maven's new central repo

2006-10-06 Thread Jorg Heymans
http://blogs.maven.org/jvanzyl/2006/10/05/1160062688005.html Jorg

[jira] Commented: (COCOON-831) XSLTC doesn't work with nodeset functions

2006-10-06 Thread JIRA
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-831?page=comments#action_12440371 ] Léon Tebbens commented on COCOON-831: - We found out that in our case the bug is caused bij Xalan issue 1640

Re: svn commit: r453409 - in /cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X: src/java/org/apache/cocoon/components/flow/FlowHelper.java src/java/org/apache/cocoon/components/flow/util/PipelineUtil.java status.xml

2006-10-06 Thread Daniel Fagerstrom
Joerg Heinicke skrev: On 06.10.2006 00:57, Antonio Gallardo wrote: Why actually? What has unwrap to do with pipeline processing? If it is because it is only used there then it makes only sense to move it there if you also make it private. Otherwise it is a public method and it should be seen

[2.2] Spring 2.0 final and property handling

2006-10-06 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Yesterday I updated Cocoon 2.2 to Spring 2.0 final - and the big plus is that the maven repository contains correct poms for this version :) Apart from that the new property override configuration mechanism is now in place as well. This means by default the spring application context we add a

Re: [2.2] Spring 2.0 final and property handling

2006-10-06 Thread Reinhard Poetz
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Yesterday I updated Cocoon 2.2 to Spring 2.0 final - and the big plus is that the maven repository contains correct poms for this version :) Apart from that the new property override configuration mechanism is now in place as well. This means by default the spring

Re: [2.2] Spring 2.0 final and property handling

2006-10-06 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Reinhard Poetz wrote: hmm, why do we have another mechanism for setting properties now?. can't we put in all properties into WEB-INF/cocoon/properties? This was actually my first implementation, but I think there is a difference between properties which you might want to use for anything

Re: [2.2] Spring 2.0 final and property handling

2006-10-06 Thread Felix Knecht
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Carsten Ziegeler schrieb: Reinhard Poetz wrote: hmm, why do we have another mechanism for setting properties now?. can't we put in all properties into WEB-INF/cocoon/properties? This was actually my first implementation, but I think there is a

Re: [2.2] Spring 2.0 final and property handling

2006-10-06 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Carsten Ziegeler schrieb: Reinhard Poetz wrote: hmm, why do we have another mechanism for setting properties now?. can't we put in all properties into WEB-INF/cocoon/properties? This was actually my first implementation, but I think there is a difference between properties which you might

Re: [2.2] Spring 2.0 final and property handling

2006-10-06 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Felix Knecht wrote: How about the different environments (prod/dev/test) for spring bean configuration? WIll they go to ../cocoon/properties directory or do we need a ../cocoon/spring/properties directory as well? It's not implemented yet, but I thought about reading them from

Re: [2.2] Spring 2.0 final and property handling

2006-10-06 Thread Reinhard Poetz
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Reinhard Poetz wrote: hmm, why do we have another mechanism for setting properties now?. can't we put in all properties into WEB-INF/cocoon/properties? This was actually my first implementation, but I think there is a difference between properties which you might want

Re: [VOTE] Lars Trieloff as a new Cocoon committer

2006-10-06 Thread Jeremy Quinn
my +1 Welcome Lars !! regards Jeremy On 3 Oct 2006, at 15:01, Jean-Baptiste Quenot wrote: Dear Community, I think time has come for Lars Trieloff to become a Cocoon committer, so he'll be able to commit his numerous patches himself, including the last hair-pulling

Re: [2.2] Spring 2.0 final and property handling

2006-10-06 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Reinhard Poetz wrote: Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Reinhard Poetz wrote: hmm, why do we have another mechanism for setting properties now?. can't we put in all properties into WEB-INF/cocoon/properties? This was actually my first implementation, but I think there is a difference between

Re: [2.2] Spring 2.0 final and property handling

2006-10-06 Thread Leszek Gawron
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Reinhard Poetz wrote: Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Reinhard Poetz wrote: hmm, why do we have another mechanism for setting properties now?. can't we put in all properties into WEB-INF/cocoon/properties? This was actually my first implementation, but I think there is a

Re: svn commit: r453534 - /cocoon/trunk/tools/archetypes/cocoon-22-archetype-block/src/main/resources/archetype-resources/pom.xml

2006-10-06 Thread Leszek Gawron
Leszek Gawron wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: cziegeler Date: Fri Oct 6 02:06:31 2006 New Revision: 453534 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=453534 Log: Deployer plugin will run automatically Modified:

Re: [2.2] Spring 2.0 final and property handling

2006-10-06 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Leszek Gawron wrote: can we make a block out of cocoon's way of doing property handling so one could use it in non cocoon projects? Hmm, yes this should be possible. Currently it's tied to some Cocoon stuff, but it should be possible to separate this. Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Open

Re: svn commit: r453534 - /cocoon/trunk/tools/archetypes/cocoon-22-archetype-block/src/main/resources/archetype-resources/pom.xml

2006-10-06 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Leszek Gawron wrote: my bad .. I had cocoon:deploy plugin defined at parent pom so it ran twice (still seems like a maven bug to me). other problems still apply Hmm, that's bad - I don't see a solution for this now. But we discussed at the GT an alternative handling of our blocks which

Re: svn commit: r453534 - /cocoon/trunk/tools/archetypes/cocoon-22-archetype-block/src/main/resources/archetype-resources/pom.xml

2006-10-06 Thread Leszek Gawron
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Leszek Gawron wrote: my bad .. I had cocoon:deploy plugin defined at parent pom so it ran twice (still seems like a maven bug to me). other problems still apply Hmm, that's bad - I don't see a solution for this now. But we discussed at the GT an alternative handling

Re: svn commit: r453534 - /cocoon/trunk/tools/archetypes/cocoon-22-archetype-block/src/main/resources/archetype-resources/pom.xml

2006-10-06 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Leszek Gawron wrote: Hmm, that's bad - I don't see a solution for this now. But we discussed at the GT an alternative handling of our blocks which would make the cocoon:deploy plugin obsolete. which is ? :) Currently the deployer extracts the files from COB-INF and META-INF into the file

Releasing M2?

2006-10-06 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
We have done a lot of changes since M1 - we have a new Spring bridge, updated to Spring 2.0 final, the dispatcher servlet etc. I think it makes sense to release this stuff as M2. WDYT? Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, SN AG http://www.s-und-n.de

Re: [2.2] Spring 2.0 final and property handling

2006-10-06 Thread Fred Vos
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 11:44:46AM +0200, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Yesterday I updated Cocoon 2.2 to Spring 2.0 final - and the big plus is that the maven repository contains correct poms for this version :) Hello Carsten, Today I updated the sources from svn and tried a rebuild. Now I'm

Re: [2.2] Spring 2.0 final and property handling

2006-10-06 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Fred Vos wrote: On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 11:44:46AM +0200, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Yesterday I updated Cocoon 2.2 to Spring 2.0 final - and the big plus is that the maven repository contains correct poms for this version :) Hello Carsten, Today I updated the sources from svn and tried a

RFC: CForms + Dojo: the way forward

2006-10-06 Thread Jeremy Quinn
Hi All We had an informal group discussion on Tuesday at the Hackathon about CForms. The purpose of the discussion was to find a consensus on the direction to take CForms, so that everybody who would like to work on it is hopefully going to take it in the same general direction. These

[jira] Commented: (COCOON-831) XSLTC doesn't work with nodeset functions

2006-10-06 Thread Henry Zongaro (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-831?page=comments#action_12440484 ] Henry Zongaro commented on COCOON-831: -- Looking at the code in org.apache.cocoon.generation.ProfilerGenerator.generate, which appears in Nils's traceback, I

Re: [2.2] Spring 2.0 final and property handling

2006-10-06 Thread Jorg Heymans
On 06 Oct 2006, at 16:02, Fred Vos wrote: Today I updated the sources from svn and tried a rebuild. Now I'm getting this error, which seems related to this update to Spring 2.0 final. Here's the output: Are you using a settings.xml with a different mirror perhaps? I know for a fact

Re: Releasing M2?

2006-10-06 Thread Leszek Gawron
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: We have done a lot of changes since M1 - we have a new Spring bridge, updated to Spring 2.0 final, the dispatcher servlet etc. I think it makes sense to release this stuff as M2. +1 I am using this cocoon in production quite long now. -- Leszek Gawron [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: svn commit: r453534 - /cocoon/trunk/tools/archetypes/cocoon-22-archetype-block/src/main/resources/archetype-resources/pom.xml

2006-10-06 Thread Leszek Gawron
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Leszek Gawron wrote: Hmm, that's bad - I don't see a solution for this now. But we discussed at the GT an alternative handling of our blocks which would make the cocoon:deploy plugin obsolete. which is ? :) Currently the deployer extracts the files from COB-INF and

Re: RFC: CForms + Dojo: the way forward

2006-10-06 Thread hepabolu
Jeremy Quinn said the following on 6/10/06 16:42: Hi All We had an informal group discussion on Tuesday at the Hackathon about CForms. The purpose of the discussion was to find a consensus on the direction to take CForms, so that everybody who would like to work on it is hopefully going to

Re: RFC: CForms + Dojo: the way forward

2006-10-06 Thread Lars Trieloff
Hi Jeremy, I see the following ways to solve this: - create a DojoReader that will dynamically compress and aggregate Javascript on the fly. - create a Maven Mojo that does the same job as Dojo's ant task, but this needs to be configured at build time. The first option needs no build time

[jira] Created: (COCOON-1929) [PATCH] Reloading classloader in Cocoon 2.2

2006-10-06 Thread Maurizio Pillitu (JIRA)
[PATCH] Reloading classloader in Cocoon 2.2 --- Key: COCOON-1929 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1929 Project: Cocoon Issue Type: Task Components: * Cocoon Core Affects

[jira] Updated: (COCOON-1929) [PATCH] Reloading classloader in Cocoon 2.2

2006-10-06 Thread Maurizio Pillitu (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1929?page=all ] Maurizio Pillitu updated COCOON-1929: - Attachment: cocoon.diff Apply to cocoon 2.2 trunk folder [PATCH] Reloading classloader in Cocoon 2.2 ---

Re: Releasing M2?

2006-10-06 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On 10/6/06, Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ...I think it makes sense to release this stuff as M2... +0.9 (meaning I cannot help but go for it) -Bertrand

Re: RFC: CForms + Dojo: the way forward

2006-10-06 Thread Jeremy Quinn
Hi Lars On 6 Oct 2006, at 18:49, Lars Trieloff wrote: Hi Jeremy, I see the following ways to solve this: - create a DojoReader that will dynamically compress and aggregate Javascript on the fly. Amazing idea !! :) - create a Maven Mojo that does the same job as Dojo's ant task, but

[jira] Closed: (COCOON-1706) Allow TeeTransformer to run a system command for debugging purposes

2006-10-06 Thread Jean-Baptiste Quenot (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1706?page=all ] Jean-Baptiste Quenot closed COCOON-1706. Fix Version/s: 2.2-dev (Current SVN) Resolution: Fixed Committed revision 453749 with some modifications. Thanks for your nice

Re: RFC: CForms + Dojo: the way forward

2006-10-06 Thread Jean-Baptiste Quenot
Hello Jeremy, This is a nice CForms roadmap indeed. See my comment below: * Jeremy Quinn: 3. We have two templating systems, there are incompatibilities between them and different capabilities, can we deprecate one? Conclusion: the JXMacro generation technique seems to be more

site module pom

2006-10-06 Thread Jorg Heymans
Hi, The root pom is currently declaring modulesite/cocoon-maven-site- skin/module directly. This is giving problems in continuum: Cannot build maven project from /home/maven/continuum-1.0.3/temp/ continuum/repos/asf/cocoon/trunk/site/cocoon-maven-site-skin/pom.xml (Cannot find parent: