Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it's not a matter of being annoyed enough (we are already!), it's
the fact that cocoon needs that file at build time.
Hmm, so why don't you realize that you have a typo
On 16-06-2005 17:00, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, I would be totally in favor of granting the gump committers
commit access to the cocoon project.
Should be quite trivial to add a rule to asf-authorization that
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Now, I would be totally in favor of granting the gump committers
commit access to the cocoon project.
Should be quite trivial to add a rule to asf-authorization that grants
rw to @gump for just that file, at least I think it allows
file-granularity.
Even
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Now, I would be totally in favor of granting the gump committers
commit access to the cocoon project.
Should be quite trivial to add a rule to asf-authorization that grants
rw to @gump for just that file, at least I think it allows
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it's not a matter of being annoyed enough (we are already!), it's
the fact that cocoon needs that file at build time.
Hmm, so why don't you realize that you have a typo in it
On 17-06-2005 05:24, Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should be quite trivial to add a rule to asf-authorization that grants
rw to @gump for just that file, at least I think it allows
file-granularity.
Even better. Can we do it or is it something that infra@ has to do?
All pmc
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it's not a matter of being annoyed enough (we are already!), it's
the fact that cocoon needs that file at build time.
Hmm, so why don't
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it's not a matter of being annoyed enough (we are already!), it's
the fact that cocoon needs that file at build time.
Hi all,
your own project definitions of commons-javaflow, commons-jci and
lately spring break the Gump supplied definitions.
We've been building svn trunk of commons-jci for weeks now, but it
gets listed as failed because it doesn't produce a jar with your
name.
spring is an installed package
Stefan,
I've committed this patch to Cocoon trunk. I presume that is the correct
place.
Regards, Upayavira
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi all,
your own project definitions of commons-javaflow, commons-jci and
lately spring break the Gump supplied definitions.
We've been building svn trunk of
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Upayavira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've committed this patch to Cocoon trunk.
Many thanks.
I presume that is the correct place.
Until the Cocoon project is annoyed enough by our patches and moves
the descriptor over to Gump land, I think it is. 8-)
Stefan
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Upayavira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've committed this patch to Cocoon trunk.
Many thanks.
I presume that is the correct place.
Until the Cocoon project is annoyed enough by our patches and moves
the descriptor over to Gump land, I
Le 16 juin 05, 14:58, Stefano Mazzocchi a crit :
Now, I would be totally in favor of granting the gump committers
commit
access to the cocoon project...
+1
-Bertrand
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it's not a matter of being annoyed enough (we are already!), it's
the fact that cocoon needs that file at build time.
Hmm, so why don't you realize that you have a typo in it for many
days? Like when you rename a jar but forget
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it's not a matter of being annoyed enough (we are already!), it's
the fact that cocoon needs that file at build time.
Hmm, so why don't you realize that you have a typo in it for many
days? Like when
15 matches
Mail list logo