Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Compress 1.26.2 based on RC1

+1 > On May 18, 2024, at 12:56 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > We have fixed a few bugs since Apache Commons Compress 1.26.1 was > released, so I would like to release Apache Commons Compress 1.26.2. > > Apache Commons Compress 1.26.2 RC1 is available for review here: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons CLI 1.8.0 based on RC2

+1 > On May 19, 2024, at 10:55 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons > CLI 1.7.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons CLI > 1.8.0. > > Apache Commons CLI 1.8.0 RC2 is available for review here: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Daemon 1.4.0 based on RC1

+1 > On May 17, 2024, at 2:05 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > > We have fixed a few bugs, added enhancements and updated the minimum Java and > Windows version since Apache Commons Daemon 1.3.4 was released, so I would > like to release Apache Commons Daemon 1.4.0. > > Apache Commons Daemon 1.4.0

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Logging 1.3.2 based on RC3

+1 looks good. Thanks a ton > On May 12, 2024, at 8:33 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > [The only difference with RC2 is the release notes text file] > > We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons > Logging 1.3.1 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons CSV 1.11.0 based on RC1

+1 > On Apr 28, 2024, at 6:24 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements (better Microsoft > Excel compatibility) since Apache Commons CSV 1.10.0 was released, so > I would like to release Apache Commons CSV 1.11.0. > > Apache Commons CSV 1.11.0 RC1 is

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Codec 1.17.0 based on RC1

+1 Thanks a ton Gary! > On Apr 20, 2024, at 2:18 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons > Codec 1.16.1 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons > Codec 1.17.0. > > Apache Commons Codec 1.17.0 RC1 is available for review

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.9.0 based on RC1

+1 here Thanks Gary!! > On Apr 25, 2024, at 4:48 PM, Gary D. Gregory wrote: > > Ping :-) > > On 2024/04/22 18:48:21 Bruno Kinoshita wrote: >> +1 >> >> Building OK from tag on >> >> Apache Maven 3.8.5 (3599d3414f046de2324203b78ddcf9b5e4388aa0) >> Maven home: /opt/apache-maven-3.8.5 >> Java

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Imaging 1.0.0-alpha5 based on RC1

+1 > On Apr 15, 2024, at 1:01 PM, Bruno Kinoshita wrote: > > +1 > > Thank you Gary! > >> On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 at 15:36, Gary Gregory wrote: >> >> We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons >> Imaging 1.0.0-alpha4 was released, so I would like to release Apache >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons CLI 1.7.0 based on RC1

+1 site, release-notes, signatures, and builds all check out Thanks!! -Rob > On Apr 13, 2024, at 7:29 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons > CLI 1.6.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons CLI > 1.7.0. > > Apache

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Text 1.12.0 based on RC1

+1 - all site, signatures, reports, and builds check out. Thank you! > On Apr 13, 2024, at 1:20 PM, Bruno Kinoshita wrote: > > +1 > > Building OK from tag on > > Apache Maven 3.8.5 (3599d3414f046de2324203b78ddcf9b5e4388aa0) > Maven home: /opt/apache-maven-3.8.5 > Java version: 17.0.10,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 based on rc1

Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8 OS name: "mac os x", version: "14.3", arch: "aarch64", family: "mac" > On Apr 5, 2024, at 11:28 AM, Gary D. Gregory wrote: > > Rob, > > What OS and such (mvn -version)? > > Gary >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons IO 2.16.1 based on RC2

+1 build, signatures, site all checkout fine. -Rob > On Apr 4, 2024, at 9:36 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > [ The difference with RC1 is https://github.com/apache/commons-io/pull/609 ] > > We have fixed a few bugs since Apache Commons IO 2.16.0 was released, > so I would like to release Apache

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 based on rc1

-0.5: building with java17 from the src zip I get the following for the jcs-core module [INFO] Results: [INFO] [ERROR] Failures: [ERROR] UDPDiscoverySenderEncryptedUnitTest.testPassiveBroadcast:116 message not received [ERROR] UDPDiscoverySenderEncryptedUnitTest.testRemoveBroadcast:138

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Collections 4.5.0-M1 based on RC1

+1 all looks good. > On Mar 31, 2024, at 12:19 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons > Collections 4.4 was released, so I would like to release Apache > Commons Collections 4.5.0-M1. > > Apache Commons Collections 4.5.0-M1 RC1 is

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Imaging 1.0.0-alpha4 based on RC1

+1 > On Mar 30, 2024, at 6:01 PM, Tomas Lanik wrote: > > +1 for 1.0.0-alpha4 > > On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 3:14 PM Gary Gregory wrote: > >> We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons >> Imaging 1.0-alpha3 was released, so I would like to release Apache >> Commons

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons IO 2.16.0 based on RC1

+1 > On Mar 25, 2024, at 9:51 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache > Commons IO 2.15.1 was released, so I would like to release Apache > Commons IO 2.16.0. > > Apache Commons IO 2.16.0 RC1 is available for review here: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Logging 1.3.1 based on RC2

+1 site good, signatures good, builds on java 8, 11, 17, 21 -Rob > On Mar 17, 2024, at 11:44 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache > Commons Logging 1.3.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache > Commons Logging 1.3.1. > > (Note

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Logging 1.3.1 based on RC2

+1 looks good > On Mar 17, 2024, at 11:44 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache > Commons Logging 1.3.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache > Commons Logging 1.3.1. > > (Note that the new release candidate is labeled 1.3.1 and

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.10.0 based on RC1

+1 > On Mar 10, 2024, at 6:02 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache > Commons VFS Project 2.9.0 was released, so I would like to release > Apache Commons VFS Project 2.10.0. > > Apache Commons VFS Project 2.10.0 RC1 is available for

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Configuration 2.10.1 based on RC1

+1 > On Mar 18, 2024, at 9:35 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > My +1 > > Gary > >> On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 4:36 PM Gary Gregory wrote: >> >> We have fixed a few bugs since Apache Commons Configuration 2.10.0 was >> released, so I would like to release Apache Commons Configuration >> 2.10.1. >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Configuration 2.10.0 based on RC1

+1 > On Mar 11, 2024, at 8:36 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > ping? > TY! > Gary > >> On Sat, Mar 9, 2024 at 9:22 AM Gary Gregory wrote: >> >> My +1 >> >> Gary >> >>> On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 9:13 AM Gary Gregory wrote: >>> >>> We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Compress 1.26.1 based on RC1

+1 tested builds on java 8 -21, site - reports all look good, RELEASE-NOTES.txt good, signatures good. > On Mar 5, 2024, at 5:40 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache > Commons Compress 1.26.0 was released, so I would like to release >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons DBCP 2.12.0 based on RC1

+1 ran tests, site looks good, signatures look good. > On Feb 29, 2024, at 5:46 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Hi All, > > We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache > Commons DBCP 2.11.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache > Commons DBCP 2.12.0. > > Apache

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.8.2 based on RC1

+1 > On Feb 21, 2024, at 7:18 PM, Gary D. Gregory wrote: > > We have fixed a few bugs since Apache Commons BCEL 6.8.1 was released, so I > would like to release Apache Commons BCEL 6.8.2. > > Apache Commons BCEL 6.8.2 RC1 is available for review here: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Compress 1.26.0 based on RC1

+1 - all looks good > On Feb 17, 2024, at 7:14 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Compress 1.26.0 based on RC1 > > We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache > Commons Compress 1.25.0 was released, so I would like to release > Apache Commons

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Codec 1.16.1 based on RC1

+1 all looks good. Keep up the good work Gary!!! Cheers, -Rob > On Feb 4, 2024, at 10:40 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache > Commons Codec 1.16.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache > Commons Codec 1.16.1. > > Apache

Re: [LAZY][VOTE] Release Apache Commons Parent 66 based on RC1

+1 > On Jan 31, 2024, at 10:22 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > This lazy vote passes with one binding +1 vote from Gary Gregory. > > Gary > >> On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 10:22 PM Gary Gregory wrote: >> >> My +1 >> >> Gary >> >>> On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 8:31 AM Gary Gregory wrote: >>> >>> I

Re: [IO-842] Deprecate more or undeprecate non-Charset methods

I think we should remove the deprecations and add more explicit Javadocs that spell out that there are oddities with the defaultCharset() depending upon the operating system. Note this problem has been in existence since Java 1.4, and we did nothing about it for a considerable amount of time.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.8.1 based on RC1

+1 all looks good > On Jan 7, 2024, at 3:20 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > We have fixed BCEL-370 for SpotBugs and added some enhancements since > Apache Commons BCEL 6.8.0 was released, so I would like to release > Apache Commons BCEL 6.8.1. > > Apache Commons BCEL 6.8.1 RC1 is available for

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Exec 1.4.0 based on RC1

+1 signatures good, builds on java 8, 11, 17, and 21, reports all good, RELEASE-NOTES.txt good. Nit, the coverage is a touch low, but this is a very minor nit. Send it!!! Cheers, -Rob > On Jan 1, 2024, at 7:29 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements

Re: [all, site] Logo Update?

Cool…I’ll have to work on the sizing but I think we’re ready. Cheers, -Rob > On Dec 26, 2023, at 12:42 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Go for it IMO. > > Gary > > On Tue, Dec 26, 2023, 11:11 AM Rob Tompkins wrote: > >> Thoughts? >> >> -Rob >>

Re: [all, site] Logo Update?

Thoughts? -Rob > On Dec 26, 2023, at 10:54 AM, Rob Tompkins wrote: > > I have Adobe Creative Suite. > > -Rob > >> On Dec 26, 2023, at 10:50 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: >> >> It's a quick change to update the main page with the current >> &q

Re: [all, site] Logo Update?

I have Adobe Creative Suite. -Rob > On Dec 26, 2023, at 10:50 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > It's a quick change to update the main page with the current > "graphical identity" of the ASF (new feather). [I.e. just use the > logo which the ASF main site is using.] > Not so much to modify

Re: [all, site] Logo Update?

If that’s indeed the case, then wouldn’t the easiest thing be to simply incorporate the feather into the current logo design as a quick update while we wait for the new branding? -Rob > On Dec 26, 2023, at 10:32 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Le mar. 26 déc. 2023 à 16:12, Rob

Re: [all, site] Logo Update?

s matched  > > Gary > > On Tue, Dec 26, 2023, 7:14 AM Gilles Sadowski wrote: > >> Hello. >> >> Le mar. 26 déc. 2023 à 03:52, Rob Tompkins a écrit : >>> >>> Hey all, >>> >>> Should we use the more modern feather with the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons FileUpload 2.0.0-M2 based on RC1

+1 Builds on java 11, 17, and 21. All looks good, signatures, reports, site and RELEASE-NOTES.txt Happy Holidays, -Rob > On Dec 24, 2023, at 2:53 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache > Commons FileUpload 2.0.0-M1 was released, so I

[all, site] Logo Update?

Hey all, Should we use the more modern feather with the same logo (-1, -0, +0, +1)? Happy to give a shot at creating the same logo with the new feather. Cheers and happy holidays, -Rob - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.8.0 based on RC1

+1 everything looks good. Nits, coverage a tad low, cpd, pmd, todo’s Send it -Rob > On Dec 3, 2023, at 11:33 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache > Commons BCEL 6.7.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache > Commons BCEL

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Validator 1.8.0 based on RC1

+1 all looks good > On Dec 2, 2023, at 10:26 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache > Commons Validator 1.7 was released, so I would like to release Apache > Commons Validator 1.8.0. > > Apache Commons Validator 1.8.0 RC1 is available for

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Logging 1.3.0 based on RC1

+1 signatures; reports; site; release-notes; builds java: 8, 11, 17, and 21 all good. Thanks Gary!! Happy thanksgiving Cheers, -Rob > On Nov 26, 2023, at 4:46 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache > Commons Logging 1.2 was

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons IO 2.15.1 based on RC1

+1 Struggled a little with the SPDX stuff, but all in all it looks good. Reports all look correct (RAT included), all tests run appropriately across java 8, 11, 17, and 21 Signatures all check out. Send it! > On Nov 24, 2023, at 11:38 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > We have fixed quite one

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Lang 3.14.0 based on RC1

Looking over the release there are some japicmp curiosities that I think are k, and the CPD report has a few nits in it. Otherwise all looks good. +1 -Rob Thank you for the good work!!! > On Nov 18, 2023, at 10:15 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > We have fixed a few bugs and added some

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Compress 1.25.0 based on RC1

+1 Signatures, Reports, Site, Release-Notes, all good. Builds on java 8, 11, and 17 properly some nits in the CPD, PMD space, but nothing of note. Hopefully the saying holds true luck favours the well prepared …. generally needing it :-) > On Nov 12, 2023, at 5:47 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons DBCP 2.11.0 based on RC1

+1 > On Oct 27, 2023, at 11:13 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > My +1 > > Gary > >> On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 6:26 AM Bruno Kinoshita >> wrote: >> >> [x] +1 Release these artifacts >> >> Site reports OK, building fine on >> >> Apache Maven 3.8.5 (3599d3414f046de2324203b78ddcf9b5e4388aa0) >>

Potential Security Issues (was: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Text 1.11.0 based on RC1)

I would bring this up in secur...@commons.apache.org if you have something noteworthy. Though a lot of people don’t understand that text manipulation is an extremely general toolkit making security concerns something that would occur at a higher lever with regards to the system using

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Text 1.11.0 based on RC1

+1 - signatures good, rat good, reports good, builds good, site good, release note good. Keep crushing it Gary! Cheers, -Rob > On Oct 24, 2023, at 9:47 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements > since Apache Commons Text 1.10.0 was

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons CLI 1.6.0 based on RC1

+1, signatures, site, builds, and release notes all good Send it! > On Oct 23, 2023, at 1:07 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements > since Apache Commons CLI 1.5.0 was released, so I would like to > release Apache Commons CLI 1.6.0.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons IO 2.15.0 based on RC1

+1 - all looks appropriate, signatures, site, builds, RELEASE-NOTES.txt, Thank you again Gary and team for all the hard work! > On Oct 25, 2023, at 5:45 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > My +1. More reviews please  > > Gary > > On Sat, Oct 21, 2023, 7:34 PM Bruno Kinoshita > wrote: > >> [x] +1

Re: [DISCUSS] - Move commons-chain to dormant?

>> Struts (but only till 1.3.x (last released in 2008)). >>> >>> According to >>> >> https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/commons-chain/commons-chain/1.2/usages >>> "Magnolia" and "eXo JCR" are the most popular projects using

Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Release Apache Commons Parent 63 based on RC1

If gary cancel’s the vote I can do that work. Will try to sort it out this week. -Rob > On Oct 1, 2023, at 9:20 AM, sebb wrote: > > Ideally we want to release a version with the updated site.xml... > > On Sat, 30 Sept 2023 at 18:44, Gary Gregory wrote: >> >> We have added some enhancements

Re: [site] [all] broken links

Will look at this and write jira for it. -Rob > On Oct 1, 2023, at 4:52 AM, sebb wrote: > > As to the other sites, there should be no need to regenerate them: one > can just update the production sites in SVN. > I should be able to do that a bit later. > >> On Sun, 1 Oct 2023 at 09:41, sebb

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache Commons IO 2.14.0

Thank you for your work! -Rob > On Sep 30, 2023, at 10:31 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > The Apache Commons team is pleased to announce the release of Apache > Commons IO 2.14.0. > > Commons IO is a package of Java utility classes like java.io. Classes > in this package are considered to be so

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Pool 2.12.0 based on RC5

+1 - looks good to me > On Sep 27, 2023, at 7:03 AM, Bruno Kinoshita wrote: > > [X] +1 Release these artifacts > > The website change page date needs to be updated for the latest release, > but that can be done after the release. > > On Tue, 26 Sept 2023 at 21:51, Phil Steitz wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons IO 2.14.0 based on RC1

+1 Builds successfully on all LTE java versions Reports look good, Rat Looks good, Signatures all check out. Cheers, -ROb :-p > On Sep 26, 2023, at 12:37 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache > Commons IO 2.13.0 was released, so I would

Re: No sign of releases for Functor or OGNL - move to dormant?

> On Sep 20, 2023, at 10:55 AM, Bruno Kinoshita wrote: > > +1 for functor to be made dormant. Never got enough time to work on it, > and we can move it out later if I need to. > +1 for functor to be made dormant too. Cheers, -Rob > Not sure about OGNL. > > Cheers > > Bruno > > On Wed,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2 based on rc1 (2nd round with fixed links)

+1 Signatures validate properly Build works appropriately on java 8, 11, and 17 Reports all look appropriate, RAT (licenses), japicmp (backwards compatibility), and soptbugs Nit (major, non-blocking). No site built for commons-jcs: Apache Commons Distribution or for JCache, OpenJPA Thanks for

Re: JCS vote

Thank you for that reminder, I will get to it today. -Rob > On Sep 15, 2023, at 2:24 AM, Thomas Vandahl wrote: > > Hi folks, > > Could some kind soul please find some time to vote on the release 3.2 of JCS? > Perhaps this weekend? > > We would need one more PMC vote. > > Thank you! > Bye,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons DbUtils 1.8.1 based on RC1

Builds on java 8,11, 17 signatures good Rat good all other reports good. +1 > On Sep 9, 2023, at 8:46 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > We have fixed one (Java JPMS >= 9) bug since Apache Commons DbUtils > 1.8.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons DbUtils > 1.8.1. > > Apache

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Compress 1.24.0 based on RC1

+1 Build works on java 11, 17, Signatures all check out, Reports all look good. Cheers, and thanks a ton for all the good work! -Rob > On Sep 4, 2023, at 9:22 AM,Gary Gregory wrote: > > We have fixed a few bugs and added one enhancement since Apache > Commons Compress 1.23.0 was released, so I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons DBCP 2.10.0 based on RC1

+1 signatures good, reports good mvn clean test package install works nit mvn site doesn’t work for me on my machine > On Aug 28, 2023, at 9:34 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache > Commons DBCP 2.9.0 was released, so I would like to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons DBCP 2.10.0 based on RC1

will look at this, this evening. -Rob > On Sep 1, 2023, at 10:59 AM, Henri Biestro wrote: > >  > [ +1] Release these artifacts > > Built on: > 22.5.0 Darwin Kernel Version 22.5.0: Thu Jun 8 22:22:20 PDT 2023; > root:xnu-8796.121.3~7/RELEASE_ARM64_T6000 arm64 > > With: > openjdk version

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons DbUtils 1.8.0 based on RC1

All looks approriate signatures ok build ok on java 8, 11, 17 reports look good. Send it! +1 > On Aug 1, 2023, at 8:40 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache > Commons DbUtils 1.7 was released, so I would like to release Apache > Commons

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Lang 3.13.0 based on RC1

+1 Builds with java 8, 11, and 17 using maven 3.9.2, on mac osx 13.4.1: “mvn clean test install site” Rat report clean japicmp looks good (I think, there was something about a removal waay down in there under something saying “unchanged”) specifically on

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Lang 3.13.0 based on RC1

Working on validating this now. -Rob > On Jul 23, 2023, at 3:57 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements > since Apache Commons Lang 3.12.0 was released, so I would like to > release Apache Commons Lang 3.13.0. > > Apache Commons Lang

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons FileUpload 2.0.0-M1 based on RC1

+1 Signatures Check Out Builds, tests, sitte on Java8, Java11, and Java17 All reports look good, (nit) the coverage is a little low 50-65% Rat reports all clean Only other Nit is a “NeedsWork" in org.apache.commons.fileupload2.javax.JavaxHttpServletRequestFactory likely more important than the

Re: [LAZY][VOTE] Release Apache Commons Build Plugin Maven Mojo 1.13 based on RC1

+1 > On Jun 25, 2023, at 11:30 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache > Commons Build Plugin Maven Mojo 1.12 was released, so I would like to > release Apache Commons Build Plugin Maven Mojo 1.13. > > Apache Commons Build Plugin Maven

Re: [LAZY][VOTE] Release Apache Commons Release Plugin 1.8.1 based on RC1

+1 > On Jun 25, 2023, at 3:13 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > We have fixed a few bugs since Apache Commons Release Plugin 1.7 was > released, so I would like to release Apache Commons Release Plugin > 1.8.1. > > Apache Commons Release Plugin 1.8.1 RC1 is available for review here: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Codec 1.16.0 based on RC2

+1 Builds on java8, java11, java17 with maven 3.9.2., Reports all look good, Signatures all look good, Site looks good… Cheers, -Rob > On Jun 17, 2023, at 8:24 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache > Commons Codec 1.15 was released, so I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons IO 2.13.0 based on RC1

+1 > On Jun 6, 2023, at 9:19 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > My +1 > > Gary > > >> On Sat, Jun 3, 2023 at 12:51 PM Gary Gregory wrote: >> >> We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache Commons >> IO 2.12.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons IO

Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache Commons IO 2.12.0 based on RC1

Cool sounds good. -Rob > On May 3, 2023, at 9:55 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Thanks Rob! Make sure you track git master as I am going through Alex's > comments and pushing updates, I should be done tonight. > > Gary > > On Wed, May 3, 2023, 08:22 Rob Tompkins wr

Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache Commons IO 2.12.0 based on RC1

I was reading this release over yesterday. I’m still looking at the code changes generally. Cheers, -Rob > On May 2, 2023, at 7:31 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Great review Alex, TY, I am canceling this vote and will reply to this > email with details. > > Gary > > On Tue, May 2, 2023, 12:14

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons FileUpload 1.5 based on RC1

+1, and thanks for the work here. Much appreciation! -Rob > On Feb 9, 2023, at 8:39 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > > Ping. One more PMC member vote required. > > Mark > > On 01/02/2023 12:57, Mark Thomas wrote: >> We have fixed a few bugs and added some small enhancements since FileUpload >> 1.4

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons FileUpload 1.5 based on RC1

Will try to get to today. -Rob > On Feb 9, 2023, at 8:39 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > > Ping. One more PMC member vote required. > > Mark > > On 01/02/2023 12:57, Mark Thomas wrote: >> We have fixed a few bugs and added some small enhancements since FileUpload >> 1.4 was released, so I would

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons CSV 1.10.0 based on RC2

+1 Checks out on java8, java11, and java17. Reports site look good Signatures all correct > On Jan 28, 2023, at 1:02 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some enhancements since > Apache Commons CSV 1.9.0 was released, so I would like to release > Apache Commons

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Crypto 1.2.0 based on RC1

+1 Build passes for java8, java11, (nit) java17 on mac M1 is a bit funky because they moved homebrew from /usr/local/homebrew -> /opt/homebrew, and java17 actually realizes that the M1 is an arm processor. The earlier versions of java do not. Signatures Check out. Reports Surefire, Rat,

Re: Math: Yearly patch for commons-math3

> On Dec 6, 2022, at 12:26 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > "even if its only updating the copyright headers" > > You must be joking, you know we are volunteers here. I can't imagine you'd > be willing to pay for this from a commercial vendor or consultant which > makes the request show a lack

Re: [ALL] components still using Travis

> On Mar 29, 2022, at 10:51 AM, sebb wrote: > > On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 at 15:27, Rob Tompkins <mailto:chtom...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> I wonder if the python script will be effective in doing the migration >> properly. I’ll try to carve some time out to he

Re: [ALL] components still using Travis

I wonder if the python script will be effective in doing the migration properly. I’ll try to carve some time out to help here. -Rob > On Mar 29, 2022, at 10:19 AM, sebb wrote: > > On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 at 13:57, Matt Juntunen wrote: >> >> Hi Sebb, >> >> Yep, geometry is still using Travis.

Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Release Apache Commons Release Plugin 1.8.0 based on RC1

Looked it over +1 Cheers, -Rob > On Mar 13, 2022, at 5:00 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache Commons > Release Plugin 1.7 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons > Release Plugin 1.8.0. > > Apache Commons Release

Re: [all] Do not build the project site with Maven 3.8.2

> On Mar 13, 2022, at 6:27 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > We have a lazy release vote in flight for commons-release-plugin 1.8.0 that > include a hack to workaround this issue.. > Many thanks Gary. -Rob > Gary > >> On Fri, Mar 4, 2022, 14:53 Rob Tompkins wrote

Re: [all] Do not build the project site with Maven 3.8.2

> On Mar 4, 2022, at 9:57 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 9:56 AM Alex Herbert > wrote: > >>> On Fri, 4 Mar 2022 at 14:43, Rob Tompkins wrote: >>> >>> Yes that is on my plate to fix, but I haven’t gotten time to fix it. >

Re: [all] Do not build the project site with Maven 3.8.2

Yes that is on my plate to fix, but I haven’t gotten time to fix it. I’ve for the first time in a while got some time this weekend away from my standard obligations and will try to put some time in on it. Pardon my being remiss, my personal life has been quite hectic over the past 2 months both

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Codec 1.16 based on RC1

I’m in with the partent pom right now….can work on getting that sorted…plus I need to to get our release plugin working with the latest version of maven. -Rob > On Jan 22, 2022, at 5:42 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: > > Alright, digging through the parent parent parent pom, it looks like the >

Re: [commons-io] branch master updated: Add CharsetEncoders.

> On Jan 11, 2022, at 8:41 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Le mar. 11 janv. 2022 à 14:21, > a écrit : >> >> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. >> >> ggregory pushed a commit to branch master >> in repository

Re: can we get rid of dependabot?

I believe that we already have begun to do this. -Rob > On Dec 30, 2021, at 6:16 PM, sebb wrote: > > Those of you who want to keep the robot, please use the instructions > to reduce the spam. > >> On Thu, 30 Dec 2021 at 22:51, Rob Tompkins wrote: >> >> >

Re: can we get rid of dependabot?

r > >>> On Dec 30, 2021, at 16:48, Rob Tompkins wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Dec 30, 2021, at 5:37 PM, sebb >>> <mailto:seb...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, 30 Dec 2021 at 21:39, Rob Tompkins >> <mail

Re: can we get rid of dependabot?

> On Dec 30, 2021, at 5:37 PM, sebb wrote: > > On Thu, 30 Dec 2021 at 21:39, Rob Tompkins wrote: >> >> Guys. The fundamental argument underpinng all this is whether it’s better to >> have robot eyes on the code and human eyes on the code. Stop arguing one &g

Re: can we get rid of dependabot?

; updates which are generally 3 emails per update. >> >> If it does fail, you will have wasted 2 cycles: the original commit of >> 10, and the revert. And only 2 emails. > > +1 and you will get many thanks from those trying to follow commits and > better review

Re: can we get rid of dependabot?

ime before > the release. > Days or weeks rather than months or years. > >> >>> Generally all the versions would be updated at the same time, instead >>> of individually. >>> >> >> Not here, if update 10 dependencies and a build fails, then

Re: can we get rid of dependabot?

> On Dec 29, 2021, at 10:29 AM, Matt Benson wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2021, 9:21 AM Mark Thomas wrote: > >>> On 29/12/2021 15:04, Gary Gregory wrote: >>>> On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 9:37 AM Rob Tompkins wrote: >>> >>>> Why not just ru

Re: can we get rid of dependabot?

ore my time and it seems like a horrible idea: The > software is stable after a few months of activity and it's time to make a > release, so the day before a release, you change all the dependencies, and > cross your fingers? Yikes! > > >> Generally all the versions would be upda

Re: can we get rid of dependabot?

>> Please stop pretending that Dependabot does things it does not (and >>> likely cannot) do. >>> >> >> Oh, boy, Sebb, it feels like you are purposely misunderstanding my POV. >> It's as simple as I stated: >> >> If Dependabot detects that a new version

Re: can we get rid of dependabot?

ent. > Gary > >> On Wed, Dec 29, 2021, 08:51 Rob Tompkins wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Dec 29, 2021, at 8:45 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau >> wrote: >>> >>> @Rob: dependabot is mainly about dependencies upgrades and it is also >> why >&g

Re: can we get rid of dependabot?

Guys. I think dependabot is our greatest advantage in the work against security problems. I know she has her failings and is chatty. But, I think we should open a line of thinking about how best she can help. The reason she’s a pain in the ass is that we don’t have enough hands on the project

Re: can we get rid of dependabot?

> On Dec 28, 2021, at 1:57 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Please no. Dependabot is a key tool for me. Inbox rules should be able to > help you depending on your client. Huge +1 I think we need to help GitHub figure out how to make it better. -Rob > > Someone had suggested creating a new

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Commons CLI 1.5.0

The Apache Commons project announces the release of Apache Commons CLI 1.5.0. Commons CLI requires at least Java 8. The Apache Commons CLI library provides a simple command Line arguments parser. This is a Feature and bug fix release (Java 8) Historical list of changes:

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Commons CLI 1.5.0

The Apache Commons project announces the release of Apache Commons CLI 1.5.0. Commons CLI requires at least Java 8. The Apache Commons CLI library provides a simple command Line arguments parser. This is a Feature and bug fix release (Java 8) Historical list of changes:

[ALL, SITE] Publishing Main Website

Hello all, In going through the CLI release of 1.5.0 (most of which I’ve finished), I needed to publish the main site. In following the standard directions [1], I’ve made the requisite commits to SVN, but I just don’t know how to publish the code out to the site. Note, I used to use the cms

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Commons CLI 1.5.0 based on RC1

Hello all, This vote passes with the following votes: Gary Gregory: +1 Bruno Kinoshita: +1 Rob Tompkins: +1 I’ll go ahead work through the promotion process today. Many thanks to those that voted on the RC. Cheers, -Rob > On Oct 23, 2021, at 5:58 PM, Rob Tompkins wrote: > > We h

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons CLI 1.5.0 based on RC1

Here’s my +1. -Rob > On Oct 23, 2021, at 5:58 PM, Rob Tompkins wrote: > > We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements since > Apache Commons CLI 1.4 was released, so I would like to release Apache > Commons CLI 1.5.0. > > Apache Commons CLI 1

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >