I'll spend some time reviewing it, but right now my vote is a -1 due to the
package naming.

Ideally, each package is "apache-daffodil-2.1.0-incubating" and this
package name should be used on all components.

John

On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 11:30 AM Steve Lawrence <slawre...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil (Incubating) 2.1.0-rc1.
>
> All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> found at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/daffodil/2.1.0-rc1/
>
> Staging artifacts can be found at:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1000/
>
> This release has been signed with PGP key 033AE661, corresponding to
> slawre...@apache.org, which is included in the repository's KEYS file.
> This key can be found on keyservers, such as:
>
> http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x033AE661
>
> It is also listed here:
>
> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/slawrence.asc
>
> The release candidate has been tagged in git with v2.1.0-rc1.
>
> For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 2.1.0:
>
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-1864?jql=project%20%3D%20DAFFODIL%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.1.0%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC
>
> For a summary of the changes in this release, see:
>
> https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/2.1.0/
>
> Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours
> (ends on Sunday, 11 February 2018, 12 Noon EST).
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> My vote: +1
>
> Thanks,
> - Steve
>

Reply via email to