I'm back from vacation, sorry I missed all the fun on version numbering :-)
+1 on 4.x for CLI
Things I see as to continue to enhance.
- Better explain each component and how they relate (in function and
dependency) on the website/docs
- Put some of the brains into the cli to better illustrate
Agree with your points Carlos. We should make issues for some of this.
Would love to see a cordova outdated command.
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Carlos Santana csantan...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm back from vacation, sorry I missed all the fun on version numbering :-)
+1 on 4.x for CLI
Lgtm! Ship!
I'll point to it in the blog post.
On Monday, October 13, 2014, Marcel Kinard cmarc...@gmail.com wrote:
After all this discussion, it's a bit unclear to me where we are currently
at. So I took a shot at capturing it in writing it for coho/docs/
versioning-and-release-strategy.md.
Pull request has been merged. Thanks for the feedback.
On Oct 14, 2014, at 3:03 AM, Steven Gill stevengil...@gmail.com wrote:
Lgtm! Ship!
I'll point to it in the blog post.
On Monday, October 13, 2014, Marcel Kinard cmarc...@gmail.com wrote:
After all this discussion, it's a bit
After all this discussion, it's a bit unclear to me where we are currently at.
So I took a shot at capturing it in writing it for
coho/docs/versioning-and-release-strategy.md.
https://github.com/apache/cordova-coho/pull/53
I intend this to be the Current State of the discussion, not the End
Thanks Marcel, doc spells things out very clearly.
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Marcel Kinard cmarc...@gmail.com wrote:
After all this discussion, it's a bit unclear to me where we are currently
at. So I took a shot at capturing it in writing it for coho/docs/
for the next release :)
On 10/9/14, 3:01 PM, Chuck Lantz cla...@microsoft.com wrote:
+1
-Chuck
-Original Message-
From: Jesse [mailto:purplecabb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 2:55 PM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: Independent platform release summary
+1
, 2014 2:55 PM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: Independent platform release summary
+1 to not voting ;) , it implies we will wait 72 hours before moving on.
How about if anyone is completely against 10.0.0 they voice it here, in
the next couple hours, otherwise we move
-
From: Jesse [mailto:purplecabb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 2:55 PM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: Independent platform release summary
+1 to not voting ;) , it implies we will wait 72 hours before moving
on.
How about if anyone is completely
-
From: brian.ler...@gmail.com [mailto:brian.ler...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Brian
LeRoux
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 9:49 AM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: Independent platform release summary
As is 4.
This is more of an outreach, marketing, blogging, tweeting, etc problem
: Independent platform release summary
With this direction, there is no single number. Users should not
functionally care about CLI version, so there will just be the platform
versions that matter, really.
Downstreams can of course put labels on combinations of versions, so
PhoneGap 4 may
Subject: Re: Independent platform release summary
+1 to not voting ;) , it implies we will wait 72 hours before moving
on.
How about if anyone is completely against 10.0.0 they voice it here,
in
the next couple hours, otherwise we move forward.
@purplecabbage
, it doesn't seem as if that should matter.
Leo
-Original Message-
From: brian.ler...@gmail.com [mailto:brian.ler...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Brian LeRoux
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 9:49 AM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: Independent platform release summary
As is 4
-Original Message-
From: Jesse [mailto:purplecabb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 2:55 PM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: Independent platform release summary
+1 to not voting ;) , it implies we will wait 72 hours before
moving
1:47 PM
To: Treggiari, Leo
Cc: Michal Mocny; Marcel Kinard; dev
Subject: Re: Independent platform release summary
With this direction, there is no single number. Users should not functionally
care about CLI version, so there will just be the platform versions that
matter, really.
Downstreams
: Re: Independent platform release summary
+1 to not voting ;) , it implies we will wait 72 hours before
moving
on.
How about if anyone is completely against 10.0.0 they voice it
here,
in
the next couple hours, otherwise we move forward
-
From: Jesse [mailto:purplecabb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 2:55 PM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: Independent platform release summary
+1 to not voting ;) , it implies we will wait 72 hours before
moving
on.
How
-
From: Jesse [mailto:purplecabb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 2:55 PM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: Independent platform release summary
+1 to not voting ;) , it implies we will wait 72 hours
before
moving
on.
How
, October 9, 2014 2:55 PM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: Independent platform release summary
+1 to not voting ;) , it implies we will wait 72 hours
before
moving
on.
How about if anyone is completely against 10.0.0 they
voice
Message-
From: Jesse [mailto:purplecabb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 2:55 PM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: Independent platform release summary
+1 to not voting ;) , it implies we will wait 72 hours
before
moving
]
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 2:55 PM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: Independent platform release summary
+1 to not voting ;) , it implies we will wait 72 hours
before
moving
on.
How about if anyone
: Independent platform release summary
+1 to not voting ;) , it implies we will wait 72 hours
before
moving
on.
How about if anyone is completely against 10.0.0 they
voice it
here,
in
the next couple hours, otherwise we move
:55 PM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: Independent platform release summary
+1 to not voting ;) , it implies we will wait 72
hours
before
moving
on.
How about if anyone is completely against 10.0.0
they
voice
: Marcel Kinard; dev
Subject: RE: Independent platform release
summary
I'll have to admit that this seems a bit
weird.
That
is,
independent versions of the CLI and
platforms,
with
a
Cordova
release named
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: Independent platform release summary
+1 to not voting ;) , it implies we will wait 72
hours
before
moving
on.
How about if anyone is completely against 10.0.0
-Original Message-
From: Jesse [mailto:purplecabb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 2:55 PM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: Independent platform release
summary
+1 to not voting
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Michal Mocny mmo...@chromium.org wrote:
Thanks everyone for participation in what was a long and grueling
discussion.
Summary of current proposal:
- Cad-ver is dead.
- Everything moves Sem-ver, with platforms continuing from current
versions and diverging
To: Treggiari, Leo
Cc: Michal Mocny; Marcel Kinard; dev
Subject: Re: Independent platform release summary
With this direction, there is no single number. Users should not functionally
care about CLI version, so there will just be the platform versions that
matter, really.
Downstreams can of course put
-
From: Treggiari, Leo [mailto:leo.treggi...@intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 12:23 PM
To: Michal Mocny
Cc: Marcel Kinard; dev
Subject: RE: Independent platform release summary
I’ll have to admit that this seems a bit weird. That is, independent versions
of the CLI and platforms
-Original Message-
From: Treggiari, Leo [mailto:leo.treggi...@intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 12:23 PM
To: Michal Mocny
Cc: Marcel Kinard; dev
Subject: RE: Independent platform release summary
I'll have to admit that this seems a bit weird. That is, independent
versions
, but the CLI bug can't.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-7670
-Chuck
-Original Message-
From: Treggiari, Leo [mailto:leo.treggi...@intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 12:23 PM
To: Michal Mocny
Cc: Marcel Kinard; dev
Subject: RE: Independent platform release summary
I'll have
Message-
From: Treggiari, Leo [mailto:leo.treggi...@intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 12:23 PM
To: Michal Mocny
Cc: Marcel Kinard; dev
Subject: RE: Independent platform release summary
I'll have to admit that this seems a bit weird. That is, independent
versions of the CLI
.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-7670
-Chuck
-Original Message-
From: Treggiari, Leo [mailto:leo.treggi...@intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 12:23 PM
To: Michal Mocny
Cc: Marcel Kinard; dev
Subject: RE: Independent platform release summary
I'll have to admit
@cordova.apache.org
Cc: Michal Mocny; Marcel Kinard
Subject: Re: Independent platform release summary
I think vladimir fixed the bug. We just need to release now.
Only thing holding back the release now is consensus on the version of the cli.
It seemed like most people were leaning toward 10.0.0
and allows independent platform rev'ing.
-Chuck
-Original Message-
From: Steven Gill [mailto:stevengil...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 2:13 PM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Cc: Michal Mocny; Marcel Kinard
Subject: Re: Independent platform release summary
I think vladimir fixed
.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-7670
-Chuck
-Original Message-
From: Treggiari, Leo [mailto:leo.treggi...@intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 12:23 PM
To: Michal Mocny
Cc: Marcel Kinard; dev
Subject: RE: Independent platform release summary
I'll have
Kinard
Subject: Re: Independent platform release summary
I think vladimir fixed the bug. We just need to release now.
Only thing holding back the release now is consensus on the version of
the cli. It seemed like most people were leaning toward 10.0.0. Should I
move forward
+1
-Chuck
-Original Message-
From: Jesse [mailto:purplecabb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 2:55 PM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: Independent platform release summary
+1 to not voting ;) , it implies we will wait 72 hours before moving on.
How about if anyone
bug can't.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-7670
-Chuck
-Original Message-
From: Treggiari, Leo [mailto:leo.treggi...@intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 12:23 PM
To: Michal Mocny
Cc: Marcel Kinard; dev
Subject: RE: Independent platform release summary
I'll have to admit
: Michal Mocny; Marcel Kinard
Subject: Re: Independent platform release summary
I think vladimir fixed the bug. We just need to release now.
Only thing holding back the release now is consensus on the version
of the cli. It seemed like most people were leaning toward 10.0.0.
Should I
So it looks like Today 1-3 EST or Friday 1-3 EST are the best times. I'm
going to start the ball rolling to do this TODAY, but if that proves too
short notices we'll move it to Friday.
I'll email out links to hangout at 12:30 or so, and I'm hoping Steven can
make it before 2pm since he's been
Sounds good! I'll definitely try to make it back for that. Have to be at
the dmv this morning. Should be back by 2est
On Wednesday, October 8, 2014, Michal Mocny mmo...@chromium.org wrote:
So it looks like Today 1-3 EST or Friday 1-3 EST are the best times. I'm
going to start the ball rolling
+dev list again
Not everyone could make 1pm, not everyone could make 2pm. While I don't
think we need a full 2 hours, I'm hoping to start late and end early --
proving opportunity people to pop in at either time and chime in.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Marcel Kinard cmarc...@gmail.com
External Public link for those that just want to watch/chat:
https://plus.google.com/events/cm4l0vifcig920qkhpn5stqiet4
Hangout link to join the conversation:
https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/hoaevent/AP36tYcNwXEyet4Xv_23HiTl4IK0jsM4NlmGy5kbLsPIW3SnOsUEIQ?authuser=0hl=en
See you in 30 minutes.
Thanks everyone for participation in what was a long and grueling
discussion.
Summary of current proposal:
- Cad-ver is dead.
- Everything moves Sem-ver, with platforms continuing from current versions
and diverging over time.
- CLI potentially gets a significant version bump to showcase this
: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 1:13 PM
To: Michal Mocny
Cc: Marcel Kinard; dev
Subject: Re: Independent platform release summary
Thanks everyone for participation in what was a long and grueling
discussion.
Summary of current proposal:
- Cad-ver is dead.
- Everything moves Sem-ver, with platforms continuing
Leo wrote:
I don't think we closed on this (I had to leave the meeting a little
early) but a remaining question is how to version what we (and users)
call Cordova. Assuming a Cordova version is a point in time
collection of the latest CLI version + platform versions + plugin
versions. Is the
...@google.com [mailto:mmo...@google.com] On Behalf Of Michal
Mocny
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 1:13 PM
To: Michal Mocny
Cc: Marcel Kinard; dev
Subject: Re: Independent platform release summary
Thanks everyone for participation in what was a long and grueling
discussion.
Summary of current
Michal Mocny wrote:
Thanks everyone for participation in what was a long and grueling
discussion.
Summary of current proposal:
- Cad-ver is dead.
- Everything moves Sem-ver, with platforms continuing from current
versions
and diverging over time.
- CLI potentially gets a significant version bump
Of Andrew
Grieve
Sent: Sunday, 5 October 2014 5:05 AM
To: Treggiari, Leo
Cc: Brian LeRoux; Andrew Grieve; dev@cordova.apache.org; Marcel Kinard
Subject: Re: Independent platform release summary
To the best of my knowledge, the version numbers of platforms do not
signify
(d) CLI versions completely independent of platforms, just like plugins.
- In this case, we need to implement platform-cli version requirements
(node peerDependancies?)
- Basically means we play down CLI version entirely, users are just
expected to stay up to date with CLI always.
Here is a doodle for those interested -- but if this timeline is too hasty
we can figure out a future date: http://doodle.com/a2nd8n3z8dm4ffbx. I'm
rather busy for two weeks starting next week (as are many of us in prep for
sh dev conf pgday) so really hope we can do this this week.
I'll put
+dev list again :P
The timezone in the doodle is EST but there is a switcher to set your own
(surprised it didn't do that).
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
What timezone is this meant for?
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 7:59 AM, Michal Mocny mmo...@chromium.org
OK, let's try this again:
What time zone is this mean for?
BTW: Can we get that fixed?
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 7:59 AM, Michal Mocny mmo...@chromium.org wrote:
Here is a doodle for those interested -- but if this timeline is too hasty
we can figure out a future date:
: Re: Independent platform release summary
To the best of my knowledge, the version numbers of platforms do not
signify that platforms have the same functionality. Version numbers for
plugins also don't really do this - many plugins have different
capabilities on different platforms even
Created a doc to summarize. Trying to keep it concise and free of
opinions/conclusions, only context goals.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VqAVo2AA5vZ7LRmq_9jJ6oa7Nyr2OrjLCfEkBhO-X8U/edit?usp=sharing
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Michal Mocny mmo...@chromium.org wrote:
+dev list
[mailto:mmo...@google.com] On Behalf Of Michal Mocny
Sent: Tuesday, October 7, 2014 8:52 AM
To: Michal Mocny
Cc: Joe Bowser; dev
Subject: Re: Independent platform release summary
Created a doc to summarize. Trying to keep it concise and free of
opinions/conclusions, only context goals.
https
] On Behalf Of Michal
Mocny
Sent: Tuesday, October 7, 2014 8:52 AM
To: Michal Mocny
Cc: Joe Bowser; dev
Subject: Re: Independent platform release summary
Created a doc to summarize. Trying to keep it concise and free of
opinions/conclusions, only context goals.
https://docs.google.com
-
From: mmo...@google.com [mailto:mmo...@google.com] On Behalf Of Michal
Mocny
Sent: Tuesday, October 7, 2014 8:52 AM
To: Michal Mocny
Cc: Joe Bowser; dev
Subject: Re: Independent platform release summary
Created a doc to summarize. Trying to keep it concise and free of
opinions
Marcel, I added the goal for latest-and-greatest which is a good idea. I
think your other goals are already covered with what's there. Again, I
wanted to be brief. Do not confuse developers goal hopefully covers your
points about communication and information (and going into detail is
imposing
, not make
it easier to ignore them.
Leo
-Original Message-
From: mmo...@google.com [mailto:mmo...@google.com] On Behalf Of Michal
Mocny
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2014 11:14 AM
To: Marcel Kinard
Cc: dev
Subject: Re: Independent platform release summary
Marcel, I added the goal
From: mmo...@google.com [mailto:mmo...@google.com] On Behalf Of Michal Mocny
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2014 11:25 AM
To: Treggiari, Leo
Cc: Michal Mocny; Marcel Kinard; dev
Subject: Re: Independent platform release summary
I don't think its a goal for us developers, but I understand
On Oct 7, 2014, at 2:13 PM, Michal Mocny mmo...@chromium.org wrote:
Do not confuse developers goal hopefully covers your points about
communication and information
It partially covers it.
To be more explicit, I'm trying to turn a negative goal into a positive goal.
So instead of how do we
This doc is a really great summary: thank you Michal (and everyone else for
the input). Super agree with starting from positive goals Marcel.
I've been asking around other Apache projects (Jackrabbit and Sling) and
the Gentoo Linux guys. This problem is hard. The good news is: we're not
the only
Cc:dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: Independent platform release summary
Just got through this thread. Summarizing Proposals:
(a) CLI moves to v10.0.0, and version numbers increment at same rate as
(union of) platforms.
- This has benefits, but is confusing as shit given our current plan.
I'm
Thanks Brian.
Its looking like 3:00 PM EST Tomorrow or 12:00 PM EST Thursday is the best
fit -- but some contributors whose opinions I'm interested in have yet to
fill out the form (looking at you Brian, Jesse, Joe).
-Michal
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
Michal Mocny wrote:
Its looking like 3:00 PM EST Tomorrow or 12:00 PM EST Thursday is the
best
fit -- but some contributors whose opinions I'm interested in have yet to
fill out the form (looking at you Brian, Jesse, Joe).
Thursday is Sukkot, I'm unavailable.
+1
On Oct 3, 2014, at 8:05 PM, Steven Gill stevengil...@gmail.com wrote:
Looking through peoples responses on this thread and the project version
thread, many people have been pushing for a bigger jump in version number for
the CLI.
Chatting with Shaz, he is very concerned about support
Of *Andrew
Grieve
*Sent:* Saturday, October 04, 2014 11:05 AM
*To:* Treggiari, Leo
*Cc:* Brian LeRoux; Andrew Grieve; dev@cordova.apache.org; Marcel Kinard
*Subject:* Re: Independent platform release summary
To the best of my knowledge, the version numbers of platforms do not
signify
@cordova.apache.org; Marcel Kinard
Subject: Re: Independent platform release summary
Leo - that was a very well thought out summary of the state of things! I agree
that from a user perspective, it would be easier to understand and reason about
things if platform versions corresponded to things
*From:* agri...@google.com [mailto:agri...@google.com] *On Behalf Of *Andrew
Grieve
*Sent:* Monday, October 06, 2014 12:12 PM
*To:* Treggiari, Leo
*Cc:* Andrew Grieve; Brian LeRoux; dev@cordova.apache.org; Marcel Kinard
*Subject:* Re: Independent platform release summary
Leo
it?
Peter
-Original Message-
From: agri...@google.com [mailto:agri...@google.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Grieve
Sent: Sunday, 5 October 2014 5:05 AM
To: Treggiari, Leo
Cc: Brian LeRoux; Andrew Grieve; dev@cordova.apache.org; Marcel Kinard
Subject: Re: Independent platform release summary
To the best
: Independent platform release summary
To the best of my knowledge, the version numbers of platforms do not
signify that platforms have the same functionality. Version numbers for
plugins also don't really do this - many plugins have different
capabilities on different platforms even
: Sunday, 5 October 2014 5:05 AM
To: Treggiari, Leo
Cc: Brian LeRoux; Andrew Grieve; dev@cordova.apache.org; Marcel Kinard
Subject: Re: Independent platform release summary
To the best of my knowledge, the version numbers of platforms do not signify
that platforms have the same functionality
...@google.com] On Behalf Of
Andrew Grieve
Sent: Sunday, 5 October 2014 5:05 AM
To: Treggiari, Leo
Cc: Brian LeRoux; Andrew Grieve; dev@cordova.apache.org; Marcel Kinard
Subject: Re: Independent platform release summary
To the best of my knowledge, the version numbers of platforms do not
signify
...@gmail.com [mailto:brian.ler...@gmail.com] *On Behalf
Of *Brian LeRoux
*Sent:* Friday, October 03, 2014 5:29 PM
*To:* Andrew Grieve
*Cc:* dev@cordova.apache.org; Marcel Kinard; Treggiari, Leo
*Subject:* Re: Independent platform release summary
I meant pinning all platforms to the cli (so
: Independent platform release summary
If a bump to major indicates an API change, how is that visible to
users?
Do users look at the CLI version as the version of Cordova, or are we
expecting users to look at the version of every Cordova component to
understand where majors got bumped? While I
Subject: Re: Independent platform release summary
I meant pinning all platforms to the cli (so an update to any of the platforms
pushes everything up one). Anyhow this is way hard to reason about. So its an
improvement how again?
On Oct 3, 2014 4:55 PM, Andrew Grieve
agri
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Steven Gill stevengil...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for feedback!
I like the idea of giving our early adopters a chance to try it out and
help us catch bugs, but I think that should be what RCs are for (3 day
window while voting is ongoing).
How do we handle
If a bump to major indicates an API change, how is that visible to users? Do
users look at the CLI version as the version of Cordova, or are we expecting
users to look at the version of every Cordova component to understand where
majors got bumped? While I agree the latter is more correct
and which Cordova CLI version gives me what I want?
Sorry, but it is confusing...
Leo
-Original Message-
From: Marcel Kinard [mailto:cmarc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2014 1:56 PM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: Independent platform release summary
If a bump to major
]
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2014 1:56 PM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: Independent platform release summary
If a bump to major indicates an API change, how is that visible to users?
Do users look at the CLI version as the version of Cordova, or are we
expecting users to look
-
From: Marcel Kinard [mailto:cmarc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2014 1:56 PM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: Independent platform release summary
If a bump to major indicates an API change, how is that visible to users?
Do users look at the CLI version as the version
]
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2014 1:56 PM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: Independent platform release summary
If a bump to major indicates an API change, how is that visible to users?
Do users look at the CLI version as the version of Cordova, or are we
expecting users to look
expect common
functionality across platforms?
Leo
From: brian.ler...@gmail.com [mailto:brian.ler...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Brian
LeRoux
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2014 5:29 PM
To: Andrew Grieve
Cc: dev@cordova.apache.org; Marcel Kinard; Treggiari, Leo
Subject: Re: Independent platform release summary
Hey All,
I wanted to give summary of where I believe this process is going and
answer any questions you all might have. None of this is set in stone, so
please provide feedback so we can iron this out.
1) Platforms can now release independently
If iOS wants to release 3.7.0, it doesn't have to
Thanks Steve for writing that up.
I can definitely see the confusion in messaging, especially at the start of
this new process.
So for 2) CLI + Lib version I am proposing a radical idea (à la Windows
10) where we jump to a new version totally separate from the current 3.x
series to further detach
I'm not opposed to a big version jump. It would draw attention to the fact
that we are changing our versioning releasing process. How do others feel?
-Steve
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Steve for writing that up.
I can definitely see the confusion
I'm down with jumping to 4.x but not convinced a jump to 5.x would actually
spur more understanding. (Also thanks for tackling this Steve.)
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 9:00 PM, Steven Gill stevengil...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not opposed to a big version jump. It would draw attention to the fact
that
...@gmail.com [mailto:brian.ler...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Brian
LeRoux
Sent: Thursday, October 2, 2014 12:58 PM
To: Steven Gill
Cc: Shazron; dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: Independent platform release summary
I'm down with jumping to 4.x but not convinced a jump to 5.x would actually
spur more
: Thursday, October 2, 2014 12:58 PM
To: Steven Gill
Cc: Shazron; dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: Independent platform release summary
I'm down with jumping to 4.x but not convinced a jump to 5.x would
actually spur more understanding. (Also thanks for tackling this Steve.)
On Thu, Oct 2
Great write-up! Totally onboard. And like the suggestion of bumping the
major (I say either 4.0 or 10.0).
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
I'm down with jumping to 4.x but not convinced a jump to 5.x would actually
spur more understanding. (Also thanks for
I don't think it's necessary to bump CLI major when platforms bump major.
Platforms and CLI are linked only superficially anyways.
What do you think about:
1. Release platform
2. Blog post telling people to try it out using CLI platform add@new_version
3. After a week, bump the default platform
Thanks for feedback!
I like the idea of giving our early adopters a chance to try it out and
help us catch bugs, but I think that should be what RCs are for (3 day
window while voting is ongoing).
How do we handle cases where the bump in platform is accompanied by a
change in cordova-lib. The
javascript:;] On Behalf Of
Brian LeRoux
Sent: Thursday, October 2, 2014 12:58 PM
To: Steven Gill
Cc: Shazron; dev@cordova.apache.org javascript:;
Subject: Re: Independent platform release summary
I'm down with jumping to 4.x but not convinced a jump to 5.x would
actually spur more
95 matches
Mail list logo
