RE: [portal] Implementing Login coplet with CForms

2004-07-21 Thread Philippe Guillard
I try again if somebody succeded or has any suggestion how to process for that topic ? Phil On Fri, 2004-07-02 at 16:48, Philippe Guillard wrote: Hi, Is there some fresh news about that topic ? I mean somebody succeded ? Regards, Phil On Thu, 2004-05-27 at 03:33, Alex Romayev wrote:

Re: The Butterfly Manifesto (was Re: [RT] Spring+JMX == Real Blocks?)

2004-07-21 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Ugo Cei wrote: Il giorno 12/lug/04, alle 18:23, Marc Portier ha scritto: think so too, just needs more wild thinking and somebody doing :-) Since I'm getting more and more bored with my daytime job, I ended up doing something: http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/ButterflyManifesto Comments are

Re: The Butterfly Manifesto (was Re: [RT] Spring+JMX == Real Blocks?)

2004-07-21 Thread Leo Sutic
Ugo Cei wrote: Since I'm getting more and more bored with my daytime job, I ended up doing something: http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/ButterflyManifesto Comments are welcome, flames /dev/null. Comments: 1. Butterfly is an experiment aiming to implement a (simplified) Cocoon clone but based

Hello

2004-07-21 Thread Jean-Claude Moissinac
I'm writing some actions for Cocoon (for your information: action which encode some MPEG-4 files) I'm searching from more than two hours for a mean to know the absolute path to the current sitemap in my action code. If I use ... Context context =

Re: Form sample doesn't work

2004-07-21 Thread Tim Larson
On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 10:14:02PM +0200, Stephan Coboos wrote: I'am using 2.1.5.1. It seems that the CForms samples doesn't work on this release? If I'am trying to start such an example the following error message will be thrown: Caused by:

VelocityGenerator and string escaping

2004-07-21 Thread Leszek Gawron
I found VelocityGenerator hadly usable because of lack of value escaping. Example: flow.js: var elem = test; cocoon.sendPage( view.vm, { elem: elem } ); view.vm: root$elem/root this unfortunatelly produces: rootelem/root which is an invalid xml Has anyone overcome this problem? I could write

[cforms] xreporter expressions on (Avalon) steroids

2004-07-21 Thread Gianugo Rabellino
I'm currently working on a more-than-average sized cforms applications. We have quite a few usecases where validation is kind of a PITA, requiring quite a few of business logic to be performed. Nothing difficult, nothing that requires heavy algos to be created, but still (as an example) quite a

Re: The Butterfly Manifesto (was Re: [RT] Spring+JMX == Real Blocks?)

2004-07-21 Thread Marc Portier
Ugo Cei wrote: Il giorno 12/lug/04, alle 18:23, Marc Portier ha scritto: think so too, just needs more wild thinking and somebody doing :-) Since I'm getting more and more bored with my daytime job, I ended up doing something: http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/ButterflyManifesto Comments are

RE: [cforms] xreporter expressions on (Avalon) steroids

2004-07-21 Thread Hunsberger, Peter
Gianugo Rabellino [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm currently working on a more-than-average sized cforms applications. We have quite a few usecases where validation is kind of a PITA, requiring quite a few of business logic to be performed. Nothing difficult, nothing that requires heavy

Re: [RT] Virtual Sitemap Components

2004-07-21 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Sylvain Wallez wrote: Reinhard Poetz wrote: snip/ I have the same understanding after reading the whole thread. Though I'm not sure if we have consensus on actions. Anyway, what will be the order of execution of actions? IIUC all actions within a pipeline are execute *before* the pipeline is

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30043] - xml2html.xslt does not work on IE

2004-07-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30043. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [RT] Virtual Sitemap Components

2004-07-21 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Sylvain Wallez wrote: Reinhard Poetz wrote: snip/ I have the same understanding after reading the whole thread. Though I'm not sure if we have consensus on actions. Anyway, what will be the order of execution of actions? IIUC all actions within a pipeline are execute

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30142] - HTML serializer puts no space between public and system doctype

2004-07-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30142. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30142] - HTML serializer puts no space between public and system doctype

2004-07-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30142. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

current sitemap directory path

2004-07-21 Thread Jean-Claude Moissinac
Hello I'm searching to obtain the directory path (absolute or relative to the main cocoon directory) for the currently used sitemap. I don't find a method. I've traversed the doc, the sample...without result. Many samples which seams to use such an information are hard coded and become false if

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30142] - HTML serializer puts no space between public and system doctype

2004-07-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30142. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [cforms] xreporter expressions on (Avalon) steroids

2004-07-21 Thread Bruno Dumon
On Wed, 2004-07-21 at 18:23, Gianugo Rabellino wrote: I'm currently working on a more-than-average sized cforms applications. We have quite a few usecases where validation is kind of a PITA, requiring quite a few of business logic to be performed. Nothing difficult, nothing that requires heavy

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30142] - HTML serializer puts no space between public and system doctype

2004-07-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30142. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: JCS logging

2004-07-21 Thread Dave Brondsema
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Dave Brondsema wrote: We at Forrest are seeing more JCS log messages than we want. I tried setting up a log4j.properties file to control it, but that didn't seem to work. At any rate, it looks like they're using commons logging now, so according to

CVS to SVN Conversion Status

2004-07-21 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Hi all, The first step toward CVS to SVN conversion is done. Results are here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/test/cocoon-test/ Please test! If everything is fine, real conversion will be done sometime later... I'm thinking end of week or start of next week. PS You'd need to create password

Re: The Butterfly Manifesto (was Re: [RT] Spring+JMX == Real Blocks?)

2004-07-21 Thread Ugo Cei
Il giorno 21/lug/04, alle 13:37, Leo Sutic ha scritto: 1. Butterfly is an experiment aiming to implement a (simplified) Cocoon clone but based on Spring instead of Hibernate Don't you mean: based on Spring instead of Avalon Of course. Typo corrected. 2. Strive for 100% unit test coverage A bit of

Re: The Butterfly Manifesto (was Re: [RT] Spring+JMX == Real Blocks?)

2004-07-21 Thread Ugo Cei
Il giorno 21/lug/04, alle 17:49, Marc Portier ha scritto: regarding the blocks issue however we will also need to cover classloading-shielding (spring doesn't do it afaik) and I'ld really like us to do that based on jars in a merlin-like repo (just like merlin does it) (actually I need

Re: [Springframework-developer] Butterfly

2004-07-21 Thread Ugo Cei
Il giorno 21/lug/04, alle 10:34, Rod Johnson ha scritto: Indeed. I edited the page to say we'd like to help. Thanks for your offer, Rod. Much apppreciated. I am asking all interested people from Cocoon to come to this list and discuss the issues (hence the crosspost). There's a feeling that we

Re: [Springframework-developer] Butterfly

2004-07-21 Thread Ugo Cei
I think we might have problems if we want to interact via email with the Spring people. Here is what the sf.net mailserver responded when I tried to send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 66.35.250.206 does not like recipient. Remote host said: 550-Callback setup failed while verifying [EMAIL

Re: The Butterfly Manifesto (was Re: [RT] Spring+JMX == Real Blocks?)

2004-07-21 Thread Antonio Gallardo
Ugo Cei dijo: Il giorno 21/lug/04, alle 13:37, Leo Sutic ha scritto: 1. Butterfly is an experiment aiming to implement a (simplified) Cocoon clone but based on Spring instead of Hibernate Don't you mean: based on Spring instead of Avalon Of course. Typo corrected. The typo was because Ugo

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30142] - HTML serializer puts no space between public and system doctype

2004-07-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30142. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28680] - HTML serialization has no space between publicId and systemId

2004-07-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28680. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: The Butterfly Manifesto (was Re: [RT] Spring+JMX == Real Blocks?)

2004-07-21 Thread Ugo Cei
Il giorno 21/lug/04, alle 23:29, Antonio Gallardo ha scritto: The typo was because Ugo has Hibernate between eyebrow and eyebrow ;-) Would you rather have OJB there? ;-) Oh by the way, the next version of Spring will have OJB support, so we could make a SpringPetstore version that supports both,

Re: cvs commit: cocoon-2.1/src/java/org/apache/cocoon/transformation/pagination Pagesheet.java

2004-07-21 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Please revert - this was already discussed once. See email archives and file commit history: http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/cocoon-2.1/src/java/org/apache/cocoon/transformation/pagination/Pagesheet.java Vadim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: unico 2004/07/21 06:20:30 Modified:

Re: The Butterfly Manifesto (was Re: [RT] Spring+JMX == Real Blocks?)

2004-07-21 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Ugo Cei wrote: Il giorno 21/lug/04, alle 13:37, Leo Sutic ha scritto: 1. Butterfly is an experiment aiming to implement a (simplified) Cocoon clone but based on Spring instead of Hibernate Don't you mean: based on Spring instead of Avalon Of course. Typo corrected. 2. Strive for 100% unit test

Re: The Butterfly Manifesto (was Re: [RT] Spring+JMX == Real Blocks?)

2004-07-21 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Ugo Cei wrote: Il giorno 12/lug/04, alle 18:23, Marc Portier ha scritto: think so too, just needs more wild thinking and somebody doing :-) Since I'm getting more and more bored with my daytime job, I ended up doing something: http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/ButterflyManifesto Comments are

Re: The Butterfly Manifesto (was Re: [RT] Spring+JMX == Real Blocks?)

2004-07-21 Thread Marc Portier
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: Ugo Cei wrote: snip / Agreed, but even if we cannot prove that code is correct with unit tests alone, we can at least hope that - statistically - code that has 100% test coverage will have less bugs than code that has 10% test coverage. Unfortunately, my impression is

Re: JCS logging

2004-07-21 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Dave Brondsema wrote: On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Dave Brondsema wrote: We at Forrest are seeing more JCS log messages than we want. I tried setting up a log4j.properties file to control it, but that didn't seem to work. At any rate, it looks like they're using commons logging now, so according to

Re: The Butterfly Manifesto (was Re: [RT] Spring+JMX == Real Blocks?)

2004-07-21 Thread peter royal
On Jul 21, 2004, at 7:28 PM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: Ugo Cei wrote: Since I'm getting more and more bored with my daytime job, I ended up doing something: http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/ButterflyManifesto Comments are welcome, flames /dev/null. have you considered picocontainer at all? i would

Re: JCS logging

2004-07-21 Thread David Crossley
Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Dave Brondsema wrote: Dave Brondsema wrote: We at Forrest are seeing more JCS log messages than we want. I tried setting up a log4j.properties file to control it, but that didn't seem to work. At any rate, it looks like they're using commons logging now, so

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30250] New: - SessionPropagatorAction defaults cause exception

2004-07-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30250. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: The Butterfly Manifesto (was Re: [RT] Spring+JMX == Real Blocks?)

2004-07-21 Thread Ralph Goers
At 7/21/2004 04:18 PM, you wrote: Ugo, tests help but don't really buy us anything: have a community that is strong and diverse enough to do the regression testing for us. I couldn't disagree more. Unit/functional tests help tremendously in verifying that a new release is still compatible with