k.apache.org
Subject: Re: Strange XenServer SR behavior when deploying system VMs in Basic
Zone on 4.9
We found it last Saturday during the factoring of a test case! That was
pure lucky.
The code of the PR is not that good yet. But, we will work to get it ready
to be reviewed and merged.
On Mon,
I still have the
> issue.
>
> From: Rafael Weingärtner <rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 8:07 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Strange XenServer SR behavior when deploying system VMs in
> Basic Zone on 4.9
>
> Would
lt;rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 8:07 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Strange XenServer SR behavior when deploying system VMs in
> Basic Zone on 4.9
>
> Would the problem discussed here relate to the one here
> https://gith
<rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 8:07 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Strange XenServer SR behavior when deploying system VMs in Basic
Zone on 4.9
Would the problem discussed here relate to the one here
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1499?
On Mon,
org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9224
>
> I added info to it.
>
> From: Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com>
> Sent: Saturday, April 16, 2016 9:58 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Strange XenServer SR behavior when d
he.org
Subject: Re: Strange XenServer SR behavior when deploying system VMs in Basic
Zone on 4.9
Thanks, Adrian!
In my case, it's a dev environment, so it's not really hurting anything (it
just seems like weird behavior, so I was curious if others were seeing it).
I can create a ticket in Jira a
, what type of storage are you using?
>>
>>> On 15-Apr-2016, at 9:49 AM, Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm not sure, Daan.
>>>
>>> I plan to keep an eye on this behavior for a while when creating new clouds.
>>>
>
ccelerite.com>
To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" <dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
Sent: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 06:48:59 +
Subject: Re: Strange XenServer SR behavior when deploying system VMs in Basic
Zone on 4.9
> Mike, what type of storage are you using?
>
> > On 15-Apr-2016,
local storage
>>> completed, the shared SR pointing at secondary storage went away (as you
>>> would expect).
>>>
>>> This leaves me now with one un-expected shared SR pointing at secondary
>>> storage on XenServer-6.5-1.
>>>
>>> _
_
> From: Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2016 2:12 AM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: Strange XenServer SR behavior when deploying system VMs in Basic
> Zone on 4.9
>
> Mike, did the iso copy process not complete as expected.
ki, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 5:10 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Strange XenServer SR behavior when deploying system VMs in Basic
> Zone on 4.9
>
> Hi,
>
>
> Has anyone recently observed the following behav
tapp.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 5:10 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Strange XenServer SR behavior when deploying system VMs in Basic
> Zone on 4.9
>
> Hi,
>
>
> Has anyone recently observed the following behavior:
>
>
> http://imgur.com/8
;
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 5:10 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Strange XenServer SR behavior when deploying system VMs in Basic Zone
on 4.9
Hi,
Has anyone recently observed the following behavior:
http://imgur.com/8ALJmWb
As you can see in the image, I have three 6.5 XenServer
Hi,
Has anyone recently observed the following behavior:
http://imgur.com/8ALJmWb
As you can see in the image, I have three 6.5 XenServer hosts in a resource
pool.
I just used them when creating a basic zone and the system VMs were deployed
just fine. However, there are SRs pointing to
14 matches
Mail list logo
