Hello,
Hey,
I'm sorry for my delayed answer too ;-)
Well, what I'm trying to gain is implementation independent blocks.
I cleaned up the JMS block using Spring provided mechanisms
(templates) for message delivery.
The sample block is now based on the ActiveMQ implementation
Hey,
I'm sorry for my delayed answer too ;-)
Well, what I'm trying to gain is implementation independent blocks.
I cleaned up the JMS block using Spring provided mechanisms (templates) for
message delivery.
The sample block is now based on the ActiveMQ implementation running in embedded
mode
Hello Lukas,
Sry for my late respond
Hello,
I'm wondering, why the eventcache block has dependencies on
the JMS block and not the other way round?
I do not know what you would win by switching the dependency around. JMS
seems to me more uncoupled from eventcache then eventcache to jms.
Hello,
I'm wondering, why the eventcache block has dependencies on
the JMS block and not the other way round?
For those who are familiar with these blocks,
in my opinion the JMSEventListener makes use of eventcache capabilities.
So I would say, JMS provides callback support via eventcache.
