Re: [butterfly] spring dependant tests (was Re: The Butterfly Manifesto (was Re: [RT] Spring+JMX == Real Blocks?))

2004-07-23 Thread Ugo Cei
Il giorno 22/lug/04, alle 11:04, Marc Portier ha scritto: I've been largely skimreading this list last couple of weeks so maybe I missed an important update on the svn switch for cocoon? IIRC there was going to be a spot for these kind of efforts? In any case it would be nice to have something

Tests (was Re: The Butterfly Manifesto (was Re: [RT] Spring+JMX == Real Blocks?))

2004-07-22 Thread Ugo Cei
Il giorno 22/lug/04, alle 01:18, Stefano Mazzocchi ha scritto: Ugo Cei wrote: Agreed, but even if we cannot prove that code is correct with unit tests alone, we can at least hope that - statistically - code that has 100% test coverage will have less bugs than code that has 10% test coverage.

[butterfly] spring dependant tests (was Re: The Butterfly Manifesto (was Re: [RT] Spring+JMX == Real Blocks?))

2004-07-22 Thread Marc Portier
Ugo Cei wrote: (Note to self: rewrite unit tests so that they don't depend on BeanFactory). yes and no: I've seen myself do both: have tests that go on detail level and just wire beans themselves in the setup() but also: have tests that use the beanfactory to do so (using a stupid base class

Re: [butterfly] spring dependant tests (was Re: The Butterfly Manifesto (was Re: [RT] Spring+JMX == Real Blocks?))

2004-07-22 Thread Ugo Cei
Il giorno 22/lug/04, alle 10:34, Marc Portier ha scritto: still have to get into your actual code sample though, by the way: could we arrange having a cvs somewhere? How about cocoondev.org? Is the migration over? I asked Steven some time ago about hosting the SpringPetstore block and he askde

Re: [butterfly] spring dependant tests (was Re: The Butterfly Manifesto (was Re: [RT] Spring+JMX == Real Blocks?))

2004-07-22 Thread Marc Portier
Ugo Cei wrote: Il giorno 22/lug/04, alle 10:34, Marc Portier ha scritto: still have to get into your actual code sample though, by the way: could we arrange having a cvs somewhere? How about cocoondev.org? Is the migration over? I asked Steven some time ago about hosting the SpringPetstore

Re: [butterfly] spring dependant tests (was Re: The Butterfly Manifesto (was Re: [RT] Spring+JMX == Real Blocks?))

2004-07-22 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Marc Portier wrote: I've been largely skimreading this list last couple of weeks so maybe I missed an important update on the svn switch for cocoon? Yep. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-devm=109043692326007 Vadim

Re: [butterfly] spring dependant tests (was Re: The Butterfly Manifesto (was Re: [RT] Spring+JMX == Real Blocks?))

2004-07-22 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Ugo Cei wrote: Il giorno 22/lug/04, alle 10:34, Marc Portier ha scritto: still have to get into your actual code sample though, by the way: could we arrange having a cvs somewhere? How about cocoondev.org? Is the migration over? I asked Steven some time ago about hosting the SpringPetstore block

Re: [butterfly] spring dependant tests (was Re: The Butterfly Manifesto (was Re: [RT] Spring+JMX == Real Blocks?))

2004-07-22 Thread Upayavira
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: What about a mailing list? We're having an unpleasant discussion about creating mailing lists on the community list... ugh IMO the right thing is to ask a vote for it, and then ask infra to set it up as per the Cocoon PMC decision. I don't want to see another

Re: [butterfly] spring dependant tests (was Re: The Butterfly Manifesto (was Re: [RT] Spring+JMX == Real Blocks?))

2004-07-22 Thread Ugo Cei
Il giorno 22/lug/04, alle 15:17, Nicola Ken Barozzi ha scritto: As I tried to explain, as a Cocoon committer you should be able to experiment in a branch. As soon as the SVN conversion is over, you can create a butterfly branch and all Cocooon committers can work there if they want to. Pardon

Re: [butterfly] spring dependant tests (was Re: The Butterfly Manifesto (was Re: [RT] Spring+JMX == Real Blocks?))

2004-07-22 Thread Dave Brondsema
On Thu, 22 Jul 2004, Ugo Cei wrote: Il giorno 22/lug/04, alle 15:17, Nicola Ken Barozzi ha scritto: As I tried to explain, as a Cocoon committer you should be able to experiment in a branch. As soon as the SVN conversion is over, you can create a butterfly branch and all Cocooon

Re: [butterfly] spring dependant tests (was Re: The Butterfly Manifesto (was Re: [RT] Spring+JMX == Real Blocks?))

2004-07-22 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Ugo Cei wrote: Il giorno 22/lug/04, alle 15:17, Nicola Ken Barozzi ha scritto: As I tried to explain, as a Cocoon committer you should be able to experiment in a branch. As soon as the SVN conversion is over, you can create a butterfly branch and all Cocooon committers can work there if they

Re: [butterfly] spring dependant tests (was Re: The Butterfly Manifesto (was Re: [RT] Spring+JMX == Real Blocks?))

2004-07-22 Thread Antonio Gallardo
Upayavira dijo: Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: What about a mailing list? We're having an unpleasant discussion about creating mailing lists on the community list... ugh IMO the right thing is to ask a vote for it, and then ask infra to set it up as per the Cocoon PMC decision. I don't