On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 18:34, Paul J. Davis
paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com wrote:
1.0.3 is on my list for today
Any progress?
Thanks,
Dirkjan
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13034633#comment-13034633
]
James Howe commented on COUCHDB-885:
Sorry, there is a _conflicts, it's not deleted
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Clare Walsh updated COUCHDB-1163:
-
Attachment: Couch logging for jira issue
Output from return changes and logging changes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13034656#comment-13034656
]
Clare Walsh commented on COUCHDB-1163:
--
Have attached the logged and returned data
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13034662#comment-13034662
]
Bob Dionne commented on COUCHDB-1163:
-
Clare,
Can you possibly say more about the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13034677#comment-13034677
]
Clare Walsh commented on COUCHDB-1163:
--
Bob,
There was an awful lot of replication
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13034683#comment-13034683
]
Bob Dionne commented on COUCHDB-1163:
-
Thanks Clare, this helps a lot, I suspect
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13034718#comment-13034718
]
James Howe commented on COUCHDB-1163:
-
I'm also trying to get a simple reproducible
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13034769#comment-13034769
]
Adam Kocoloski commented on COUCHDB-1163:
-
Clare, thanks for the logging. It
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13034772#comment-13034772
]
Adam Kocoloski commented on COUCHDB-994:
Filipe, I'm pretty sure this is still an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13034776#comment-13034776
]
Filipe Manana commented on COUCHDB-994:
---
Adam, I think it might have been. Since
Hello,
I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 1.
We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts so
that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is
free to vote on this release, so get stuck in!
We are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13034785#comment-13034785
]
Adam Kocoloski commented on COUCHDB-994:
Hi Filipe, did you happen to read my
Importing several document and adding attachments subsequently fails, and leads
to crash report on server (see unit test)
--
Key: COUCHDB-1167
Those who develop on Mac OS X and have installed CouchDB using Homebrew [1],
should do the following to test CouchDB 1.1.0 with their applications:
`brew update` # Make sure you have the latest formulae
`brew edit couchdb` # Edit the CouchDB formula using $EDITOR
and replace the following line:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13034792#comment-13034792
]
Filipe Manana commented on COUCHDB-994:
---
Adam, I was thinking the issue is related
On 17 May 2011, at 15:38, Gabor Ratky wrote:
Those who develop on Mac OS X and have installed CouchDB using Homebrew [1],
should do the following to test CouchDB 1.1.0 with their applications:
If you're using CouchDB on your development machine, I would strongly recommend
AGAINST doing this.
On 17 May 2011, at 15:38, Gabor Ratky wrote:
PS It seems the version number has not been set correctly yet, `couchdb -V`
returns 'couchdb - Apache CouchDB 1.2.0a-' for me
We've not been able to reproduce this.
Could you provide some more information?
What does curl localhost:5984 produce?
also this;
PS It seems the version number has not been set correctly yet,
`couchdb -V` returns 'couchdb - Apache CouchDB 1.2.0a-' for me
appears not to be the case. The build artifact correctly reports 1.1.0
for me and others.
B.
On 17 May 2011 15:44, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
On
On 17 May 2011, at 15:38, Gabor Ratky wrote:
Those who develop on Mac OS X and have installed CouchDB using Homebrew [1],
should do the following to test CouchDB 1.1.0 with their applications:
Also, please do not test the release artefact in this way. If you would like to
vote on the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13034797#comment-13034797
]
Bob Clary commented on COUCHDB-994:
---
I believe view compaction is also an issue to be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Roth updated COUCHDB-1167:
-
Description:
I just started to explore CouchDB and implemented a few Python unit tests.
On 17 May 2011, at 16:17, Robert Newson wrote:
Hello,
I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 1.
We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts
so
that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 16:17, Robert Newson rnew...@apache.org wrote:
We are voting on the following release artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/
I tested it on amd64 Gentoo Linux. etap tests passed, browser tests
mostly passed. I got these failures, but I'm running this
On 17 May 2011, at 17:14, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 16:17, Robert Newson rnew...@apache.org wrote:
We are voting on the following release artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/
I tested it on amd64 Gentoo Linux. etap tests passed, browser tests
Please fully ignore the email I sent below. As others have pointed out here and
on #couchdb, the email has gotten the following things wrong:
I am not meant to test the release artifacts with the release artifact prepared
for voting.
The release artifacts should be built from source using the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Newson updated COUCHDB-885:
--
Attachment: COUCHDB-885.sh
A script that reproduces the conflict on the target against 1.0.2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13034842#comment-13034842
]
Clare Walsh commented on COUCHDB-885:
-
Have you tried that script against trunk?
On 17 May 2011 15:17, Robert Newson rnew...@apache.org wrote:
Hello,
I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 1.
We encourage the whole community to download and test these release
artifacts so
that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made.
I have created a test procedure:
http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure
This should help new users figure out how they can help with the vote.
Please let me know your thoughts on it.
Probably made a few mistakes, or missed some things out.
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
I'm getting the following unit test failures:
http://friendpaste.com/ZMbw7g2OxETvcAzEDDcGv
This is a known race condition. The problem is the test, not what's
being tested.
I tried running CouchDB and got a segfault.
On 17 May 2011, at 18:21, Paul Davis wrote:
Can you reproduce it? Which test was running when it failed? If you
can reproduce it, can you attach gdb to your couchdb process to get a
stack trace of when it segfaults?
Yep, it's the design_docs tests. Segfaults every time.
From the log:
All,
Firstly, thank you to everyone who took the time to vote on this artifact.
Unfortunately I'm voting -1 and aborting round one of this release.
We've uncovered a bug serious enough that we would like a fix for it
to ship with 1.1.0 (COUCHDB-885). The behavior at fault is not
verified by any
On 17 May 2011, at 18:21, Paul Davis wrote:
Can you reproduce it? Which test was running when it failed? If you
can reproduce it, can you attach gdb to your couchdb process to get a
stack trace of when it segfaults?
Okay, now we have:
Program received signal EXC_BAD_ACCESS, Could not access
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13034935#comment-13034935
]
Johannes J. Schmidt commented on COUCHDB-1155:
--
Yes, allowing to send a
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
On 17 May 2011, at 18:21, Paul Davis wrote:
Can you reproduce it? Which test was running when it failed? If you
can reproduce it, can you attach gdb to your couchdb process to get a
stack trace of when it segfaults?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13034974#comment-13034974
]
Robert Newson commented on COUCHDB-885:
---
hi Clare,
Yes, I've verified that trunk
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13034976#comment-13034976
]
Robert Newson commented on COUCHDB-885:
---
I should be clearer: the bug was
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Newson updated COUCHDB-1144:
---
Fix Version/s: 1.1
This is happening in 1.1.0.
oauth requests with non-percent-encoded
On 17 May 2011, at 19:49, Paul Davis wrote:
Maybe your fuzzy logic board needs replaced?
New MBA is new.
I installed by doing brew install couchdb and then installing CouchDB from
source from the tarball. Jan recomended this as a way of getting the
dependancies installed with minimum fuss.
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
On 17 May 2011, at 19:49, Paul Davis wrote:
Maybe your fuzzy logic board needs replaced?
New MBA is new.
I installed by doing brew install couchdb and then installing CouchDB from
source from the tarball. Jan
On 17 May 2011, at 20:24, Paul Davis wrote:
Let me know when your manilla envelope of segfaults is empty.
I have stopped testing for now, as I do not know how to proceed.
I'm sending you a manilla envelope of discontentment.
The multipart API is not documented
---
Key: COUCHDB-1168
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1168
Project: CouchDB
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Documentation
Reporter: Eli
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Newson updated COUCHDB-885:
--
Fix Version/s: 1.1
1.0.3
The new fix will appear in 1.0.3 and 1.1.0.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Newson updated COUCHDB-1045:
---
Priority: Blocker (was: Major)
Fix Version/s: 1.1
1.0.3
+1 on the manilla envelope. I'm super happy that we have momentum on
the release process. And it looks like some of the fixes we are
finding are useful.
It may be frustrating, but this is exactly what a release process is
for -- finding those manila envelopes, and fixing them.
Chris
On Tue, May
On 17 May 2011, at 23:30, Chris Anderson wrote:
+1 on the manilla envelope. I'm super happy that we have momentum on
the release process. And it looks like some of the fixes we are
finding are useful.
It may be frustrating, but this is exactly what a release process is
for -- finding
On 17 May 2011, at 23:35, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
This is the most surreal email I've read for a long time.
I work with this guy, it's like that every day.
Just for the record, the genesis of this meme was on IRC today.
18:54 +rnewson davisp: I sent a manila envelope full of segfaults to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13035180#comment-13035180
]
Paul Joseph Davis commented on COUCHDB-1163:
For posterity:
The key part
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13035182#comment-13035182
]
Adam Kocoloski commented on COUCHDB-1163:
-
Paul also pointed out that in this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Paul Joseph Davis updated COUCHDB-1163:
---
Attachment: COUCHDB-1163.patch
formatted_rev_tree.txt
*BIG NOTE*
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Paul Joseph Davis updated COUCHDB-1163:
---
Attachment: COUCHDB-1163-1.1.x.patch
This should apply against 1.1.x. Haven't run
52 matches
Mail list logo
