Niclas Hedhman dijo:
On Saturday 13 September 2003 20:46, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Writing DOS comes to mind my the interesting means of this abrev.
for today world (Denial of services) I wonder think of what will
means Windows
in the future of the Internet!
what about
Windows Intruding
On Thursday, Sep 4, 2003, at 08:27 Europe/Rome, Jeff Ramsdale wrote:
I expect the average new Cocoon user is also a Windows user
(though I could be wrong). So why are the snapshots not in .zip
format?
FYI: WinZip supports tar.gz files just fine.
That may be (and I suspected as much), but
On Thursday, Sep 4, 2003, at 16:13 Europe/Rome, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Giacomo Pati dijo:
Have a look at
http://quartz.sourceforge.net/javadoc/org/quartz/CronTrigger.html
for more details.
I would love to, but it is - for any reason - not accessible from
here
right now - only the tutorial. And
On Thursday, Sep 4, 2003, at 16:21 Europe/Rome, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler dijo:
Giacomo Pati wrote:
I would love to, but it is - for any reason - not accessible
from here right
now - only the tutorial. And there I found the periodic trigger :)
Go blame you
Stefano Mazzocchi dijo:
On Thursday, Sep 4, 2003, at 16:21 Europe/Rome, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler dijo:
Giacomo Pati wrote:
I would love to, but it is - for any reason - not accessible
from here right
now - only the tutorial. And there I found the
Jeff Ramsdale [EMAIL PROTECTED] asks:
Asking a user to download and install another software
package is out of the question. They have perfectly capable
.zip functionality already on their system. We provide a .zip
file for the latest distribution, why night the nightly snapshot?
It seems
--- Hunsberger, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
If you really think it's necessary we could place links to the necessary
unzip tools on the download pages...
Lets add the links, just to be friendly to the users.
--Tim Larson
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo!
Hunsberger, Peter wrote:
Jeff Ramsdale [EMAIL PROTECTED] asks:
Asking a user to download and install another software
package is out of the question. They have perfectly capable
.zip functionality already on their system. We provide a .zip
file for the latest distribution, why night the
I expect the average new Cocoon user is also a Windows user
(though I could be wrong). So why are the snapshots not in .zip format?
FYI: WinZip supports tar.gz files just fine.
That may be (and I suspected as much), but WinZip would be another download
for a user who just wants to try out
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Thanks to Bruno we have a solution (or workaround)
for the CommandManager problem. Great!
So afaik we don't have another blocker for the 2.1.1 release.
As I'm going on vacation starting saturday (yeah), I propose
to do the release this friday.
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Reinhard Poetz wrote:
From: Reinhard Poetz
From: Bruno Dumon
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 12:01, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
snip/
As I'm going on vacation starting saturday (yeah), I
propose to do the
release this friday.
+1
Since we decided that we
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Andrew Savory wrote:
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Steven Noels wrote:
IMHO, it's simply unworkable to have major stuff going on in one module,
over two branches, at the same time.
In CVS, I've always found branches == pain.
Can you explain you pains? I've found it quite
Giacomo Pati wrote:
One thing I'd like to put in:
Now that the new Corn block has been added, can we get rid of the
Cornerstone Scheduler? If we can, it would never appear in ANY release.
Corn? Nice. You know, if you go into a pub you often order a beer and
a corn (=booze). Ok, I'm drifting
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Giacomo Pati wrote:
One thing I'd like to put in:
Now that the new Corn block has been added, can we get rid of the
Cornerstone Scheduler? If we can, it would never appear in ANY release.
Corn? Nice. You know, if you go into a pub you often
Giacomo Pati wrote:
I will have a look at the cron block right now.
Thanks, awaiting your comments :-)
Hi Giacomo,
please look at the other thread (Cron Block). I added
an addPeriodicJob() method to your scheduler to allow
periodic invocation (in seconds).
With that change I'm able to
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Giacomo Pati wrote:
I will have a look at the cron block right now.
Thanks, awaiting your comments :-)
Hi Giacomo,
please look at the other thread (Cron Block). I added
an addPeriodicJob() method to your scheduler to allow
periodic
Miles Elam wrote:
Jeff Ramsdale wrote:
I expect the average new Cocoon user is also a Windows user (though I
could be wrong). So why are the snapshots not in .zip format?
FYI: WinZip supports tar.gz files just fine.
With WinXP, most people (meaning at least me) don't bother with WinZip
: Thursday, September 04, 2003 2:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Vote] Releasing 2.1.1
So, if I followed all the scheduler stuff going back and forth for the past
week, the Quartz scheduler is being used and your scheduler stuff uses it
now. I just wanted to wait for the dust to settle before
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Giacomo Pati wrote:
please look at the other thread (Cron Block). I added
an addPeriodicJob() method to your scheduler to allow
periodic invocation (in seconds).
With that change I'm able to convert to your scheduler
and we can
Berin Loritsch dijo:
Miles Elam wrote:
Jeff Ramsdale wrote:
I expect the average new Cocoon user is also a Windows user (though I
could be wrong). So why are the snapshots not in .zip format?
Because there are too big for download and waste broandband ;)
FYI: WinZip supports tar.gz files
Giacomo Pati wrote:
Yes, this is easy for each second, but what when I want to schedule the
job, let's say every 5 seconds or every 80 minutes?
You don't know cron, don't you?
No, and the expert I ask, suggested to write 0,5,10,... * * * * :)
every 5 second: */5 * * * *
every 80
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Giacomo Pati wrote:
Yes, this is easy for each second, but what when I want to schedule the
job, let's say every 5 seconds or every 80 minutes?
You don't know cron, don't you?
No, and the expert I ask, suggested to write 0,5,10,... * *
Giacomo Pati wrote:
I would love to, but it is - for any reason - not accessible
from here right
now - only the tutorial. And there I found the periodic trigger :)
Go blame you ISP :-)
Or I can drink some corn until I forget about it :)
Carsten
Carsten Ziegeler dijo:
Giacomo Pati wrote:
I would love to, but it is - for any reason - not accessible
from here right
now - only the tutorial. And there I found the periodic trigger :)
Go blame you ISP :-)
Or I can drink some corn until I forget about it :)
Do you mean corn wine? lol.
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler dijo:
Giacomo Pati wrote:
I would love to, but it is - for any reason - not accessible
from here right
now - only the tutorial. And there I found the periodic trigger :)
Go blame you ISP :-)
Or I can drink some corn until I forget about
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler dijo:
Giacomo Pati wrote:
I would love to, but it is - for any reason - not accessible
from here right
now - only the tutorial. And there I found the periodic trigger :)
Go blame you ISP :-)
Or I can drink some corn
Seriously, here in Latin America this is a kind of native drink.
One gets native very soon drinking the corn Carsten means ;-)
In my
country it is called chicha bruja Also the indians has another drink
using corn it is destilled alcohol called cususa. :)
Corn from sweet corn?
Can
Whops! I ment to mail to Carsten (as he and I had conversations about
this before the scheduler switch)
Sorry.
David Kavanagh wrote:
So, if I followed all the scheduler stuff going back and forth for the
past week, the Quartz scheduler is being used and your scheduler stuff
uses it
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Giacomo Pati wrote:
please look at the other thread (Cron Block). I added
an addPeriodicJob() method to your scheduler to allow
periodic invocation (in seconds).
With that change I'm able to convert to your scheduler
and we can forget the cornerstone one (and 5 jar
Giacomo Pati dijo:
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler dijo:
Giacomo Pati wrote:
I would love to, but it is - for any reason - not accessible
from here right
now - only the tutorial. And there I found the periodic trigger
:)
Go blame you ISP :-)
Or I
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Berin Loritsch wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Giacomo Pati wrote:
please look at the other thread (Cron Block). I added
an addPeriodicJob() method to your scheduler to allow
periodic invocation (in seconds).
With that change I'm able to convert to your scheduler
I expect the average new Cocoon user is also a Windows user (though I
could be wrong). So why are the snapshots not in .zip format?
Because there are too big for download and waste broandband ;)
Versus downloading from CVS, which was the suggestion from the initial
fictitious conversation
Carsten Ziegeler wrote, On 03/09/2003 12.01:
...
As I'm going on vacation starting saturday (yeah), I propose
to do the release this friday.
+1
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
From: Carsten Ziegeler
Thanks to Bruno we have a solution (or workaround)
for the CommandManager problem. Great!
So afaik we don't have another blocker for the 2.1.1 release.
As I'm going on vacation starting saturday (yeah), I propose
to do the release this friday.
The
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
One question: Has the issue with proxies been solved?
Do you have a pointer?
Carsten
-
From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 12:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Vote] Releasing 2.1.1
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
One question: Has the issue with proxies been solved?
Do you have a pointer?
Carsten
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 12:01, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
snip/
As I'm going on vacation starting saturday (yeah), I propose
to do the release this friday.
+1
Since we decided that we don't like creating new repositories nor CVS
branches, I assume this will be the last release in the 2.1.x series?
From: Bruno Dumon
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 12:01, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
snip/
As I'm going on vacation starting saturday (yeah), I
propose to do the
release this friday.
+1
Since we decided that we don't like creating new repositories
nor CVS branches, I assume this will be the
From: Reinhard Poetz
From: Bruno Dumon
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 12:01, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
snip/
As I'm going on vacation starting saturday (yeah), I
propose to do the
release this friday.
+1
Since we decided that we don't like creating new repositories
nor CVS
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Thanks to Bruno we have a solution (or workaround)
for the CommandManager problem. Great!
So afaik we don't have another blocker for the 2.1.1 release.
As I'm going on vacation starting saturday (yeah), I propose
to do the release this friday.
The alternatives are:
-
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
Since we decided that we don't like creating new repositories
nor CVS branches, I assume this will be the last release in
the 2.1.x series?
If this doesn't mean that we wait another 18 months or so
until releasing 2.2 ... ;)
more seriously: How do we deal
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
more seriously: How do we deal with bugfix releases in the future if we
don't have a branch or another repository?
Like we do with 2.0.x? It's just a matter of releasing, actually.
/Steven
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought -
From: Carsten Ziegeler
Im really tired of discussing this (it's not your fault, Reinhard).
I suggested again and again to start a new repository for 2.2
(which is equivalent to starting a 2.2 branch - or a 2.1.x
branch), but I always got the reply let's see if we really
need 2.2, let's
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
I understand your feelings ...
IMO we should be able to release 2.1.x version in the future. Mabe I'm a
bit afraid of the changes (blocks, fortress, virtual sitemap components)
and how long it takes us to release stable versions of Cocoon (not beta,
not milestone or
From: Steven Noels
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
I understand your feelings ...
IMO we should be able to release 2.1.x version in the
future. Mabe I'm
a bit afraid of the changes (blocks, fortress, virtual sitemap
components) and how long it takes us to release stable versions of
.
Reinhard
-Original Message-
From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 12:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Vote] Releasing 2.1.1
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
One question: Has the issue with proxies been solved?
Do you have
From: Vadim Gritsenko
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
a comment by Vadim:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-devm=106096301526641w=2
My comment has nothing to do with proxies. As Joerg found
out, this is
the problem with M$ html extensions and XPath:
Nicola Ken Barozzi dijo:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote, On 03/09/2003 12.01:
...
As I'm going on vacation starting saturday (yeah), I propose
to do the release this friday.
+1
+1 ;) But please include:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13070
Best Regards,
Antonio Gallardo
--- Reinhard Poetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I think so many people (of course including me) were waiting for 2.1 and
I really want to use it for some time in production without doing
alpha/beta testing of 2.2 and I like to have support of bugfix
releases of 2.1 (see the security holes
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
Since we decided that we don't like creating new repositories nor CVS branches, I assume this will be the last release in the 2.1.x series?
If this doesn't mean that we wait another 18 months or so until releasing 2.2 ... ;)
more
Timothy Larson dijo:
--- Reinhard Poetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I think so many people (of course including me) were waiting for 2.1
and I really want to use it for some time in production without doing
alpha/beta testing of 2.2 and I like to have support of bugfix
releases of 2.1 (see
From: Antonio Gallardo
Timothy Larson dijo:
--- Reinhard Poetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I think so many people (of course including me) were
waiting for 2.1
and I really want to use it for some time in production
without doing
alpha/beta testing of 2.2 and I like to have
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
I haven't got it: How are we able to release e.g. 2.1.2 without a
branch/new repository without using e.g. Fortress as container (nothing
against Fortress, I'm no specialist in these container things and maybe
this is the reason for my concerns)? I would like to give us some
Steven Noels wrote:
I'm +1 on a 2.2 module, and +1 on 2.1.1 on Friday. Fortress might be
something for 2.2 rather than 2.1.1, but I'll leave that to the people
^
duh: 2.1.x, of course
/Steven
--
Steven Noels
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
+1 ;) But please include:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13070
I will apply the patch asap. Thanks Antonio!
Could you please provide some docs as well for using the
logicsheet in the correct xml format. Something like you
have in the readme
Carsten Ziegeler dijo:
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
+1 ;) But please include:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13070
I will apply the patch asap. Thanks Antonio!
Could you please provide some docs as well for using the
logicsheet in the correct xml format. Something like you
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Steven Noels wrote:
IMHO, it's simply unworkable to have major stuff going on in one module,
over two branches, at the same time.
In CVS, I've always found branches == pain.
I appreciate a move to something like subversion is quite a revolution,
and I'd suggest it's
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
As I'm going on vacation starting saturday (yeah), I propose
to do the release this friday.
+1 for Friday
Geoff
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
From: Carsten Ziegeler
Im really tired of discussing this (it's not your fault, Reinhard).
I suggested again and again to start a new repository for 2.2
(which is equivalent to starting a 2.2 branch - or a 2.1.x
branch), but I always got the reply let's see if we really
IMHO, it's simply unworkable to have major stuff going on in one module,
over two branches, at the same time.
In CVS, I've always found branches == pain.
I appreciate a move to something like subversion is quite a revolution,
and I'd suggest it's something best kept for the next
Jeff Ramsdale wrote:
If all the cool features that users want to play with are in the HEAD via
Subversion, you might think about easing the path to entry for the new
user...
Ain't this (http://cvs.apache.org/snapshots/cocoon-2.1/) easy enough? :)
Vadim
If all the cool features that users want to play with are in the HEAD via
Subversion, you might think about easing the path to entry for the new
user...
Ain't this (http://cvs.apache.org/snapshots/cocoon-2.1/) easy enough? :)
Vadim
For a moment I was going to acquiesce, but then I
Jeff Ramsdale wrote:
I expect the average new Cocoon user is also a Windows user (though I could be wrong). So why are the snapshots not in .zip format?
FYI: WinZip supports tar.gz files just fine.
- Miles Elam
63 matches
Mail list logo
