Re: [VOTE] Website update process - Ross

2005-08-16 Thread hepabolu
Ross Gardler wrote: I'll test the Forrest plugin on the Daisy docs today. I'm not sure why my first version never made it to the list, so here it goes again: I want the first new version of the website to be as it was when the reported missing docs were there, i.e. the old navigation

Re: [VOTE] Website update process - Ross

2005-08-16 Thread Ross Gardler
hepabolu wrote: Ross Gardler wrote: I'll test the Forrest plugin on the Daisy docs today. I'm not sure why my first version never made it to the list, so here it goes again: I want the first new version of the website to be as it was when the reported missing docs were there, i.e. the

Re: [VOTE] Website update process - Ross

2005-08-16 Thread hepabolu
Ross Gardler wrote: So, if you can run the Daisy-to-Forrest export, can you use the old navigation structure documents or should I be rewriting these in Daisy? Yes, just tell me which version of the navigation document you want me to use. In fact this goes for any focuments, by default it

Docs structure using Daisy + Forrest (was Re: [VOTE] Website update process - Ross)

2005-08-16 Thread Ross Gardler
hepabolu wrote: Ross Gardler wrote: So, if you can run the Daisy-to-Forrest export, can you use the old navigation structure documents or should I be rewriting these in Daisy? Yes, just tell me which version of the navigation document you want me to use. In fact this goes for any

Re: Docs structure using Daisy + Forrest (was Re: [VOTE] Website update process - Ross)

2005-08-16 Thread hepabolu
Ross Gardler wrote: Ah, I see I misunderstood your question. The Forrest plugin can use the old site.xml files or new ones defined in Daisy or even a mix of the two (i.e. new ones imported into the old ones). More on this when I have an iniital demo working. In the first instance I'll use