Luca Morandini wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
So we can take a different approach, and consider that we can use
plain programming languages rather than grow our own
pseudo-languages. A well-defined Java API and its Javascript
binding would make people way more productive than an XML-based
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
This time I will
create the Maven 2 release artifacts and normal zip/tar release
artifacts for non-Maven users.
I created release artifacts for the Servlet-Service framework using the old
RC1 release form October last year and published them to
I saw that some committers have been using lowercase filenames
e.g. notice.txt, so the release-builder needs to handle that.
-David
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
I have started to write some Ant scripts to produce non-Maven
release artifacts. This will of course help everybody who doesn't
want to use Maven or Ivy for dependency management but will also
bundle all the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-2150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grzegorz Kossakowski closed COCOON-2150.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix version (Component): Parent values: Servlet
Hello guys,
I believe that COCOON-2150 is finally fixed but that was quite radical change involving lots of
conditional coding craft so I cannot be entirely sure if I hadn't missed any obscure case.
Therefore I would like you to give latest trunk Cocoon version extensive testing and observing
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Luca Morandini wrote:
Do you mind terribly showing me an example of the use of this API ?
Something like:
CocooonStream stream= new CocoonStream(file, documents/mydoc.xml);
stream.transform(xslt, xsl/doc2html.xsl);
return stream.serialize(html);
Yes, something like
Luca Morandini wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
snip/
About existing APIs, javax.xml.transform addresses part of it (it
doesn't have stream inspection though) but it often perceived as
difficult to grasp from the simple fact that you have to wire the
pipeline backwards, starting with the
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
Of course we are! We only have to work out the details of how we do it. The
main question is, if we have to go through ASF IP clearance or not.
Since it's rather a proposal than a finished project (~700 lines of code),
I think it's enough if Steven sends in an CLA
