ConCom used to be the home for this kind of thing. It moved to ComDev when
ConCom was disbanded. ComDev are yet to define how this support, this is a good
thing as ConCom became a controlling influence that often stifled the energy
behind local meetups.
On thus list there are plenty of people
As I mentioned to you in private I can reach out to UK government CTO if you
want an eGovernment replacement (would likely result in the same outcome as
going to Wardley)
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: jan imailto:j...@apache.org
Sent: 9/24/2014 8:06 AM
To:
dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org (you need to send it from the subscribed
email address, if that is difficult the help message you get in response will
guide you)
-Original Message-
From: Mark Brodsky [mailto:rktsm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 12:53 PM
To:
Note, we have recently been discussing how OfBiz can help with management of
the fundraising activities. Melissa (our EA) is in contract with the project.
It seems to me that this would be the simplest starting point (and isn't public
facing, so less of a design overhead).
Other than that, as
and Retail Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
Note, we have recently been discussing how OfBiz can help with
management of the fundraising activities. Melissa (our EA) is in
contract with the project
Sorry here's the mail I meant to send...
We are evaluating options around Apache-extras at present. I'd note that its
nit the tools that create communities, its the people within. It could be
argued that GitHub is the default place for folks to search but other than that
the location is mostly
A couple of years ago I had the same concerns. I got pushback on messing with
the TLD pages (perhaps more accurately there were so many strong opinions it
wasn't worth the argument, plus the task is daunting to say the least). Instead
I started trying to create signposts into our dense TLD
Rich,
As per your blog at
https://blogs.apache.org/conferences/entry/apachecon_north_america_returns_to
please sign me up. I don't want to do a project specific track, I'm more
interested in a cloud track. I want to create a coherent track in which each
session, whilst being valuable as a
Moving dev@community.apache.org to BCC so as not to create unnecessary traffic
(I assume it was a mistake having it in the To line)
Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
-Original Message-
From: Leif Hedstrom [mailto:zw...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday,
It's absolutely my intention to manage the track I have signed up for
independently of all other tracks.
It is entirely possible that I will want a talk that others have identified for
their tracks. We can resolve those issues when CFP has closed.
Ross
-Original Message-
From: jan i
send a few email and gauge the interest. If there's enough (which I
assume to be the case), I'll volunteer.
Cheers,
Hadrian
On 12/12/2014 04:53 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
If you arrange it, yes :-)
Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
How about Jono Bacon. He's got the open source creds but his new gig at XPrize
is a fascinating demonstration that what we do here in open source is akin to
the processes needed to create huge innovation leaps. If we were to pair that
with some bigwig at a research org then we can do the full
If LF want to do it they can. It's their conference. I totally agree that we
should not be a part of it.
We discussed this when negotiation the contract. Buying sessions is not on the
cards.
However, my point is not about sales pitches or bought slots. Mine is about
taking it too far. People
We should not explore anything. It's an LF responsibility.
(I know I said this about 5 times in quick succession, sorry. I just want to
make sure we don't start becoming ConCom. ApacheCon has been outsourced to LF)
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Pierre
@community.apache.orgmailto:dev@community.apache.org
Subject: Re: ApacheCon NA CFP closed
On Wednesday, February 4, 2015, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote:
On 02/04/2015 11:21 AM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
Sally is not part of the ACNA process. Nobody in the ASF is. This is an
LF event.
We can
Sally is not part of the ACNA process. Nobody in the ASF is. This is an LF
event.
We can (and should) make recommendations to LF but we are are not to take on
responsibility for these things. That takes us back to where we were with
ConCom.
Sent from my Windows Phone
Dropping board to BCC.
Note that:
If ComDev is going to host this stuff, then ComDev should have the say
in what the actual requirements are.
Absolutely! And right now I'm personally volunteering my cycles to help with
that within the ComDev framework.
Is exactly the kind of
On Wednesday, February 4, 2015, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
I never intended to say that we should not take responsibility for
content. I intended to say LF should take responsibility for defining
the theme of the conference they want to market and we *help
@community.apache.org
Subject: Re: ApacheCon NA CFP closed
On Feb 4, 2015, at 12:05 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
Sally the volunteer can do what she wants
Sally the contractor has no responsibility for ApacheCon
We are *not* responsible (by contract
I attended Nicks sessions in Budapest - they were *excellent*. Using them as a
model for Austin is to be recommended.
Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
-Original Message-
From: Hadrian Zbarcea [mailto:hzbar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February
(work which just started today).
All that said, I believe in general we should look for ways to motivate our
projects a lot more to participate (not only with talks, but also getting
people to come).
just my opinion
rgds
jan i.
On Feb 2, 2015, at 11:11 AM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH
See http://community.apache.org/gsoc.html for I fo on GSoC and
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Subham Sonimailto:subham.soni...@gmail.com
Sent: 2/2/2015 12:43 AM
To: dev@community.apache.orgmailto:dev@community.apache.org
Subject: Contributing to Apache
been
announced.
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)mailto:ross.gard...@microsoft.com
Sent: 2/2/2015 7:56 AM
To: dev@community.apache.orgmailto:dev@community.apache.org
Subject: RE: Contributing to Apache
See http://community.apache.org
I don't believe there is (certainly shouldn't be) a restriction on wiki access.
That said as a PMC member I was completely unaware there is a ComDev wiki.
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Bertrand Delacretazmailto:bdelacre...@apache.org
Sent: 2/5/2015 1:05 AM
Allowing everyone to rate every session will always result in an average of
accept. I recommend the individual track leads make a judgement call. They can
consult with any experts they feel they should
We want great content, not averaged content.
The model we use in GSoC works well (the
).
just my opinion
rgds
jan i.
On Feb 2, 2015, at 11:11 AM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
Great job Rich, and those who helped.
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Rich Bowenmailto:rbo...@rcbowen.com
Sent: 2/2/2015 12:19
Where are you seeing discouragement of pilot projects? Any volunteer can step
up and deliver any pilot for the foundation on a voluntary basis. We are set up
to do that.
However, if a service stood up by a volunteer becomes a core part of the ASF
then that must be maintained in an ongoing
edit you do will
generate an email with the new project data and send it to dev@community.a.o,
as a review measure.
I hope this will make it easier for people to jump in and help with
creating the site :)
With regards,
Daniel.
On 2015-01-14 18:53, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
Daniel
the site :)
With regards,
Daniel.
On 2015-01-14 18:53, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
Daniel,
There is no assuming just do it :-)
You have a number of ComDev PMC members saying +1, and you are a PMC member
yourself. Let's have the code where we can start working on it and let's
) to access
and contribute to ASF mailing lists.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) [mailto:ross.gard...@microsoft.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2015 07:29
To: dev@community.apache.org
Subject: RE: Mailinglists - a tool from the 90s?
For me any alternative
Having read the while thread, to date, I find I have nothing to add other than
a hearty +1
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Daniel Grunomailto:humbed...@apache.org
Sent: 1/14/2015 3:48 AM
To: dev@community.apache.orgmailto:dev@community.apache.org
Subject:
This requires that infra maintain a running instance of OfBiz and that any
ComDev member who wants to help out needs to learn OfBiz. Have you consulted
with infra? Can ComDev members be expected to learn OfBiz in order to make a
small tweak?
It seems to me that whilst the extra functionality
: projects.apache.org overhaul proposal
On 14 Jan 2015, at 10:36, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
As I said when you originally raised this I would recommend focusing on a
committee that tracks other data, data that is not currently well structured.
Trademarks, media
, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
This requires that infra maintain a running instance of OfBiz and that any
ComDev member who wants to help out needs to learn OfBiz. Have you
consulted with infra? Can ComDev members be expected to learn OfBiz
Daniel,
There is no assuming just do it :-)
You have a number of ComDev PMC members saying +1, and you are a PMC member
yourself. Let's have the code where we can start working on it and let's get it
to feature parity with projects.apache.org ASAP. I agree with Rich that there
is value in
There are many reasons why the ASF requires projects to use its own servers for
some items. For example, we couldn't use GitHub until we had built a system
that would provide adequate traceability of contributions.
Failure to do that would have meant it was no longer possible to provide the
I agree Joe,
We only have a very few immutable rules. Everything else is policy. As long as
policy don't break those immutable rules the they can shift and change as much
as they need to in order to empower individual project communities.
Coincidentally I wrote a presentation on this very
Yep. I've added some such comments, but got frustrated with the only CFP so am
now working in a spreadsheet you can't see (sorry).
If you see my name in a owning comment drop me a mail and we can talk about
which track it fits best.
Sent from my Windows Phone
[mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 9:50 AM
To: dev@community.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Way talks
On 16 February 2015 at 16:51, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
I think that's exactly it. If we write policy down it becomes a rule.
Huh?
Written
Thanks Joe, if you don't mind I'd like to hold on the container track. I'm
putting together a larger group of cloud tracks and trying to weave a
narrative through the whole thing. This includes containers. The good news is
you and I mostly agree on the valuable container related talks are. I'll
It's probably best we start an online doc somewhere...
Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
-Original Message-
From: Rich Bowen [mailto:rbo...@rcbowen.com]
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 12:29 PM
To: dev@community.apache.org
Subject: Re: Knowing which
] Proposed tracks Community + Containers
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015, at 02:01 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
Thanks Joe, if you don't mind I'd like to hold on the container track.
I'm putting together a larger group of cloud tracks and trying to weave
a narrative through the whole thing. This includes
: Rich Bowen [mailto:rbo...@rcbowen.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 11:35 AM
To: dev@community.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ApacheCon] Big Data track?
On 02/17/2015 02:29 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015, at 12:13 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
I'll do this as part of my
? Also when I might see your draft track?
Thanks.
On 02/17/2015 01:13 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
I'll do this as part of my Cloud tracks (see why I chose such a broad
term ;-)
Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
-Original Message-
From
, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
Thanks Joe, if you don't mind I'd like to hold on the container track.
I'm putting together a larger group of cloud tracks and trying to weave
a narrative through the whole thing. This includes containers. The good
news is you and I mostly agree on the valuable
To: dev@community.apache.orgmailto:dev@community.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ApacheCon NA 2015] Proposed tracks Community + Containers
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015, at 02:01 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
Thanks Joe, if you don't mind I'd like to hold on the container track.
I'm putting together a larger
form a big part of ACNA, we really need a higher number of
wait-listed tasks.
just for info, adding the row# from the spreadsheet, helps the postprocess
work.
rgds
jan i
On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
Formatting is screwy, here's
Re pushing out to PMCs. Historically this has not been a good idea. Once you
have 200+ PMCs and PPMCs fighting over 200+ slots you get a horribly disjointed
program with no real value.
This is one reason why I want LF to set the theme. We can then create a smaller
list of PMCs that fit the
cloud based VMs to build community
-Original Message-
From: Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) [mailto:ross.gard...@microsoft.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 7:52 AM
To: dev@community.apache.org
Subject: RE: DevOps tracks
Damn wrapping messed up again, here's a readable version (removed
I just added 4 sessions. There is one more for the community track if Joe wants
it (not in CFP). So there is space for a 6 session track from Hadrian.
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: jan imailto:j...@apache.org
Sent: 2/19/2015 7:59 AM
To:
Zero to Test Driven Infrastructure Workflow in Six Hours
Using cloud based VMs to build community
-Original Message-
From: Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) [mailto:ross.gard...@microsoft.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 6:15 AM
To: dev@community.apache.org
Subject: DevOps tracks
Rich
Subject: Re: Cloud, Big Data and DevOps tracks
What happened with the container track? I don't see that reflected in the
Cloud track.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015, at 12:23 AM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
I've put together three tracks (if there is space), if not then we can
talk about which ones
Are you willing to organize this? I've never been much of a fan of poster
sessions at conferences, but others will strongly disagree with me, I'm sure.
It might be a good idea to have these in the hackathon space. Where folks from
the involved projects are present they could locate themselves
talks
On Sat, 14 Feb 2015, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
There is value in these sessions, some people are completely new and we
probably should still schedule them. However, I think we ought to do
some new stuff along the lines of:
How is the ASF different from other foundations?
Why
Sent: 2/14/2015 9:48 AM
To: dev@community.apache.orgmailto:dev@community.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Way talks
On 14-02-2015, at 11:47, Nick Burch n...@apache.org wrote:
On Sat, 14 Feb 2015, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
There is value in these sessions, some people are completely new
You can submit at any level you want. The conference tends to have very
technical folk as well as some more general decision maker folks.
We particularly like sessions that tell the story of how Apache software has
improved things for you and your company in some way. This could be a case
+1 to What Rich says
Community managed examinations are unlikely to be adequately maintained.
However, someone making a living out of it whilst also respecting our marks
helps to grow the community. We should leave that space open for people with
the time and skills.
Ross
Microsoft Open
LGTM
Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
-Original Message-
From: Rich Bowen [mailto:rbo...@rcbowen.com]
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 1:19 PM
To: dev@community.apache.org
Subject: Re: DevOps tracks
On 02/19/2015 08:54 AM, jan i wrote:
Hold on
need that by Sunday if possible. Thanks.
On 02/19/2015 03:54 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
Yep, I'll get it ASAP and share here.
Ross
-Original Message-
From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.net]
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 3:48 PM
To: dev@community.apache.org
+1 to lazy consensus - this is a reversible step
-Original Message-
From: Ulrich Stärk [mailto:u...@spielviel.de]
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 10:08 AM
To: dev@community.apache.org
Subject: Re: commit rights to ComDev non-community.a.o site resources
Actually I just realized how dumb
in the
characterization, however)
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 12:04 AM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
I said the ASF not Apache Foo. I do agree with your observation with
respect to Apache Foo. Any project which fails to recognize merit of any
sort should reconsider
Is it really necessary for our web pages to be served from Apache hardware? If
so, why?
I understand why we want to control the canonical source, but do we really need
to own web server?
A concern, for me, would be if hosting on GitHub Pages meant that we could not
easily switch to another
: [ApacheCon] Scheduling help, pass 2
On 03/11/2015 03:05 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
I can give you a content one for mobile (Cordova) as I just confirmed that a
colleague here will be at ApacheCon to organize a tooling BoF on Cordova with
some colleagues in a number of other companies
I can give you a content one for mobile (Cordova) as I just confirmed that a
colleague here will be at ApacheCon to organize a tooling BoF on Cordova with
some colleagues in a number of other companies (Adobe currently being
confirmed). I'll get an abstract out of him to consider along with any
of Universal
App enabler. During this session we will demonstrate what Universal App means
in the context of Cordova. We will look at tooling that can be used to deliver
on the Cordova vision of Universal App (and Cross Platform) paradigm.
-Original Message-
From: Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH
: Rich Bowen [mailto:rbo...@rcbowen.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 3:46 PM
To: dev@community.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ApacheCon] Scheduling help, pass 2
On 03/11/2015 04:53 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
Oh, that was my case study session. That's not so easy to replace.
I do have
+1
Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
-Original Message-
From: Rich Bowen [mailto:rbo...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, March 6, 2015 8:53 AM
To: dev
Subject: [VOTE] Replace projects.apache.org with projects-new.apache.org
I'd like for us to go ahead and
I'm -1 on using Apache Foo in a job title. It great confusion between the
paid role and the community role. The community role is not attached to a paid
role. It is connected to the individual.
I see no reason why individuals can't also use ASF titles where appropriate.
I see no problem with a
Subject: Re: What's the ideal job title for somebody who is payed to help ASF
communities grow?
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
I'm -1 on using Apache Foo in a job title. It great confusion between the
paid role and the community role
Given what Joe said is exactly what I said I really object to this
confrontational approach.
To your specific question, if someone is speaking *for* a project then they can
only do so with the permission of the project (being a PMC member or committer
does not automatically bestow that
, Mar 8, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
Who said we allow it for engineers? My position is the same for any
community member no matter what they do.
It is all over LI
...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
Who said we allow it for engineers? My position is the same for any
community member no matter what they do
@community.apache.org
Subject: Re: What's the ideal job title for somebody who is payed to help ASF
communities grow?
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
Who said
grow?
Ideally and aspirationally, that is true. Practically speaking, definitely not
true.
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
Once again, the ASF makes no distinction between code and other
contributions.
Sent from Windows Mail
, no news since then.
Can you shed some light on who is driving this atm?
Cheers,
Uli
On 2015-03-12 21:22, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
Today Google announced that Google Code will be shutting down Jan 25, 2016.
We need to create a replacement for Apache-extras. Can we please make
,
Uli
On 2015-03-12 21:40, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
Moving board@ to BCC
I am *not* working on it. I have no idea who said I was (I do hope it
wasn't me!)
All I know is that Jim, David and Roberto are working on it, I don't
know how actively but it is now a priority.
I believe
Today Google announced that Google Code will be shutting down Jan 25, 2016.
We need to create a replacement for Apache-extras. Can we please make sure that
progress on this is reported in the ComDev board report each quarter.
I suggest the starting point should be to expand discussions with
Sally we could weave this into the diversity angle, as a reminder I intend to
use the state of the feather to acknowledge that we have mostly failed to move
the needle on diversity in our community, that very little works (GSoC is a
good example of something that does work), accept we don’t
I’m around until the end of next week
Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
From: Sally Khudairi [mailto:sallykhuda...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 1:15 PM
To: Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH); dev@community.apache.org
Cc: Sally Khudairi; pr
, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
Ahhh... I see no that's just code for I don't have time, but these
folks have shown interest ;-)
I'm happy to help make sure we hit this deadline, but I'm not driving it.
Ross
-Original Message
This has nothing to do with the AOO downloads, it only affects apache-extras.
As far as I'm aware AOO downloads have been fine for a very long time - has
that changed?
Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
-Original Message-
From: jan i
facilitate the move (and
hence our involvement thus far).
On Thursday, March 12, 2015, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
It seems there is confusion over who owns the decision. Happy for it
to be ComDev if you are happy from infra perspective.
Ross
Microsoft
in October David asked for feedback on a proof of concept, no
news since then.
Can you shed some light on who is driving this atm?
Cheers,
Uli
On 2015-03-12 21:22, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
Today Google announced that Google Code will be shutting down Jan 25, 2016.
We need
At this point you should make your interest known on the existing Groovy lists.
The project has not yet made a proposal to the incubator, I'm sure they could
use help with that.
Alternatively wait until the proposal hits gene...@incubator.apache.org and get
involved there.
Sent from my
An excellent thought, but every service adds overhead on the infra team. If
there were enough projects demanding it I guess we would find a way of
providing it. So how many projects demand it? Do infra feel that that is
enough?
What if infra provided VMs and PMCs managed the instances
are more represented than
those that didn't.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:16 AM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
I covered that in a separate mail. In the end I left your track untouched.
I've recorded it in the spreadsheet as a container track for you.
Ross
trying to not be outsmarted by his Shetland sheepdog
while watching British panel quiz shows.
-Original Message-
From: Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 12:51 PM
To: dev@community.apache.org
Subject: RE: ApacheCon Schedule
I can't comment on the time (I haven't
Decision on the below?
-Original Message-
From: Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) [mailto:ross.gard...@microsoft.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 4:21 PM
To: dev@community.apache.org
Subject: Proposed Cordova replacement session (was RE: [ApacheCon] Scheduling
help, pass 2)
Here's
Trials lead to services that need to be maintained. No trial unless we know we
can maintain it.
For that to happen someone needs to come up with a full proposal for the infra
team to evaluate with clear justification for the approach and clarity on how
ASF budgets would need to scale to
I'm changing the recipient list to our infrastructure team who can better
advise on this.
Ross
-Original Message-
From: Baruch Burstein [mailto:bmburst...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 12:50 PM
To: dev@community.apache.org
Subject: Dump of entire asf repo
Hi all,
I was
http://community.apache.org/speakers/slides.html
for updated stats see https://projects-new.apache.org/ (will eventually be
projects.apache.org)
-Original Message-
From: Krzysztof Sobkowiak [mailto:krzys.sobkow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2015 1:16 PM
To:
exactly the Apache License mean for slides? How can
the Apache licensed slides be reused?
Regards
Krzysztof
On 02.04.2015 23:42, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
You need to look for license information in each of the files. For my own
decks on there they should be considered Apache licensed
ApacheCon is created by the LF. It will have a tighter focus on talks that
bring people. Our community defined and selected tracks simply do not create a
good conference (from the perspective of the paying attendee).
What this means is that we have, moving forwards, very little say in what
*we* do not have to ask it. The LF do.
The ASF are responsible for proposing (via CFP) content. We are not responsible
for selecting it.
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Pierre Smitsmailto:pierre.sm...@gmail.com
Sent: 4/20/2015 8:05 AM
To:
Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
*we* do not have to ask it. The LF do.
The ASF are responsible for proposing (via CFP) content. We are not
responsible
Edward, I will send you the State of the Feather presentation offlist.
Ross
-Original Message-
From: Edward J. Yoon [mailto:edwardy...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2015 12:09 AM
To: dev@community.apache.org
Subject: I'm looking for State of the Feather filetype:pptx
Hi community,
Edward, I should also have pointed you at some useful speaker materials at
http://community.apache.org/speakers/slides.html (state of the feather is in
you inbox).
-Original Message-
From: Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) [mailto:ross.gard...@microsoft.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2015 12:26
Fair enough. It happens. I suspect the real concern was that the reg list might
have been shared. Thanks for confirming that wasn't the case.
Ross
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Roman Shaposhnikmailto:ro...@shaposhnik.org
Sent: 5/14/2015 4:12 PM
To:
Anyone can do whatever they want with whatever level of attribution they feel
is appropriate where my decks are concerned. No need to complicate things with
policies or best practice guidelines for anyone to worry about. Just do what
feels right.
Thank you for sharing the world of the ASF, I
To get people involved we need to provide value. Today, we offer no value. So,
if I may, I would like to answer a slightly different question. The one I want
to answer is how can we provide value so that PMCs will proactively maintain a
central events calendar? Here's my starting answer, more
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
