Stephan Michels wrote:
Thank you that you didn't take it wrong :)
Okay here another vote(and I wait more than 24h)
Move java into scratchpad?
[X] Move it into scratchpad
[ ] Leave it where it is
[ ] Rename it to ___
My opinion is to leave it where it is, because I heard too much the
Marc Portier wrote:
(though what I'd really like to see is a more clean separation of
stable/unstable blocks, possibly with a clear directory hierarchy
(src/blocks/stable, src/blocks/unstable), a default commented out
-1 on dir structure, cvs hastle would kinda prevent blocks of becoming
Stephan Michels wrote:
[ ] Move it into scratchpad
[X] Leave it where it is
[ ] Rename it to ___
my argumentation is primarily short-term/pragmatic:
starting at two observations:
1/ this is cool stuff and as far as I can see the reactions just about
everyone here is salivating and wants
Le 30 mars 04, à 10:20, Marc Portier a écrit :
...just an idea popping up: why not reverse the default
exclude.block.XXX setting for the unstable ones?
then people will need to enable those and thus be more explicitely
confronted?...
I like the idea, and it's easy to do as blocks.properties are
Le 30 mars 04, à 09:45, Gianugo Rabellino a écrit :
...(though what I'd really like to see is a more clean separation of
stable/unstable blocks, possibly with a clear directory hierarchy
(src/blocks/stable, src/blocks/unstable), a default commented out
unstable.blocks.properties that Joe User
Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
Stephan Michels wrote:
Hey, no problem - Stephan already contacted me and I think we have
sorted everything out - if there was something to sort out at all
between us. Now, as I still think that a new block gives the wrong
impression
(which user really reads that it's
Okay here another vote(and I wait more than 24h)
Move java into scratchpad?
[ ] Move it into scratchpad
[x] Leave it where it is
[ ] Rename it to ___
Hiding anything in scratchpad does not help
anything IMO. The block is marked unstable
and this should give the right perception.
scratchpad =
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le 30 mars 04, à 10:20, Marc Portier a écrit :
...just an idea popping up: why not reverse the default
exclude.block.XXX setting for the unstable ones?
then people will need to enable those and thus be more explicitely
confronted?...
I like the idea, and it's easy
Stephan Michels wrote:
snip/
Okay here another vote(and I wait more than 24h)
Move java into scratchpad?
[ ] Move it into scratchpad
[X] Leave it where it is
[ ] Rename it to ___
IMO, this is a very much expected feature that a lot of people are
waiting for.
It needs to be marked as
Am Di, den 30.03.2004 schrieb Marc Portier um 10:32:
my argumentation is primarily short-term/pragmatic:
starting at two observations:
1/ this is cool stuff and as far as I can see the reactions just about
everyone here is salivating and wants to interact with that code
Yes, seems so. And
Gianugo Rabellino [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Okay here another vote(and I wait more than 24h)
Move java into scratchpad?
[ ] Move it into scratchpad
[+1] Leave it where it is
[ ] Rename it to ___
(though what I'd really like to see is a more clean separation of
On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 08:16:32AM -0800, Christopher Oliver wrote:
Stephan Michels wrote:
Thank you that you didn't take it wrong :)
Okay here another vote(and I wait more than 24h)
Move java into scratchpad?
[ ] Move it into scratchpad
[+1 ] Leave it where it is
[ ] Rename it to
Christopher Oliver wrote:
Stephan Michels wrote:
Thank you that you didn't take it wrong :)
Okay here another vote(and I wait more than 24h)
Move java into scratchpad?
[ ] Move it into scratchpad
[+1 ] Leave it where it is
[ ] Rename it to ___
Vadim
Am Di, den 30.03.2004 schrieb Carsten Ziegeler um 09:07:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
IMHO some kind of action is needed on this: either keep the
javaflow block as is, move it to the scratchpad or move it
somewhere else.
Stephan, I understand the public pressure and excitement
Le 30 mars 04, à 09:37, Stephan Michels a écrit :
Move java into scratchpad?
you mean javaflow for sure ;-)
[ ] Move it into scratchpad
[+1 ] Leave it where it is
[ ] Rename it to ___
But I'd add very visible mentions of the experimental status of this
block: on the samples page at least
Stephan Michels wrote:
Hey, no problem - Stephan already contacted me and I think we have
sorted everything out - if there was something to sort out at all
between us.
Now, as I still think that a new block gives the wrong impression
(which user really reads that it's alpha?) I would prefer the
Stephan Michels wrote:
[ ] Move it into scratchpad
[X] Leave it where it is
[ ] Rename it to ___
Ugo
17 matches
Mail list logo
