On 09/09/2011 10:33, Thorsten Scherler wrote:
...
Hmm, Jakarta RegExp does some things different and IMO much better then
java.util. Even if it is retired that does not mean it is not worth using it,
more since this way the component works exactly as in our prior versions. Not
sure when I wil
Am 09.09.2011 10:33, schrieb Thorsten Scherler:
...
Hmm, Jakarta RegExp does some things different and IMO much better then
java.util. Even if it is retired that does not mean it is not worth
using it, more since this way the component works exactly as in our
prior versions. Not sure when I will
...
> > Hmm, Jakarta RegExp does some things different and IMO much better then
> > java.util. Even if it is retired that does not mean it is not worth
> > using it, more since this way the component works exactly as in our
> > prior versions. Not sure when I will find the time to look into a
> > r