Re: BVT report 9/29

The Advanced Network with SG don't works with me (perhaps mistake in my setup). The error on wizard final step is: string '' has an unknown BroadcastDomainType Perhaps need a VLAN ID? (mandatory?) Extract of log: 2015-09-30 06:53:01,070 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet]

RE: BVT report 9/29

run...@gmail.com> Cc: dev <dev@cloudstack.apache.org>; Boris Schrijver <bo...@pcextreme.nl>; Pierre-Luc Dion <pd...@cloudops.com>; Milamber <milam...@apache.org> Subject: Re: BVT report 9/29 Hi Sebastian, On 29 Sep 2015, at 20:42, Sebastien Goasguen <run...@gmail.co

Re: BVT report 9/29

Hi Sebastian, On 29 Sep 2015, at 20:42, Sebastien Goasguen > wrote: @miguel, looks like smoke/test_scale_vm is reporting errors. It seems you were the last one to touch that test. Could you try to run the tests on some cloudstack setup you have and

Re: BVT report 9/29

The advanced network installation without SG seems works, but the final screen of setup wizard stills blank until the activation zone pop-up. A lot of error in the browser console. I need make more test (clean my browser cache before setup) See screenshot:

Re: BVT report 9/29

r_specifics | Status : >> EXCEPTION === >> >> ===final results are now copied to: /tmp//MarvinLogs/test_scale_vm_FUCV6R=== > > > Cheers, > \ Miguel Ferreira >mferre...@schubergphilis.com > > > > >> On 30 Sep 2015, at 10:17, Raja Pu

Re: BVT report 9/29

Boris Schrijver <bo...@pcextreme.nl<mailto:bo...@pcextreme.nl>>; Pierre-Luc Dion <pd...@cloudops.com<mailto:pd...@cloudops.com>>; Milamber <milam...@apache.org<mailto:milam...@apache.org>> Subject: Re: BVT report 9/29 Hi Sebastian, On 29 Sep 2015,

RE: BVT report 9/29

tName: test_02_scale_vm_without_hypervisor_specifics | Status >> : EXCEPTION === >> >> ===final results are now copied to: >> /tmp//MarvinLogs/test_scale_vm_FUCV6R=== > > > Cheers, > \ Miguel Ferreira >mferre...@schubergphilis.com > > >

BVT report 9/29

Hopefully the format of this email stays as I compose ? Bugs to be fixed for BVTs: a. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8915 b. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8697 c. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8891 - Should be a blocker d.

Re: BVT report 9/29

I’m testing 8915 now. The vrrp configuration was broken: instead of CIDR it was configured with IP only - messed up the guest network interfaces. Concerning 8891, it was fixed over the weekend, right? We tested iso nets and VMs got IPs assigned successfully. Cheers, Wilder > On 29 Sep 2015,

Re: BVT report 9/29

Cool! Thanks for retesting! Cheers, Wilder > On 29 Sep 2015, at 19:07, Raja Pullela wrote: > > Yes, looks like 8891 is resolved based on the comments. I will double check > the tests in regression too - just to make sure. > >> On Sep 29, 2015, at 6:55 PM, Wilder

Re: BVT report 9/29

Yes, looks like 8891 is resolved based on the comments. I will double check the tests in regression too - just to make sure. > On Sep 29, 2015, at 6:55 PM, Wilder Rodrigues > wrote: > > I’m testing 8915 now. The vrrp configuration was broken: instead of CIDR it

Re: BVT report 9/29

I have tested an installation of the CS 4.6.0 SNAPSHOT (today) on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS with latest update (installation with a ansible script) The cloudstack-management don't works. I don't known the root cause, but I suppose that is the (new?) dependency of Tomcat v7 (before ~1 month: tomcat6

Re: BVT report 9/29

If I change my ansible script to install the tomcat6 package before cloudstack-management, that's works. Tomorrow I will test a full ACS advanced network installation. root@cs-mgr1:~# service cloudstack-management status * CloudStack-specific Tomcat servlet engine is running with pid 5798

Re: BVT report 9/29

Hi folks, let’s try to shed some lights on those tests errors. First off, it appears some of those tests are not included in our Travis run…:( If anyone wants to check that list of tests and cross check with Travis, we could run them as well. @miguel, looks like smoke/test_scale_vm is