Hi. I ended up skipping my Spanish class and signing onto the Youtube
broadcast. I took some longer note, feel free to skim through:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IVyfFZ-kCIkg1Cnftxfm3viXHpxpJ2zdVa8B1CK0qU0/(Was
going to paste them but they turned out a lot longer than I
remembered...)
I
Reminder, this is today.
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 2:11 PM, James Jong wjamesj...@gmail.com wrote:
- Latest updates / strategic direction on medic CI
-James Jong
On Oct 15, 2013, at 11:30 AM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
This is coming up this Thursday! What do people want
will this also be a hangout like last time
On Oct 17, 2013, at 10:13 AM, Michal Mocny mmo...@chromium.org wrote:
Reminder, this is today.
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 2:11 PM, James Jong wjamesj...@gmail.com wrote:
- Latest updates / strategic direction on medic CI
-James Jong
On Oct
Yes, is that a concern?
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Lucas Holmquist lholm...@redhat.comwrote:
will this also be a hangout like last time
On Oct 17, 2013, at 10:13 AM, Michal Mocny mmo...@chromium.org wrote:
Reminder, this is today.
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 2:11 PM, James Jong
Nope, just wondering if there was a sign up sheet like last time, i didn't
see one other than the doodle about the times
On Oct 17, 2013, at 10:31 AM, Michal Mocny mmo...@chromium.org wrote:
Yes, is that a concern?
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Lucas Holmquist
I don't know that the invite list was super useful last time.
We will post the URL to the public stream here at 5:30 and post
instructions on how to join the stream for those who want to speak. Once
again we will be limited to 10, so please use the viewing-only option if
you can.
-Michal
On
template create CLI command yay. Night all.
i believe i've started something for that
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-4886
Sent from my Windows Phone From: Lucas Holmquist
Sent: 17/10/2013 23:33
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: Post 3.1 release committer community meeting
What time zone is this 5:30 PM occurring in? It was implied earlier that this
was EST, but not absolutely stated.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 17, 2013, at 7:39 AM, Michal Mocny mmo...@chromium.org wrote:
I don't know that the invite list was super useful last time.
We will post the URL
EST.
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 12:05 PM, purplecabbage purplecabb...@gmail.comwrote:
What time zone is this 5:30 PM occurring in? It was implied earlier that
this was EST, but not absolutely stated.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 17, 2013, at 7:39 AM, Michal Mocny mmo...@chromium.org wrote:
I meant that we'll be using my laptop here in Vancouver at the Regus
space. Who is hosting the hangout?
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
So, can I get an invite to the hangout? I'll be hosting it from the
Regus space in Vancouver.
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at
So, can I get an invite to the hangout? I'll be hosting it from the
Regus space in Vancouver.
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Michal Mocny mmo...@chromium.org wrote:
EST.
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 12:05 PM, purplecabbage
purplecabb...@gmail.comwrote:
What time zone is this 5:30 PM
Okay, for those who want to be able to talk:
https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/a8df1213897c69821d177842af7d2bfbf948ef2b
I'll post the viewing link closer to 5:30
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
I meant that we'll be using my laptop here in Vancouver at
Also, if you're having trouble connecting, I'll be on IRC.
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
Okay, for those who want to be able to talk:
https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/a8df1213897c69821d177842af7d2bfbf948ef2b
I'll post the viewing link closer
And here's the viewing link!
http://youtu.be/X3bUWVHeJJ0
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
Also, if you're having trouble connecting, I'll be on IRC.
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.orgwrote:
Okay, for those who
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Michal Mocny mmo...@chromium.org wrote:
My Short notes from meeting, longer emails to follow about some of these
topics:
CI/Medic brief description
Summarize Mike's CordovaTests prototype
-- Looks good, but do we support
for cordova.
Repository: cordova-site
Description
---
3.1 release blog post
Diffs
-
/www/_posts/2013-10-01-cordova-31.md PRE-CREATION
/www/css/_master.less 1528178
/www/css/main.css 1528178
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14429/diff/
Testing
- Latest updates / strategic direction on medic CI
-James Jong
On Oct 15, 2013, at 11:30 AM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
This is coming up this Thursday! What do people want to talk about? Here's
a couple to get us going:
- Plugin registry download counts (Are these
This is coming up this Thursday! What do people want to talk about? Here's
a couple to get us going:
- Plugin registry download counts (Are these available yet)
- Idea: Split cordova-cli-lib from cordova-cli on NPM (have cordova-cli and
phonegap-cli depend on cordova-cli-lib)
- Michal's work on
Okay, options are updated for the poll (http://doodle.com/2pmy2ptafmxsrna2)
For those who filled it out, sorry, you will need to do it again.
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Michal Mocny mmo...@google.com wrote:
Ugh Sorry that was a misreading of course. I'll set up a new doodle
tomorrow
Ugh Sorry that was a misreading of course. I'll set up a new doodle
tomorrow morning.
On 2013-10-06 1:52 AM, Tommy Williams to...@devgeeks.org wrote:
+1 for post 16th for Joe availability.
Also, thanks for thinking of Australia... One benefit of the time of year,
the nasty time difference
+1 for post 16th for Joe availability.
Also, thanks for thinking of Australia... One benefit of the time of year,
the nasty time difference just got an hour better today...
- tommy
On 5 Oct 2013 08:33, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote:
I filled it out, however, Joe is not available until
Hi everyone,
After the 3.0 release we had a successful Google Hangout session to discuss
lots of topics.
Now that 3.1 is out should we look at kicking off another Google Hangout
for our various locations?
Cheers,
Al
Sounds good! I was thinking the same thing :)
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Al Harding alharding...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
After the 3.0 release we had a successful Google Hangout session to discuss
lots of topics.
Now that 3.1 is out should we look at kicking off another Google
Yes, let's do it.
I am unavailable until the 11th, but after that, let's hang.
(UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US Canada)
@purplecabbage
risingj.com
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
Sounds good! I was thinking the same thing :)
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at
I'm unavailable until after the 15th. I'll be at Big Android BBQ.
11-15 sounds like the range to shoot for. I'll set up a doodle..
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm unavailable until after the 15th. I'll be at Big Android BBQ.
http://www.doodle.com/2pmy2ptafmxsrna2
I put a lot of options for time (sorry) since I wasn't sure if we should be
europe or australia friendly this time.
There are also three options this time: yes, (yes), no, where the middle
option is supposed to be a prefer not, but if need be, fine
-Michal
: cordova-site
Description
---
3.1 release blog post
Diffs (updated)
-
/www/_posts/2013-10-01-cordova-31.md PRE-CREATION
/www/css/_master.less 1528178
/www/css/main.css 1528178
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14429/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Andrew Grieve
for cordova.
Repository: cordova-site
Description
---
3.1 release blog post
Diffs
-
/www/_posts/2013-10-01-cordova-31.md PRE-CREATION
/www/css/_master.less 1528178
/www/css/main.css 1528178
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14429/diff/
Testing
---
3.1 release blog post
Diffs
-
/cordova/site/www/_posts/2013-10-01-cordova-31.md PRE-CREATION
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14429/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Andrew Grieve
: cordova-site
Description
---
3.1 release blog post
Diffs (updated)
-
/cordova/site/www/_posts/2013-10-01-cordova-31.md PRE-CREATION
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14429/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Andrew Grieve
generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14429/
---
(Updated Oct. 2, 2013, 12:47 a.m.)
Review request for cordova.
Repository: cordova-site
Description
---
3.1 release blog post
Diffs
/14429/
---
(Updated Oct. 2, 2013, 12:47 a.m.)
Review request for cordova.
Repository: cordova-site
Description
---
3.1 release blog post
Diffs
-
/cordova/site/www/_posts/2013-10-01-cordova-31.md PRE
would
like
to
read up on the details look there.
No one likes the situation, we've been making headway into fixing
it
ever
since we discovered the problem, and it can be resolved as soon as
users
upgrade from 3.0 (maybe that means we can switch after 3.1
release
discovered the problem, and it can be resolved as soon as
users
upgrade from 3.0 (maybe that means we can switch after 3.1
release,
maybe
that means we wait for some 3-months deprecation time, not sure).
-Michal
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Braden Shepherdson
since we discovered the problem, and it can be resolved as soon as users
upgrade from 3.0 (maybe that means we can switch after 3.1 release, maybe
that means we wait for some 3-months deprecation time, not sure).
-Michal
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.org
switch after 3.1 release,
maybe
that means we wait for some 3-months deprecation time, not sure).
-Michal
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Braden Shepherdson
bra...@chromium.org
wrote:
I agree with Joe that developing on anything other than master sucks.
But
unfortunately
be resolved as soon as
users
upgrade from 3.0 (maybe that means we can switch after 3.1 release,
maybe
that means we wait for some 3-months deprecation time, not sure).
-Michal
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Braden Shepherdson
bra...@chromium.org
wrote:
I agree
that means we can switch after 3.1 release,
maybe
that means we wait for some 3-months deprecation time, not sure).
-Michal
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Braden Shepherdson
bra...@chromium.org
wrote:
I agree with Joe that developing on anything other than master
it
ever
since we discovered the problem, and it can be resolved as soon as
users
upgrade from 3.0 (maybe that means we can switch after 3.1 release,
maybe
that means we wait for some 3-months deprecation time, not sure).
-Michal
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 9:51 AM
3.1.0 is coincidental and it's temporary for this release because I
wasn't sure where to get the code from and didn't want to compromise
master or dev. I could have called it something else.
Jesse, I'd advise you to commit to dev. Everything will be merged to
master eventually.
So to re-iterate
Yes, let's get this cleared up - confused myself.
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 3:52 AM, Anis KADRI anis.ka...@gmail.com wrote:
3.1.0 is coincidental and it's temporary for this release because I
wasn't sure where to get the code from and didn't want to compromise
master or dev. I could have
I agree with Joe that developing on anything other than master sucks. But
unfortunately, our hands are tied in the near term because the registry
doesn't know to fetch plugins from anywhere else. Also it makes life easier
for being who are installing plugins from git URLs.
I think we eventually
upgrade from 3.0 (maybe that means we can switch after 3.1 release, maybe
that means we wait for some 3-months deprecation time, not sure).
-Michal
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.orgwrote:
I agree with Joe that developing on anything other than master sucks
to
read up on the details look there.
No one likes the situation, we've been making headway into fixing it ever
since we discovered the problem, and it can be resolved as soon as users
upgrade from 3.0 (maybe that means we can switch after 3.1 release, maybe
that means we wait for some 3-months
I don't think we want the Cordova version (3.1.0) getting tagged in
plugins. I should think we should merge dev to master and then tag it with
the plugin's own version number, not Cordova versions. Put another way,
it's only a coincidence that this plugin release happens to be near the
Cordova
So, what are the plugins being versioned at? 3.x? 1.x?
I'm asking because the plugins are tagged with the 3.0.0 release, so
it makes sense for them to start there.
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 6:40 AM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.org wrote:
I don't think we want the Cordova version (3.1.0)
I have a small change for Windows 8 that I need to apply to all the core
plugins.
Which branch should I work from, and which should I push to?
@purplecabbage
risingj.com
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
So, what are the plugins being versioned at? 3.x?
Plugins are not tagged nor branched along with platforms. They are releases
completely independently.
Commit to the dev branch always.
For how to do a plugin release (aka merge dev into master, see
https://wiki.apache.org/cordova/StepsForPluginRelease). Anis just added a
branch for pushing them
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
Plugins are not tagged nor branched along with platforms. They are releases
completely independently.
Commit to the dev branch always.
AND FOREVER!11!!eleventyone!!!
Seriously, can't we have a stable branch
Jira issue is: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-4889
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Anis KADRI anis.ka...@gmail.com wrote:
This is what I've done. Hopefully I didn't mess up because I haven't
really followed the master/dev debate.
For each plugin:
- I created a branch and named it
...@blackberry.commailto:
jheif...@blackberry.com
Subject: Re: 3.1 Release
+Jeffrey - maybe you could take on the BlackBerry component
for
this
release?
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Michael Brooks
mich...@michaelbrooks.camailto:mich
jheif...@blackberry.commailto:
jheif...@blackberry.com
Subject: Re: 3.1 Release
+Jeffrey - maybe you could take on the BlackBerry component
for
this
release?
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Michael Brooks
mich
@cordova.apache.org
,
Jeffrey
Heifetz jheif...@blackberry.commailto:
jheif...@blackberry.com
Subject: Re: 3.1 Release
+Jeffrey - maybe you could take on the BlackBerry
component
for
this
release
Is the RC still on track to get tagged today?
I'm working on the PhoneGap-CLI and want to also release an RC version of
that when you guys have tagged.
=Ryan
On 9/20/13 1:01 PM, Steven Gill stevengil...@gmail.com wrote:
I think since it has taken longer than expected to get the RC tagged, the
I think Braden is supposed to get an RC of the cli out today. I'm told
this this may not included updated plugins yet until later, though.
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Ryan Stewart rstew...@adobe.com wrote:
Is the RC still on track to get tagged today?
I'm working on the PhoneGap-CLI
Ahh, thanks for the info. Any ETA on the updated plugins?
=Ryan
On 9/20/13 1:46 PM, Michal Mocny mmo...@chromium.org wrote:
I think Braden is supposed to get an RC of the cli out today. I'm told
this this may not included updated plugins yet until later, though.
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 4:19
I'm confused about the date for 3.1.0 final release. These two posts don't
match.
On Sep 19, 2013, at 11:27 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
Next Thursday:
- If everything seems fine with RC1, release 3.1.0 final.
On Sep 10, 2013, at 3:20 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org
I think since it has taken longer than expected to get the RC tagged, the
final release has been push till thursday to allow more time to test. Is
this correct?
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Marcel Kinard cmarc...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm confused about the date for 3.1.0 final release. These
Sorry for being silent today. I ended up not having much time to work today
:(. Mostly what I got done is more thinking about how to go about things :P.
That said, Braden did manage to take care of RC1 of CLI! Thanks Braden! (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-4837). To get it:
npm
Once the platforms are tagged, I can handle the docs. I'll need to review
our release process and see how the docs can best abide by them.
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
Shaz - Thanks for the update :). If iOS is the last one then I'd say let's
go
+Jeffrey - maybe you could take on the BlackBerry component for this
release?
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Michael Brooks
mich...@michaelbrooks.cawrote:
Once the platforms are tagged, I can handle the docs. I'll need to review
our release process and see how the docs can best abide by
...@chromium.orgmailto:agri...@chromium.org
Date: Thursday, 19 September, 2013 10:40 AM
To: dev dev@cordova.apache.orgmailto:dev@cordova.apache.org, Jeffrey
Heifetz jheif...@blackberry.commailto:jheif...@blackberry.com
Subject: Re: 3.1 Release
+Jeffrey - maybe you could take on the BlackBerry component
Heifetz jheif...@blackberry.commailto:jheif...@blackberry.com
Subject: Re: 3.1 Release
+Jeffrey - maybe you could take on the BlackBerry component for this
release?
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Michael Brooks
mich...@michaelbrooks.camailto:mich...@michaelbrooks.ca wrote:
Once
...@blackberry.commailto:jheif...@blackberry.com
Subject: Re: 3.1 Release
+Jeffrey - maybe you could take on the BlackBerry component for this release?
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Michael Brooks
mich...@michaelbrooks.camailto:mich...@michaelbrooks.ca wrote:
Once the platforms are tagged, I
@cordova.apache.orgmailto:dev@cordova.apache.org,
Jeffrey
Heifetz jheif...@blackberry.commailto:jheif...@blackberry.com
Subject: Re: 3.1 Release
+Jeffrey - maybe you could take on the BlackBerry component for this
release?
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Michael Brooks
mich
...@chromium.orgmailto:agri...@chromium.org
Date: Thursday, 19 September, 2013 10:40 AM
To: dev dev@cordova.apache.orgmailto:dev@cordova.apache.org,
Jeffrey
Heifetz jheif...@blackberry.commailto:jheif...@blackberry.com
Subject: Re: 3.1 Release
+Jeffrey - maybe you could take on the BlackBerry component
,
Jeffrey
Heifetz jheif...@blackberry.commailto:jheif...@blackberry.com
Subject: Re: 3.1 Release
+Jeffrey - maybe you could take on the BlackBerry component for
this
release?
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Michael Brooks
mich
:
agri...@chromium.org
Date: Thursday, 19 September, 2013 10:40 AM
To: dev dev@cordova.apache.orgmailto:dev@cordova.apache.org
,
Jeffrey
Heifetz jheif...@blackberry.commailto:jheif...@blackberry.com
Subject: Re: 3.1 Release
+Jeffrey - maybe you could take
Subject: Re: 3.1 Release
+Jeffrey - maybe you could take on the BlackBerry component
for
this
release?
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Michael Brooks
mich...@michaelbrooks.camailto:mich...@michaelbrooks.ca
wrote:
Once the platforms
FFOS will be tagged tomorrow. I have a few changes I am going to get in
tomorrow before tagging but it will be good to go very soon!
With FFOS, Only two plugins have been ported so far (vibration and device).
We are going to continue to add firefoxos support to plugins post release.
I don't think
When i mean ios-deploy still works, it _installs_ it on the device, but
does _not_ run it.
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm 99% done with iOS specific fixes. One last one I'm trying to do is
ios-deploy with lldb:
I'm 99% done with iOS specific fixes. One last one I'm trying to do is
ios-deploy with lldb: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-4804
This means if I don't get this fix in, we _can_ deploy from the command
line using ios-deploy _but_ we can't attach to the debugger. Will that be
acceptable
Shaz - Thanks for the update :). If iOS is the last one then I'd say let's
go without, but maybe keep at it until we get BB tagged? (just my opinion)
Heading home now - anyone know if Lorin is away or not?
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote:
When i mean
Jesse - The - in there is needed for the version to be semver-compatible.
There was some work done to support the missing -, but I think it's still
the case that without it plugins that have engine tags that require
cordova-win8 = 3.1.0 might fail to parse your version without the -.
Probably not
In other news, I had to re-tag the JS because the build label was wrong.
You can actually see it in the previous email's output. It was
3.1.0-rc1-0-g0d70465
it should be 3.1.0-rc1. I've fixed it and re-tagged the JS.
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.orgwrote:
Andrew, why don't you tag all the RC1 yourself, since you're the only
one who can.
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 7:11 AM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
Jesse - The - in there is needed for the version to be semver-compatible.
There was some work done to support the missing -, but I think
I'm totally fine with doing the branch cutting. Doing the actual testing is
the time intensive part though.
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
Andrew, why don't you tag all the RC1 yourself, since you're the only
one who can.
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 7:11
Will the plugin repos get tagged? If so, do they get tagged on every weekly
cycle, or only when a cadence lines up with a weekly cycle, or both?
I see that StepsForPluginRelease wiki say it will happen, and the most recent
coho looks like it will do it, but I currently see only tags for 3.0.0
My understanding is that the plugins are totally independent of Cordova
versions, and release on their own weekly-at-the-most-frequent cycle.
They only depend on Cordova versions when they need a sufficiently new
platform to support some feature (binary bridge, for example), and then
they set
For the last plugin release, I tagged them with the plugin's version.
(e.g. r0.2.1 for cordova-plugin-file). Only plugins that had changes were
included in the release, so some may still not have any release tags.
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.orgwrote:
My
WP7, WP8, and Windows8 are all tagged 3.1.0-rc1
re: Changelog
It is a little more difficult in these cases, and I n'er volunteered to do
it, so whatevs
- WP7+8 live in one repo, so their changes would need to be demuxed
- all the changes for Windows8 have happened in the plugin repos, and
Thanks Jesse! Great work on being on top of things. If changes were done in
plugin repos, then those aren't a part of this release anyways and will be
picked up by the RELEASENOTES.md within the plugin repos on the next
plugins release.
I think it's up to you if you want to start writing
So, what's happening with this release?
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
Sure! New plan:
Monday 16th - Create release branches tag RC of all repos
Tuesday 17th - Draft Release Blog Post (digest of changelogs)
Monday 20th - Tag 3.1.0 for all repos
Looks like no one volunteered for release master, so I'll do so for this
one.
First up is creating the release bug and branching JS / Spec. I'll get on
it and report back! :)
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
So, what's happening with this release?
On Tue,
Release Bug:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-4830
I've done the first task (tagging JS).
The release bug may not have all of the platforms that it should. Wasn't
sure if win 8 or ffos should be in the list. If so, please add them :)
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:26 PM, purplecabbage
Also - FYI - I updated the coho command today to update the VERSION file on
repo master branches to be 3.2.0-dev.
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
Release Bug:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-4830
I've done the first task (tagging JS).
You set the version on the 3.1.x branch to 3.2.x-dev.
I tried following the steps on the wiki, and coho still fails horribly
on this end. I'm going to keep tagging the old fashioned way with
git. We should try and keep use of coho only for what we have
problems with (managing multiple plugin
I am working for Win8 inclusion.
Can we skip the dash in the version number? 3.2.0-dev is problematic for
now, I can create issues to support it, but I expect at least some things
will break. 3.2.0dev works great for me.
@purplecabbage
risingj.com
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Andrew Grieve
Sure! New plan:
Monday 16th - Create release branches tag RC of all repos
Tuesday 17th - Draft Release Blog Post (digest of changelogs)
Monday 20th - Tag 3.1.0 for all repos
Tuesday 21st - Push 3.1.0-1.0.0 of CLI to npm Post blog post
While we're at it, anyone want to volunteer to be Release
I think it's time to get the ball rolling on this. It'll be the first
release post-3.0, so will likely have a few bumps to work through.
How about:
Friday 13th - Create release branches tag RC of all repos
Monday 16th - Draft Release Blog Post (digest of changelogs)
Thurs 19th - Tag 3.1.0 for
Sounds good
On Sep 9, 2013 7:50 AM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
I think it's time to get the ball rolling on this. It'll be the first
release post-3.0, so will likely have a few bumps to work through.
How about:
Friday 13th - Create release branches tag RC of all repos
92 matches
Mail list logo
