hean Seng:
Hi Wido,
My initial thought is not like this, it is the /48 at ISP router, and /64
subnet assign to AdvanceZoneVR, AdvanceZoneVR responsible is
distribule IPv6 ip (from the assigned /64 sunet) to VM, and not routing
the traffic, in the VM
Op 15-07-2021 om 20:49 schreef Kristaps Cudars:
Hi Wido,
DHCPv6 is not an option?
It is poorly implemented in many Operating Systems. Address obtaining
does not work. I have seen it fail too many times.
It enables feature parity between IPv4 and IPv6 in context of VR.
IPv6 != IPv4
Op 15-07-2021 om 17:05 schreef Kristaps Cudars:
Hi Wido,
What is benefit of using Route Advertisement on internal VR networks?
The VMs need the Router Advertisement to learn their default gateway.
That's the only way with IPv6.
The RA also contains the prefix (/64) which the VMs can
with SLAAC is much better supported in Operating
Systems then DHCPv6 is.
Wido
Thanks
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Kristaps Cudars
Sent: 13 July 2021 20:44
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks
Hi,
I would like to argue that implement
But you still need routing. See the attached PNG (and draw.io XML).
You need to route the /48 subnet TO the VR which can then route it to
the Virtual Networks behind the VR.
There is no other way then routing with either BGP or a Static route.
Wido
Op 15-07-2021 om 12:39 schreef Hean Seng
:
neighbor 2001:db8:4fa::179 remote-as external
The /48 you need to have at the VR anyway in case of either a static
route or BGP.
We just need to add a NullRoute on the VR for that /48 so that traffic
will not be routed to the upper gateway in case of the VR can't find a
route.
Wido
ut:
- DNS servers
- DNS domain
- Prefix (/64) to be used
There is no need for DHCPv6. You can calculate the IPv6 address the VM
will obtain by using the MAC and the prefix.
So in short:
- Using BGP you routed a /48 to the VR
- Now you split this into /64 subnets towards the isolated networks
Wido
> Alex Mattioli
>
>
>
>
/updateStoragePool.html
The 'enabled' flag does exactly what you want:
'false to disable the pool for allocation of new volumes, true to enable
it back.'
Wido
+1 (binding)
On 6/2/21 11:50 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a 4.15.1.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SHA:
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.15.1.0-RC20210602T1429
> Commit: aaac4b17099ba838a3f7b57400277ca9b23f98f5
>
That's already possible:
https://cloudstack.apache.org/api/apidocs-4.15/apis/updateAccount.html
roleid: "The UUID of the dynamic role to set for the account"
Isn't that what you are looking for?
Wido
On 22/04/2021 11:55, Rakesh Venkatesh wrote:
Hello folks
I dont think there is a
for private communication between the hosts. It
is failing to find that.
Wido
--
*Thanks & Regards.*
Support Admin
Facebook | Twitter
<https://twitter.com/technologyrss1> | Website <https://technologyrss.com>
116/1 West Malibagh, D. I. T Road
Dhaka-1217, Bangladesh
*Mob :*
On 28/03/2021 21:27, Stephan Seitz wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 28.03.2021, 20:33 +0200 schrieb Wido den Hollander:
On 26/03/2021 20:56, Stephan Seitz wrote:
Wido, thank's a lot!
I just had to look into the db. The correctly calculated SLAAC is
already there.
Double-check: The API and UI do
On 26/03/2021 20:56, Stephan Seitz wrote:
Wido, thank's a lot!
I just had to look into the db. The correctly calculated SLAAC is
already there.
Double-check: The API and UI do show an IPv6 address for the NIC?
It's then up to you to make sure the Routers in the (shared) network
send
!)
When that works you have security grouping also working. It then filters
on source addresses from VMs and such.
We have thousands of VMs connected with IPv6 this way.
Wido
Best case is, that I'm stuck with hosts correctly configured by the
router advertisement, but ACS doesn't know about it. So
if something like this is available for KVM
with CloudStack or if somebody has ever put effort into this.
Thanks,
Wido
VMware 6.0),
but we keep mentioning we support things that, probably, nobody tested, nor
is using at all - the ones from above.
Opinions, suggestion?
Like I said, this list can probably shrink as many things are untested
and haven't been used for a while.
Wido
On 16/02/2021 07:00, Rohit Yadav wrote:
Wido - in that case should we disable metadata re-generating cronjobs for both
rpm/deb repos? We only need to regenerate repo metadata on a new release.
There's no need to do this via cron for official releases.
I have disabled the CRON jobs
--baseurl
Based on your suggestion, I've changed the script to include: "createrepo --update
--retain-old-md ".
@Wido Hollander<mailto:w...@pcextreme.nl> @Gabriel Beims
Bräscher<mailto:gabr...@pcextreme.nl> - any reason why we have the cron job to update
repo metadata?
On 28/01/2021 10:55, Rohit Yadav wrote:
Agree we can ask that.
Is infra from ASF the place to ask this?
Wido
Regards.
From: Wido den Hollander
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2021 15:35
To: Niclas Lindblom ; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: dev
e Terraform and don't have a major stake in it, but I would
hate to see the Provider being removed from Terraform.
Should we request https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform at
infra and then host the Provider there?
Wido
> Niclas
>
>> On 26 Jan 2021, at 18:33, christian.nieph...@
we can maybe arrange
something.
Is it technically broken or just abandoned?
Wido
>
>> We're aware of Ansible CloudStack module
>> (https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/latest/scenario_guides/guide_cloudstack.html)
>> but are there any other alternatives of Terraform that you m
to be looked at which caused it to
be archived?
Wido
Regards,
Abhishek
abhishek.ku...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
3 London Bridge Street, 3rd floor, News Building, London SE1 9SGUK
@shapeblue
are uses VMFS with VMDK images on top as
that provides a lot of flexibility.
This time the use-case is iSCSI, but thinking ahead we'll get new things
like NVMeOF which provides even lower latency.
Probably best to set up a PoC and see how it works out.
Wido
Lucian
, but otherwise you have to use
corosync.
Anybody else otherwise using CLVM?
Wido
HTH,
Lucian
On 2021-01-21 09:32, Wido den Hollander wrote:
Hi,
For a specific use-case I'm looking into the possibility to use iSCSI
in combination with KVM.
Use-case: Low-latenc I/O with 4k blocks and QD=1
KVM
' as a storage pool
with KVM. Does is support all the features NFS supports?
Thanks,
Wido
be facing a different situation here.
Wido
> @Wido Hollander<mailto:w...@pcextreme.nl> can you advise how this was tested
> and can you advise mitigation of the double escape issue or send a PR?
>
>
> Regards.
>
>
> From: Rohit Yadav
On 1/4/21 1:42 PM, Andrija Panic wrote:
> Side question, has anyone (Wido, Garbiel) ever tested Ceph 15.x to work
> with any CloudStack version so far?
>
Yes. Running it in production on Ubuntu 18.04 hypervisors and Ceph servers.
This is with CloudStack 4.13.1
Wido
>
> On
On 1/4/21 12:25 PM, li jerry wrote:
> Hi Rohit and Wido
>
>
> According to the document description, I re-tested adding RBD primary storage
> monitor: 10.100.250.14:6789
>
> (createStoragePool api :
> url:
> rbd://hyperx:AQAywfFf8jCiIxAAbnDBjX1QQAO9Sj22kUBh
:
> "rbd://cephtest:AQC3u_JfhipzGBAACiILEFKembN8gTJsIvu6nQ==@192.168.1.10:6789/cephtest"
>
> @Daan Hoogland<mailto:daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com> @Gabriel Beims
> Bräscher<mailto:gabr...@pcextreme.nl> @Wido
> Hollander<mailto:w...@pcextreme.nl> @Wei ZHOU<mailt
between Linux distributions.
I could well be that CloudStacks works on CentOS Stream, Rocky, SL and
many other RPM based distributions.
But since this is all very fresh I would wait for now and see how this
turns out.
Wido
On 12/24/20 1:01 PM, Giles Sirett wrote:
> You may have seen this n
.
Wido
Kind regards,
Wei
On Sat, 29 Aug 2020 at 11:47, Rohit Yadav wrote:
All,
Ubuntu 16.04 does not have JRE11 package as well as some packages for
Python3 such as python3-distutils:
https://packages.ubuntu.com/search?suite=default=all=any=python3-distutils=names
The Java 11 JRE
Indeed. Great stuff!
Thanks!
Wido
On 6/9/20 7:23 PM, Andrija Panic wrote:
> Great stuff Rohit, thanks!
>
> On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 at 05:51, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>
>> Typo - "the 4.14 Debian 10 systemvmtemplate will", was supposed to be "the
>> 4.14 Debian 9
.04 support (and drop 16.04)
- CentOS 8 support
Wido
On 5/25/20 11:48 AM, Andrija Panic wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> code is free/open for merges again.
>
> Regards,
> Andrija
>
> On Sat, 14 Mar 2020 at 10:12, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>
>> H all, I've been working with Andri
On 4/23/20 11:04 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> never mind found it 3959
Do you mean: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3959 ?
Wido
>
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 11:03 AM Daan Hoogland
> wrote:
>
>> Jerry,
>> you say you have a PR but point to the issue.
s are painful and
this makes it a lot easier.
We then have to merge a couple of things for 4.13.1 then :-)
We should prevent dragging the releases even further.
Wido
>
> Opinion?
>
> Thanks,
>
g disabled. One will than have to make/mark it
> "ready for merge" before it *can* be merged.
>
That sounds like a good idea! Would be a +1 from me :-)
Wido
> [1]
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f3f0988907f85bfc2cfcb0fbcde831037f9b1cb017e94bc68932%40%3Cdev.cloudstack.apache.org%3E
> please shoot any comments you may have back at me,
> thanks
>
Welcome Hoang!
Wido
On 2/7/20 3:13 AM, Hoang Nguyen wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> My name is Hoang and I'm working for Ewerk. It is my great pleasure to have a
> chance to join Cloudstack Primate project. It has been a wonderful time for
> me since last December when I starte
On 12/5/19 10:08 AM, Nux! wrote:
> Hi Wido,
>
> When you put it like that it does seem like a pointless exercise, but
> the devil is the details.
>
> - very up to date kvm/kernel some may seek for various features
>
You can do the same with KVM right now. Just insta
It supports Ceph, ZFS (just set it up) and HA.
So I don't see what we are lacking or what Proxmox integration would
bring us?
Wido
> Regards,
> Lucian
>
+1 !!
On 10/7/19 1:31 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> All,
>
> The feedback and response has been positive on the proposal to use Primate as
> the modern UI for CloudStack [1] [2]. Thank you all.
>
> I'm starting this vote (to):
>
> * Accept Primate codebase [3] as a project under Apache
On 9/8/19 5:26 AM, Andrija Panic wrote:
> Maaany release ago, deleting Ceph volume snap, was also only deleting it in
> DB, so the RBD performance become terrible with many tens of (i. e. Hourly)
> snapshots. I'll try to verify this on 4.13 myself, but Wido and the guys
> will know
On 9/6/19 11:34 PM, Andrija Panic wrote:
> One question though... for me (4.13, Nautilus 14.2, test env) - it fails to
> revert back to snapshot with below error
>
Ok, that's weird.
Gabriel worked on this code recently, maybe he can take a look. I'll
ping him
Wido
> Which C
On 9/5/19 6:03 PM, Riepl, Gregor (SWISS TXT) wrote:
>
>>> Wido, makes sense that log4j and logrotate would conflict. Log4j
>>> has its
>>> own rotate functionality.
>>
>
> Note that a few CS log files are not generated by log4j.
> You still need
On 9/5/19 11:13 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> Wido, makes sense that log4j and logrotate would conflict. Log4j has its
> own rotate functionality.
It does indeed :-)
> I didn't understand before but the binary data is always the beginning of
> the file? Is always nulls?
I fo
On 9/3/19 2:55 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 2:22 PM Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 9/3/19 9:57 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>>> Can you find/look at the line before in the log. It is probably the one
>>> containing
ent.log.1.gz and after I decompress is that file is not
binary, text only.
The binary data only seems to be present in the current file.
Wido
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 8:22 AM Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 9/2/19 10:18 PM, Wei ZHOU wrote:
>>> Hi Wid
On 9/2/19 10:18 PM, Wei ZHOU wrote:
> Hi Wido,
>
> I had similar issue (not agent.log). It is probably caused by one or few>
> lines with special characters.
And I'm trying to figure out what causes it :-)
> "grep -a" should work.
I know, but other tools whi
bin1kKK_RS4uR.bin
Description: PGP/MIME version identification
1 - 100 of 1526 matches
Mail list logo
