Reinhard Pötz pisze:
So do you agree with me changing both schema and implementation so @uri is
required?
yes, go ahead
Done in r753635.
The same concern (about too many of optional attributes) applies to
call instruction.
What about this?
@controller and @select could be mandatory.
Reinhard Pötz pisze:
Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote:
Hi,
It's again me trying to understand current sitemap design. This time
I wonder if it's intended that redirect-to/@uri is optional. I fail
to see how implementation of redirect-to handles this case in any
meaningful way.
I haven't tried
Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote:
Reinhard Pötz pisze:
Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote:
Hi,
It's again me trying to understand current sitemap design. This time
I wonder if it's intended that redirect-to/@uri is optional. I fail
to see how implementation of redirect-to handles this case in any
Hi,
It's again me trying to understand current sitemap design. This time I wonder
if it's intended that redirect-to/@uri is
optional. I fail to see how implementation of redirect-to handles this case in
any meaningful way.
The same concern (about too many of optional attributes) applies to
Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote:
Hi,
It's again me trying to understand current sitemap design. This time
I wonder if it's intended that redirect-to/@uri is optional. I fail
to see how implementation of redirect-to handles this case in any
meaningful way.
I haven't tried it now what happens if
