Le lun. 19 avr. 2021 à 20:26, Matt Juntunen
a écrit :
>
> Hi Gilles,
>
> Are you suggesting skipping another beta version and having numbers 1.0 and
> geometry 1.0 be the next releases?
Yes, that's the question which I'm asking.
There is no point in waiting much longer for feedback that
may
Hi Gilles,
Are you suggesting skipping another beta version and having numbers 1.0 and
geometry 1.0 be the next releases? I could get on board with that. It would be
great to have an official release of these. What needs to be done on numbers
before we're ready for 1.0 (aside from moving over
Hello Matt.
Le lun. 19 avr. 2021 à 15:20, Matt Juntunen
a écrit :
>
> I'd like to release commons-geometry 1.0-beta2 within the next couple of
> weeks. I'm planning on including GEOMETRY-118 (additional methods for
> transform matrix classes) in that if possible. Is there anything else anyone
Hello.
Le lun. 19 avr. 2021 à 08:35, Avijit Basak a écrit :
>
> Hi
>
> >Isn't a GA inherently parallel?
> >If so, why not take advantage of the concurrency tools provided by the JDK?
> -- Are we planning to implement multi-threading for GA operations even as
> part of a single population
This
I'd like to release commons-geometry 1.0-beta2 within the next couple of weeks.
I'm planning on including GEOMETRY-118 (additional methods for transform matrix
classes) in that if possible. Is there anything else anyone would like to
include?
Regards,
Matt J
On Mon, 19 Apr 2021 at 07:54, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
> On 2021-04-18, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
> > I've created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21741 if you
> > want to lend a hand moderating, you may want to add yourself to the
> > ticket before the list is created.
>
> The list has
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 8:56 AM Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
> Can there be more than one "primary" contact? There is a reason why we
> use role based mail aliases and mailing lists, it is pretty likely
> people become completely unavailable for a while and I don't want to
> block adding people to
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 9:03 AM Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> I hope my approval has been enough as I'm not a "reviewer with write
> access".
I think it will suffice to prove that I have submitted the PRs on
behalf of someone affiliated with Apache Commons. The OSS-Fuzz
reviewers will review the PR
On 2021-04-19, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2021-04-18, Fabian Meumertzheim wrote:
>> Stefan, if you agree, I would submit the two PRs tomorrow and ask you
>> to sign them off on GitHub via a comment on the PR and a link to this
>> email thread.
> Fine with me.
I hope my approval has been enough
On 2021-04-18, Fabian Meumertzheim wrote:
> Stefan, if you agree, I would submit the two PRs tomorrow and ask you
> to sign them off on GitHub via a comment on the PR and a link to this
> email thread.
Fine with me.
Thank you
Stefan
On 2021-04-18, Fabian Meumertzheim wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 6:22 PM Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> Can probably do, what is the duty of a primary contact? My github
>> username is bodewig.
> The primary contact may be asked to sign off on PRs to that project in
> the OSS-Fuzz repo, in
On 2021-04-18, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> I've created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21741 if you
> want to lend a hand moderating, you may want to add yourself to the
> ticket before the list is created.
The list has been created, so if you want to receive the fuzz reports
please
Hi
>Isn't a GA inherently parallel?
>If so, why not take advantage of the concurrency tools provided by the JDK?
-- Are we planning to implement multi-threading for GA operations even as
part of a single population or only for multi-population parallel GA.
-- We can implement different types
13 matches
Mail list logo
