Multiple issues have been found with this release, so I am officially
canceling this vote. We would still ask for continued review of the
2.1.0-rc1 release so that any issues found can be fixed in the 2.1.0-rc2
release.
Thanks,
- Steve
On 02/08/2018 11:30 AM, Steve Lawrence wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
I'll spend some time reviewing it, but right now my vote is a -1 due to the
package naming.
Ideally, each package is "apache-daffodil-2.1.0-incubating" and this
package name should be used on all components.
John
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 11:30 AM Steve Lawrence wrote:
> Hi
We'll definitely hold off for further feedback.
Naming logic makes sense to me.
As far as binary files in /dist/dev go, my preference (not a strong
preference) would be to have the zip/tar/rpm as part of the reviewable
materials just so we can catch any errors with those as early as
possible,
Dave Thompson created DAFFODIL-1897:
---
Summary: Some Schemas fail to compile with latest updates
(v2.1.0-rc1)
Key: DAFFODIL-1897
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-1897
Project:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-1897?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16357307#comment-16357307
]
Steve Lawrence commented on DAFFODIL-1897:
--
It is still possible for someone to create at NCSA
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-1895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steve Lawrence updated DAFFODIL-1895:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.1.0)
2.2.0
> Eclipse classpath for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-1886?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steve Lawrence updated DAFFODIL-1886:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0.0)
2.2.0
> Delimited parsing with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-1882?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steve Lawrence updated DAFFODIL-1882:
-
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0
> Implement support for the various formats of binaryCalendarRep
Michael Beckerle created DAFFODIL-1898:
--
Summary: TDML Runner not assembling mixtures of BE+MSBF and
LE+LSBF test data properly.
Key: DAFFODIL-1898
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-1898
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-1896?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steve Lawrence reassigned DAFFODIL-1896:
Assignee: Steve Lawrence
> Modify artifact names to include "apache" and
mbeckerle opened a new pull request #37: Fix bitOrder bug detected by Link16
schema.
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-daffodil/pull/37
Issue was that alignmentFill wasn't able to provide bit alignment.
(It was checking for bit-order transitions being proper before
doing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-1897?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16357497#comment-16357497
]
Michael Beckerle commented on DAFFODIL-1897:
I think moving the built-in-formats is going
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-1897?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16357651#comment-16357651
]
Michael Beckerle commented on DAFFODIL-1897:
I have been able to get DFDLSchemas minus NITF
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-1886?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steve Lawrence updated DAFFODIL-1886:
-
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0
> Delimited parsing with occursCountKind="implicit" with
stevedlawrence commented on issue #36: Change names of zip/tar/rpm binary
artifacts
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-daffodil/pull/36#issuecomment-364222715
Note, this is for DAFFODIL-1896. Need to fixup commit message.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-1897?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16357635#comment-16357635
]
Steve Lawrence commented on DAFFODIL-1897:
--
Ah, ignore the above comment. Didn't reload the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-1897?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16357674#comment-16357674
]
Michael Beckerle commented on DAFFODIL-1897:
Furthermore, these work under eclipse, where
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-1881?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steve Lawrence resolved DAFFODIL-1881.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Dave Thompson (was: Steve Lawrence)
Fixed in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-1866?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dave Thompson closed DAFFODIL-1866.
---
Pulled latest updates from incubator-daffodil repository which included the
specified commit,
stevedlawrence closed pull request #31: Prepare for 2.1.0 release
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-daffodil/pull/31
This is a PR merged from a forked repository.
As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for
the sake of provenance:
As this is a foreign
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-1872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dave Thompson closed DAFFODIL-1872.
---
Pulled latest updates from incubator-daffodil repository which included the
associated
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-1859?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steve Lawrence resolved DAFFODIL-1859.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Dave Thompson (was: Steve Lawrence)
Fixed in a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-1881?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steve Lawrence updated DAFFODIL-1881:
-
Component/s: Infrastructure
> Prepare 2.1.0 release
> -
>
>
I'm not sure a tag would add a whole lot of value, and would add a
little bit of clutter. I don't think splitting a rebase into two will
help very much (and if it is, the commit of interest just a few commits
before the soon to be created 2.1.0-rc1 tag). The hard part is knowing
how to deal with
I believe this:
945a1c1ab363485003ebf14fef3463055d4fab37
Is the last commit using the old file structure, old packages, etc.
I suspect it would be prudent to make a tag for this. This would be in case
some developer has lots of outstanding changes based on earlier commits. They
could first
I have about 5 development branches that I've rebased yesterday onto the last
edu.illnois.ncsa commit. I will try to rebase them onto the current master and
let you know the outcome. If this goes smoothly, then yeah I would agree with
you.
From: Steve Lawrence
Michael Beckerle created DAFFODIL-1895:
--
Summary: Eclipse classpath for daffodil-core needs fix
Key: DAFFODIL-1895
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-1895
Project: Daffodil
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-1895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16357033#comment-16357033
]
Michael Beckerle commented on DAFFODIL-1895:
PR
28 matches
Mail list logo