Re: Shards database name error in logs

Doh! Forgot about cassim. > On Sep 14, 2016, at 12:17 PM, Alexander Shorin wrote: > > Paul, > > _metadata is our special database which is valid. > https://github.com/apache/couchdb-cassim/blob/master/src/cassim_metadata_cache.erl#L63-L64 > -- > ,,,^..^,,, > > >> On Wed,

Re: [PROPOSAL] CouchDB 2.0 log to ./var/log/couchdb.log by default

Seems reasonable to me. I wonder if we should add a stdout log line that indicates where logs are going? Would be easy to add that as a module callback so it would work for stderr, file, and syslog. > On Aug 2, 2016, at 2:36 PM, Joan Touzet wrote: > > Presently, CouchDB

Re: On dependency management and CI issues associated with it

> On Apr 15, 2016, at 3:13 AM, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > > >> On 14 Apr 2016, at 23:11, Joan Touzet wrote: >> >> Based on this information, are we in violation of ASF requirements? Can >> anyone clarify for me what we actually need to be doing here? > >

Re: Windows build failing on couch_ejson_compare.c

The macro is totally fine. There are always plenty of those to account for windows/*nix differences so it's not dirty by any means. On Jul 18, 2015, at 8:28 AM, Nick North nort...@gmail.com wrote: I see a couple of obvious solutions to this problem: 1. Use the thread_local keyword

Re: [DISCUSSION] Move Fauxton to its own mailing list?

+1 On Apr 14, 2015, at 3:50 PM, Andy Wenk andyw...@apache.org wrote: +1 On 14 April 2015 at 21:02, Alexander Shorin kxe...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org wrote: We create new mailing list c...@couchdb.apache.org (or your favourite bike

Re: [DISCUSS] Multiple Repositories for Erlang Apps and Dependencies

On Jan 14, 2014, at 8:47 PM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.comwrote: I would also point out that even though our main repo would need to fetch other dependencies from the internet to build the final

Re: [DISCUSS] Multiple Repositories for Erlang Apps and Dependencies

On Jan 14, 2014, at 8:37 PM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.comwrote: I've recently been having discussions about how to handle the repository configuration for various bits of CouchDB post-merge. The

Re: Proposed couch hack in November or December

November 28th is Thanksgiving which is big family thing. As long as it's not that weekend I'm in. On Sep 27, 2013, at 11:51 AM, Dave Cottlehuber d...@jsonified.com wrote: Hi everybody, Is there interest in having a hackathon again in late November or early December? Ideally we'd

Re: All The Numbers -- View Engine Performance Benchmarks

I tried this a long time ago with the binary to JS code in C. It didn't make for a huge improvement in total speed. On Jan 27, 2013, at 11:37 PM, Jason Smith j...@iriscouch.com wrote: Hey, Jan. This is a totally random and hypothetical idea: Do you think there would be any speedup to use

Re: why etc/default.d etc/local.d

I'd rather leave them or remove the functionality. Hiding the config chain seems wrong. On Nov 12, 2012, at 5:37 PM, Randall Leeds randall.le...@gmail.com wrote: +0 on removing them. On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org wrote: On Nov 10, 2012, at 12:12 ,

Starting the Git Experiment

Dear committers, We now have a green light from infrastructure to switch to using Git as our writable VCS. This is to be considered a live experiment. If something breaks its possible we'll have to revert back to SVN. But nothing will break and everyone will forgive me for any bugs that may

Re: Starting the Git Experiment

as the current read-only mirror. Adam On Friday, September 23, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Paul J. Davis wrote: Dear committers, We now have a green light from infrastructure to switch to using Git as our writable VCS. This is to be considered a live experiment. If something breaks its

Re: Starting the Git Experiment

randall.le...@gmail.com (mailto:randall.le...@gmail.com) wrote: +1 Thank you! On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 13:52, Paul J. Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com (mailto:paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com)wrote: Dear committers, We now have a green light from

Re: Starting the Git Experiment

-us.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb.git General docs are up at: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/ GitWeb is at: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf And a commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/commit/f07c75fe On Friday, September 23, 2011 at 10:12 PM, Paul J. Davis wrote: SVN

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.

+1 here. Motions pass on latest OS X. On May 30, 2011, at 8:09 PM, Randall Leeds randall.le...@gmail.com wrote: * Signature OK * MD5 OK * SHA1 OK * Make check OK * Futon OK +1 On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 15:25, Robert Newson rnew...@apache.org wrote: Hello, I would like call a vote

Re: svn commit: r1125654 - in /couchdb/trunk: AUTHORS THANKS

Woot! On May 21, 2011, at 5:47 AM, rand...@apache.org wrote: Author: randall Date: Sat May 21 09:47:32 2011 New Revision: 1125654 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1125654view=rev Log: moving myself from THANKS to AUTHORS Modified: couchdb/trunk/AUTHORS

Re: Helping out with releases

1.0.3 is on my list for today On May 15, 2011, at 11:50 AM, till t...@php.net wrote: Just wanted to ask what the status of either release is? Are the two tests failing still failing, or can we move on to make dist? :-) Till On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Benoit Chesneau

Re: Broken build

Cool. I'll ignore it for now then. On Apr 9, 2011, at 7:13 AM, Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org wrote: My nightly builds got tripped up on the make distcheck breakage, but seem to work after that got fixed. On 9 Apr 2011, at 02:25, Paul Davis wrote: Apparently the initial ejson commit

Re: SpiderMonkey 1.8.5 upgrades

Adam, I'm with Bob on this one. 1.1 and 1.0 are forked so they stay the same. This should only concern trunk. Also, just rewriting couchjs and letting configure choose for 1.2 might be doable. On Apr 2, 2011, at 6:09 AM, Robert Newson robert.new...@gmail.com wrote: +1 for supporting 1.8.5

Re: couchdb conflict resolution

Here is some high level text on it. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-988 On Feb 15, 2011, at 10:14 AM, Aaron Boxer boxe...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I am very interested in understanding how conflict resolution works in couchdb: Is there a technical overview, somewhere, of

Re: Preparing the 1.0.2 release

I've already got the bits made, if you can double check what's online, that'd be great. Unfortunately I'm already back in Iowa so free time will be hit or miss. Paul Davis On Nov 24, 2010, at 4:35 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote: I have an hour or two to help you through this

Re: silent view index file corruption

This corruption was quite odd in that there wasn't a conspicuous reason for it. I didn't dive to deep into the whole thing so it's possible i missed something obvious. There are two things at play here. How proactive should we be in provoking these errors and how much should we check for

Re: silent view index file corruption

On Apr 6, 2010, at 11:20 PM, Adam Kocoloski kocol...@apache.org wrote: On Apr 6, 2010, at 10:50 PM, Paul J Davis wrote: This corruption was quite odd in that there wasn't a conspicuous reason for it. I didn't dive to deep into the whole thing so it's possible i missed something obvious