1 from trunk SVN.
>>
>> Thank you
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Masanz, James J.
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Did you download the source and import into eclipse, or did you check
>> out
>> > 3.1.1 from SVN.
>
nd use Check out as Maven Project menu option on that
> (sub)project.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Harpreet Khanduja [mailto:hsk5...@rit.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 2:32 PM
> To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Lucene for UMLS2014
>
> Hello,
>
ent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 2:32 PM
To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
Subject: Re: Lucene for UMLS2014
Hello,
I checked out 3.1.1 from trunk SVN.
Thank you
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Masanz, James J.
wrote:
> Did you download the source and import into eclipse, or did you check out
>
> the tag for 3.1.1.
>
> -- James
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Harpreet Khanduja [mailto:hsk5...@rit.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 12:49 PM
> To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Lucene for UMLS2014
>
> Hello,
>I am using ctakes 3.1.1 in
, 2014 12:49 PM
To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
Subject: Re: Lucene for UMLS2014
Hello,
I am using ctakes 3.1.1 in eclipse and I have added my customizations to
the project, but now I want to update it to 3.2 so that I can use
ctakes-dictionary-lookup-fast.
Is there any way to update the whole
Hello,
I am using ctakes 3.1.1 in eclipse and I have added my customizations to
the project, but now I want to update it to 3.2 so that I can use
ctakes-dictionary-lookup-fast.
Is there any way to update the whole ctakes project to 3.2 without my
customizations getting removed?
It would
Thank you so much for your help.
Harpreet.
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 6:28 PM, Finan, Sean <
sean.fi...@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote:
> Hi Harpreet,
>
> If you are willing to use cTakes 3.2, try the dictionary-lookup-fast
> module as a replacement of the default dictionary-lookup. That module ha
Hi Harpreet,
If you are willing to use cTakes 3.2, try the dictionary-lookup-fast module as
a replacement of the default dictionary-lookup. That module has a new
dictionary resource (hsql, not lucene) and slightly different methods for
lookup and matching. In time trials it has been faster th