I'll spend some time reviewing it, but right now my vote is a -1 due to the package naming.
Ideally, each package is "apache-daffodil-2.1.0-incubating" and this package name should be used on all components. John On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 11:30 AM Steve Lawrence <slawre...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil (Incubating) 2.1.0-rc1. > > All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be > found at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/daffodil/2.1.0-rc1/ > > Staging artifacts can be found at: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1000/ > > This release has been signed with PGP key 033AE661, corresponding to > slawre...@apache.org, which is included in the repository's KEYS file. > This key can be found on keyservers, such as: > > http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x033AE661 > > It is also listed here: > > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/slawrence.asc > > The release candidate has been tagged in git with v2.1.0-rc1. > > For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 2.1.0: > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-1864?jql=project%20%3D%20DAFFODIL%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.1.0%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC > > For a summary of the changes in this release, see: > > https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/2.1.0/ > > Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours > (ends on Sunday, 11 February 2018, 12 Noon EST). > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > My vote: +1 > > Thanks, > - Steve >