Re: [Proposal] Concerning open PRs

2016-02-25 Thread Syed Mushtaq
quot; RPMs! > > > > -- > > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > > > > Nux! > > www.nux.ro > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Paul Angus" <paul.an...@shapeblue.com> > > > To: dev@c

Re: [Proposal] Concerning open PRs

2016-02-25 Thread Will Stevens
ely > > for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or > opinions > > expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily > represent those > > of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended > recipient > > of this

Re: [Proposal] Concerning open PRs

2016-02-20 Thread Nux!
+1 for "on PR" RPMs! -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Paul Angus" <paul.an...@shapeblue.com> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Sent: Saturday, 20 February, 2016 12:31:56 > Subje

RE: [Proposal] Concerning open PRs

2016-02-20 Thread Paul Angus
s.com] Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2016 8:40 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [Proposal] Concerning open PRs Hi there all, @Sebastian: it might look a bit extreme, but I believe that at the moment it might be easier to get at least 5 of the community members investing 1 day per

Re: [Proposal] Concerning open PRs

2016-02-20 Thread Wilder Rodrigues
t; From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 2:07 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [Proposal] Concerning open PRs > > >> On Feb 18, 2016, at 8:38 AM, Wilder Rodrigues >> <wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com> wrote:

RE: [Proposal] Concerning open PRs

2016-02-19 Thread Ramanath Katru
: Thursday, February 18, 2016 2:07 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [Proposal] Concerning open PRs > On Feb 18, 2016, at 8:38 AM, Wilder Rodrigues <wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com> > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > It’s been a long time, but the Wolverine is not dead yet

Re: [Proposal] Concerning open PRs

2016-02-18 Thread Jeff Hair
I think that requiring everyone to test a pull request before opening a new one will just grind development to a halt. Although it has to be done, nobody likes testing. Automated testing relieves a lot of this, and many of the pull requests are involved enough to require extensive

Re: [Proposal] Concerning open PRs

2016-02-18 Thread sebgoa
> On Feb 18, 2016, at 8:38 AM, Wilder Rodrigues > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > It’s been a long time, but the Wolverine is not dead yet. ;) > > Currently we have 175 opened PRs, which we all agree to be a lot, given the > fact that few people, if any, are

[Proposal] Concerning open PRs

2016-02-17 Thread Wilder Rodrigues
Hi all, It’s been a long time, but the Wolverine is not dead yet. ;) Currently we have 175 opened PRs, which we all agree to be a lot, given the fact that few people, if any, are testing/merging them. I have been a bit off the radar, but from next week I will start helping to get some of