Hi Rich
That's a fair comment.
We can also take the example of Livy that we were able to "restart"
thanks to new contributors.
Call For Action can also work (as we did for a few projects),
especially when the project is in use.
Regards
JB
On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 2:35 PM Rich Bowen wrote:
>
>
Thanks, folks.
I’ve opened a PR with the feedback from this thread -
https://github.com/apache/comdev-site/pull/174 - and would appreciate a review,
and if you think it passes muster, a merge. Thanks.
> On Mar 29, 2024, at 9:35 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> This week, I’ve been approached by
A common mistake for leveraging the power of community is to make
it complicated ”what is suitable for newcomers". Working in many OSS
projects, I practice and encourage other maintainers to practice: Do not
think "community" as an external resource and you need to feed them. We're
part of the
> * Roadmap -
> a sense of new things that they could help build
> a sense the project is still going someplace
+1 This is what I advise the StreamPark podling every time I meet its
"original author". He shares the challenges that he "cannot find many peers
to collaborate with."
I told him,
Rich Bowen wrote on 3/29/24 9:35 AM:
This week, I’ve been approached by someone concerned about one of our projects,
and looking for a “how to get back on track” document, with concrete,
actionable steps that a project can take when it is struggling to find
contributors. This seems like a
This is why we emphasize community over code. And Kvrocks can be a valuable
example that although quite a few of its "original authors" faded away due
to many reasons, we keep invite new members and due to its product value (a
well-known software's alternative, named Redis), so it can be
I can share two examples:
* Livy podling. Users take over the community.
* Ambari. Vendors/Individual Devs revived the community.
But both of them don't seem to be quite active (again).
Best,
tison.
Michael Sokolov 于2024年3月29日周五 22:21写道:
> I guess it depends on what the problem with the
On Mar 29, 2024, at 10:20 AM, Michael Sokolov wrote:
>
> I guess it depends on what the problem with the project is. It seems
> implicit in your ideas that the project has lost momentum; nobody is
> contributing to it or maintaining it actively? But I just want to
> point out there can be other
I guess it depends on what the problem with the project is. It seems
implicit in your ideas that the project has lost momentum; nobody is
contributing to it or maintaining it actively? But I just want to
point out there can be other problems that might need correction with
different solutions (too
This week, I’ve been approached by someone concerned about one of our projects,
and looking for a “how to get back on track” document, with concrete,
actionable steps that a project can take when it is struggling to find
contributors. This seems like a great doc that we should write. What comes
10 matches
Mail list logo