Re: [jira] Reopened: (COCOON-2065) huge performance increase of LuceneIndexTransformer on large Lucene indexes

2007-07-23 Thread Felix Knecht
Antonio Gallardo (JIRA) wrote: [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-2065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Antonio Gallardo reopened COCOON-2065: -- Patch was not applied in cocon 2.1.11-dev. I

[jira] Updated: (COCOON-2065) huge performance increase of LuceneIndexTransformer on large Lucene indexes

2007-07-23 Thread Felix Knecht (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-2065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Felix Knecht updated COCOON-2065: - Fix Version/s: (was: 2.1.11-dev (Current SVN)) Assignee: (was: Felix Knecht)

Re: [heads-up] cocoon-template is little broken in trunk

2007-07-23 Thread Felix Knecht
I think that I have (finally) sorted out all cases and everything works as before. Building the whole cocoon MAVEN_OPTS=-Xmx256m mvn clean install -Dmaven.test.skip=true -Pallblocks I got following error: INFO] Building Eventcache Block Implementation [INFO]task-segment: [clean, install]

Re: [heads-up] cocoon-template is little broken in trunk

2007-07-23 Thread Grzegorz Kossakowski
Felix Knecht pisze: I think that I have (finally) sorted out all cases and everything works as before. Building the whole cocoon MAVEN_OPTS=-Xmx256m mvn clean install -Dmaven.test.skip=true -Pallblocks I got following error: snip/

Re: [jira] Closed: (COCOON-2091) Move from HTMLArea to Xinha

2007-07-23 Thread Grzegorz Kossakowski
Felix Knecht (JIRA) pisze: [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-2091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Felix Knecht closed COCOON-2091. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.2-dev (Current SVN) - Added xinha and

Re: [jira] Closed: (COCOON-2091) Move from HTMLArea to Xinha

2007-07-23 Thread Felix Knecht
Grzegorz Kossakowski schrieb: Felix Knecht (JIRA) pisze: [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-2091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Felix Knecht closed COCOON-2091. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.2-dev

Re: [jira] Closed: (COCOON-2091) Move from HTMLArea to Xinha

2007-07-23 Thread Felix Knecht
Sorry, I hit the wrong button, so former reply doesn't has any changes :-( I haven't tested your changes but I would like to something more general. I wonder if you have not hurried up too much with this change. Even though Xinha is an obvious replacement for HTMLArea they are _not_ the same

Move from HTMLArea to Xinha

2007-07-23 Thread Reinhard Poetz
Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: Felix Knecht (JIRA) pisze: [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-2091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Felix Knecht closed COCOON-2091. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.2-dev (Current

Re: Move from HTMLArea to Xinha

2007-07-23 Thread Felix Knecht
Reinhard Poetz schrieb: Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: Felix Knecht (JIRA) pisze: [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-2091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Felix Knecht closed COCOON-2091. Resolution: Fixed Fix

Re: Move from HTMLArea to Xinha

2007-07-23 Thread Reinhard Poetz
Felix Knecht wrote: Reinhard Poetz schrieb: Was htmlarea removed completly or is it just a styling option whether I want to use Xinha or Htmlarea? It's just a styling option you have (xinha instead of htmlarea) and no real replacement has be done. You can use both at the moment, it depends on

Re: Move from HTMLArea to Xinha

2007-07-23 Thread Felix Knecht
Then I don't see a problem (as long as Xinha resources are not loaded from every form ... haven't had time to look into the implementation yet). It's more or less exactly the same implementations as for htmlarea. Please reopen the issue if it's going wrong.

What happened in cocoon-template and cocoon-expression-language

2007-07-23 Thread Grzegorz Kossakowski
Hello, I would like to give you a brief description of what happened in cocoon-template and cocoon-expression-language blocks/modules. All my changes were about introducing new ObjectModel API (COCOON-2086) and switching to it in cocoon-template (COCOON-2092). As a consequence of a switch I

Re: Move from HTMLArea to Xinha

2007-07-23 Thread Grzegorz Kossakowski
Felix Knecht pisze: Reinhard Poetz schrieb: Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: Was htmlarea removed completly or is it just a styling option whether I want to use Xinha or Htmlarea? It's just a styling option you have (xinha instead of htmlarea) and no real replacement has be done. You can use both

Re: Move from HTMLArea to Xinha

2007-07-23 Thread Felix Knecht
I corrected the summary and description of the issue. Do you think it's ok this way?

[jira] Updated: (COCOON-2091) Add Xinha as an alternative to HTMLArea

2007-07-23 Thread Felix Knecht (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-2091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Felix Knecht updated COCOON-2091: - Description: The used HTMLArea as webbased editor is no longer actively maintained [1].

Re: Move from HTMLArea to Xinha

2007-07-23 Thread Grzegorz Kossakowski
Felix Knecht pisze: I corrected the summary and description of the issue. Do you think it's ok this way? Yes, Felix, it's now a lot clearer. Thanks! If you we are already in this area. What about deprecating HTMLArea? The project is not maintained any more so I think it would be very wise

Re: Move from HTMLArea to Xinha

2007-07-23 Thread Felix Knecht
If you we are already in this area. What about deprecating HTMLArea? The project is not maintained any more so I think it would be very wise to deprecate HTMLArea, especially when we have replacement for it, already. What others think about it? Do we need a vote? Felix, could you handle

Re: Move from HTMLArea to Xinha

2007-07-23 Thread Reinhard Poetz
Felix Knecht wrote: If you we are already in this area. What about deprecating HTMLArea? The project is not maintained any more so I think it would be very wise to deprecate HTMLArea, especially when we have replacement for it, already. What others think about it? Do we need a vote? yes

Re: Move from HTMLArea to Xinha

2007-07-23 Thread Grzegorz Kossakowski
Reinhard Poetz pisze: Once we had a deprecation logger but I don't think that the infrastructure for it is still in place. Do you talk about client or server logger? I think that we could create special matcher for HTMLArea resources and put a simple action (DeprecateAction?) that would

Re: Move from HTMLArea to Xinha

2007-07-23 Thread Reinhard Poetz
Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: Reinhard Poetz pisze: Once we had a deprecation logger but I don't think that the infrastructure for it is still in place. Do you talk about client or server logger? server logger. IIRC there was a log target named deprecated. Maybe Carsten knows more. I

Re: Move from HTMLArea to Xinha

2007-07-23 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Reinhard Poetz schrieb: Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: Reinhard Poetz pisze: Once we had a deprecation logger but I don't think that the infrastructure for it is still in place. Do you talk about client or server logger? server logger. IIRC there was a log target named deprecated. Maybe

Re: Move from HTMLArea to Xinha

2007-07-23 Thread Felix Knecht
Reinhard Poetz schrieb: Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: Reinhard Poetz pisze: Once we had a deprecation logger but I don't think that the infrastructure for it is still in place. Do you talk about client or server logger? server logger. IIRC there was a log target named deprecated. Maybe

[jira] Closed: (COCOON-2054) StatusGenerator must now show default Store explicitly (because no longer part of StoreJanitor)

2007-07-23 Thread Grzegorz Kossakowski (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-2054?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Grzegorz Kossakowski closed COCOON-2054. Resolution: Fixed Patch applied in r558726. Thanks for it, Alexander. I tested

[jira] Closed: (COCOON-1991) Make Forms and Ajax use of new features introduced by servlet-service-fw

2007-07-23 Thread Grzegorz Kossakowski (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Grzegorz Kossakowski closed COCOON-1991. Resolution: Fixed Changes has been merged with trunk long time ago and everything

[jira] Created: (COCOON-2095) Make Object Model a Spring bean

2007-07-23 Thread Grzegorz Kossakowski (JIRA)
Make Object Model a Spring bean --- Key: COCOON-2095 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-2095 Project: Cocoon Issue Type: Sub-task Components: - Expression language Affects Versions:

[jira] Created: (COCOON-2096) map:when test=servlet:servlet:/path/to/file always returns true

2007-07-23 Thread Alexander Weber (JIRA)
map:when test=servlet:servlet:/path/to/file always returns true -- Key: COCOON-2096 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-2096 Project: Cocoon Issue Type: Bug

Re: [jira] Closed: (COCOON-2091) Move from HTMLArea to Xinha

2007-07-23 Thread Giacomo Pati
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: Felix Knecht (JIRA) pisze: [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-2091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Felix Knecht closed COCOON-2091.

Re: [jira] Reopened: (COCOON-2065) huge performance increase of LuceneIndexTransformer on large Lucene indexes

2007-07-23 Thread Antonio Gallardo
Hi Felix, You should not feel bad for that. Currently we have only 2 branches: 2.2-dev and 2.1.11-dev. The patch was applied to 2.2-dev but not to 2.1.11-dev, this is why I reopened the issue. Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo. Felix Knecht escribió: Antonio Gallardo (JIRA) wrote:

Re: cocoon 2.2 application memory consumption problems

2007-07-23 Thread joakim
I did some more studying with jhat, and it appears that the jpegs inside the zips are being held in memory by the cocoon cache, in the end leading to the out of memory condition. I used a noncaching pipeline instead, and the problem seems to go away. However, I find it odd the cache doesnt

Re: [jira] Reopened: (COCOON-2065) huge performance increase of LuceneIndexTransformer on large Lucene indexes

2007-07-23 Thread Felix Knecht
Antonio Gallardo wrote: Hi Felix, You should not feel bad for that. Currently we have only 2 branches: 2.2-dev and 2.1.11-dev. The patch was applied to 2.2-dev but not to 2.1.11-dev, this is why I reopened the issue. I don't feel bad, the main question was if I can trust in the 'fixed'

Re: [jira] Reopened: (COCOON-2065) huge performance increase of LuceneIndexTransformer on large Lucene indexes

2007-07-23 Thread Joerg Heinicke
On 24.07.2007 00:42, Felix Knecht wrote: I don't feel bad, the main question was if I can trust in the 'fixed' tags in jira (2.1.11-dev was marked as fixed) or if I need to check in the code if really all (even the already marked as fixed version) mentioned branches are fixed before closing.