Not sure if this is what you wanted, but I made the blue background
transparent.
Cheers,
Thor HW
On 29-Oct-05, at 11:31 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 29 Oct 2005, at 17:18, hepabolu wrote:
On my brand new Powerbook, the background color of the Apache
Cocoon logo
I see knopflerfish in the trunk, but to compile it I have to copy the
knopflerfish jars from core to /lib/osgi/knopflerfish.
Ihave built it using
build osgi
cocoon osgi or ./cocoon.sh osgi
as described in the README.osgi
When I try and run it I get an error in this line:
Error: Command
Is cocoon going to use knopflerfish or oscar for its default OSGI
container?
Cheers,
Thor HW
Daniel:
Check out RIO, which is a QoS oriented system based upon Jini. It
has either completed its relicensing or will have completed its
relicensing to use the Apache 2.0 license. This is the
infrastructure used in Sun's RFID initiative and in their Formula1
Race Car monitoring system.
Actually, the idea of OSGi has been running in my head for a long
time. I discovered OSGi when working on the embedded Cocoon, as we had
to make an OSGi bundle with it so that it can be added to an
OSGi-powered system in a car. OSGi is widely used in embedded systems,
especially automotive
/unload was solved based upon the questions coming
from Pier and the discussions on how to do that.
If I'm wrong, great. Then lets have a look at the new kernel and see
what we want to view in it.
Cheers,
Thor HW
On 29-Mar-04, at 7:40 AM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Thor Heinrichs-Wolpert wrote
It could be we're talking about much the same things.
JMX provides instrumentation capabilities, and standard services, one
of the standard services is the loading/un-load of archives using the
MLet service.
There is a strong rumour you've already finished the kernel Pier ... if
so share I'm
-Mar-04, at 7:14 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Since you guys are talking about JMX based stuff. Please take a look
at the GBean/Kernel stuff in
Geronimo. It's very rich, comprehensice and based on JMX.
-- dims
--- Thor Heinrichs-Wolpert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It could be we're talking about
enjoying these discussions!!!)
On 28-Mar-04, at 10:19 AM, Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
Thor Heinrichs-Wolpert wrote:
I think a big point (and that may be from never having used JMX) that
is being missed. When I was saying JMX and its style form part of a
good kernel candidate, you have to look at how
I know there is no love lost between the Apache and JBoss
communities, but have a look at their kernel. It is not entirely
based upon JMX, but JMX forms a very integral part of their kernel
and is pretty good, all things considered.
Well, you see, I don't want to do that because of licensing
) and after that the speed difference should be
negligible.
Cheers,
Thor HW
On 26-Mar-04, at 7:13 AM, Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 25 Mar 2004, at 19:40, Thor Heinrichs-Wolpert wrote:
Hmmm ... I've never used JMX for remote loading as the security just
isn't there for my tastes
,
Thor HW
On 25-Mar-04, at 3:23 PM, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 25 Mar 2004, at 19:40, Thor Heinrichs-Wolpert wrote:
Hmmm ... I've never used JMX for remote loading as the security just
isn't there for my tastes and there other mechanisms that work so
much better. It does do a fine job of loading
services and usage
guidelines.
Thoughts?
Thor HW
On 25-Mar-04, at 7:16 AM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Thor Heinrichs-Wolpert wrote:
Sounds good ... as you may remember when you started to talk about
Blocks in Ghent we started talking about JMX then as well. It may
not have everything you want
, Hamilton Verissimo de Oliveira (Engenharia -
SPO) wrote:
-Mensagem original-
De: Thor Heinrichs-Wolpert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
So I think JMX can be a bolt on, or an underpinning depending on how
you use it. I'd be surprised if it didn't meet the core of what you
described blocks needed
XDoclet is a good generator, but the license is wrong for Apache.
Using straight Introspection can and will expose things that you do not
wish to allow users to alter on the fly.
Unfortunately I'm completely snowed under until March 29th. After that
date I will get back to working on JMX for
As a contractor my main bread butter client is the BC Government in
Canada.
To save money, the BC Gov't has standardized on M$ Windows for the
desktop. They've never actually looked to see if they have saved any
money from this decision, but I can tell you about the thousands of
work days
On 7-Dec-03, at 11:54 AM, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
You're talking about failover... Yeah, that's the problem... I've seen
too many AAARRRGGGHHH when I said the word Perl, so, the solution
proposed by Jules and Greg (Jetty) of doing it in a module might be
better...
Is there any way to catch the
On 7-Dec-03, at 4:08 PM, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
BTW, Mac OS X is a Linux based distribution for the Mac processors
with a
price included. They use KDE as the desktop environment.
Sorry, I haven't responded to some other incorrect stuff, but
OSX is GNU Mach from NeXT with a FreeBSD
You're both wrong, guys... Mac OS/X is not based on Linux, nor on BSD. It's based on a derivate of CMU's original Mach kernel, which was a direct response to a architectural problem of the BSD kernel...
Getting closer ... Mach was the name chosen because MOOS sounded wrong and one of the other
On 7-Dec-03, at 7:00 PM, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
snip/snip
I'm glad you like your Linux based laptop, the fellow asked if we liked
our OSX boxes ... which we do.
But for the record I never stop my OSX laptop, so I don't have to
restart, (okay for your 1 minute). Then I don't have to restart my
On 7-Dec-03, at 8:37 PM, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Antonio Gallardo dijo:
Why Apple fans always try to forgot the fact: Intel or AMD craps are
faster in the same space and time than Gx processors? And try to hide
this
fact it behind the OS arena? I know, in hardware, it is not an MHz.
issue.
But
If you try to profile on a Unix environment based on timings you have
to do multiple passes and get a statistical average to be meaningful.
The timer functionality in the kernel or user space is at such a low
priority that effectively it jumps between values ... that's why when
tuning using
intro
JMX is a standardized framework to uniformly instrument disparate
chunks of Java code in a JVM. JMX can be used to load, start, manage,
monitor and stop software components in a standardized way. There are
more and more J2EE containers that continue to adopt JMX as the default
, 2003, at 12:02 PM, Thor Heinrichs-Wolpert wrote:
intro
JMX is a standardized framework to uniformly instrument disparate
chunks of Java code in a JVM. JMX can be used to load, start, manage,
monitor and stop software components in a standardized way. There are
more and more J2EE containers
Thanks for the great sessions and hospitality.
Everyone involved put in a lot of work to make this a great even. I
sure appreciated.
I'm looking forward to next years!
Cheers all,
Thor HW
25 matches
Mail list logo
